Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2012 | Research | Ausgabe 1/2012 Open Access

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2012

Rasch analysis of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) among a heterogeneous sample of long-term cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study

Zeitschrift:
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes > Ausgabe 1/2012
Autoren:
Alison Zucca, Sylvie D Lambert, Allison W Boyes, Julie F Pallant
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1477-7525-10-55) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

AZ participated in the conception of secondary research question, implementation the study protocol, interpretation of data and drafting of the manuscript. SL performed the statistical analysis; and participated in interpretation of the data and drafting of the manuscript. AB participated in study conception, design and acquisition of funding; conception of secondary research question, coordinated the implementation of the study protocol, and provided intellectual contribution to drafting the manuscript. JP participated in the statistical analysis and interpretation of the data, and provided intellectual contribution to drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abstract

Background

The mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) is a well-recognised, popular measure of coping in psycho-oncology and assesses five cancer-specific coping strategies. It has been suggested that these five subscales could be grouped to form the over-arching adaptive and maladptive coping subscales to facilitate the interpretation and clinical application of the scale. Despite the popularity of the mini-MAC, few studies have examined its psychometric properties among long-term cancer survivors, and further validation of the mini-MAC is needed to substantiate its use with the growing population of survivors. Therefore, this study examined the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the mini-MAC in a sample of long-term cancer survivors using Rasch analysis.

Methods

RUMM 2030 was used to analyse the mini-MAC data (n=851). Separate Rasch analyses were conducted for each of the original mini-MAC subscales as well as the over-arching adaptive and maladaptive coping subscales to examine summary and individual model fit statistics, person separation index (PSI), response format, local dependency, targeting, item bias (or differential item functioning -DIF), and dimensionality.

Results

For the fighting spirit, fatalism, and helplessness-hopelessness subscales, a revised three-point response format seemed more optimal than the original four-point response. To achieve model fit, items were deleted from four of the five subscales – Anxious Preoccupation items 7, 25, and 29; Cognitive Avoidance items 11 and 17; Fighting Spirit item 18; and Helplessness-Hopelessness items 16 and 20. For those subscales with sufficient items, analyses supported unidimensionality. Combining items to form the adaptive and maladaptive subscales was partially supported.

Conclusions

The original five subscales required item deletion and/or rescaling to improve goodness of fit to the Rasch model. While evidence was found for overarching subscales of adaptive and maladaptive coping, extensive modifications were necessary to achieve this result. Further exploration and validation of over-arching subscales assessing adaptive and maladaptive coping is necessary with cancer survivors.
Zusatzmaterial
Authors’ original file for figure 1
12955_2011_984_MOESM1_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 2
12955_2011_984_MOESM2_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 3
12955_2011_984_MOESM3_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 4
12955_2011_984_MOESM4_ESM.jpeg
Authors’ original file for figure 5
12955_2011_984_MOESM5_ESM.jpeg
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe