Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 2/2014

01.02.2014

Re-Validating the Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery Tool (OTAS-D): Cultural Adaptation, Refinement, and Psychometric Evaluation

verfasst von: Stefanie Passauer-Baierl, Louise Hull, Danilo Miskovic, Stephanie Russ, Nick Sevdalis, Matthias Weigl

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The nontechnical and team skills of surgical teams are critical for safety and efficiency in the operating room. Assessment of nontechnical and team skills can facilitate improvement by encouraging both self-reflection and team reflection, identifying training needs, and informing operating room (OR) team training approaches. The observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS) tool is a well-validated and robust tool for capturing teamwork in the operating room. The aims of the present study were to systematically adapt and refine the OTAS for German-speaking OR staff and to test the adapted assessment tool (OTAS-D) for psychometric properties and metric equivalence.

Methods

The study was carried out in three stages: at stage 1, OTAS was translated into German. At stage 2, experienced German OR experts (surgeons, OR nurses, anesthetists) were interviewed. At stage 3, two blinded assessors observed 11 general surgical operations (general surgical and vascular procedures) and interrater reliability was tested for refined OTAS-D behavioral exemplars and scorings.

Results

The German OR experts confirmed the applicability and content validity of the vast majority of translated behavioral exemplars. After their evaluation, 32 items were changed slightly, six were changed substantially, and one item was added. During observations, perfect and substantial interobserver agreement was found for 77 behavioral exemplars (67.1 % of the items, kappa coefficient >0.60). Rating at all OTAS behaviors showed acceptable levels of reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.72).

Conclusions

The OTAS-D is a tool for valid and reliable assessment of nontechnical skills that contribute to safe and effective surgical performance in ORs staffed by German-speaking professionals. Furthermore, our study serves as an example for systematically adapting and customizing well-established observational tools across different healthcare environments.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM et al (2003) Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery 133:614–621PubMedCrossRef Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM et al (2003) Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery 133:614–621PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT et al (2009) Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg 197:678–685PubMedCrossRef Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT et al (2009) Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg 197:678–685PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Shouhed D, Gewertz B, Wiegmann D et al (2012) Integrating human factors research and surgery: a review. Arch Surg 147:1141–1146PubMedCrossRef Shouhed D, Gewertz B, Wiegmann D et al (2012) Integrating human factors research and surgery: a review. Arch Surg 147:1141–1146PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Manser T (2009) Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:143–151PubMedCrossRef Manser T (2009) Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:143–151PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Armour Forse R, Bramble JD, McQuillan R (2011) Team training can improve operating room performance. Surgery 150:771–778PubMedCrossRef Armour Forse R, Bramble JD, McQuillan R (2011) Team training can improve operating room performance. Surgery 150:771–778PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R et al (2012) The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 214:214–230PubMedCrossRef Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R et al (2012) The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 214:214–230PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Young-Xu Y, Neily J, Mills PD et al (2011) Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical morbidity. Arch Surg 146:1368–1373PubMedCrossRef Young-Xu Y, Neily J, Mills PD et al (2011) Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical morbidity. Arch Surg 146:1368–1373PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y et al (2010) Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA 304:1693–1700PubMedCrossRef Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y et al (2010) Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA 304:1693–1700PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Catchpole K, Mishra A, Handa A et al (2008) Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles. Ann Surg 247:699–706PubMedCrossRef Catchpole K, Mishra A, Handa A et al (2008) Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles. Ann Surg 247:699–706PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hull L, Arora S, Kassab E et al (2011) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. J Am Coll Surg 212:234–243PubMedCrossRef Hull L, Arora S, Kassab E et al (2011) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. J Am Coll Surg 212:234–243PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Undre S, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2009) Observing and assessing surgical teams: the observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS). In: Flin R, Mitchell L (eds) Safer Surgery. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 83–102 Undre S, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2009) Observing and assessing surgical teams: the observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS). In: Flin R, Mitchell L (eds) Safer Surgery. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 83–102
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sevdalis N, Lyons M, Healey AN et al (2009) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: construct validation with expert versus novice raters. Ann Surg 249:1047–1051PubMedCrossRef Sevdalis N, Lyons M, Healey AN et al (2009) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: construct validation with expert versus novice raters. Ann Surg 249:1047–1051PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Amato S, Basilico O, Bevilacqua L et al (2010) Observational team work assessment for surgery as quality and safety improvement tool. Ig Sanita Pubbl 66:357–374PubMed Amato S, Basilico O, Bevilacqua L et al (2010) Observational team work assessment for surgery as quality and safety improvement tool. Ig Sanita Pubbl 66:357–374PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pena ED (2007) Lost in translation: methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. Child Dev 78:1255–1264PubMedCrossRef Pena ED (2007) Lost in translation: methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. Child Dev 78:1255–1264PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sperber AD (2004) Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology 126:S124–S128PubMedCrossRef Sperber AD (2004) Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology 126:S124–S128PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Flin R, Yule S, McKenzie L et al (2006) Attitudes to teamwork and safety in the operating theatre. Surgeon 4:145–151PubMedCrossRef Flin R, Yule S, McKenzie L et al (2006) Attitudes to teamwork and safety in the operating theatre. Surgeon 4:145–151PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA et al (2006) Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg 202:746–752PubMedCrossRef Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA et al (2006) Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg 202:746–752PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN et al (2006) Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion? J Eval Clin Pract 12:182–189PubMedCrossRef Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN et al (2006) Teamwork in the operating theatre: cohesion or confusion? J Eval Clin Pract 12:182–189PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P et al (2003) Anaesthetists’ Non-technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth 90:580–588PubMedCrossRef Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P et al (2003) Anaesthetists’ Non-technical Skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth 90:580–588PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mishra A, Catchpole K, McCulloch P (2009) The Oxford NOTECHS System: reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care 18:104–108PubMedCrossRef Mishra A, Catchpole K, McCulloch P (2009) The Oxford NOTECHS System: reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care 18:104–108PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S et al (2006) Development of a rating system for surgeons’ non-technical skills. Med Educ 40:1098–1104PubMedCrossRef Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S et al (2006) Development of a rating system for surgeons’ non-technical skills. Med Educ 40:1098–1104PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Paris CR, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics 43:1052–1075PubMedCrossRef Paris CR, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics 43:1052–1075PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Yule S, Rowley D, Flin R et al (2009) Experience matters: comparing novice and expert ratings of non-technical skills using the NOTSS system. ANZ J Surg 79:154–160PubMedCrossRef Yule S, Rowley D, Flin R et al (2009) Experience matters: comparing novice and expert ratings of non-technical skills using the NOTSS system. ANZ J Surg 79:154–160PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Russ S, Hull L, Rout S et al (2012) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: feasibility of clinical and nonclinical assessor calibration with short-term training. Ann Surg 255:804–809PubMedCrossRef Russ S, Hull L, Rout S et al (2012) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: feasibility of clinical and nonclinical assessor calibration with short-term training. Ann Surg 255:804–809PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Abell N, Springer DW, Kamata A (2009) Developing and validating rapid assessment instruments. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef Abell N, Springer DW, Kamata A (2009) Developing and validating rapid assessment instruments. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hull L, Arora S, Symons NR et al (2012) Training faculty in nontechnical skill assessment: national Guidelines on Program Requirements. Ann Surg 258:370–375CrossRef Hull L, Arora S, Symons NR et al (2012) Training faculty in nontechnical skill assessment: national Guidelines on Program Requirements. Ann Surg 258:370–375CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Re-Validating the Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery Tool (OTAS-D): Cultural Adaptation, Refinement, and Psychometric Evaluation
verfasst von
Stefanie Passauer-Baierl
Louise Hull
Danilo Miskovic
Stephanie Russ
Nick Sevdalis
Matthias Weigl
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2299-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

World Journal of Surgery 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.