nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.03.2012 | Cardiac

Radiation dose considerations by intra-individual Monte Carlo simulations in dual source spiral coronary computed tomography angiography with electrocardiogram-triggered tube current modulation and adaptive pitch

verfasst von: Matthias S. May, Paul Deak, Axel Kuettner, Michael M. Lell, Wolfgang Wuest, Michael Scharf, Andrea K. Keller, Lothar Häberle, Stephan Achenbach, Martin Seltmann, Michael Uder, Willi A. Kalender

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate radiation dose levels in patients undergoing spiral coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) on a dual-source system in clinical routine.

Methods

Coronary CTA was performed for 56 patients with electrocardiogram-triggered tube current modulation (TCM) and heart-rate (HR) dependent pitch adaptation. Individual Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were performed for dose assessment. Retrospective simulations with constant tube current (CTC) served as reference. Lung tissue was segmented and used for organ and effective dose (ED) calculation.

Results

Estimates for mean relative ED was 7.1 ± 2.1 mSv/100 mAs for TCM and 12.5 ± 5.3 mSv/100 mAs for CTC (P < 0.001). Relative dose reduction at low HR (≤60 bpm) was highest (49 ± 5%) compared to intermediate (60–70 bpm, 33 ± 12%) and high HR (>70 bpm, 29 ± 12%). However lowest ED is achieved at high HR (5.2 ± 1.5 mSv/100 mAs), compared with intermediate (6.7 ± 1.6 mSv/100 mAs) and low (8.3 ± 2.1 mSv/100 mAs) HR when automated pitch adaptation is applied.

Conclusions

Radiation dose savings up to 52% are achievable by TCM at low and regular HR. However lowest ED is attained at high HR by pitch adaptation despite inferior radiation dose reduction by TCM.

Key Points

• Monte Carlo simulations allow for individual radiation dose calculations.

• ECG-triggered tube current modulation (TCM) can effectively reduce radiation dose.

• Slow and regular heart rates allow for highest dose reductions by TCM.

• Adaptive pitch accounts for lowest radiation dose at high heart rates.

• Women receive higher effective dose than men undergoing spiral coronary CT-angiography.

Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256–268PubMedCrossRef

Kerl JM, Schoepf UJ, Zwerner PL et al (2011) Accuracy of coronary artery stenosis detection with CT versus conventional coronary angiography compared with composite findings from both tests as an enhanced reference standard. Eur Radiol 21:1895–1903PubMedCrossRef

Muenzel D, Noel PB, Dorn F, Dobritz M, Rummeny EJ, Huber A (2011) Step and shoot coronary CT angiography using 256-slice CT: effect of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2185-4

Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol 21:2130–2138PubMedCrossRef

Achenbach S (2006) Computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1919–1928PubMedCrossRef

Lehmkuhl L, Gosch D, Nagel HD, Stumpp P, Kahn T, Gutberlet M (2010) Quantification of radiation dose savings in cardiac computed tomography using prospectively triggered mode and ECG pulsing: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 20:2116–2125PubMedCrossRef

Dikkers R, Greuter MJ, Kristanto W et al (2008) Assessment of image quality of 64-row Dual Source versus Single Source CT coronary angiography on heart rate: a phantom study. Eur J Radiol 70:61–68PubMedCrossRef

Tsiflikas I, Brodoefel H, Reimann AJ et al (2010) Coronary CT angiography with dual source computed tomography in 170 patients. Eur J Radiol 74:161–165PubMedCrossRef

Achenbach S, Anders K, Kalender WA (2008) Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: image quality and dose considerations. Eur Radiol 18:1188–1198PubMedCrossRef

10.

Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T et al (2009) Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:940–946PubMedCrossRef

11.

Paul JF, Abada HT (2007) Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT. Eur Radiol 17:2028–2037PubMedCrossRef

12.

McCollough CH, Primak AN, Saba O et al (2007) Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. Radiology 243:775–784PubMedCrossRef

13.

Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B et al (2002) Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12:1081–1086PubMedCrossRef

14.

Ketelsen D, Thomas C, Werner M et al (2010) Dual-source computed tomography: estimation of radiation exposure of ECG-gated and ECG-triggered coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol 73:274–279PubMedCrossRef

15.

Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T et al (2008) Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18:592–599PubMedCrossRef

16.

Kirchhoff S, Herzog P, Johnson T et al (2010) Assessment of radiation exposure on a dual-source computed tomography-scanner performing coronary computed tomography-angiography. Eur J Radiol 74:e181–e185PubMedCrossRef

17.

Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P, Rowles N, Morgan-Hughes G, Roobottom C (2010) Cardiac CT: are we underestimating the dose? A radiation dose study utilizing the 2007 ICRP tissue weighting factors and a cardiac specific scan volume. Clin Radiol 65:1013–1017PubMedCrossRef

18.

Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Pugliese F et al (2008) Optimal electrocardiographic pulsing windows and heart rate: effect on image quality and radiation exposure at dual-source coronary CT angiography. Radiology 248:792–798PubMedCrossRef

19.

Deak P, van Straten M, Shrimpton PC, Zankl M, Kalender WA (2008) Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 18:759–772PubMedCrossRef

20.

Protection ICoR (1990) ICRP Publication 60: 1990 Recommendations of the ICRP. Annals of the ICRP Volume 21/1–3. International Commission on Radiological Protection

21.

Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC et al (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage 31:1116–1128PubMedCrossRef

22.

Kalender WA, Schmidt B, Zankl M, Schmidt M (1999) A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography. Eur Radiol 9:555–562PubMedCrossRef

23.

Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305–1310PubMedCrossRef

24.

Ketelsen D, Fenchel M, Buchgeister M et al (2011) Estimation of radiation exposure of different dose saving techniques in 128-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.052

25.

Rastenyte D, Tuomilehto J, Moltchanov V, Lindstrom J, Pietinen P, Nissinen A (1997) Association between salt intake, heart rate and blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens 11:57–62PubMedCrossRef

26.

Leschka S, Stinn B, Schmid F et al (2009) Dual source CT coronary angiography in severely obese patients: trading off temporal resolution and image noise. Invest Radiol 44:720–727PubMedCrossRef

27.

Burgstahler C, Reimann A, Brodoefel H et al (2009) Quantitative parameters to compare image quality of non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-slice, 64-slice and dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol 19:584–590PubMedCrossRef

28.

Techasith T, Ghoshhajra BB, Truong QA et al (2011) The effect of heart rhythm on patient radiation dose with dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:255–263PubMed

29.

Rixe J, Rolf A, Conradi G et al (2008) Image quality on dual-source computed-tomographic coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18:1857–1862PubMedCrossRef

30.

Kerl JM, Bauer RW, Maurer TB et al (2011) Dose levels at coronary CT angiography—a comparison of Dual Energy-, Dual Source- and 16-slice CT. Eur Radiol 21:530–537PubMedCrossRef

31.

Duarte R, Bettencourt N, Costa JC, Fernandez G (2010) Coronary computed tomography angiography in a single cardiac cycle with a mean radiation dose of approximately 1 mSv: initial experience. Rev Port Cardiol 29:1667–1676PubMed

32.

Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol 19:2576–2583PubMedCrossRef

33.

Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T et al (2010) Comparison of sequential and helical scanning for radiation dose and image quality: results of the Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiation Dose Estimates of Cardiac CT Angiography (PROTECTION) I Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1495–1499PubMedCrossRef

34.

Bastarrika G, Broncano J, Arraiza M et al (2011) Systolic prospectively ECG-triggered dual-source CT angiography for evaluation of the coronary arteries in heart transplant recipients. Eur Radiol 21:1887–1894PubMedCrossRef

35.

Sun ML, Lu B, Wu RZ et al (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering on different heart rate patients. Eur Radiol 21:1635–1642PubMedCrossRef

36.

Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H et al (2008) Radiation dose of cardiac dual-source CT: the effect of tailoring the protocol to patient-specific parameters. Eur J Radiol 68:385–391PubMedCrossRef

37.

Mahabadi AA, Achenbach S, Burgstahler C et al (2010) Safety, efficacy, and indications of beta-adrenergic receptor blockade to reduce heart rate prior to coronary CT angiography. Radiology 257:614–623PubMedCrossRef

38.

Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, Kiguchi M et al (2009) Prospective ECG-triggered axial CT at 140-kV tube voltage improves coronary in-stent restenosis visibility at a lower radiation dose compared with conventional retrospective ECG-gated helical CT. Eur Radiol 19:2363–2372PubMedCrossRef

39.

Hausleiter J, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M et al (2010) Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3:1113–1123PubMedCrossRef

40.

Matt D, Scheffel H, Leschka S et al (2007) Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:567–573PubMedCrossRef

41.

Dewey M, Vavere AL, Arbab-Zadeh A et al (2010) Patient characteristics as predictors of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT compared with conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery stenoses: CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:93–102PubMedCrossRef

42.

Protection ICoR (2007) P103: the 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP. ICRP, pp 37(32–34): p 31–332

Titel: Radiation dose considerations by intra-individual Monte Carlo simulations in dual source spiral coronary computed tomography angiography with electrocardiogram-triggered tube current modulation and adaptive pitch
verfasst von: Matthias S. May
Paul Deak
Axel Kuettner
Michael M. Lell
Wolfgang Wuest
Michael Scharf
Andrea K. Keller
Lothar Häberle
Stephan Achenbach
Martin Seltmann
Michael Uder
Willi A. Kalender
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2012
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: European Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2300-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Radiation dose considerations by intra-individual Monte Carlo simulations in dual source spiral coronary computed tomography angiography with electrocardiogram-triggered tube current modulation and adaptive pitch

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Key Points

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Key Points

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2012

What is the optimal b value in diffusion-weighted MR imaging to depict prostate cancer at 3T?

Performing MR-guided biopsies in clinical routine: factors that influence accuracy and procedure time

Diagnostic performance of 64-section CT using CT gastrography in preoperative T staging of gastric cancer according to 7th edition of AJCC cancer staging manual

In vivo imaging of human breast cancer mouse model with high level expression of calcium sensing receptor at 3T

Radiological diagnosis of incomplete partition type I versus type II: significance for cochlear implantation

Diagnostic performance of state-of-the-art imaging techniques for morphological assessment of vascular abnormalities in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie