nach oben

Surgical Endoscopy

Erschienen in:

24.09.2021

Rates and predictors of repeat preoperative endoscopy for elective colorectal resections: how can we avoid repeated procedures?

verfasst von: Olivia Hershorn, Jason Park, Harminder Singh, Kathleen Clouston, Ashley Vergis, Ramzi M. Helewa

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Despite limited endoscopy resources, repeat endoscopy prior to surgery is commonly practised. Our aim was to determine repeat preoperative endoscopy rates and factors influencing this practice at a high-volume Canadian tertiary centre.

Method

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients undergoing elective colorectal resections for benign and malignant neoplasms at a tertiary centre in Winnipeg, Canada between 2007 and 2017. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of repeat preoperative endoscopy.

Results

Of 1062 patients identified, mean age was 68 years and 56% were male. Rate of repeat preoperative endoscopy was 29%. On multivariable analysis, male sex (OR 1.68, CI 1.19–2.34, p = 0.003) and lesions located in the left colon (OR 2.73, CI 1.79–4.14, p < 0.001), rectosigmoid (OR 9.11, CI 2.14–38.8, p = 0.003), and rectum (OR 4.06, CI 2.58–6.38, p < 0.001) were at increased odds of undergoing repeat preoperative endoscopy. Patients with a tattoo placed at index endoscopy were at markedly lower odds of undergoing repeat preoperative endoscopy (OR 0.48, CI 0.34–0.68, p < 0.001). Index endoscopist specialty was not a significant predictor of repeat endoscopy (OR 0.76, CI 0.54–1.06, p = 0.09).

Conclusions

Repeat preoperative lower endoscopy is commonly practised and may be unnecessary if appropriate identification and documentation of lesions has been achieved. Tattooing of suspicious lesions is a key modifiable factor associated with reduced likelihood of repeat preoperative endoscopy. This study highlights the need for standardized guidelines and endoscopy reporting practices given the delays and costs associated with repeat preoperative endoscopy.

Al Abbasi T, Saleh F, Jackson TD, Okrainec A, Quereshy FA (2014) Preoperative re-endoscopy in colorectal cancer patients: an institutional experience and analysis of influencing factors. Surg Endosc 28:2808–2814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3549-zCrossRefPubMed

Saleh F, Al AT, Cleghorn M, Jimenez MC, Jackson TD, Okrainec A, Quereshy FA (2015) Preoperative endoscopy localization error rate in patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 29:2569–2575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3969-9CrossRefPubMed

Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Ulrich A, Reissman P (1995) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery—are we being honest with our patients? Dis Colon Rectum 38:723–727CrossRef

Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB, Lieb JG, Park WG, Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Shaheen NJ, Wani S, Weinberg DS (2015) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 81:31–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.385CrossRef

Sharara N, Adam V, Crott R, Barkun AN (2008) The costs of colonoscopy in a Canadian hospital using a microcosting approach. Can J Gastroenterol 22:565–570. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/854984CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Elarini T, Wexner SD, Isenberg GA (2015) The need for standardization of colonoscopic tattooing of colonic lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 58:264–267. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000304CrossRefPubMed

Cho YB, Lee WY, Yun HR, Lee WS, Yun SH, Chun H-K (2007) Tumor localization for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Surg 31:1491–1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9082-7CrossRefPubMed

Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4640CrossRefPubMed

Acuna SA, Elmi M, Shah PS, Coburn NG, Quereshy FA (2017) Preoperative localization of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31:2366–2379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5236-8CrossRefPubMed

10.

Azin A, Saleh F, Cleghorn M, Yuen A, Jackson T, Okrainec A, Quereshy FA (2017) A comparison of endoscopic localization error rate between operating surgeons and referring endoscopists in colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 31:1318–1326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5114-4CrossRefPubMed

11.

Fernandez LM, Ibrahim RNM, Mizrahi I, Dasilva G, Wexner SD (2019) How accurate is preoperative colonoscopic localization of colonic neoplasia? Surg Endosc 33:1174–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6388-5CrossRefPubMed

12.

Yang M, Pepe D, Schlachta CM, Alkhamesi NA (2017) Endoscopic tattoo: the importance and need for standardised guidelines and protocol. J R Soc Med 110:287–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076817712244CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Spaete J, Zheng J, Chow S, Burbridge RA, Garman KS (2019) Inconsistencies in colonic tattooing practice: differences in reported and actual practices at a tertiary medical center. South Med J 112:222–227. https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000964CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Szura M, Pasternak A, Solecki R et al (2017) Accuracy of preoperative tumor localization in large bowel using 3D magnetic endoscopic imaging: randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 31:2089–2095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5203-4CrossRefPubMed

15.

Goldenberg BA, Holliday EB, Helewa RM, Singh H (2018) Rectal cancer in 2018: a primer for the gastroenterologist. Am J Gastroenterol 113:1763–1771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0180-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040694CrossRefPubMed

17.

Rex DK (2018) The appropriate use and techniques of tattooing in the colon. Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:314–317

18.

Hershorn O, Park J, Singh H, Restall G, Clouston K, Vergis A, Helewa RM (2020) Variability in communication and reporting practices between gastroenterologists and surgeons contributes to repeat preoperative endoscopy for colorectal neoplasms: a qualitative analysis. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2020 Annual Scie. Dis Colon Rectum 63:e87–e468. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001712CrossRef

19.

Aquina CT, Probst CP, Becerra AZ, Iannuzzi JC, Kelly KN, Hensley BJ, Rickles AS, Noyes K, Fleming FJ, Monson JRT (2016) High volume improves outcomes: the argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery. Surgery 159:736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.021CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Rates and predictors of repeat preoperative endoscopy for elective colorectal resections: how can we avoid repeated procedures?
verfasst von: Olivia Hershorn
Jason Park
Harminder Singh
Kathleen Clouston
Ashley Vergis
Ramzi M. Helewa
Publikationsdatum: 24.09.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08733-2

Impact of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants on the performance of fecal immunochemical tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical outcomes after one anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in super-super-obese patients

Open Access

Feasibility of laparoscopy and factors associated with conversion to open in minimally invasive emergency major abdominal surgery: population database analysis

Intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis for robotic-assisted and laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes of a multi-center prospective trial

Open Access

Training program using a traction device improves trainees’ learning curve of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair to treat recurrent pediatric inguinal hernia

Open Access

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Ab sofort gelten die neuen Verordnungsausnahmen für Lipidsenker

12.02.2025
Praxis und Beruf
Nachrichten

Freie Fahrt für Lipidsenker? Das nicht, doch mit niedrigerem Schwellenwert fürs Infarktrisiko und neuen Indikationen hat der G-BA die Verordnungs-Handbremse ein gutes Stück weit gelockert.

Appendizitis und Darminfarkt durch Blinddarm-Lipom

12.02.2025
Lipomentfernung
Nachrichten

Eigentlich sind Lipome recht harmlos. Im Zäkum können sie jedoch erhebliche Komplikationen mit Darminfarkt und Appendizitis verursachen.

Gluteuslappen nach Rektumkarzinom-Op. schützt vor Abszessen

12.02.2025
Rektumexstirpation
Nachrichten

Die Wunddeckung mit einem autologen Rotationslappen nach Entfernung eines Rektumkarzinoms konnte in einer randomisierten Studie gegenüber dem primären Wundverschluss vor allem in einer Hinsicht punkten: Sie führte deutlich seltener zu präsakralen Abszessen.

MedTalk Leitlinie KOMPAKT: S3-Leitline zu peripheren Nervenverletzungen

Webinar | 10.02.2025 | 13:00

Über den Weg zur finalen Fassung der S3-Leitlinie "Versorgung peripherer Nervenverletzungen" sprechen Prof. Dr. Leila Harhaus-Wähner und Ressortleiter Dr. Gunter Freese im WebTalk Leitlinie KOMPAKT, einer neuen Webcast-Serie von SpringerMedizin passend zu Ihrem Fachmagazin Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Mitteilungen und Nachrichten. In dem kurzen Video geht es darum, was sich im Vergleich zur vorigen Fassung der Leitlinie geändert hat, welche Aspekte für die tägliche Praxis besonders wichtig sind und was jeder gemäß Leitlinie nun anders oder besser machen sollte.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Rates and predictors of repeat preoperative endoscopy for elective colorectal resections: how can we avoid repeated procedures?