Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016

29.04.2016

Quantifying inadvertent thermal bowel injury from the monopolar instrument

verfasst von: Kimberly E. Martin, Camille M. Moore, Robert Tucker, Pascal Fuchshuber, Thomas Robinson

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Insulation defects are observed in 3–39 % of laparoscopic instruments. Electrosurgical injuries due to insulation defects or capacitive coupling remain an issue in laparoscopic surgery with a prevalence of 0.6–5 per thousand cases. Shielded instruments with active electrode monitoring (AEM) have been postulated to prevent these injuries. The benefit of these instruments has not been quantified. Most bowel injuries are unrecognized intra-operatively. Injury is revealed only after the patient exhibits peritonitis symptoms and surgical intervention to repair the bowel is required. These injuries may result in devastating and costly complications or mortality. The extent of bowel injury possible with commonly used generator settings and associated energy output has never been histologically defined. Our objectives in this experimental study were: quantify and compare the energy released through insulation defects or capacitive coupling with standard unshielded monopolar versus shielded instruments with (AEM), determine energy required to cause a visible burn, and relate the histological burn depth to a given amount of energy.

Methods

Ex vivo porcine jejunum was used for tissue testing. An oscilloscope measured energy output from three common electrosurgical generators at recommended power settings with standard or AEM instruments with insulation defects and in capacitive coupling scenarios. Presence of a visible burn was noted, and depth of tissue damage for a given amount of energy was measured histologically.

Results

All samples that received ≥3.8 J of energy had visible burns. As little as 10 J caused full wall thickness burns. 3.8 J was exceeded at the 30- and 50-W power settings in every experimental scenario using standard monopolar instruments; AEM instruments never approached this much energy.

Conclusions

Serious burn injury results from small amounts of energy leaked from standard instruments. AEM instruments appeared protective and did not leak sufficient energy to cause burn injuries to the bowel.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu-Rafea B, Vilos GA, Al-Obeed O, Al Sheikh A, Vilos AG, Al-Mandeel H (2011) Monopolar electrosurgery through single-port laparoscopy: a potential hidden hazard for bowel burns. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:734–740CrossRefPubMed Abu-Rafea B, Vilos GA, Al-Obeed O, Al Sheikh A, Vilos AG, Al-Mandeel H (2011) Monopolar electrosurgery through single-port laparoscopy: a potential hidden hazard for bowel burns. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:734–740CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hulka JF, Levy BS, Parker WH, Phillips JM (1997) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists’ 1995 membership survey. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4:167–171CrossRefPubMed Hulka JF, Levy BS, Parker WH, Phillips JM (1997) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists’ 1995 membership survey. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4:167–171CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nduka CC, Super PA, Monson JR, Darzi AW (1994) Cause and prevention of electrosurgical injuries in laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 179:161–170PubMed Nduka CC, Super PA, Monson JR, Darzi AW (1994) Cause and prevention of electrosurgical injuries in laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 179:161–170PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Voyles CR, Tucker RD (1992) Education and engineering solutions for potential problems with laparoscopic monopolar electrosurgery. Am J Surg 164:57–62CrossRefPubMed Voyles CR, Tucker RD (1992) Education and engineering solutions for potential problems with laparoscopic monopolar electrosurgery. Am J Surg 164:57–62CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Montero PN, Robinson TN, Weaver JS, Stiegmann GV (2010) Insulation failure in laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc 24:62–65CrossRef Montero PN, Robinson TN, Weaver JS, Stiegmann GV (2010) Insulation failure in laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc 24:62–65CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones EL, Dunn CL, Townsend NT, Jones TS, Bruce Dunne J, Montero PN, Govekar HR, Stiegmann GV, Robinson TN (2013) Blend mode reduces unintended thermal injury by laparoscopic monopolar instruments: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 27:4016–4020CrossRefPubMed Jones EL, Dunn CL, Townsend NT, Jones TS, Bruce Dunne J, Montero PN, Govekar HR, Stiegmann GV, Robinson TN (2013) Blend mode reduces unintended thermal injury by laparoscopic monopolar instruments: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 27:4016–4020CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson TN, Pavlovsky KR, Looney H, Stiegmann GV, McGreevy FT (2010) Surgeon-controlled factors that reduce monopolar electrosurgery capacitive coupling during laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:317–320CrossRefPubMed Robinson TN, Pavlovsky KR, Looney H, Stiegmann GV, McGreevy FT (2010) Surgeon-controlled factors that reduce monopolar electrosurgery capacitive coupling during laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:317–320CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Schroder F (1999) Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol 161:887–890CrossRefPubMed Bishoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Schroder F (1999) Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol 161:887–890CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yazdani A, Krause H (2007) Laparoscopic instrument insulation failure: the hidden hazard. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:228–232CrossRefPubMed Yazdani A, Krause H (2007) Laparoscopic instrument insulation failure: the hidden hazard. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:228–232CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Espada M, Munoz R, Noble BN, Magrina JF (2011) Insulation failure in robotic and laparoscopic instrumentation: a prospective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(121):e1–e5 Espada M, Munoz R, Noble BN, Magrina JF (2011) Insulation failure in robotic and laparoscopic instrumentation: a prospective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(121):e1–e5
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierce J (1986) Electrosurgery Wiley medical. Division of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York Pierce J (1986) Electrosurgery Wiley medical. Division of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Overbey DM, Townsend NT, Chapman BC, Bennett DT, Foley LS, Rau AS, Yi JA, Jones EL, Stiegmann GV, Robinson TN (2015) Surgical energy-based device injuries and fatalities reported to the food and drug administration. J Am Coll Surg 221:197–205CrossRefPubMed Overbey DM, Townsend NT, Chapman BC, Bennett DT, Foley LS, Rau AS, Yi JA, Jones EL, Stiegmann GV, Robinson TN (2015) Surgical energy-based device injuries and fatalities reported to the food and drug administration. J Am Coll Surg 221:197–205CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Calabrese E, Zorzi F, Onali S, Stasi E, Fiori R, Prencipe S, Bella A, Petruzziello C, Condino G, Lolli E, Simonetti G, Biancone L, Pallone F (2013) Accuracy of small-intestine contrast ultrasonography, compared with computed tomography enteroclysis, in characterizing lesions in patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:950–955CrossRefPubMed Calabrese E, Zorzi F, Onali S, Stasi E, Fiori R, Prencipe S, Bella A, Petruzziello C, Condino G, Lolli E, Simonetti G, Biancone L, Pallone F (2013) Accuracy of small-intestine contrast ultrasonography, compared with computed tomography enteroclysis, in characterizing lesions in patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:950–955CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraquelli M, Sarno A, Girelli C, Laudi C, Buscarini E, Villa C, Robotti D, Porta P, Cammarota T, Ercole E, Rigazio C, Senore C, Pera A, Malacrida V, Gallo C, Maconi G (2008) Reproducibility of bowel ultrasonography in the evaluation of Crohn’s disease. Dig Liver Dis 40:860–866CrossRefPubMed Fraquelli M, Sarno A, Girelli C, Laudi C, Buscarini E, Villa C, Robotti D, Porta P, Cammarota T, Ercole E, Rigazio C, Senore C, Pera A, Malacrida V, Gallo C, Maconi G (2008) Reproducibility of bowel ultrasonography in the evaluation of Crohn’s disease. Dig Liver Dis 40:860–866CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Emergency care Research Institute (2005) Safety technologies for laparoscopic monopolar electrosurgery; devices for managing burn risks. Health Devices 34:259–272 Emergency care Research Institute (2005) Safety technologies for laparoscopic monopolar electrosurgery; devices for managing burn risks. Health Devices 34:259–272
Metadaten
Titel
Quantifying inadvertent thermal bowel injury from the monopolar instrument
verfasst von
Kimberly E. Martin
Camille M. Moore
Robert Tucker
Pascal Fuchshuber
Thomas Robinson
Publikationsdatum
29.04.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4807-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.