Erschienen in:
01.10.2020 | Original Contributions
Randomized Prospective Clinical Study of Spatz3® Adjustable Intragastric Balloon Treatment with a Control Group: a Large-Scale Brazilian Experiment
verfasst von:
Ricardo José Fittipaldi-Fernandez, Idiberto José Zotarelli-Filho, Cristina Fajardo Diestel, Márcia Regina Simas Torres Klein, Marcelo Falcão de Santana, João Henrique Felicio de Lima, Fernando Santos Silva Bastos, Newton Teixeira dos Santos
Erschienen in:
Obesity Surgery
|
Ausgabe 2/2021
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
To analyze the results regarding weight loss and complications related to the Spatz3® adjustable intragastric balloon (IGB) in Brazil.
Methods
This randomized prospective study covered patients who had undergone treatment using a Spatz3® adjustable IGB between October 2016 and June 2018 at a private clinic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The patients had a minimum body mass index (BMI) of 27 kg/m2. The study examined complications of Spatz3® treatment and BMI reduction, percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), and % of excess weight loss (%EWL).
Results
One hundred eighty patients underwent a Spatz3® balloon implant in the period. The patients were randomly divided into one group in which the Spatz balloon was kept at the same volume (600 mL) throughout treatment (Control Group), and another adjustment group with 250 mL greater volume. The complication rate was 16.14%. No death or major complication occurred during the study. Mean BMI decreased from 39.51 to 32.84 kg/m2 (p < 0.0001), bodyweight from 111.87 to 90.28 kg (p < 0.0001), and excess weight from 41.55 to 22.99 kg (p < 0.0001). The adjustment resulted in greater mean weight loss of 4.35 kg (− 8 to 17.6 kg), and the average time of the procedure was 7.12 ± 1.63 months. The upward adjustment group did not present greater %TWL, %EWL, or BMI reduction when compared with the control group (p = 0.4413, p = 0,9245, p = 0.2729, respectively).
Conclusion
This study shows that Spatz3® IGB treatment is an effective procedure for weight reduction, with no mortality but higher morbidity compared with traditional IGBs. This procedure also enabled the balloon to stay in place for longer. The efficacy of upward adjustment still requires further confirmation.