Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pathology & Oncology Research 4/2018

11.09.2017 | Original Article

Re-Appraisal of Estrogen Receptor Negative/Progesterone Receptor Positive (ER−/PR+) Breast Cancer Phenotype: True Subtype or Technical Artefact?

verfasst von: Niamh M. Foley, J. M. Coll, A. J. Lowery, S. O. Hynes, M. J. Kerin, M. Sheehan, C. Brodie, K. J. Sweeney

Erschienen in: Pathology & Oncology Research | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Expression of the ER and PR receptors is routinely quantified in breast cancer as a predictive marker of response to hormonal therapy. Accurate determination of ER and PR status is critical to the optimal selection of patients for targeted therapy. The existence of an ER−/PR+ subtype is controversial, with debate centred on whether this represents a true phenotype or a technical artefact on immunohistochemistry (IHC). The aim of this study was to investigate the true incidence and clinico-pathological features of ER−/PR+ breast cancers in a tertiary referral symptomatic breast unit. Clinico-pathological data were collected on invasive breast cancers diagnosed between 1995 and 2005. IHC for ER and PR receptors was repeated on all cases which were ER−/PR+, with the same paraffin block used for the initial diagnostic testing. Concordance between the diagnostic and repeat IHC was determined using validated testing. Complete data, including ER and PR status were available for 697 patients diagnosed during the study period. On diagnostic IHC, the immunophenotype of the breast tumours was: ER+/PR+ in 396 (57%), ER−/PR- in 157 (23%), ER+/PR- in 88 (12%) and ER−/PR+ in 56 (8.6%) patients. On repeat IHC of 48/56 ER−/PR+ tumours 45.8% were ER+/PR+, 6% were ER+/PR- and 43.7% were ER−/PR- None of the cases were confirmed to be ER−/PR+. The ER−/PR+ phenotypic breast cancer is likely to be the result of technical artefact. Prompt reassessment of patients originally assigned to this subtype who re-present with symptoms should be considered to ensure appropriate clinical management.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson WF, Chatterjee N, Ershler WB et al (2002) Estrogen receptor breast cancer phenotypes in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Breast Cancer Res Treat 76:27–36CrossRefPubMed Anderson WF, Chatterjee N, Ershler WB et al (2002) Estrogen receptor breast cancer phenotypes in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Breast Cancer Res Treat 76:27–36CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nadji M, Gomez-Fernandez C, Ganjei-Azar P et al (2005) Immunohistochemistry of estrogen and progesterone receptors reconsidered: experience with 5,993 breast cancers. Am J Clin Pathol 123:21–27CrossRefPubMed Nadji M, Gomez-Fernandez C, Ganjei-Azar P et al (2005) Immunohistochemistry of estrogen and progesterone receptors reconsidered: experience with 5,993 breast cancers. Am J Clin Pathol 123:21–27CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378(9793):771–784CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378(9793):771–784CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng CH, Pathy NB, Taib NA, Mun KS, Rhodes A, Yip CH (2012) The estrogen receptor negative-progesterone receptor positive breast carcinoma is a biological entity and not a technical artifact. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13(4):1111–1113CrossRefPubMed Ng CH, Pathy NB, Taib NA, Mun KS, Rhodes A, Yip CH (2012) The estrogen receptor negative-progesterone receptor positive breast carcinoma is a biological entity and not a technical artifact. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13(4):1111–1113CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Maleki Z, Shariat S, Mokri M, Atri M (2012) ER-negative /PR-positive breast carcinomas or technical artifacts in immunohistochemistry? Arch Iran Med 15(6):366–369PubMed Maleki Z, Shariat S, Mokri M, Atri M (2012) ER-negative /PR-positive breast carcinomas or technical artifacts in immunohistochemistry? Arch Iran Med 15(6):366–369PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL et al (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(16):2784–2795CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL et al (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(16):2784–2795CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, Paish EC, Powe DG, Gee J et al (2007) Biologic and clinical characteristics of breast cancer with single hormone receptor positive phenotype. J Clin Oncol 25(30):4772–4778CrossRefPubMed Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, Paish EC, Powe DG, Gee J et al (2007) Biologic and clinical characteristics of breast cancer with single hormone receptor positive phenotype. J Clin Oncol 25(30):4772–4778CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat De Maeyer L, Van Limbergen E, De Nys K, Moerman P, Pochet N, Hendrickx W et al (2008) Does Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive breast carcinoma exist? J Clin Oncol 26(2):335–336CrossRefPubMed De Maeyer L, Van Limbergen E, De Nys K, Moerman P, Pochet N, Hendrickx W et al (2008) Does Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive breast carcinoma exist? J Clin Oncol 26(2):335–336CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Chen WY, Holmes MD, Hankinson SE (2004) Risk factors for breast cancer according to estrogen and progesterone receptor status. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 96(3):218–228CrossRefPubMed Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Chen WY, Holmes MD, Hankinson SE (2004) Risk factors for breast cancer according to estrogen and progesterone receptor status. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 96(3):218–228CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu KD, Di GH, Wu J, Lu JS, Shen KW, Lu GY et al (2008) Breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive tumors: being younger and getting less benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 134(12):1347–1354CrossRefPubMed Yu KD, Di GH, Wu J, Lu JS, Shen KW, Lu GY et al (2008) Breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive tumors: being younger and getting less benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 134(12):1347–1354CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiani J, Khan A, Khawar H, Shuaib F, Pervez S (2006) ER-alpha negative and PR-positive breast cancer: lab error or clinical entity? Pathol Oncol Res 12(4):223–227CrossRefPubMed Kiani J, Khan A, Khawar H, Shuaib F, Pervez S (2006) ER-alpha negative and PR-positive breast cancer: lab error or clinical entity? Pathol Oncol Res 12(4):223–227CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen T, Brandwein Gensler M, Hameed O, Siegal GP, Wei S (2015) Characterization of estrogen receptor–negative/progesterone receptor–positive breast cancer. Hum Pathol 46(11):1776–1784CrossRefPubMed Shen T, Brandwein Gensler M, Hameed O, Siegal GP, Wei S (2015) Characterization of estrogen receptor–negative/progesterone receptor–positive breast cancer. Hum Pathol 46(11):1776–1784CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunwald LK, Rossing MA, Li CI (2007) Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res 9(1):R6CrossRef Dunwald LK, Rossing MA, Li CI (2007) Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res 9(1):R6CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes A, Jasani B, Balaton AJ, Barnes DM, Miller KD (2000) Frequency of oestrogen and progesterone receptor positivity by immunohistochemical analysis in 7016 breast carcinomas: correlation with patient age, assay sensitivity, threshold value, and mammographic screening. J Clin Pathol 53:688–696CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rhodes A, Jasani B, Balaton AJ, Barnes DM, Miller KD (2000) Frequency of oestrogen and progesterone receptor positivity by immunohistochemical analysis in 7016 breast carcinomas: correlation with patient age, assay sensitivity, threshold value, and mammographic screening. J Clin Pathol 53:688–696CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gown AM (2008) Current issues in ER and HER2 testing by IHC in breast cancer. Mod Pathol 21(Suppl 2):S8–15CrossRefPubMed Gown AM (2008) Current issues in ER and HER2 testing by IHC in breast cancer. Mod Pathol 21(Suppl 2):S8–15CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnitt SJ (2006) Estrogen receptor testing of breast cancer in current clinical practice: What’s the question? J Clin Oncol 24(12):1797–1799CrossRefPubMed Schnitt SJ (2006) Estrogen receptor testing of breast cancer in current clinical practice: What’s the question? J Clin Oncol 24(12):1797–1799CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstein NS, Ferkowicz M, Odish E et al (2003) Minimum formalin fixation time for consistent estrogen receptor immunohistochemical staining of invasive breast carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 120:86–92CrossRefPubMed Goldstein NS, Ferkowicz M, Odish E et al (2003) Minimum formalin fixation time for consistent estrogen receptor immunohistochemical staining of invasive breast carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 120:86–92CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat van Diest PJ, van Dam P, Henzen-Longmans SC et al (1997) A scoring system for immunohistochemical staining: consensus report of the task force for basic research EORTC-GCCG. J Clin Pathol 50:801–804CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Diest PJ, van Dam P, Henzen-Longmans SC et al (1997) A scoring system for immunohistochemical staining: consensus report of the task force for basic research EORTC-GCCG. J Clin Pathol 50:801–804CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Larsson LI (1993) Tissue preparation methods for light microscopic immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem 1:2–16 Larsson LI (1993) Tissue preparation methods for light microscopic immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem 1:2–16
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes A, Jasani B, Balaton AJ, Barnes DM, Anderson E, Bobrow LG et al (2001) Study of interlaboratory reliability and reproducibility of estrogen andprogesterone receptor assays in Europe. Documentation of poor reliability and identification of insufficient microwave antigen retrieval time as a major contributory element of unreliable assays. Am J Clin Pathol 115(1):44–58CrossRefPubMed Rhodes A, Jasani B, Balaton AJ, Barnes DM, Anderson E, Bobrow LG et al (2001) Study of interlaboratory reliability and reproducibility of estrogen andprogesterone receptor assays in Europe. Documentation of poor reliability and identification of insufficient microwave antigen retrieval time as a major contributory element of unreliable assays. Am J Clin Pathol 115(1):44–58CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC (1999) Estrogen Receptor Status by Immunohistochemistry Is Superior to the Ligand-Binding Assay for Predicting Response to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 17(5):1474–1481CrossRefPubMed Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC (1999) Estrogen Receptor Status by Immunohistochemistry Is Superior to the Ligand-Binding Assay for Predicting Response to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 17(5):1474–1481CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan M, Chang MC, Gonzalez R, Lategan B, del Barco E, Vera-Badillo F et al (2015) Outcomes of estrogen receptor negative and progesterone receptor positive breast cancer. PLoS One 10(7):e0132449CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chan M, Chang MC, Gonzalez R, Lategan B, del Barco E, Vera-Badillo F et al (2015) Outcomes of estrogen receptor negative and progesterone receptor positive breast cancer. PLoS One 10(7):e0132449CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hefti MM, Hu R, Knoblauch NW, Collins LC, Haibe-Kains B, Tamimi RM, Beck AH (2013) Estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor positive breast cancer is not a reproducible subtype. Breast Cancer Res 15(4):R68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hefti MM, Hu R, Knoblauch NW, Collins LC, Haibe-Kains B, Tamimi RM, Beck AH (2013) Estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor positive breast cancer is not a reproducible subtype. Breast Cancer Res 15(4):R68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Re-Appraisal of Estrogen Receptor Negative/Progesterone Receptor Positive (ER−/PR+) Breast Cancer Phenotype: True Subtype or Technical Artefact?
verfasst von
Niamh M. Foley
J. M. Coll
A. J. Lowery
S. O. Hynes
M. J. Kerin
M. Sheehan
C. Brodie
K. J. Sweeney
Publikationsdatum
11.09.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Pathology & Oncology Research / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1219-4956
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-2807
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-017-0304-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Pathology & Oncology Research 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.