Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery 1/2021

27.11.2020 | Original Article

Quantifying the scientific interest in surgical training and education: numerical evidence of a PubMed analysis

verfasst von: Gaetano La Greca, Elena Schembari, Carlo Bortolussi, Antonio Pesce, Marco Vitale, Saverio Latteri, Elisa Reitano, Domenico Russello

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The scientific interest (SI) for a given field can be ascertained by quantifying the volume of published research. We quantified the SI in surgical education to clarify the extent of worldwide efforts on this crucial factor required to improve health-care systems. A set of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) was defined for the PubMed search. The number of Pubmed Indexed Papers (nPIP) relevant to the SI was extracted from database conception to December 2016 and their distribution and evolution by country were analyzed at 10-year intervals. Population Adjusted Index (PAI) and Medical School Adjusted Index (MSAI) analyses were performed for countries with the nPIP > 30. We identified 51,713 articles written in 33 different languages related to surgical education; 87.6% of these were written in English. General surgery was the leading surgical specialty. The overall nPIP doubled every 10 years from 1987 (from 6009 to 13,501, to 26,272) but stabilized at 3707, 3800 and 3433 in the past 3 years, respectively. The PAI and MSAI analyses showed that the USA, United Kingdom, New Zealand, Canada, Australia and Ireland are top producers of published research in surgical education, constituting a combined 62.88% of the nPIP. Our quantification of the change in SI in surgical education and training gives a clear picture of evolution, efforts and leadership worldwide over time. This picture mirrors an international academic society that should encourage all those involved in surgical education to improve efforts in educational research.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham EA (1936) Report of the Committee to study further problems of postgraduate surgical education in general and the qualifications for specialization in general surgery in particular. Ann Surg 103(6):863–869CrossRef Graham EA (1936) Report of the Committee to study further problems of postgraduate surgical education in general and the qualifications for specialization in general surgery in particular. Ann Surg 103(6):863–869CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkie D (1937) Education in surgery for general practice. Br Med J 2(4000):439–442CrossRef Wilkie D (1937) Education in surgery for general practice. Br Med J 2(4000):439–442CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Blalock A (1950) Problems in the training of the surgeon. Ann Surg 131(5):609–616CrossRef Blalock A (1950) Problems in the training of the surgeon. Ann Surg 131(5):609–616CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Feliciano DV et al (2008) Surgeons and astronauts: so close, yet so far apart. Can J Surg 51(4):247–250PubMedPubMedCentral Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Feliciano DV et al (2008) Surgeons and astronauts: so close, yet so far apart. Can J Surg 51(4):247–250PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook DA, Andriole DA, Durning SJ et al (2010) Longitudinal research databases in medical education: Facilitating the study of educational outcomes over time and across institutions. Acad Med 85:1340–1346CrossRef Cook DA, Andriole DA, Durning SJ et al (2010) Longitudinal research databases in medical education: Facilitating the study of educational outcomes over time and across institutions. Acad Med 85:1340–1346CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneewind JH (1959) The need for an active teaching program in the emergency service. Am J Surg 97(4):400–406CrossRef Schneewind JH (1959) The need for an active teaching program in the emergency service. Am J Surg 97(4):400–406CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Singleton AO (1946) The clinicians’ responsibility in the teaching of surgery. Ann Surg 124:981–990CrossRef Singleton AO (1946) The clinicians’ responsibility in the teaching of surgery. Ann Surg 124:981–990CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Reznick RK (1993) Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg 165(3):358–361CrossRef Reznick RK (1993) Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg 165(3):358–361CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Reznick RK, MacRae H (2006) Teaching surgical skills-changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355:2664–2669CrossRef Reznick RK, MacRae H (2006) Teaching surgical skills-changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355:2664–2669CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Fitts PM, Posner MI (1967) Human performance. Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA Fitts PM, Posner MI (1967) Human performance. Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kopta JA (1971) The development of motor skills in orthopaedic education. Clin Orthop Relat Res 75:80–85CrossRef Kopta JA (1971) The development of motor skills in orthopaedic education. Clin Orthop Relat Res 75:80–85CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Datta V, Mackay SD, Mandalia M et al (2001) The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. J Am Coll Surg 193:479–485CrossRef Datta V, Mackay SD, Mandalia M et al (2001) The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. J Am Coll Surg 193:479–485CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Moorthy K, Munz Y, Adams S et al (2005) A human factors analysis of technical and team skills among surgical trainees during procedural simulations in a simulated operating theatre. Ann Surg 242:631–639CrossRef Moorthy K, Munz Y, Adams S et al (2005) A human factors analysis of technical and team skills among surgical trainees during procedural simulations in a simulated operating theatre. Ann Surg 242:631–639CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Leedom D, Dimon R (1995) Improving team coordination: a case for behavior-based training. Mil Psych 7:109–112CrossRef Leedom D, Dimon R (1995) Improving team coordination: a case for behavior-based training. Mil Psych 7:109–112CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim S, Dunkin BJ, Paige JT et al (2014) What is the future of training in surgery? Needs assessment of national stakeholders. Surgery 156(3):707–717CrossRef Kim S, Dunkin BJ, Paige JT et al (2014) What is the future of training in surgery? Needs assessment of national stakeholders. Surgery 156(3):707–717CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanfey H (2014) Assessment of surgical training. The Surgeon, Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland Sanfey H (2014) Assessment of surgical training. The Surgeon, Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillespie C, Zabar S, Altshuler L et al (2016) The research on medical education outcomes (ROMEO) registry. Acad Med 91:690–695CrossRef Gillespie C, Zabar S, Altshuler L et al (2016) The research on medical education outcomes (ROMEO) registry. Acad Med 91:690–695CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Touchie C (2016) The promise, perils, problems and progress of competency-based medical education. Med Educ 50:93–100CrossRef Touchie C (2016) The promise, perils, problems and progress of competency-based medical education. Med Educ 50:93–100CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank JR, Snell L, Englander R, ICBME collaborators et al (2017) Implementing competency-based medical education: moving forward. Med Teach 39:568–573CrossRef Frank JR, Snell L, Englander R, ICBME collaborators et al (2017) Implementing competency-based medical education: moving forward. Med Teach 39:568–573CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Quantifying the scientific interest in surgical training and education: numerical evidence of a PubMed analysis
verfasst von
Gaetano La Greca
Elena Schembari
Carlo Bortolussi
Antonio Pesce
Marco Vitale
Saverio Latteri
Elisa Reitano
Domenico Russello
Publikationsdatum
27.11.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00922-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Updates in Surgery 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.