Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2017

29.09.2016 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Radiological findings and radiation exposure during trauma workup in a cohort of 1124 level 1 trauma patients

verfasst von: G. F. Giannakopoulos, T. P. Saltzherr, L. F. M. Beenen, G. J. Streekstra, J. B. Reitsma, F. W. Bloemers, J. C. Goslings, F. C. Bakker, on behalf of the REACT study group

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

During the initial assessment of patients with potential severe injuries, radiological examinations are performed in order to rapidly diagnose clinically relevant injuries. Previous studies have shown that performing these examinations routinely is not always necessary and that trauma patients are exposed to substantial radiation doses. The aim of this study was to assess the amount and findings of radiological examinations during the initial assessment of trauma patients and to determine the radiation doses to which these patients are exposed to.

Methods

We analyzed the 1124 patients included in a randomized trial. All radiological examinations during the initial assessment (i.e., primary and secondary survey) were assessed. The examination results were categorized as positive findings (i.e., (suspicion for) traumatic injury) and normal findings. The effective radiation doses for the examinations were calculated separately for each patient.

Results

Eight hundred and three patients were male (71 %), median age was 38 years, and 1079 patients sustained blunt trauma (96 %). During initial assessment, almost 3900 X-rays were performed, of which 25.4 % showed positive findings. FAST of the abdomen was performed in 989 patients (88 %), with positive findings in 10.6 %. Additional CT scanning of specific body regions was performed 1890 times in 813 patients (72.1 %), of which approximately 43.4 % revealed positive findings. Hemodynamically stable patients showed more normal findings on the radiographic studies than unstable patients. The mean radiation doses for the total population was 8.46 mSv (±7.7) and for polytraumatized patients (ISS ≥ 16) 14.3 mSv (±9.5).

Conclusion

Radiological diagnostics during initial assessment of trauma patients show a high rate of normal findings in our trauma system. The radiation doses to which trauma patients are exposed are considerable. Considering that the majority of the injured patients are hemodynamically stable, we suggest more selective use of X-ray and CT scanning.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoff WS, Tinkoff GH, Lucke JF et al (1992) Impact of minimal injuries on a level I trauma centre. J Trauma 33:408–412CrossRefPubMed Hoff WS, Tinkoff GH, Lucke JF et al (1992) Impact of minimal injuries on a level I trauma centre. J Trauma 33:408–412CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook CH, Muscarella P, Praba AC et al (2001) Reducing overtriage without compromising outcomes in trauma patients. Arch Surg 136:752–756CrossRefPubMed Cook CH, Muscarella P, Praba AC et al (2001) Reducing overtriage without compromising outcomes in trauma patients. Arch Surg 136:752–756CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tien HC, Tremblay LN, Rizoli SB et al (2007) Radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging in severely injured trauma patients. J Trauma 62:151–156CrossRefPubMed Tien HC, Tremblay LN, Rizoli SB et al (2007) Radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging in severely injured trauma patients. J Trauma 62:151–156CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ott M, McAlister J, VanderKolk WE et al (2006) Radiation exposure in trauma patients. J Trauma 61:607–609CrossRefPubMed Ott M, McAlister J, VanderKolk WE et al (2006) Radiation exposure in trauma patients. J Trauma 61:607–609CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Korley FK, Pham JC, Kirsch TD (2010) Use of advanced radiology during visits to US emergency departments for injury-related conditions, 1998–2007. JAMA 304:1465–1471CrossRefPubMed Korley FK, Pham JC, Kirsch TD (2010) Use of advanced radiology during visits to US emergency departments for injury-related conditions, 1998–2007. JAMA 304:1465–1471CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hui CM, MacGregor JH, Tien HC et al (2009) Radiation dose from initial trauma assessment and resuscitation: review of the literature. Can J Surg 52:147–152PubMedPubMedCentral Hui CM, MacGregor JH, Tien HC et al (2009) Radiation dose from initial trauma assessment and resuscitation: review of the literature. Can J Surg 52:147–152PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Inaba K, Branco BC, Lim G et al (2011) The increasing burden of radiation exposure in the management of trauma patients. J Trauma 70:1366–1370CrossRefPubMed Inaba K, Branco BC, Lim G et al (2011) The increasing burden of radiation exposure in the management of trauma patients. J Trauma 70:1366–1370CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tasse JL, Janzen ML, Ahmed NA et al (2008) Screening laboratory and radiology panels for trauma patients have low utility and are not cost effective. J Trauma 65:1114–1116CrossRefPubMed Tasse JL, Janzen ML, Ahmed NA et al (2008) Screening laboratory and radiology panels for trauma patients have low utility and are not cost effective. J Trauma 65:1114–1116CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Saltzherr TP, Bakker FC, Beenen LF et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of computed tomography in the trauma room versus the radiology department on injury outcomes. Br J Surg 99(Suppl 1):105–113CrossRefPubMed Saltzherr TP, Bakker FC, Beenen LF et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of computed tomography in the trauma room versus the radiology department on injury outcomes. Br J Surg 99(Suppl 1):105–113CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rady MY, Smithline HA, Blake H, Nowak R, Rivers E (1994) A comparison of the shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 24:685–690CrossRefPubMed Rady MY, Smithline HA, Blake H, Nowak R, Rivers E (1994) A comparison of the shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 24:685–690CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT et al (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263CrossRefPubMed Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT et al (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Giannakopoulos GF, Unal Y, Bloemers FW et al (2009) Overtriage, a problem in handling the triage guideline in the trauma region North-West Netherlands. Dutch J Traumatol 17:3–7 Giannakopoulos GF, Unal Y, Bloemers FW et al (2009) Overtriage, a problem in handling the triage guideline in the trauma region North-West Netherlands. Dutch J Traumatol 17:3–7
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Plurad D, Green D, Demetriades D et al (2007) The increasing use of chest computed tomography for trauma: is it being overutilized? J Trauma 62:631–635CrossRefPubMed Plurad D, Green D, Demetriades D et al (2007) The increasing use of chest computed tomography for trauma: is it being overutilized? J Trauma 62:631–635CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Salottolo K, Bar-Or R, Fleishman M et al (2009) Current utilization and radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with trauma. Crit Care Med 37:1336–1340CrossRefPubMed Salottolo K, Bar-Or R, Fleishman M et al (2009) Current utilization and radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with trauma. Crit Care Med 37:1336–1340CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (1994) Initial assessment and management. In: Advanced trauma life support reference manual. American College of Surgeons, Chicago 17–37 American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (1994) Initial assessment and management. In: Advanced trauma life support reference manual. American College of Surgeons, Chicago 17–37
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerland S, Bouillon B, Rixen D et al (2004) The reliability of clinical examination in detecting pelvic fractures in blunt trauma patients: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:123–128CrossRefPubMed Sauerland S, Bouillon B, Rixen D et al (2004) The reliability of clinical examination in detecting pelvic fractures in blunt trauma patients: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:123–128CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Salvino CK, Esposito TJ, Smith D et al (1992) Routine pelvic X-ray studies in awake blunt trauma patients: a sensible policy? J Trauma 33:413–416CrossRefPubMed Salvino CK, Esposito TJ, Smith D et al (1992) Routine pelvic X-ray studies in awake blunt trauma patients: a sensible policy? J Trauma 33:413–416CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez RP, Fried PQ, Bukhalo M (2002) The utility of clinical examination in screening for pelvic fractures in blunt trauma. J Am Coll Surg 194:121–125CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez RP, Fried PQ, Bukhalo M (2002) The utility of clinical examination in screening for pelvic fractures in blunt trauma. J Am Coll Surg 194:121–125CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wisbach GG, Sise MJ, Sack DI et al (2007) What is the role of chest X-ray in the initial assessment of stable trauma patients? J Trauma 62:74–78CrossRefPubMed Wisbach GG, Sise MJ, Sack DI et al (2007) What is the role of chest X-ray in the initial assessment of stable trauma patients? J Trauma 62:74–78CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005. Emerg Radiol 13:25–30CrossRefPubMed Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005. Emerg Radiol 13:25–30CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB et al (2000) Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 343:94–99CrossRefPubMed Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB et al (2000) Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 343:94–99CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL et al (2001) The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 286:1841–1848CrossRefPubMed Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL et al (2001) The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 286:1841–1848CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Saltzherr TP, Beenen LF, Reitsma JB et al (2010) Frequent computed tomography scanning due to incomplete three-view X-ray imaging of the cervical spine. J Trauma 68:1213–1217CrossRefPubMed Saltzherr TP, Beenen LF, Reitsma JB et al (2010) Frequent computed tomography scanning due to incomplete three-view X-ray imaging of the cervical spine. J Trauma 68:1213–1217CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Natarajan B, Gupta PK, Cemaj S et al (2010) FAST scan: is it worth doing in hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients? Surgery 148:695–700CrossRefPubMed Natarajan B, Gupta PK, Cemaj S et al (2010) FAST scan: is it worth doing in hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients? Surgery 148:695–700CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim PK, Gracias VH, Maidment AD et al (2004) Cumulative radiation dose caused by radiologic studies in critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma 57:510–514CrossRefPubMed Kim PK, Gracias VH, Maidment AD et al (2004) Cumulative radiation dose caused by radiologic studies in critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma 57:510–514CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sierink JC, Saltzherr TP, Beenen LF, Russchen MJ, Luitse JS, Dijkgraaf MG, Goslings JC (2014) A case-matched series of immediate total-body CT scanning versus the standard radiological work-up in trauma patients. World J Surg 38:795–802CrossRefPubMed Sierink JC, Saltzherr TP, Beenen LF, Russchen MJ, Luitse JS, Dijkgraaf MG, Goslings JC (2014) A case-matched series of immediate total-body CT scanning versus the standard radiological work-up in trauma patients. World J Surg 38:795–802CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Huber-Wagner S, Biberthaler P, Häberle S, Wierer M, Dobritz M, Rummeny E, van Griensven M, Kanz KG, Lefering R, TraumaRegister DGU (2013) Whole-body CT in haemodynamically unstable severely injured patients—a retrospective, multicentre study. PLoS One 8(7):e68880CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huber-Wagner S, Biberthaler P, Häberle S, Wierer M, Dobritz M, Rummeny E, van Griensven M, Kanz KG, Lefering R, TraumaRegister DGU (2013) Whole-body CT in haemodynamically unstable severely injured patients—a retrospective, multicentre study. PLoS One 8(7):e68880CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Brink M, Deunk J, Dekker HM et al (2010) Criteria for the selective use of chest computed tomography in blunt trauma patients. Eur Radiol 20:818–828CrossRefPubMed Brink M, Deunk J, Dekker HM et al (2010) Criteria for the selective use of chest computed tomography in blunt trauma patients. Eur Radiol 20:818–828CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Huber-Wagner S, Stegmaier J, Mathonia P, Paffrath T, Euler E, Mutschler W, Kanz KG, Lefering R, Working Group on Polytrauma (NIS) of the German Trauma Society (DGU) (2010) The sequential trauma score—a new instrument for the sequential mortality prediction in major trauma. Eur J Med Res 15:185–195CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huber-Wagner S, Stegmaier J, Mathonia P, Paffrath T, Euler E, Mutschler W, Kanz KG, Lefering R, Working Group on Polytrauma (NIS) of the German Trauma Society (DGU) (2010) The sequential trauma score—a new instrument for the sequential mortality prediction in major trauma. Eur J Med Res 15:185–195CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Radiological findings and radiation exposure during trauma workup in a cohort of 1124 level 1 trauma patients
verfasst von
G. F. Giannakopoulos
T. P. Saltzherr
L. F. M. Beenen
G. J. Streekstra
J. B. Reitsma
F. W. Bloemers
J. C. Goslings
F. C. Bakker
on behalf of the REACT study group
Publikationsdatum
29.09.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1515-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.