Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Critical Care 2/2007

01.04.2007 | Commentary

Re-examining ethical obligations in the intensive care unit: HIV disclosure to surrogates

verfasst von: Anthony T Vernillo, Paul R Wolpe, Scott D Halpern

Erschienen in: Critical Care | Ausgabe 2/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Physicians treating newly incapacitated patients often must help navigate surrogate decision-makers through a difficult course of treatment decisions, while safeguarding the patient's autonomy. We offer guidance for intensive care physicians who must frequently address the difficult questions concerning disclosure of confidential information to surrogates. Three clinical vignettes will highlight the ethical challenges to physician disclosure of a critically ill patient's HIV status. Two key distinctions are offered that influence the propriety of disclosure: first, whether HIV infection represents a 'primary cause' for the patient's critical illness; and second, whether the surrogate may be harmed by failure to disclose HIV status. This balanced consideration of the direct duties of physicians to patients, and their indirect duties to surrogates and third-party contacts, may be used as a framework for considering other ethical obligations in the intensive care unit. We also provide a tabulation of individual US state laws relevant to disclosure of HIV status.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen LA, Ross LF: Patient confidentiality and the surrogate's right to know. J Law Med Ethics 2000, 28: 137-143. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2000.tb00003.xCrossRefPubMed Jansen LA, Ross LF: Patient confidentiality and the surrogate's right to know. J Law Med Ethics 2000, 28: 137-143. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2000.tb00003.xCrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat White DB, Curtis JR, Lo B, Luce JM: Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers. Crit Care Med 2006, 34: 2053-2059. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000227654.38708.C1CrossRefPubMed White DB, Curtis JR, Lo B, Luce JM: Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers. Crit Care Med 2006, 34: 2053-2059. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000227654.38708.C1CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Beauchamp TL, Childress JF: Beneficence. In Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th edition. Edited by: Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001:165-224. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF: Beneficence. In Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th edition. Edited by: Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001:165-224.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Menikoff J (Ed): Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California In Law and Bioethics an Introduction. 1st edition. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press; 2001:176-181. Menikoff J (Ed): Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California In Law and Bioethics an Introduction. 1st edition. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press; 2001:176-181.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gostin LO, Lazzarini Z, Neslund VS, Osterholm MT: The public health information infrastructure: a national review of the law on health information privacy. JAMA 1996, 275: 1921-1927. 10.1001/jama.275.24.1921CrossRefPubMed Gostin LO, Lazzarini Z, Neslund VS, Osterholm MT: The public health information infrastructure: a national review of the law on health information privacy. JAMA 1996, 275: 1921-1927. 10.1001/jama.275.24.1921CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, Janssen RS, Taylor AW, Lyss SB, Clark JE: Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006, 55: 1-17.PubMed Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, Janssen RS, Taylor AW, Lyss SB, Clark JE: Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006, 55: 1-17.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez H: Is AIDS different? Alb Law Rev 1998, 61: 1053-1070. Fernandez H: Is AIDS different? Alb Law Rev 1998, 61: 1053-1070.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Salmon S: The name game: issues surrounding New York State's HIV partner notification law. N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights 2000, 16: 959-991.PubMed Salmon S: The name game: issues surrounding New York State's HIV partner notification law. N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights 2000, 16: 959-991.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gostin LO: HIV screening in health care settings Public health and civil liberties in conflict? JAMA 2006, 296: 2023-2025. 10.1001/jama.296.16.2023CrossRefPubMed Gostin LO: HIV screening in health care settings Public health and civil liberties in conflict? JAMA 2006, 296: 2023-2025. 10.1001/jama.296.16.2023CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Halpern SD: HIV testing without consent in critically ill patients. JAMA 2005, 294: 734-737. 10.1001/jama.294.6.734CrossRefPubMed Halpern SD: HIV testing without consent in critically ill patients. JAMA 2005, 294: 734-737. 10.1001/jama.294.6.734CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodge JG, Gostin KG: Challenging themes in American health information privacy and the public's health: Historical and modern assessments. J Law Med Ethics 2004, 32: 670-679. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2004.tb00165.xCrossRefPubMed Hodge JG, Gostin KG: Challenging themes in American health information privacy and the public's health: Historical and modern assessments. J Law Med Ethics 2004, 32: 670-679. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2004.tb00165.xCrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Re-examining ethical obligations in the intensive care unit: HIV disclosure to surrogates
verfasst von
Anthony T Vernillo
Paul R Wolpe
Scott D Halpern
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2007
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Critical Care / Ausgabe 2/2007
Elektronische ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc5720

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2007

Critical Care 2/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.