Background
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a recognised cardiovascular disease risk factor, is reaching epidemic proportions in developing countries. According to the International Diabetes Federation, diabetes mellitus affects around 285 million people globally, and the number is expected to increase to 438 million by 2030, with two-thirds of all cases occurring in low to middle-income countries [1]. Type 2 diabetes mellitus constitutes up to 90% of all cases of diabetes mellitus globally [1]. In Africa, prevalence rate for diabetes mellitus in 2013 was estimated at 4.8% and is projected to rise to 5.3% by 2035 [1]. In Kenya the estimated population prevalence ranges from 4.2% in a multiethnic study involving both rural and urban Kenyans to 5.3% in a recent study conducted in the largest urban slum in Kenya [2, 3].
Type 2 diabetes mellitus can predispose to disturbed sleep patterns and disturbed sleep in turn can predispose to insulin resistance and T2DM [4]. In comparative studies, patients with T2DM have been found to have a higher prevalence of sleep disturbances compared to matched non- diabetic individuals [5].
Anzeige
Overweight and/ or obesity in T2DM are a major risk factor for sleep disturbances, particularly obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Other factors contributing to disturbed sleep in diabetes include: nocturia, autonomic and peripheral neuropathy, hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia [6, 7].
Presence of sleep disorders in patients with T2DM causes worsening of glycemic control and increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [8‐10]. Several mechanisms have been postulated to explain increased cardiovascular risk including: increased sympathetic activity, increased oxidative stress, low grade inflammation and endothelial dysfunction [9, 10].
Various studies on the prevalence and CVD risk association, of sleep disorders have been undertaken; however data from the African continent is scant. To the best of our knowledge, there is no published data available on the burden and impact of sleep disturbances in patients with T2DM from the Sub Saharan African region.
Therefore this study set out to determine the prevalence of poor quality of sleep (QOS) and prevalence of high risk for OSA in persons with T2DM and in an age and sex matched non- diabetic comparison group. We also aimed to determine associations of sleep disturbance with socio-demographic, clinical and anthropometric measures in persons with T2DM.
Anzeige
Methods
The study was a cross- sectional descriptive study with a comparative arm and was carried out at the Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), a national, tertiary referral hospital located in Nairobi, the capital city of Kenya. The comparison arm was included to serve as a benchmark to determine sleep disturbances in a non diabetic population since no prior studies have been conducted in the field of sleep medicine in Kenya.
The outpatient department of KNH operates two diabetes clinics. A daily mini clinic, attends to 25 to 30 patients per day, with care being offered by registered Medical Assistants (Clinical Officers). A Friday main clinic attends to 55 to 60 patients, and care is offered by diabetologists and specialist physicians, along with internal medicine residents.
Study subjects were included if they were equal to or above 18 years old, were literate in English/ Kiswahili and provided informed consent. We excluded pregnant women, individuals with known psychiatric and/ or neurologic disease, fluid overload states, night shift jobs and those consuming cigarette and/ or alcohol in the preceding month since these conditions are associated with sleep disturbances [11, 12]. In addition to the above, study cases were individuals attending the diabetic outpatient clinics during the study period who had a file recorded diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) based on American Diabetes Association criteria [13].
Comparison group were age and sex matched individuals, not diagnosed with diabetes, with no symptoms suggestive of diabetes and had a random capillary blood sugar (RCBS) reading in non- diabetic range (below 11.1 mmol/l). The comparison group was recruited from relatives of patients attending other outpatient clinics and hospital staff members.
Sample size for cases was computed using the Daniel formula for prevalence studies [14]. Imputing a 16% prevalence of high risk for obstructive sleep apnoea as reported in a Korean study [15], and a 5% precision, a minimal sample size of 207 was arrived at.
Comparison group was recruited in a 2:1 ratio of cases to comparison group. A 2:1 rather than 1:1 ratio was opted by the researchers on account of logistic difficulties encountered in recruitment in a pilot study. Further, since this was a pioneer study, the aim of the comparison group was not to serve as a control per se but to provide a benchmark for the general population.
A two stage screening strategy was utilised to select cases. File records of patients booked to attend diabetes clinics were consecutively screened for age and recorded diagnosis eligibility criteria. Cases were then recruited randomly using simple random sampling and comparison group were recruited consecutively.
The study procedure and relevance was explained to the participants and any queries clarified. Using aseptic technique, random capillary blood sugar (RCBS) was then obtained from the comparison group by a fingertip skin prick using a validated glucometer (ACON- Acon Laboratories, Inc - AconLabs.com). Comparison group individuals with RCBS above 11 mmol/l or between 7.8 mmol/l and 11 mmol/l with symptoms of diabetes mellitus were excluded from the study and referred for follow-up assessment. Those recruited were explained further study procedures.
Anzeige
Data collection was done by the first author assisted by a study trained registered medical assistant. Training was done by the first author with regards to standard procedures for completion of the study proforma and measurement of anthropometric measures. Participants’ socio-demographic data (age, gender, marital status, employment status, level of education) and a targeted medical history (duration of diabetes since diagnosis and medication use) were taken by the first author and research assistants through direct patient interview. Duration of diabetes was determined from the file or where not available, by directly interviewing the patients. Anthropometric measurements (BMI, waist circumference, neck circumference, hip circumference and waist/ hip ratio) were then obtained using standard procedures recommended internationally [16]. Study subjects were then introduced to and requested to complete two self administered sleep questionnaires in either English or Kiswahili as per their language preference. The questionnaires are: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) [17, 18].
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a ten item questionnaire assessing quality of sleep (QOS) and identifies individuals as poor or good quality sleepers by calculating the sum score (global score; range 0 to 21)) of seven domains of sleep. Global score of >5 is considered as poor QOS. The PSQI is a validated tool; when assessed using clinical and clinimetric properties, and validated against polysomnography, it demonstrated sensitivity of 89.6% and specificity of 86.5% for identifying poor QOS [19]. It has also been validated against the General Health Questionnaire and wrist actigraphy [20, 21].
The Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) for assessing risk for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a nine item questionnaire, with five items on snoring, three on daytime somnolence and one item on hypertension/ BMI. The snoring or daytime somnolence categories are positive if responses indicate persistent symptoms (greater than three to four times a week) on the questionnaire items. To score positive in the 3rd category a history of hypertension or a BMI greater than or equal to 25 kg/m2 is required. Positive scores in ≥2 categories identify individuals at high risk for OSA. The BQ has been validated against polysomnography, with a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 77% for identifying individuals with OSA [22].
For purposes of non English speakers, a forward and backward translation of the validated questionnaires was undertaken by independent linguists and the forward translation was validated for content against the original English version [Additional files 1 and 2].
Anzeige
Statistical analysis
Statistical Products and Service Solutions (SPSS) version 17.0 (vendor SPSS Inc., Chicago) was utilised. Data was summarized into means (standard deviation) and medians (inter quartile range) for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables. We presented mean and standard deviation for normally distributed continuous data and compared between two groups using student’s t-test. The non- normally distributed data was presented using median and inter quartile range and compared between two groups using Mann Whitney U test.
The prevalence of poor quality of sleep (QOS) is presented in proportions with its corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Risk for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) was categorized as high or low risk and presented as proportions (95% CI).
The association between categories of QOS and categorical variables were estimated using Odds Ratios and association with continuous variables was assessed using Student’s t-test.
Similarly, association between categories of risk for OSA and categorical variables was determined using odds ratios and association of high risk for OSA and continuous variables was assessed using Student’s t-test.
Anzeige
Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to seek the independent correlates of poor QOS and high risk for OSA. All variables (socio demographic and anthropometric) with significant associations on univariable analysis were adjusted for in the logistic regression. All statistical tests were performed at 5% level of significance.
Results
Between 8th October 2012 and 1st November 2012, out of 719 diabetic clinic attendees, 245 with a chart diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and aged over 18 years were randomly selected. On secondary screening, 17 were excluded: five were current smokers and/ or alcohol consumers, three were night shift workers, seven had language barriers; one refused consent and one had neurologic disease. Thus 228 participants were enrolled as study cases. Five cases had incomplete data, thus not included in the final analysis.
Comparison group individuals were recruited in the same time period as cases. From 126 age and sex matched non-diabetic individuals screened for comparison group eligibility from various sources (84 from relatives of patients attending other medical outpatient clinics and 42 from members of hospital staff), 13 were excluded (nine had random capillary blood sugar (RCBS) in diabetic range, two were smokers and or alcohol users, two were night shift workers and one refused consent). Thus 112 comparison group individuals (89% of those screened) were enrolled and included in final analysis.
Demographics & disease characteristics
Mean age of the cases was 56.8 years (SD 12.2), 58.3% were females, 71.1% were urban residents and three quarter were married (75.8%); 79.8% were employed and majority (92.4%) had attained formal education (primary school and beyond), about two thirds (59.2%) of cases had completed secondary school and beyond (Table 1). The mean duration since diagnosis of T2DM was 10.4 years (SD 8.0). Mean BMI was 28.8 kg/m2 (SD 4.4, range 19.8–46.3). Almost two thirds of cases (62.8%) were on insulin therapy, either alone (13%) or in combination with oral anti-diabetic (OAD) drugs (49.8%) whereas 81 (36.3%) cases were on OAD alone (Table 1).
Table 1
Demographic, anthropometric and clinical characteristics of cases and comparison group
Variable | Cases | Comparison |
P value |
|---|---|---|---|
n (%) | n (%) | ||
Age, mean (SD) | 56.8 (12.2) | 56.5 (11.7) | 0.816 |
Gender | |||
Male | 93 (41.7%) | 46 (41.1%) | 0.912 |
Female | 130 (58.3%) | 66 (58.9%) | |
Current residence | |||
Urban | 163 (73.1%) | 100 (89.3%) | 0.001 |
Rural | 60 (26.9%) | 12 (10.7%) | |
Employment status | |||
Self employed | 178 (79.8%) | 103 (92.0%) | 0.004 |
Dependant | 45 (20.2%) | 9 (8.0%) | |
Level of education | |||
None | 17 (7.6%) | 16 (14.3%) | 0.001 |
Primary | 74 (33.2%) | 38 (33.9%) | |
Secondary | 101 (45.3%) | 29 (25.9%) | |
Tertiary | 31 (13.9%) | 29 (25.9%) | |
Marital status | |||
Single | 18 (8.1%) | 8 (7.1%) | 0.626 |
Married | 169 (75.8%) | 92 (82.1%) | |
Divorced | 7 (3.1%) | 2 (1.8%) | |
Widowed | 29 (13.0%) | 10 (8.9%) | |
Anthropometric measures, mean (SD) | |||
BMI (kg/m2) | 28.8 (4.4) | 25.8 (6) | 0.001 |
Neck circumference (cm) | 36.5 (3.2) | 33.3 (2.9) | 0.001 |
Waist circumference (cm) | 100.3 (10) | 90 (12.7) | 0.001 |
Hip circumference (cm) | 107.1 (9.1) | 102.5 (12.3) | 0.001 |
Waist/hip ratio | 0.94 (0.07) | 0.88 (0.07) | 0.001 |
Duration of T2DM in years, median (IQR) | 10 (4–15) | N/A | N/A |
Medications | |||
Insulin | 29 (13.0%) | N/A | N/A |
Insulin and OAD | 111 (49.8%) | ||
OAD alone | 81 (36.3%) | ||
None | 2 (0.9%) | ||
The age and sex matched comparison group had a similar distribution as cases with regard to marital status, but significantly differed in residence, employment status and level of education. They also had significantly lower BMI, neck, waist and hip circumferences and waist/ hip ratio compared to cases (p = 0.001) (Table 1).
Quality of sleep and risk for obstructive sleep apnoea
Poor Quality of Sleep (QOS) was detected in 53.4% (95% CI 46.5–60.2) of cases with a median global QOS score of 6.0 [Inter quartile range (IQR) 3–10]; and 44.4% (95% CI 37.8–50.9) of cases had high risk for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).
In the comparison group, 29.5% (95% CI 20.9–38.3) had poor QOS with a median global QOS score of 4.0 (IQR 2–6) and 8% (95% CI 3.3–13.4) had high risk for OSA.
Cases had significantly higher probability for poor QOS [OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.7–4.4)] and high risk for OSA [OR 9.1 (95% CI 4.4–19.0)] which remained significant after adjusting for obesity, residence, employment and education level [QOS adjusted OR 2.1 (95% CI 1.1–3.8); OSA adjusted OR 6.5 (2.9–14.6)] (Table 2).
Table 2
Odds for poor QOS & high risk for OSA in cases & comparison group
Variable | Cases | Comparison group | Crude | Adjusted for anthropometric/Socio- demographic measuresa
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n (%) | n (%) | OR (95% CI) |
P value | OR (95% CI) |
P value | |
Quality of sleep | ||||||
Poor | 119 (53.4) | 33 (29.5) | 2.7 (1.7–4.4) | 0.001 | 2.1 (1.1–3.8) | 0.018 |
Good | 104 (46.6) | 79 (70.5) | 1.0 | - | ||
Risk for OSA | ||||||
High risk | 99 (44.4) | 9 (8.0) | 9.1 (4.4–19.0) | 0.001 | 6.5 (2.9–14.6) | <0.001 |
Low risk | 124 (55.6) | 103 (92.0) | 1.0 | - | ||
On univariable analysis to determine association between QOS and socio-demographic, anthropometric and clinical measures in cases, duration of diabetes since diagnosis and the risk of OSA were significantly associated with poor QOS (Table 3). Good quality sleepers (global QOS ≤5) had a longer median duration of T2DM than poor quality sleepers [10.0 years (range 5.0–15.0) vs 8.0 years (range 2.0–16.0), p = 0.033]. Similarly, 70.2% of the good quality sleepers had low risk of OSA compared to 42.9% of poor quality sleepers (p < 0.001). Adjusting for the two factors in multiple logistic regression (Table 4), duration of T2DM [OR 0.96 (95% CI 0.93–0.99), p = 0.021] and high risk for OSA [OR 3.4 (95% CI 1.9–5.9), p < 0.001] were independently associated with poor QOS in cases.
Table 3
Factors associated with poor QOS in cases
Variable | Quality of sleep (PSQI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
Good (n = 104) | Poor (n = 119) | ||
Age (mean (SD)) | 56.8 (12.2) | 56.8 (12.2) | 0.992 |
Gender | |||
Male | 44 (42.3%) | 49 (41.2%) | 0.864 |
Female | 60 (57.7%) | 70 (58.8%) | |
Marital status | |||
Single | 7 (6.7%) | 11 (9.2%) | 0.607 |
Married | 82 (78.8%) | 87 (73.1%) | |
Divorced | 4 (3.8%) | 3 (2.5%) | |
Widowed | 11 (10.6%) | 18 (15.1%) | |
Employment status | |||
Self employed | 84 (80.8%) | 94 (79.0%) | 0.741 |
Dependant | 20 (19.2%) | 25 (21.0%) | |
Medications | |||
Insulin | 14 (13.5%) | 15 (12.6%) | 0.521 |
Insulin & OAD | 53 (51.0%) | 58 (48.7%) | |
OAD | 35 (33.7%) | 46 (38.7%) | |
None | 2 (1.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Duration of T2DM (years) | 10.0 (5.0–15.0) | 8.0 (2.0–16.0) | 0.033 |
BMI (kg/m2) [mean (SD)] | 28.7 (4.4) | 28.8 (4.3) | 0.969 |
Neck circumference | 36.6 (3.1) | 36.3 (3.3) | 0.626 |
Waist circumference | 100.0 (9.4) | 100.5 (10.5) | 0.523 |
Waist-hip ratio | 0.93 (0.07) | 0.94 (0.07) | 0.308 |
OSA | |||
High risk | 31 (29.8) | 68 (57.1) | <0.001 |
Low risk | 73 (70.2) | 51 (42.9) | |
Table 4
Predictors of poor QOS in cases
Variable | OR (95% CI) |
P value |
|---|---|---|
Mean duration of T2DM (years) | 0.96 (0.93–0.99) | 0.021 |
High risk of OSA | 3.4 (1.9–5.9) | <0.001 |
Compared to those at low risk for OSA, cases at high risk for OSA were more likely to be older (59 years vs 55.6 years; p = 0.017), unemployed (26.3% vs 15.3%; p = 0.001) and have higher mean waist circumference (102.2 [SD 10.7] cm vs 98.7 [SD 9.1] cm; p = 0.008) and hip circumference (108.7 [SD 10.0] cm vs 105.9 [SD 8.1] cm; p = 0.026). Cases at high risk for OSA were also more likely to have poor quality of sleep (68.7% vs 41.1%; p < 0.001) (Table 5). On multivariable analysis, higher waist circumference [OR1.04 (95% CI 1.01–1.07), p = 0.014] and poor QOS [OR 3.2 (95% CI 1.8–5.7), p < 0.001] were independently associated with a high risk for OSA (Table 6).
Table 5
Factors associated with high risk for OSA in cases
Variable | Berlin score | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
High risk (n = 99) | Low risk (n = 124) | |||
Age | 59.0 (12.2) | 55.6 (11.8) | 1.03 (1.01–1.05) | 0.017 |
Gender | ||||
Male | 41 (41.4%) | 52 (41.9%) | 1.0 (0.6–1.7) | 0.937 |
Female | 58 (58.6%) | 72 (58.1%) | 1.0 | |
Marital status | ||||
Single | 10 (10.1%) | 8 (6.5%) | 1.0 | |
Married | 73 (73.7%) | 96 (77.4%) | 0.6 (0.2–1.6) | 0.319 |
Divorced | 3 (3.0%) | 4 (3.2%) | 0.6 (0.1–3.5) | 0.570 |
Widowed | 13 (13.1%) | 16 (12.9%) | 0.7 (0.2–2.1) | 0.475 |
Employment status | ||||
Self employed | 73 (73.7%) | 105 (84.7%) | 1.0 | 0.043 |
Dependant | 26 (26.3%) | 19 (15.3%) | 2.0 (1.0–3.8) | |
Duration of T2D (years) | 10.0 (5.0–18.0) | 10.0 (3.5–14.5) | 1.01 (0.98–1.05) | 0.405 |
Medications | ||||
Insulin | 17 (17.2%) | 12 (9.7%) | 2.1 (0.9–5.1) | 0.084 |
Insulin and other | 50 (50.5%) | 64 (51.6%) | 1.2 (0.7–2.1) | 0.571 |
Others | 31 (31.3%) | 47 (37.9%) | 1.0 | |
None | 1 (1.0%) | 1 (0.8%) | 1.5 (0.1–25.1) | 0.772 |
Neck circumference (cm) | 36.7 (3.5) | 36.2 (2.9) | 0.270 | |
Waist circumference (cm) | 102.2 (10.7) | 98.7 (9.1) | 0.008 | |
Hip circumference (cm) | 108.7 (10.0) | 105.9 (8.1) | 0.026 | |
Waist/hip ratio | 0.94 (0.07) | 0.93 (0.07) | 0.380 | |
Quality of PSQI score | ||||
Good | 31 (31.3%) | 73 (58.9%) | 1.0 | <0.001 |
Poor | 68 (68.7%) | 51 (41.1%) | 3.1 (1.8–5.5) | |
Table 6
Predictors of high risk for OSA in cases (Logistic regression model)
Variable | OR (95% CI) |
P value |
|---|---|---|
Quality of PSQI score | ||
Good | 1.0 | <0.001 |
Poor | 3.2 (1.8–5.7) | |
Waist circumference | 1.04 (1.01–1.07) | 0.014 |
Employment status | ||
Self-employed | 1.0 | 0.071 |
Dependent | 1.9 (0.9–3.9) | |
Discussion
In this pioneer study in the field of sleep medicine in Kenya and utilising validated instruments, we demonstrate a high prevalence of sleep disorders in ambulatory persons with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The obesity adjusted odds for poor QOS and high risk for OSA in study cases was two to three fold that of non-diabetic subjects. In addition, we demonstrate that high risk for OSA is independently associated with central obesity and poor sleep quality. Thus this study establishes a useful platform for conducting further research in sleep disturbances among persons with diabetes in Kenya.
To the best of our knowledge, no similar studies have been reported in African patients with T2DM. Utilising the PSQI and BQ, a Korean study, in patients with T2DM, report a 38% prevalence of poor QOS and 15.8% prevalence of high risk for OSA [15]. The lower prevalence rates in the Korean study compared to our study could be explained by study subjects’ low mean BMI (24.8Kg/ m2), exclusion of those on insulin for diabetes management and exclusion of patients with severe painful neuropathy. In our study the mean BMI was 28.8 Kg/m2, two third of our patients were on insulin therapy, and we did not exclude painful neuropathy, suggesting more complicated or poorly controlled diabetes subjects. However, from different parts of the world, prevalence rates for poor QOS in patients with T2DM, using the PSQI range from 38% in Korea to 69% in a South Asian Indian study [15, 23, 24]. Using subjects from the Sleep Heart Health study and utilising polysomnography, a high prevalence of OSA was found among patients with T2DM, where up to 58% had at least mild OSA (apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥5) [25].
Our finding of the association of obesity with OSA is consistent with previous reports. Obesity, older age and male sex have been shown to be independently associated with high risk for OSA in several reports [6, 25, 26]. Obesity increases the risk for OSA by mechanical obstruction, thus increasing upper airway resistance and increased tendency to develop apnoeic and hypopnoeic events during sleep [27]. In addition, fat deposits around the thoracic cage (truncal obesity) reduce chest compliance and functional residual capacity, thus may increase oxygen demand [28]. Further, genetic polymorphisms may influence both OSA and obesity, and may be interrelated in the development of both these conditions [29]. To assess the link between obesity and OSA, studies have shown that treating obesity by weight reduction improves OSA symptoms; a moderate weight reduction was shown to prevent the progression of mild OSA, and even cure it [30].
Although male sex is a recognized risk factor for OSA, explained by the increased mass in the torso and neck [31], we were unable to demonstrate such an association among our diabetic study subjects. Similar to our findings, a Turkish study utilising overnight polysomnograhy to assess gender differences in patients with OSA failed to find significant difference between sexes [32].
Older age was significantly associated with a high risk for OSA in our study, though it did not have an independent association. The prevalence of OSA increases with age; 2- to 3-fold higher prevalence in older persons (≥65 years) compared to middle aged persons (30–64 years) [33]. Old age is often accompanied by muscular and neurological loss of muscle tone of the upper airway with enhanced collapsibility, thus increasing risk for OSA [34, 35].
Our finding of poor QOS being inversely related to duration of diabetes diagnosis is a counter intuitive finding since we expected patients with longer duration of diabetes to have poorer quality of sleep due to increased complications. Most studies have reported a positive association between disease duration and poor QOS. A study on patients with T2DM in the USA, using the PSQI, reported that the poorest QOS was among patients who had been diagnosed more than 10 years earlier. This was attributed to more frequent diabetic complications after the first 10 years of disease, thus greater probability of having poor QOS [23]. A South East Indian study found a significant positive correlation between duration of T2DM and QOS, independent of other variables [24].
We are not aware of a plausible biological mechanism to explain our findings. A possible explanation could be that patients with longer duration of diabetes have better management of their conditions, resulting in better sleep and fewer symptoms. In addition, these could be spurious findings confounded by a measurement bias in establishing duration of disease.
Strengths & limitations
Our study demonstrates certain strengths. To begin with this is the first reported study in the field of sleep medicine not only in Kenya but also from the East African region. Furthermore, we included a comparative arm to provide a reference baseline, undertook random sampling to select participants and used validated instruments.
Our limitations include: firstly, our results are from a tertiary referral hospital and are not generalisable to the entire T2DM Kenyan population. In addition, we used self reported questionnaires which depend heavily on factors such as the respondents’ mood, perception and level of education. Further, this was a cross- sectional study thus it is not possible to establish temporality between sleep disturbance and risk factors.
Conclusion
We demonstrate a high burden of sleep disturbances in a high risk, previously unstudied, disease category of ambulatory subjects with T2DM. This calls for heightened awareness of clinicians to detect sleep disturbances in these patients. Furthermore, our findings warrant further research in the field of sleep disorders in diabetes including determining associations with quality of life, glycemic control and cardiovascular disease among others.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge all who assisted and participated in the study; study subjects who willingly participated in the study, research assistant, who assisted with data collection, diabetes clinic staff who assisted in coordinating patients in the diabetes clinic during data collection and where eligible voluntarily participated in the study as comparison group.
Funding
not applicable
Availability of data and materials
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author [SS]. The data are not publicly available due to them containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/ consent.
Authors’ contributions
SMS conceived the study, participated in the design of the study, data collection, performed statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. MDJ designed the study, performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. EAO participated in the design and statistical analysis. KA conceived the study and participated in the design. JOM participated in the design of the study and data collection. KKM performed statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ information
All the authors are from the department of Clinical Medicine and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Nairobi, Kenya. SMS, the corresponding author, is a Consultant Physician. MDJ is an Associate Professor, Cardiologist and Clinical Epidemiologist, who also works at the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, University of Nairobi. EOA is an Associate Professor and a Neurologist. KA is a lecturer and Endocrinologist. JOM is a lecturer and Pulmonologist. KKM is a biostatistician.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
not applicable
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All procedures were in accordance with the institutional ethical standards and the proposal was approved by the Kenyatta National Hospital/ University of Nairobi Ethics and Research Committee (P.O. Box 19676, code 00202, Telephone no. +254-20-1726300, Nairobi, Kenya; Email- uonknh_erc@uonbi.ac.ke, Website- www.uonbi.ac.ke).
The subjects were informed about the purpose of research and study procedures/ tests were clearly explained. They were assured that participation was voluntary, confidentiality would be maintained, and no medical attention would be denied should they decline to participate. They were further assured of full and free access to their results and that therapeutic interventions would be recommended where need arose. Written, informed consent was obtained from all study participants. Only specimens needed for the study (i.e) prick capillary sample for RCBS were obtained from the comparison group.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.