Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2019

09.04.2019 | Original Article

Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Published By Plastic Surgeons: Long-Term Follow-Up

verfasst von: Thiago Bezerra de Morais, Daniela Francescato Veiga, Joel Veiga-Filho, Andréia Cristina Feitosa do Carmo, Rosely de Fátima Pellizzon, Yara Juliano, Miguel Sabino-Neto, Lydia Masako Ferreira

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

In two previous studies, the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with the participation of at least one plastic surgeon was evaluated in two periods: 1966–2003 and 2004–2008.

Objective

To evaluate the evolution of the quality of RCT publications by plastic surgeons in the subsequent 5-year period, from 2009 to 2013.

Methods

RCTs published from 2009 to 2013 in English with the participation of at least one plastic surgeon were identified by electronic search and classified for concealment of allocation by two independent evaluators. The studies with adequate allocation concealment had their quality evaluated by two evaluators using the Delphi List and the Jadad Quality Scale.

Results

Of the 6997 identified studies, 261 were classified as to concealment of allocation. Of these, 43 (16.47%) had adequate allocation concealment. According to the evaluation in the Delphi List, there was an improvement, in relation to 1966–2003, in the items “most important characteristics of the prognosis” (p < 0.001), “use of independent evaluator” (p = 0.0029), and “measures of variability and point estimate for the primary variable” (p = 0.0057); there was no difference in relation to 2004–2008. Regarding the Jadad Quality Scale, there was an increase in scores in relation to 1966–2003 (p < 0.0004) but not in relation to the 2004–2008 period.

Conclusion

There was no difference in the quality of publications of RCTs by plastic surgeons in the period 2009–2013 compared to the previous 5 years (2004–2008), but both periods presented higher quality than the period 1966–2003.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohrich RJ, Eaves FF 3rd (2011) So you want to be an evidence-based plastic surgeon? A lifelong journey. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:467–472CrossRefPubMed Rohrich RJ, Eaves FF 3rd (2011) So you want to be an evidence-based plastic surgeon? A lifelong journey. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:467–472CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kowalski E, Chung KC (2013) The outcomes movement and evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 40:241–247CrossRefPubMed Kowalski E, Chung KC (2013) The outcomes movement and evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 40:241–247CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sears ED, Burns PB, Chung KC (2007) The outcomes of outcome studies in plastic surgery: a systematic review of 17 years of plastic surgery research. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:2059–2065CrossRef Sears ED, Burns PB, Chung KC (2007) The outcomes of outcome studies in plastic surgery: a systematic review of 17 years of plastic surgery research. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:2059–2065CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohrich RJ, Cho MJ (2017) Evidence based medicine in aesthetic surgery: the significance of level to aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:1195eCrossRefPubMed Rohrich RJ, Cho MJ (2017) Evidence based medicine in aesthetic surgery: the significance of level to aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:1195eCrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Leal DG, Rodrigues MA, Tedesco ACB, Nahas FX, Ferreira LM, Roxo ACW, de Castro CC, Aboudib JH (2018) Evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery: are we there yet? Ann Plast Surg 80:71–75PubMed Leal DG, Rodrigues MA, Tedesco ACB, Nahas FX, Ferreira LM, Roxo ACW, de Castro CC, Aboudib JH (2018) Evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery: are we there yet? Ann Plast Surg 80:71–75PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Boden C, Bidonde J, Busch A (2017) Gaps exist in the current guidance on the use of randomized controlled trial study protocols in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 85:59–69CrossRefPubMed Boden C, Bidonde J, Busch A (2017) Gaps exist in the current guidance on the use of randomized controlled trial study protocols in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 85:59–69CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Veiga DF, Veiga-Filho J, Pellizzon RF, Juliano Y, Ferreira LM (2011) Evolution of reports of randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:703–709CrossRefPubMed Veiga DF, Veiga-Filho J, Pellizzon RF, Juliano Y, Ferreira LM (2011) Evolution of reports of randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:703–709CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Waljee JF, Larson BP, Chung KC (2012) Measuring treatment effectiveness: a guide to incorporating the principles of evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:1382–1394CrossRefPubMed Waljee JF, Larson BP, Chung KC (2012) Measuring treatment effectiveness: a guide to incorporating the principles of evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:1382–1394CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Taghinia AH, Liao EC, May JW Jr (2008) Randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery: a 20-year review of reporting standards, methodologic quality, and impact. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1253–1263CrossRefPubMed Taghinia AH, Liao EC, May JW Jr (2008) Randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery: a 20-year review of reporting standards, methodologic quality, and impact. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1253–1263CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Momeni A, Becker A, Antes G, Diener MK, Blümle A, Stark BG (2009) Evidence-based plastic surgery: controlled trials in three plastic surgical journals (1990–2005). Ann Plast Surg 62:293–296CrossRefPubMed Momeni A, Becker A, Antes G, Diener MK, Blümle A, Stark BG (2009) Evidence-based plastic surgery: controlled trials in three plastic surgical journals (1990–2005). Ann Plast Surg 62:293–296CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Karri V (2006) Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: survey of output and quality of reporting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:787–796CrossRefPubMed Karri V (2006) Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: survey of output and quality of reporting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:787–796CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Loonen MPJ, Hage JJ, Kon M (2007) Publications of plastic surgery research 1972 trough 2004: a longitudinal trend analysis of three international journals. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:934–945CrossRefPubMed Loonen MPJ, Hage JJ, Kon M (2007) Publications of plastic surgery research 1972 trough 2004: a longitudinal trend analysis of three international journals. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:934–945CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Becker A, Blümle A, Antes G, Bannasch H, Torio-Padron N, Stark GB, Momeni A (2008) Controlled trials in aesthetic plastic surgery: a 16-year analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:359–362CrossRefPubMed Becker A, Blümle A, Antes G, Bannasch H, Torio-Padron N, Stark GB, Momeni A (2008) Controlled trials in aesthetic plastic surgery: a 16-year analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:359–362CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohrich RJ (2010) So you want to be better: the role of evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1395–1398CrossRefPubMed Rohrich RJ (2010) So you want to be better: the role of evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1395–1398CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Agha RA, Camm CF, Edison E, Orgill DP (2013) The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery needs improvement: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:447–452CrossRefPubMed Agha RA, Camm CF, Edison E, Orgill DP (2013) The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery needs improvement: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:447–452CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Veiga Filho J, Castro AA, Veiga DF, Juliano Y, Castilho HT, Rocha JL, Ferreira LM (2005) Quality of reports of randomized clinical trials in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:320–323PubMed Veiga Filho J, Castro AA, Veiga DF, Juliano Y, Castilho HT, Rocha JL, Ferreira LM (2005) Quality of reports of randomized clinical trials in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:320–323PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Guidugli F, Castro AA, Atallah AN (2000) Systematic reviews on leptospirosis. Rev Inst Med Trop 42:47–49CrossRef Guidugli F, Castro AA, Atallah AN (2000) Systematic reviews on leptospirosis. Rev Inst Med Trop 42:47–49CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, Kessels AG, Boers M, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG (1998) The Delphi List: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1235–1241CrossRefPubMed Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, Kessels AG, Boers M, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG (1998) The Delphi List: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1235–1241CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12CrossRefPubMed Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel S, Castellan NJ Jr (2006) Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. Portuguese language edition, 2nd edn. Artmed/Bookman, Porto Alegre Siegel S, Castellan NJ Jr (2006) Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. Portuguese language edition, 2nd edn. Artmed/Bookman, Porto Alegre
22.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy CM, Collins ED, Pusic AL (2008) Where do we find the best evidence? Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1942–1947CrossRefPubMed McCarthy CM, Collins ED, Pusic AL (2008) Where do we find the best evidence? Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1942–1947CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Thoma A, Sprague S, Temple C, Archibald S (2008) The role of the randomized controlled trial in plastic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 35:275–284CrossRefPubMed Thoma A, Sprague S, Temple C, Archibald S (2008) The role of the randomized controlled trial in plastic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 35:275–284CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Farrokhyar F, Karanicolas PJ, Thoma A, Simunovic M, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Anvari M, Adili A, Guyatt G (2010) Randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions. Ann Surg 251:409–416CrossRefPubMed Farrokhyar F, Karanicolas PJ, Thoma A, Simunovic M, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Anvari M, Adili A, Guyatt G (2010) Randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions. Ann Surg 251:409–416CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Solomon MJ, McLeod RS (1995) Should we be performing more randomized controlled trials evaluating surgical operations? Surgery 118:459–467CrossRefPubMed Solomon MJ, McLeod RS (1995) Should we be performing more randomized controlled trials evaluating surgical operations? Surgery 118:459–467CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Gattellari M, Ward JE, Solomon MJ (2001) Randomized controlled trials in surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44(10):1413–1420CrossRefPubMed Gattellari M, Ward JE, Solomon MJ (2001) Randomized controlled trials in surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44(10):1413–1420CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Huemer GM, Bauer T, Gurunluoglu R, Sakho C, Oehlbauer M, Dunst KM (2004) Analysis of publications in three plastic surgery journals for the year 2002. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1147–1154CrossRefPubMed Huemer GM, Bauer T, Gurunluoglu R, Sakho C, Oehlbauer M, Dunst KM (2004) Analysis of publications in three plastic surgery journals for the year 2002. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1147–1154CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Loiselle F, Mahabir RC, Harrop AR (2008) Levels of evidence in plastic surgery research over 20 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:207e–211eCrossRefPubMed Loiselle F, Mahabir RC, Harrop AR (2008) Levels of evidence in plastic surgery research over 20 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:207e–211eCrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Goulden O, Waters R (2017) Evidence-based plastic surgery in 2017. JPRAS Open 12:31–38CrossRef Goulden O, Waters R (2017) Evidence-based plastic surgery in 2017. JPRAS Open 12:31–38CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Asplund O (1984) Capsular contracture in silicone gel and saline-filled breast implants after reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:270–275CrossRefPubMed Asplund O (1984) Capsular contracture in silicone gel and saline-filled breast implants after reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:270–275CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D, Stroup DF (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 276:637–639CrossRefPubMed Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D, Stroup DF (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 276:637–639CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L (2001) Use of the CONSORT Statement and quality of reports of randomized trials. A comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA 285:1992–1995CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L (2001) Use of the CONSORT Statement and quality of reports of randomized trials. A comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA 285:1992–1995CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Agha RA, Barai I, Rajmohan S, Lee S, Anwar MO, Fowler AJ, Orgill DP, Altman DG (2017) Support for reporting guidelines in surgical journals needs improvement: a systematic review. Int J Surg 45:14–17CrossRefPubMed Agha RA, Barai I, Rajmohan S, Lee S, Anwar MO, Fowler AJ, Orgill DP, Altman DG (2017) Support for reporting guidelines in surgical journals needs improvement: a systematic review. Int J Surg 45:14–17CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Agha RA, Altman DG, Rosin D (2015) The SPIRIT 2013 statement—defining standard protocol items for trials. Int J Surg 13:288–291CrossRefPubMed Agha RA, Altman DG, Rosin D (2015) The SPIRIT 2013 statement—defining standard protocol items for trials. Int J Surg 13:288–291CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147:573–577CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147:573–577CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, PRISMA-P Group (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 350:g7647CrossRefPubMed Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, PRISMA-P Group (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 350:g7647CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Farwana R, Koshy K, Fowler AJ, Orgill DP, SCARE Group (2018) The SCARE 2018 statement: updating consensus Surgical Case Report (SCARE) guidelines. Int J Surg 60:132–136CrossRefPubMed Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Farwana R, Koshy K, Fowler AJ, Orgill DP, SCARE Group (2018) The SCARE 2018 statement: updating consensus Surgical Case Report (SCARE) guidelines. Int J Surg 60:132–136CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Farwana R, Koshy K, Fowler AJ, Orgill DP, PROCESS Group (2018) The PROCESS 2018 statement: updating consensus preferred reporting of case series in surgery (PROCESS) guidelines. Int J Surg 60:279–282CrossRefPubMed Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Farwana R, Koshy K, Fowler AJ, Orgill DP, PROCESS Group (2018) The PROCESS 2018 statement: updating consensus preferred reporting of case series in surgery (PROCESS) guidelines. Int J Surg 60:279–282CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Olivo SA, Macedo LG, Gadotti IC, Fuentes J, Stanton T, Magee DJ (2008) Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Phys Ther 88:156–175CrossRefPubMed Olivo SA, Macedo LG, Gadotti IC, Fuentes J, Stanton T, Magee DJ (2008) Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Phys Ther 88:156–175CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu J, Li X, Li Y, Sun X (2017) Quality of reporting in surgical randomized clinical trials. Br J Surg 104:296–303CrossRefPubMed Yu J, Li X, Li Y, Sun X (2017) Quality of reporting in surgical randomized clinical trials. Br J Surg 104:296–303CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Agha RA, Camm CF, Doganay E, Edison E, Siddiqui MR, Orgill DP (2014) Randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery: a systematic review of reporting quality. Eur J Plast Surg 37:55–62CrossRefPubMed Agha RA, Camm CF, Doganay E, Edison E, Siddiqui MR, Orgill DP (2014) Randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery: a systematic review of reporting quality. Eur J Plast Surg 37:55–62CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Published By Plastic Surgeons: Long-Term Follow-Up
verfasst von
Thiago Bezerra de Morais
Daniela Francescato Veiga
Joel Veiga-Filho
Andréia Cristina Feitosa do Carmo
Rosely de Fátima Pellizzon
Yara Juliano
Miguel Sabino-Neto
Lydia Masako Ferreira
Publikationsdatum
09.04.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01335-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.