Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2019

04.01.2019 | Original Scientific Report

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in the Surgical Management and Outcomes of Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma

verfasst von: Ashley L. Cairns, Francisco Schlottmann, Paula D. Strassle, Marco Di Corpo, Marco G. Patti

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the USA. We aimed to determine racial and socioeconomic disparities in the surgical management and outcomes of patients with CRC in a contemporary, national cohort.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample for the period 2009–2015. Adult patients diagnosed with CRC and who underwent colorectal resection were included. Multivariable linear and logistic regressions were used to assess the effect of race, insurance type, and household income on patient outcomes.

Results

A total of 100,515 patients were included: 72,552 (72%) had elective admissions and 27,963 (28%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Patients with private insurance and higher household income were consistently more likely to have laparoscopic procedures, compared to other insurance types and income levels, p < 0.0001. Black patients, compared to white patients, were more likely to have postoperative complications (OR 1.23, 95% CI, 1.17, 1.29). Patients with Medicare and Medicaid, compared to private insurance, were also more likely to have postoperative complications (OR 1.30, 95% CI, 1.24, 1.37 and OR 1.40, 95% CI, 1.31, 1.50). Patients in low-household-income areas had higher rates of any complication (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06, 1.16).

Conclusions

The use of laparoscopic surgery in patients with CRC is strongly influenced by insurance type and household income, with Medicare, Medicaid and low-income patients being less likely to undergo laparoscopic surgery. In addition, black patients, patients with public insurance, and patients with low household income have significant worse surgical outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA et al (2017) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 67(3):177–193CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA et al (2017) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 67(3):177–193CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen CF, Lin YC, Tsai HL, et al (2018) Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery, mini-laparotomy and conventional laparotomy in patients with Stage I–III colorectal cancer. J Minim Access Surg, epub ahead of print Chen CF, Lin YC, Tsai HL, et al (2018) Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery, mini-laparotomy and conventional laparotomy in patients with Stage I–III colorectal cancer. J Minim Access Surg, epub ahead of print
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Shavers VL (2007) Racial/ethnic variation in the anatomic subsite location of in situ and invasive cancers of the colon. J Natl Med Assoc 99:733–748PubMedPubMedCentral Shavers VL (2007) Racial/ethnic variation in the anatomic subsite location of in situ and invasive cancers of the colon. J Natl Med Assoc 99:733–748PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dignam JJ, Colangelo L, Tian W et al (1999) Outcomes among African–Americans and Caucasians in colon cancer adjuvant therapy trials: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1933–1940CrossRefPubMed Dignam JJ, Colangelo L, Tian W et al (1999) Outcomes among African–Americans and Caucasians in colon cancer adjuvant therapy trials: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1933–1940CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Doubeni CA, Field TS, Buist DS et al (2007) Racial differences in tumor stage and survival for colorectal cancer in an insured population. Cancer 109:612–620CrossRefPubMed Doubeni CA, Field TS, Buist DS et al (2007) Racial differences in tumor stage and survival for colorectal cancer in an insured population. Cancer 109:612–620CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Aarts MJ, Lemmens VE, Louwman MW et al (2010) Socioeconomic status and changing inequalities in colorectal cancer? A review of the associations with risk, treatment and outcome. Eur J Cancer 46:2681–2695CrossRefPubMed Aarts MJ, Lemmens VE, Louwman MW et al (2010) Socioeconomic status and changing inequalities in colorectal cancer? A review of the associations with risk, treatment and outcome. Eur J Cancer 46:2681–2695CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Q, Wang Y, Hu H et al (2017) Impact of socioeconomic status on survival of colorectal cancer patients. Oncotarget 8:106121–106131PubMedPubMedCentral Zhang Q, Wang Y, Hu H et al (2017) Impact of socioeconomic status on survival of colorectal cancer patients. Oncotarget 8:106121–106131PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Siegel R, Ma J et al (2015) Inequalities in premature death from colorectal cancer by state. J Clin Oncol 33:829–835CrossRefPubMed Jemal A, Siegel R, Ma J et al (2015) Inequalities in premature death from colorectal cancer by state. J Clin Oncol 33:829–835CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlottmann F, Strassle PD, Charles AG et al (2018) Esophageal cancer surgery: spontaneous centralization in the US contributed to reduce mortality without causing health disparities. Ann Surg Oncol 25(6):1580–1587CrossRefPubMed Schlottmann F, Strassle PD, Charles AG et al (2018) Esophageal cancer surgery: spontaneous centralization in the US contributed to reduce mortality without causing health disparities. Ann Surg Oncol 25(6):1580–1587CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlottmann F, Gaber C, Strassle PD, et al (2018) Cholecystectomy vs. cholecystostomy for the management of acute cholecystitis in elderly patients. J Gastrointest Surg, epub ahead of print Schlottmann F, Gaber C, Strassle PD, et al (2018) Cholecystectomy vs. cholecystostomy for the management of acute cholecystitis in elderly patients. J Gastrointest Surg, epub ahead of print
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S et al (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 287(3):321–328CrossRefPubMed Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S et al (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 287(3):321–328CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaiser AM, Kang JC, Chan LS et al (2004) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 14(6):329–334CrossRef Kaiser AM, Kang JC, Chan LS et al (2004) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 14(6):329–334CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA et al (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187(1):46–54CrossRefPubMed Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA et al (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187(1):46–54CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bagshaw PF, Allardyce RA, Frampton CM et al (2012) Long-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study trial. Ann Surg 256(6):915–919CrossRefPubMed Bagshaw PF, Allardyce RA, Frampton CM et al (2012) Long-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study trial. Ann Surg 256(6):915–919CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Soneji S, Iyer SS, Armstrong K, Asch DA (2010) Racial disparities in stage-specific colorectal cancer mortality: 1960–2005. Am J Public Health 100:1912–1916CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Soneji S, Iyer SS, Armstrong K, Asch DA (2010) Racial disparities in stage-specific colorectal cancer mortality: 1960–2005. Am J Public Health 100:1912–1916CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2013) Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 63:11–30CrossRef Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2013) Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 63:11–30CrossRef
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolen JC, Rhodes L, Powell-Griner EE et al (2000) State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity—behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 1997. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 49:1–60PubMed Bolen JC, Rhodes L, Powell-Griner EE et al (2000) State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity—behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 1997. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 49:1–60PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Advani AS, Atkeson B, Brown CL et al (2003) Barriers to the participation of African–American patients with cancer in clinical trials: a pilot study. Cancer 97:1499–1506CrossRefPubMed Advani AS, Atkeson B, Brown CL et al (2003) Barriers to the participation of African–American patients with cancer in clinical trials: a pilot study. Cancer 97:1499–1506CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gregg J, Curry RH (1994) Explanatory models for cancer among African–American women at two Atlanta neighborhood health centers: the implications for a cancer screening program. Soc Sci Med 39:519–526CrossRefPubMed Gregg J, Curry RH (1994) Explanatory models for cancer among African–American women at two Atlanta neighborhood health centers: the implications for a cancer screening program. Soc Sci Med 39:519–526CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ravi P, Sood A, Schmid M et al (2015) Racial/ethnic disparities in perioperative outcomes in major procedures: results from national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg 262(6):955–964CrossRefPubMed Ravi P, Sood A, Schmid M et al (2015) Racial/ethnic disparities in perioperative outcomes in major procedures: results from national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg 262(6):955–964CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Alnasser M, Schneider EB, Gearhart SL et al (2014) National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 28(1):49–57CrossRefPubMed Alnasser M, Schneider EB, Gearhart SL et al (2014) National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 28(1):49–57CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehtsun WT, Figueroa JF, Zhang J et al (2017) Racial disparities in surgical mortality: the gap appears to have narrowed. Health Affairs 36(6):64CrossRef Mehtsun WT, Figueroa JF, Zhang J et al (2017) Racial disparities in surgical mortality: the gap appears to have narrowed. Health Affairs 36(6):64CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Robbins AS, Chen AY, Stewart AK et al (2010) Insurance status and survival disparities among nonelderly rectal cancer patients in the national cancer data base. Cancer 116:4178–4186CrossRefPubMed Robbins AS, Chen AY, Stewart AK et al (2010) Insurance status and survival disparities among nonelderly rectal cancer patients in the national cancer data base. Cancer 116:4178–4186CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Robbins AS, Pavluck AL, Fedewa SA et al (2009) Insurance status, comorbidity level, and survival among colorectal cancer patients age 18 to 64 years in the national cancer data base from 2003 to 2005. J Clin Oncol 27:3627–3633CrossRefPubMed Robbins AS, Pavluck AL, Fedewa SA et al (2009) Insurance status, comorbidity level, and survival among colorectal cancer patients age 18 to 64 years in the national cancer data base from 2003 to 2005. J Clin Oncol 27:3627–3633CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in the Surgical Management and Outcomes of Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma
verfasst von
Ashley L. Cairns
Francisco Schlottmann
Paula D. Strassle
Marco Di Corpo
Marco G. Patti
Publikationsdatum
04.01.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-04898-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

World Journal of Surgery 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.