Erschienen in:
12.06.2017 | Original Scientific Report
Quantitative Assessment of Pancreatic Texture Using a Durometer: A New Tool to Predict the Risk of Developing a Postoperative Fistula
verfasst von:
Giovanni Marchegiani, Roberto Ballarin, Giuseppe Malleo, Stefano Andrianello, Valentina Allegrini, Alessandra Pulvirenti, Marina Paini, Erica Secchettin, Fabrizio Boriero, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Claudio Bassi, Roberto Salvia
Erschienen in:
World Journal of Surgery
|
Ausgabe 11/2017
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
Pancreatic texture is one of the key predictors of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Currently, the “gold standard” for assessment of pancreatic texture is surgeon’s subjective evaluation through manual palpation.
Aim
To evaluate a new “durometer” that is able to assess quantitatively the pancreatic stiffness by measuring its elastic module (i.e., the resistance offered by the pancreatic stump when elastically deformed expressed in mPa).
Methods
Measurements were obtained from the pancreatic remnant during 138 consecutive PDs performed at the Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery—The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust. Values were correlated to clinical features and, in particular, with the senior surgeon’s evaluation of pancreatic texture (hard/soft). Sixteen beating-heart donors were used as a control group to assess the stiffness of a non-pathologic pancreas. Univariate analysis was performed for the assessment of POPF predictors.
Results
Durometry allowed segregating between non-pathologic, soft and hard pancreas according to surgeon’s evaluation (mean values 111 vs. 196 vs. 366 mPa, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in stiffness with regard to histology, BMI, and neoadjuvant therapy. Larger tumors (>20 mm) and male sex were associated with greater stiffness on univariate analysis. Pancreatic texture, pancreatic duct size, BMI, prior neoadjuvant therapy, and histology were predictors of POPF. Patients who developed POPF showed a lesser stiffness (178 vs. 261 mPa, p = 0.05).
Conclusion
Assessment of pancreatic stiffness using a durometer correlated with the surgeon’s evaluation of pancreatic texture. Measurement of pancreatic parenchymal stiffness is reliable and correlates with the development of POPF.