Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 5/2018

29.01.2018 | Original Paper

Quality of life before and after rhinoplasty surgery measured with SF-36, RSES, and WHOQOL-BREF

verfasst von: Seyed Jaber Mousavi, Jason Abbas Aramideh, Seyyedeh Sanam Fattahi, Aminda Amanolahi, Mohammadhossein Hesamirostami

Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Rhinoplasty continues to be among the most popular surgical cosmetic treatments around the world. This is often a reflection of the significance of nose shapes in sociocultural, ethnic, and psychological contexts. Despite developments in the therapeutic field of cosmetic surgery, there is scarce information available within current literature concerning the effects of cosmetic procedures on quality of life (QOL), particularly in Iran. The purpose of this study was to survey QOL among Iranian adults before and after rhinoplasty.

Methods

From July 2015 to July 2016, 83 patients over 16 years of age seeking cosmetic rhinoplasty were included in this study. Demographic information such as age, sex, marital status, education, occupation, and monthly income of patients were recorded. SF-36 version 2, Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES), and WHOQOL-BREF questionnaires were completed by a single trained interviewer for all patients, before and 6 months after rhinoplasty. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS ver. 16. Results before and after surgery were compared.

Results

The mean age of the subjects was 24.87 ± 5.8 years, with a median of 24 years. The female-to-male ratio was 4.53:1. In all cases and all questionnaires, QOL was improved after rhinoplasty. Significant differences were observed on six subscales of SF-36 comprised bodily pain (p = 0.003), general health (p = 0.002), vitality (p = 0.005), social functioning (p < 0.001), emotional role (p = 0.02), and mental health state (p = 0.012). According to RSES and WHOQOL-BREF questionnaires, self-esteem (p = 0.002), psychological health (p < 0.001), social relationships (p < 0.001), and general quality of life (p = 0.011) indicated significant differences.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that QOL can be improved after rhinoplasty in Iranian adult patients. With proper patient selection and a successful operation, improvement of QOL can be expected.
Level of Evidence: Level III, risk / prognostic study
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis RE (2006) Rhinoplasty and concepts of facial beauty. Facial Plast Surg 22(03):198–203 Davis RE (2006) Rhinoplasty and concepts of facial beauty. Facial Plast Surg 22(03):198–203
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank (2014) Statistics 2013. Aesthet Surg J 34(1 suppl):1S–22SCrossRef Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank (2014) Statistics 2013. Aesthet Surg J 34(1 suppl):1S–22SCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwitzer JA, Sher SR, Fan KL, Scott AM, Gamble L, Baker SB (2015) Assessing patient-reported satisfaction with appearance and quality of life following rhinoplasty using the FACE-Q appraisal scales. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(5):830e–837eCrossRef Schwitzer JA, Sher SR, Fan KL, Scott AM, Gamble L, Baker SB (2015) Assessing patient-reported satisfaction with appearance and quality of life following rhinoplasty using the FACE-Q appraisal scales. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(5):830e–837eCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurunluoglu R, Gurunluoglu A, Williams SA, Tebockhorst S (2013) Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010. Ann Plastic Surg 70(1):103–110CrossRef Gurunluoglu R, Gurunluoglu A, Williams SA, Tebockhorst S (2013) Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010. Ann Plastic Surg 70(1):103–110CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zojaji R, Keshavarzmanesh M, Arshadi HR, Mazloum Farsi Baf M, Esmaeelzadeh S (2014) Quality of life in patients who underwent rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 30(5):593–596CrossRef Zojaji R, Keshavarzmanesh M, Arshadi HR, Mazloum Farsi Baf M, Esmaeelzadeh S (2014) Quality of life in patients who underwent rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 30(5):593–596CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Furnham A, Levitas J (2012) Factors that motivate people to undergo cosmetic surgery. Can J Plast Surg 20(4):e47–e50CrossRef Furnham A, Levitas J (2012) Factors that motivate people to undergo cosmetic surgery. Can J Plast Surg 20(4):e47–e50CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarwer DB, Magee L, Clark V (2003) Physical appearance and cosmetic medical treatments: physiological and socio-cultural influences. J Cosmet Dermatol 2(1):29–39CrossRef Sarwer DB, Magee L, Clark V (2003) Physical appearance and cosmetic medical treatments: physiological and socio-cultural influences. J Cosmet Dermatol 2(1):29–39CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schofield M, Hussain R, Loxton D, Miller Z (2002) Psychosocial and health behavioural covariates of cosmetic surgery: Women’s Health Australia Study. J Health Psychol 7(4):445–457CrossRef Schofield M, Hussain R, Loxton D, Miller Z (2002) Psychosocial and health behavioural covariates of cosmetic surgery: Women’s Health Australia Study. J Health Psychol 7(4):445–457CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozgur F, Tuncali D, Guler Gursu K (1998) Life satisfaction, self-esteem, and body image: a psychosocial evaluation of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery candidates. Aesthetic Plast Surg 22(6):412–419 Ozgur F, Tuncali D, Guler Gursu K (1998) Life satisfaction, self-esteem, and body image: a psychosocial evaluation of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery candidates. Aesthetic Plast Surg 22(6):412–419
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Alderman A, Chung KC (2013) Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 40(2):297–304CrossRef Alderman A, Chung KC (2013) Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 40(2):297–304CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe RE, Antony MM (2003) Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(1):469–480CrossRef Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe RE, Antony MM (2003) Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(1):469–480CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Edmonds A (2007) ‘The poor have the right to be beautiful’: cosmetic surgery in neoliberal Brazil. J R Anthropol Inst 13(2):363–381CrossRef Edmonds A (2007) ‘The poor have the right to be beautiful’: cosmetic surgery in neoliberal Brazil. J R Anthropol Inst 13(2):363–381CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Swami V, Chamorro-Premuzic T, Bridges S, Furnham A (2009) Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: personality and individual difference predictors. Body Image 6(1):7–13CrossRef Swami V, Chamorro-Premuzic T, Bridges S, Furnham A (2009) Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: personality and individual difference predictors. Body Image 6(1):7–13CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsukiura T, Cabeza R (2011) Shared brain activity for aesthetic and moral judgments: implications for the beauty-is-good stereotype. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 6(1):138–148CrossRef Tsukiura T, Cabeza R (2011) Shared brain activity for aesthetic and moral judgments: implications for the beauty-is-good stereotype. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 6(1):138–148CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Faria FS, Guthrie E, Bradbury E, Brain AN (1999) Psychosocial outcome and patient satisfaction following breast reduction surgery. Br J Plast Surg 52(6):448–452CrossRef Faria FS, Guthrie E, Bradbury E, Brain AN (1999) Psychosocial outcome and patient satisfaction following breast reduction surgery. Br J Plast Surg 52(6):448–452CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowling A, Jacobson B, Southgate L (1993) Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district. Soc Sci Med 37(7):851–857CrossRef Bowling A, Jacobson B, Southgate L (1993) Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district. Soc Sci Med 37(7):851–857CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Margraf J, Meyer AH, Lavallee KL (2013) Well-being from the knife? Psychological effects of aesthetic surgery. Clin Psychol Sci 1(3):239–252CrossRef Margraf J, Meyer AH, Lavallee KL (2013) Well-being from the knife? Psychological effects of aesthetic surgery. Clin Psychol Sci 1(3):239–252CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bulut OC, Wallner F, Plinkert PK, Prochnow S, Kuhnt C, Baumann I (2015) Quality of life after septorhinoplasty measured with the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 (FROI-17). Rhinology 53(1):54–58CrossRef Bulut OC, Wallner F, Plinkert PK, Prochnow S, Kuhnt C, Baumann I (2015) Quality of life after septorhinoplasty measured with the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 (FROI-17). Rhinology 53(1):54–58CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kucur C, Kuduban O, Ozturk A, Gozeler MS, Ozbay I, Deveci E, Simsek E, Kaya Z (2016) Psychological evaluation of patients seeking rhinoplasty. Eur J Med 48(2):5–106 Kucur C, Kuduban O, Ozturk A, Gozeler MS, Ozbay I, Deveci E, Simsek E, Kaya Z (2016) Psychological evaluation of patients seeking rhinoplasty. Eur J Med 48(2):5–106
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT (2004) Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(2):157–163 Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT (2004) Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(2):157–163
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT (2004) Development and validation of theNasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(2):157–163 Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT (2004) Development and validation of theNasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(2):157–163
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG (1996) Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105(6):415–422CrossRef Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG (1996) Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105(6):415–422CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Klassen AF, Cano SJ, East CA, Baker SB, Badia L, Schwitzer JA, Pusic AL (2016) Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q scales for patients undergoing rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 18(1):27–35CrossRef Klassen AF, Cano SJ, East CA, Baker SB, Badia L, Schwitzer JA, Pusic AL (2016) Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q scales for patients undergoing rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 18(1):27–35CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Naraghi M, Atari M (2016) Development and validation of the expectations of aesthetic rhinoplasty scale. Arch Plast Surg 43(4):365–370CrossRef Naraghi M, Atari M (2016) Development and validation of the expectations of aesthetic rhinoplasty scale. Arch Plast Surg 43(4):365–370CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bensoussan J-C, Bolton MA, Pi S, Powell-Hicks AL, Postolova A, Razani B, Reyes K, IsHak WW (2013) Quality of life before and after cosmetic surgery. CNS Spectr 19(4):282–292CrossRef Bensoussan J-C, Bolton MA, Pi S, Powell-Hicks AL, Postolova A, Razani B, Reyes K, IsHak WW (2013) Quality of life before and after cosmetic surgery. CNS Spectr 19(4):282–292CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarwer DB, Gibbons LM, Magee L, Baker JL, Casas LA, Glat PM, Gold AH, Jewell ML, LaRossa D, Nahai F, Young VL (2005) A prospective, multi-site investigation of patient satisfaction and psychosocial status following cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 25(3):263–269CrossRef Sarwer DB, Gibbons LM, Magee L, Baker JL, Casas LA, Glat PM, Gold AH, Jewell ML, LaRossa D, Nahai F, Young VL (2005) A prospective, multi-site investigation of patient satisfaction and psychosocial status following cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 25(3):263–269CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Saleh AM, Younes A, Friedman O (2012) Cosmetics and function: quality-of-life changes after rhinoplasty surgery. Laryngoscope 122(2):254–259CrossRef Saleh AM, Younes A, Friedman O (2012) Cosmetics and function: quality-of-life changes after rhinoplasty surgery. Laryngoscope 122(2):254–259CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2016) A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 247(4):1807–1811CrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2016) A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 247(4):1807–1811CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Group W (1994) Development of the WHOQOL: rationale and current status. Int J Ment Health 23(3):24–56CrossRef Group W (1994) Development of the WHOQOL: rationale and current status. Int J Ment Health 23(3):24–56CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Orley J, Kuyken W (1994) The development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument: preliminary data. Qual Life Res 3(1):53–54 Orley J, Kuyken W (1994) The development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument: preliminary data. Qual Life Res 3(1):53–54
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lavinsky-Wolff M, Camargo HL, Barone CR, Rabaioli L, Wolff FH, Dolci JEL, Polanczyk CA (2013) Effect of turbinate surgery in rhinoseptoplasty on quality-of-life and acoustic rhinometry outcomes: a randomized clinical trial: turbinate surgery in rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 123(1):82–89CrossRef Lavinsky-Wolff M, Camargo HL, Barone CR, Rabaioli L, Wolff FH, Dolci JEL, Polanczyk CA (2013) Effect of turbinate surgery in rhinoseptoplasty on quality-of-life and acoustic rhinometry outcomes: a randomized clinical trial: turbinate surgery in rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 123(1):82–89CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohammadshahi M, Pourreza A, Orojlo PH, Mahmoodi M, Akbari F (2014) Rhinoplasty as a medicalized phenomenon: a 25-center survey on quality of life before and after cosmetic rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 38(4):615–619 Mohammadshahi M, Pourreza A, Orojlo PH, Mahmoodi M, Akbari F (2014) Rhinoplasty as a medicalized phenomenon: a 25-center survey on quality of life before and after cosmetic rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 38(4):615–619
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Fatemi MJ, Rajabi F, Moosavi SJ, Soltani M (2012) Quality of life among Iranian adults before and after rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(2):448–452 Fatemi MJ, Rajabi F, Moosavi SJ, Soltani M (2012) Quality of life among Iranian adults before and after rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(2):448–452
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kotzampasakis D, Piniara A, Themelis S, Kotzampasakis S, Gabriel E, Maroudias N, Nikolopoulos T (2017) Quality of life of patients who underwent aesthetic rhinoplasty: 100 cases assessed with the Glascow Benefit Inventory. Laryngoscope 127(9):2017–2025CrossRef Kotzampasakis D, Piniara A, Themelis S, Kotzampasakis S, Gabriel E, Maroudias N, Nikolopoulos T (2017) Quality of life of patients who underwent aesthetic rhinoplasty: 100 cases assessed with the Glascow Benefit Inventory. Laryngoscope 127(9):2017–2025CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Chauhan N, Warner J, Adamson PA (2010) Adolescent rhinoplasty: challenges and psychosocial and clinical outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34(4):510–516 Chauhan N, Warner J, Adamson PA (2010) Adolescent rhinoplasty: challenges and psychosocial and clinical outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34(4):510–516
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Bulut OC, Wallner F, Hohenberger R, Plinkert PK, Baumann I (2017) Quality of life after primary septorhinoplasty in deviated- and non-deviated nose measured with ROE, FROI-17 and SF-36. Rhinology 55(1):75–80CrossRef Bulut OC, Wallner F, Hohenberger R, Plinkert PK, Baumann I (2017) Quality of life after primary septorhinoplasty in deviated- and non-deviated nose measured with ROE, FROI-17 and SF-36. Rhinology 55(1):75–80CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Quality of life before and after rhinoplasty surgery measured with SF-36, RSES, and WHOQOL-BREF
verfasst von
Seyed Jaber Mousavi
Jason Abbas Aramideh
Seyyedeh Sanam Fattahi
Aminda Amanolahi
Mohammadhossein Hesamirostami
Publikationsdatum
29.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-018-1392-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.