Background
Aim of study
Methods
Study design
Study sample
Information leaflet design
Intervention arm
Control arm
Study outcomes
Sample size
Randomisation
Data treatment
Reporting
Trial registration
Results
Participation and demographics
Time Point 1 | Time Point 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention Arm (n = 50) | Control Arm (n = 50) | Intervention Arm (n = 34) | Control Arm (n = 39) | ||
Age of participant (yrs) | Range | 24–48 | 22–43 | 24–48 | 24–43 |
Mean/median | 35.5 | 34 | 35.5 | 34 | |
IQR | 33.0–38.0 | 31.8–37.0 | 33.0–38.3 | 33.0–37.0 | |
Gender (%) | Female | 88 | 94 | 91.2 | 92.3 |
Male | 12 | 6 | 08.8 | 7.7 | |
Education (%) | Tertiary | 72 | 81.6 | 67.6 | 81.6 |
Secondary | 24 | 16.3 | 26.5 | 15.8 | |
Primary | 4 | 2 | 5.9 | 2.6 | |
Nationality (%) | Irish | 80 | 92 | 85.3 | 92.3 |
British | 4 | 2 | 2.9 | 2.6 | |
Polish | 2 | 2 | 2.6 | ||
American | 4 | 2.9 | |||
French | 2 | 2.9 | |||
Mauritian | 2 | 2.9 | |||
Ecuadorian | 2 | ||||
Lithuanian | 2 | ||||
Australian | 2 | 2.9 | |||
Bangladesh | 2 | 2.6 | |||
Italian | 2 | ||||
Marital Status (%) | Married | 78 | 74 | 79.4 | 76.9 |
Cohabiting | 2 | 20 | 11.8 | 20.5 | |
Single | 8 | 6 | 5.9 | 2.6 | |
Civil P’ship | 12 | 2.9 | |||
Number of children | Range | 1–5 | 1–6 | 1–4 | 1–6 |
Mean | 2.06 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.1 | |
Age of children (yrs) | Range | 2 wk-29 yrs | 7wk-16 | 2wk-29 yrs | 8wks- |
Median | 3 | yrs | 2.5 | 16 yrs | |
IQR | 1–6 | 3 1–5.62 | 10.4mth-4.5 yrs | 3 1–6 |
Secondary outcome analysis
Use of medication
T1 (n = 100) | T2 (n = 73) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention Arm (%) | Control Arm (%) | Intervention Arm (%) | Control Arm (%) | |
Use of medications regardless of distress | 56 | 84 | 47 | 82 |
Use of medication when child is distressed | 38 | 14 | 47 | 18 |
No medication | 6 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
Alternating medication
T1 (n = 100) | T2 (n = 73) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention Arm (%) | Control Arm (%) | Intervention Arm (%) | Control Arm (%) | |
Alternating antipyretics regardless of distress | 26 | 54 | 15 | 51 |
Alternating medication when child is distressed | 44 | 16 | 56 | 21 |
No medication | 22 | 24 | 29 | 28 |
Unsure | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Using medication together
Use of tepid sponging
Tepid Sponging is Effective | T1 (n = 100) | T2 (n = 73) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention Arm (%) | Control Arm (%) | Intervention Arm (%) | Control Arm (%) | |
Agree | 4 | 52 | 3 | 62 |
Disagree | 72 | 18 | 97 | 36 |
Unsure | 24 | 30 | 0 | 3 |