Skip to main content

01.12.2011 | Case report | Ausgabe 1/2011 Open Access

Journal of Medical Case Reports 1/2011

Quinupristin/dalfopristin in Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis: a case report

Journal of Medical Case Reports > Ausgabe 1/2011
Sergio E Hernandez-Da Mota
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1752-1947-5-130) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

The author was in charge of the patient's treatment and follow-up, as well as the echography study. He was also responsible for the manuscript drafting and revision.


Postoperative endophthalmitis has been a major and dreaded complication in all types of eye surgery. Several measures have been used for its prevention, such as aseptic techniques and topical prophylactic antibiotics. Although these measures have resulted in very low endophthalmitis incidence [ 1], they have not been able to eliminate it completely.
Once infection is identified, the mainstay of therapy has been the intravitreal injection of antibiotics [ 2]. The concomitant use of pars plana vitrectomy and steroids has also been recommended [ 3] in some cases.
The most common bacterial etiology of the disease involves Gram-positive bacteria, especially Staphylococci. Vancomycin, a glucopeptide antibiotic, has shown adequate activity against this type of bacteria [ 4].
Nonetheless, as with all kinds of antibiotics, resistance that could preclude a favorable outcome in these patients may emerge [ 5].
Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Q/D), a recently developed streptogramin antibiotic, has shown better activity against vancomycin-resistant strains of staphylococci [ 6].
The purpose of this report is to describe a case in which intravitreal quinupristin/dalfopristin injection in endophthalmitis due to Staphylococcus sp. resulted in remission of the infection.

Case presentation

A 55-year-old Hispanic man, in whom non-complicated phacoemulsification surgery had been performed in the right eye, exhibited a sudden decrease in visual acuity, intense pain, and marked red eye two days later.
The visual acuity was hand movement, with an intense ciliary reaction, hypopion, and moderate corneal edema (Figure 1). A diagnosis of endophthalmitis was then made.
B-scan echography showed increased intravitreal echoes due to the severe inflammatory reaction. A pars plana vitrectomy was performed, and a vitreous biopsy specimen was obtained. A combination of quinupristin/dalfopristin (0.4 mg/0.1 ml; Synercid; DSM Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Greenville, NC), ceftazidime (2.25 mg/0.1 ml) (Fortum; GlaxoSmithKline, Mexico DF, Mexico), and dexamethasone (0.4 mg/0.1 ml) (Alin, Chinoin, Mexico DF, Mexico) was injected intravitreally.
A coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aureus strain that was vancomycin resistant was identified through culture analysis.
Four days after intravitreal injection, total remission of pain and hypopion was observed (Figure 2). Vitreous opacities had cleared at the two-month follow-up. The final best-corrected visual acuity was 20/40.


Infectious endophthalmitis treatment has evolved with time. The condition was a common complication in the pre-Listerian era and the cause of many disastrous outcomes in intraocular surgery.
Now, although uncommon, endophthalmitis remains one of the most feared complications of intraocular surgery [ 1]. The gold standard of treatment has been the intravitreal administration [ 2] of antibiotics over topical, subconjunctival, or systemic routes.
Several modifications have been made to the combination of antibiotics given intravitreally before the causative agent is known. These modifications are mainly based on retinal toxicity and bacterial susceptibility to different antibiotics. The combination of antibiotics that is currently preferred empirically includes vancomycin and ceftazidime.
Vancomycin is a glucopeptide antibiotic that is active against Gram-positive bacteria [ 4]. Ceftazidime, a third-generation cephalosporine, is active against Gram-negative bacteria, especially enterobacteria.
Although vancomycin has not been overused and is reserved as a third-line antibiotic against serious infections (for example, sepsis), certain staphylococci strains have developed resistance [ 5]. This could be a potential source of therapeutic failure in some cases of endophthalmitis.
Q/D is a combination of two streptogramins: quinupristin (a B streptogramin) and dalfopristin (an A streptogramin) at a 30:70 ratio, respectively. The combination acts as a rapid bactericide, except for its action against Enterococcus faecium, which is less. The combination has a prolonged antibiotic effect (up to 10 hours) for Staphylococcus aureus compared with other antibiotics. Its spectrum of coverage includes Gram-positive cocci, including strains that are resistant to other antibiotics. Methicillin-sensitive and resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus are also covered by Q/D.
The minimal inhibitory concentrations are 1 mg/ml or less. To the best of our knowledge, no reports of ocular toxicity exist [ 6]. Given this excellent anti-staphylococcal profile, the absence of ocular toxicity reports, the prolonged antibacterial effects, and the fact that no vancomycin was available at the time, we decided to treat the patient with the antibiotic combination described. Q/D, conversely, is a more recent antibiotic, which, theoretically, is less likely to induce the development of resistant strains than is vancomycin. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravitreal Q/D have not yet been studied.
Our patient exhibited an adequate response to the use of intravitreal Q/D that was documented four days after injection. This response is similar to that shown to vancomycin. Notably, the use of the combination carries with it the potential advantage that we could be fighting strains that are resistant to vancomycin. Moreover, a synergistic effect of the vancomycin-quinupristin/dalfopristin combination has been documented against some Gram-positive bacteria [ 7]. We believe that the favorable outcome in our patient was achieved, in order of decreasing importance, by the following factors: 1) Q/D; 2) vitrectomy, which removed infected vitreous strands; and 3) dexamethasone, which limited the severity of inflammation. Ceftazidime affects mainly Gram-negative bacteria, so it probably did not play an important role in controlling the infection process.
Another issue that should be addressed is the fact that Q/D is an expensive medication, and its cost may outweigh its benefit. Moreover, the intravitreal route of this antibiotic is off-label for infectious endophthalmitis.


In conclusion, Q/D showed a positive outcome in this case of infectious postoperative endophthalmitis caused by Gram-positive bacteria. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the use of intravitreal quinupristin/dalfopristin in infectious Staphylococcus endophthalmitis. This report does not recommend Q/D as a first-line choice for conventional treatment of infectious endophthalmitis. Rather, we describe a positive outcome in one case.

Patient's perspective

I write the following to provide assistance to the case report written about my operation. I have no medical knowledge or background, so I only write from my own perspective and experience. I arrived at the hospital with severe eye pain and completely blurred vision in my right eye a few days after my cataract surgery. I then was told that a very bad infection had taken over my eye. I was told that one of the specific antibiotics for this type of infection was not available, but that a non-approved one could be of benefit, so I agreed to be treated with the non-approved antibiotic via eye injection, in combination with other drugs as well as a vitrectomy surgery, which was performed subsequently. A few hours later, the pain slowly decreased until I did not feel it any more. My sight was still blurred for about a month and a half, but it slowly came back. I still see some little dots, but my vision seems okay now.


Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the treatment and the publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.


The author acknowledges the support of the staff of Clinica David.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

The author was in charge of the patient's treatment and follow-up, as well as the echography study. He was also responsible for the manuscript drafting and revision.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär


Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag als Mediziner

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf

e.Med Allgemeinmedizin


Mit e.Med Allgemeinmedizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Premium-Inhalten der allgemeinmedizinischen Zeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Allgemeinmedizin-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Journal of Medical Case Reports 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe