Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2008

01.04.2008 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Quality of Life Among Five-Year Survivors After Treatment for Very Low Rectal Cancer With or Without a Permanent Abdominal Stoma

verfasst von: C. Fucini, MD, R. Gattai, MD, C. Urena, MD, L. Bandettini, MD, C. Elbetti, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 4/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Low rectal cancers situated less than 5 cm from the anal margin are still usually treated with abdomino-perineal excision (APE). Our aim is to compare the quality of life (QOL) of five-year survivors treated for low or very low rectal cancer with an advanced/complex coloanal procedure with the QOL of patients submitted to a standard APE with a definitive abdominal stoma.

Methods

Sixty-two patients, operated on radically for low or very low rectal cancer, who came for their fifth year follow-up visit and were free from cancer, were studied. Thirty patients (group 1) had an APE with permanent abdominal stoma. Thirty-two patients (group 2) had undergone a radical advanced and complex procedure to avoid the abdominal stoma. The patients received the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL-30 generic and the CR38 colorectal cancer QOL questionnaires with the recommendation to return the questionnaire to the hospital. The Mann–Whitney U-test and χ 2 Fisher test were employed for statistical analysis.

Results

All questionnaires were returned. Patients without a terminal abdominal stoma had a better score in six categories of the QOL 30 and in two categories of the CR38. No differences were observed in the other variables examined.

Conclusions

After five years, cancer-free patients operated on for low or very low rectal cancer have a better QOL if a definitive terminal abdominal stoma was avoided.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicholls RJ, Dozois RR, editors. Surgery of the colon and rectum. Churchill Livingstone; 1997 Nicholls RJ, Dozois RR, editors. Surgery of the colon and rectum. Churchill Livingstone; 1997
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sprangers MA, Taal BG, Aaronson NK. Quality of life in colorectal cancer: Stoma vs. nonstoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:361–9PubMedCrossRef Sprangers MA, Taal BG, Aaronson NK. Quality of life in colorectal cancer: Stoma vs. nonstoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:361–9PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ. Quality of life after treatment for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:1036–43PubMedCrossRef Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ. Quality of life after treatment for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:1036–43PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Koller M, Lorenz W. Quality of life research in patients with rectal cancer: Traditional approaches vs. a problem-solving oriented perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998;383:427–36PubMedCrossRef Koller M, Lorenz W. Quality of life research in patients with rectal cancer: Traditional approaches vs. a problem-solving oriented perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998;383:427–36PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sprangers MA, Te Velde A, Aaransun NK. The construction and testing of EORTC colorectal cancer-specific: Quality of life questionnaire module (qLq-CR 38). Eur J Cancer 1999;35:238–47PubMedCrossRef Sprangers MA, Te Velde A, Aaransun NK. The construction and testing of EORTC colorectal cancer-specific: Quality of life questionnaire module (qLq-CR 38). Eur J Cancer 1999;35:238–47PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Grumann MM, Noack EM, Hoffmann IA. Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2001;233:157–8CrossRef Grumann MM, Noack EM, Hoffmann IA. Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2001;233:157–8CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jess P, Christiansen J, Bech P. Quality of life after anterior resection vs. abdominoperineal extirpation for rectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37:1201–4PubMedCrossRef Jess P, Christiansen J, Bech P. Quality of life after anterior resection vs. abdominoperineal extirpation for rectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37:1201–4PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A. Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: A four year prospective study. Ann Surg 2003;238:2003–13 Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A. Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: A four year prospective study. Ann Surg 2003;238:2003–13
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sideris L, Zenasni F, Vernerey D, Dauchy S, Lasser P, Pignon JP, Elias D, Di Palma M, Pocard M. Quality of life of patients operated on for low rectal cancer: Impact of the type of surgery and patients’ characteristics. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:2180–91PubMedCrossRef Sideris L, Zenasni F, Vernerey D, Dauchy S, Lasser P, Pignon JP, Elias D, Di Palma M, Pocard M. Quality of life of patients operated on for low rectal cancer: Impact of the type of surgery and patients’ characteristics. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:2180–91PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Harisin R, Bodoky G, Borsodi M, et al. Rectal cancer therapy: decision making on basis of quality life? Zentralbl Chir 2004;129:139–48CrossRef Harisin R, Bodoky G, Borsodi M, et al. Rectal cancer therapy: decision making on basis of quality life? Zentralbl Chir 2004;129:139–48CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;3:CD004323 Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;3:CD004323
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: Long-term results. Ann Surg 2004;240:711–7; discussion 717–8PubMed Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: Long-term results. Ann Surg 2004;240:711–7; discussion 717–8PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch, Herbst F et al. Inter-sphincteric resection for low rectal tumors. Br J Surg 1994;81:1376–8 Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch, Herbst F et al. Inter-sphincteric resection for low rectal tumors. Br J Surg 1994;81:1376–8
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fucini C, Elbetti C, Petrolo A, et al. Excision of the levator muscles with external sphincter preservation in the treatment of selected low T4 rectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1697–705PubMedCrossRef Fucini C, Elbetti C, Petrolo A, et al. Excision of the levator muscles with external sphincter preservation in the treatment of selected low T4 rectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1697–705PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams NS, Hallan RI, Koeze TH, et al. Restoration of gastrointestinal continuity and continence after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum using an electrically stimulated neoanal sphinter. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:561–5PubMedCrossRef Williams NS, Hallan RI, Koeze TH, et al. Restoration of gastrointestinal continuity and continence after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum using an electrically stimulated neoanal sphinter. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:561–5PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen HR, Novi G, Zoech G, et al. Restauration of anal sphincter function by single stage dynamic graciloplasty with a modified (split sling) technique. Am J Surg 1998;175:187–93PubMedCrossRef Rosen HR, Novi G, Zoech G, et al. Restauration of anal sphincter function by single stage dynamic graciloplasty with a modified (split sling) technique. Am J Surg 1998;175:187–93PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cavina E, Seccia M, Banti P, et al. Anorectal recostruction after abdominoperineal resection. Experience with double wrap graciloplasty supported by low-frequency electrostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1010–6PubMedCrossRef Cavina E, Seccia M, Banti P, et al. Anorectal recostruction after abdominoperineal resection. Experience with double wrap graciloplasty supported by low-frequency electrostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1010–6PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B, et al. Technique and long-term results of intersphinteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1858–65PubMedCrossRef Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B, et al. Technique and long-term results of intersphinteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1858–65PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365–76PubMedCrossRef Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365–76PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mc Lachlan SA, Devins GM, Goodwin PJ. Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) as a measure of psychosocial function in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:510–7CrossRef Mc Lachlan SA, Devins GM, Goodwin PJ. Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) as a measure of psychosocial function in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:510–7CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Osoba D, Aaronson N, Zee B. Modification of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 2.0) based on content validity and reliability testing in large samples of patients with cancer. The Study Group on Quality of Life of the EORTC and the Symptom Control and Quality of life Committees of the NCI of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Qual Life Res 1997;6:103–8PubMedCrossRef Osoba D, Aaronson N, Zee B. Modification of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 2.0) based on content validity and reliability testing in large samples of patients with cancer. The Study Group on Quality of Life of the EORTC and the Symptom Control and Quality of life Committees of the NCI of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Qual Life Res 1997;6:103–8PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cull AM. Cancer-specific quality of life questionnaires: the state of the art in Europe. Eur J Cancer 1997;33:S3–S7PubMedCrossRef Cull AM. Cancer-specific quality of life questionnaires: the state of the art in Europe. Eur J Cancer 1997;33:S3–S7PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sprangers MAG, Te Velde A, Aaronson NK. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). Eur J Cancer 1999;35:238–47PubMedCrossRef Sprangers MAG, Te Velde A, Aaronson NK. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). Eur J Cancer 1999;35:238–47PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjordal K. On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group.QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual, 1st Ed. Brussels: 1995 Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjordal K. On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group.QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual, 1st Ed. Brussels: 1995
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaube J, Scharf P, Herz R. The quality of life after extirpation of the rectum for carcinoma. Dtsch Med – Wochenschr 1996;121:153–7, discussion 158PubMedCrossRef Schaube J, Scharf P, Herz R. The quality of life after extirpation of the rectum for carcinoma. Dtsch Med – Wochenschr 1996;121:153–7, discussion 158PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hallbook O, Hass U, Wanstrom A. Quality of life measurement after rectal excision for cancer. Comparison between straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997;32:490–3PubMedCrossRef Hallbook O, Hass U, Wanstrom A. Quality of life measurement after rectal excision for cancer. Comparison between straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997;32:490–3PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Guren MG, Eriksen MT, Wii GN. Quality of life and functional outcome following anterior or abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31:735–42PubMedCrossRef Guren MG, Eriksen MT, Wii GN. Quality of life and functional outcome following anterior or abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31:735–42PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rauch P, Miny J, Conroy T, et al. Quality of life among disease-free survivors of rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:354–60PubMedCrossRef Rauch P, Miny J, Conroy T, et al. Quality of life among disease-free survivors of rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:354–60PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt E. Continent colostomy. Helv Chir Acta 1982;48:855–62PubMed Schmidt E. Continent colostomy. Helv Chir Acta 1982;48:855–62PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Da Silva AL. Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum and anal canal with perianal colostomy. Eur J Surg 1995;161:761–4PubMed Da Silva AL. Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum and anal canal with perianal colostomy. Eur J Surg 1995;161:761–4PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Velitchkov NG, Kirov GK, Losanoff JE, et al. Abdominoperineal resection and perineal colostomy for low rectal cancer. The Lazaro Da Silva Technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:530–3PubMedCrossRef Velitchkov NG, Kirov GK, Losanoff JE, et al. Abdominoperineal resection and perineal colostomy for low rectal cancer. The Lazaro Da Silva Technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:530–3PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Gamagami RA, Chiotasso P, Lazorthes F. Continent perineal colostomy after abdominoperineal resection: Outcome after 63 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:626–31PubMedCrossRef Gamagami RA, Chiotasso P, Lazorthes F. Continent perineal colostomy after abdominoperineal resection: Outcome after 63 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:626–31PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Farroni N, Van den Bosch A, Haustermans K, et al. Perineal colostomy with appendicostomy as an alternative for an abdominal colostomy:symptoms, functional status, quality of life, and perceived health. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:817–24PubMedCrossRef Farroni N, Van den Bosch A, Haustermans K, et al. Perineal colostomy with appendicostomy as an alternative for an abdominal colostomy:symptoms, functional status, quality of life, and perceived health. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:817–24PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Rubini D, et al. Long-term functional assessment of antegrade colonic enema for combined incontinence and constipation using a modified Marsh and Kiff technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1023–31PubMedCrossRef Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Rubini D, et al. Long-term functional assessment of antegrade colonic enema for combined incontinence and constipation using a modified Marsh and Kiff technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1023–31PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Quality of Life Among Five-Year Survivors After Treatment for Very Low Rectal Cancer With or Without a Permanent Abdominal Stoma
verfasst von
C. Fucini, MD
R. Gattai, MD
C. Urena, MD
L. Bandettini, MD
C. Elbetti, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 4/2008
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9748-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2008

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.