Skip to main content
main-content

01.08.2011 | Healthcare Policy and Outcomes | Ausgabe 8/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2011

Quality of Care Management Decisions by Multidisciplinary Cancer Teams: A Systematic Review

Zeitschrift:
Annals of Surgical Oncology > Ausgabe 8/2011
Autoren:
MRCS Benjamin W. Lamb, PhD Katrina F. Brown, MRCS Kamal Nagpal, PhD Charles Vincent, FRCS (Urol) James S. A. Green, PhD Nick Sevdalis
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1245/​s10434-011-1675-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Background

Factors that affect the quality of clinical decisions of multidisciplinary cancer teams (MDTs) are not well understood. We reviewed and synthesised the evidence on clinical, social and technological factors that affect the quality of MDT clinical decision-making.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched in May 2009. Eligible studies reported original data, quantitative or qualitative. Data were extracted and tabulated by two blinded reviewers, and study quality formally evaluated.

Results

Thirty-seven studies were included. Study quality was low to medium. Studies assessed quality of care decisions via the effect of MDTs on care management. MDTs changed cancer management by individual physicians in 2–52% of cases. Failure to reach a decision at MDT discussion was found in 27–52% of cases. Decisions could not be implemented in 1–16% of cases. Team decisions are made by physicians, using clinical information. Nursing personnel do not have an active role, and patient preferences are not discussed. Time pressure, excessive caseload, low attendance, poor teamworking and lack of leadership lead to lack of information and deterioration of decision-making. Telemedicine is increasingly used in developed countries, with no detriment to quality of MDT decisions.

Conclusions

Team/social factors affect management decisions by cancer MDTs. Inclusion of time to prepare for MDTs into team-members’ job plans, making team and leadership skills training available to team-members, and systematic input from nursing personnel would address some of the current shortcomings. These improvements ought to be considered at national policy level, with the ultimate aim of improving cancer care.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Zusatzmaterial
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 73 kb)
10434_2011_1675_MOESM1_ESM.doc
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 111 kb)
10434_2011_1675_MOESM2_ESM.doc
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2011 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Sie können e.Med Chirurgie 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

  2. Das kostenlose Testabonnement läuft nach 14 Tagen automatisch und formlos aus. Dieses Abonnement kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Chirurgie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise