Erschienen in:

31.08.2024 | Urologic Oncology

Recent Advances in Diagnosing and Treating Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence

verfasst von: Yunlong Li, MM, YingMing Xiao, MM, Zhengang Shen, MM, ShengKe Yang, MD, Zeng Li, MM, Hong Liao, MM, Shukui Zhou, PhD, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 12/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy are common first-line treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer. Despite advances in surgical technology and multidisciplinary management, post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) remains a common clinical complication. The incidence and duration of PPI are highly heterogeneous, varying considerably between individuals. Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence may result from a combination of factors, including patient characteristics, lower urinary tract function, and surgical procedures. Physicians often rely on detailed medical history, physical examinations, voiding diaries, pad tests, and questionnaires-based symptoms to identify critical factors and select appropriate treatment options. Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence treatment can be divided into conservative treatment and surgical interventions, depending on the severity and type of incontinence. Pelvic floor muscle training and lifestyle interventions are commonly conservative strategies. When conservative treatment fails, surgery is frequently recommended, and the artificial urethral sphincter remains the “gold standard” surgical intervention for PPI. This review focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of PPI, based on the most recent clinical research and recommendations of guidelines, including epidemiology and risk factors, diagnostic methods, and treatment strategies, aimed at presenting a comprehensive overview of the latest advances in this field and assisting doctors in providing personalized treatment options for patients with PPI.

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17–48. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21763.CrossRefPubMed

Lehto US, Tenhola H, Taari K, Aromaa A. Patients’ perceptions of the negative effects following different prostate cancer treatments and the impact on psychological well-being: a nationwide survey. Br J Cancer. 2017;116(7):864–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Moses KA, Sprenkle PC, Bahler C, et al. NCCN guidelines® insights: prostate cancer early detection, Version 1. 2023. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2023;21(3):236–46. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2023.0014.CrossRef

Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79(2):243–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042.CrossRefPubMed

Sekhoacha M, Riet K, Motloung P, Gumenku L, Adegoke A, Mashele S. Prostate cancer review: genetics, diagnosis, treatment options, and alternative approaches. Molecules. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175730.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Abramowitz MC, Pollack A. Postprostatectomy radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2008;18(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2007.09.003.CrossRefPubMed

Thompson IM Jr, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296(19):2329–35. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.19.2329.CrossRefPubMed

Litwin MS, Melmed GY, Nakazon T. Life after radical prostatectomy: a longitudinal study. J Urol. 2001;166(2):587–92.CrossRefPubMed

Gacci M, Simonato A, Masieri L, et al. Urinary and sexual outcomes in long-term (5+ years) prostate cancer disease free survivors after radical prostatectomy. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Gacci M, De Nunzio C, Sakalis V, Rieken M, Cornu JN, Gravas S. Latest Evidence on post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence. J Clin Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031190.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Kasai T, Banno T, Nakamura K, et al. Duration and influencing factors of postoperative urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a Japanese community hospital: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054085.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Lamberg H, Shankar PR, Singh K, et al. Preoperative prostate MRI predictors of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy. Radiology. 2022;303(1):99–109. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.210500.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int. 2009;103(4):448–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08012.x.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Singh I, Hemal AK. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in 2010. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2010;10(5):671–82. https://doi.org/10.1586/era.10.35.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, et al. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2011;59(5):702–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.032.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F, et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int. 2006;97(6):1234–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06185.x.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):405–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, et al. Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the pasadena consensus Panel. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):368–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.057.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Holze S, Kuntze AS, Mende M, et al. Assessment of different continence definitions in the context of the randomized multicenter prospective LAP-01 trial-Does the best definition change over time? Eur J Med Res. 2024;29(1):58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-024-01662-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Moretti TBC, Magna LA, Reis LO. Continence criteria of 193 618 patients after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16180.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Holze S, Mende M, Healy KV, et al. Comparison of various continence definitions in a large group of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a multicentre, prospective study. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0500-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Nakane A, Kubota H, Noda Y, et al. Improvement in early urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy based on postoperative pelvic anatomic features: a retrospective review. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0519-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Hammerer P, Huland H. Urodynamic evaluation of changes in urinary control after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 1997;157(1):233–6.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Donnellan SM, Duncan HJ, MacGregor RJ, Russell JM. Prospective assessment of incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: objective and subjective analysis. Urology. 1997;49(2):225–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00451-7.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Abuelnaga M, Gendy R, Yao M, et al. Impact of definitions on continence outcomes in a series of 1000 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies, time for an internationally agreed definition? BJU Int. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16327.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Dubbelman Y, Groen J, Wildhagen M, Rikken B, Bosch R. The recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized trial comparing the effect of physiotherapist-guided pelvic floor muscle exercises with guidance by an instruction folder only. BJU Int. 2010;106(4):515–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09159.x.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Rasmussen A, Mouritsen L, Dalgaard A, Frimodt-Møller C. Twenty-four hour pad weighing test: reproducibility and dependency of activity level and fluid intake. Neurourol Urodyn. 1994;13(3):261–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6777(1994)13:3%3c261::aid-nau1930130308%3e3.0.co;2-t.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Moore KN, Truong V, Estey E, Voaklander DC. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: can men at risk be identified preoperatively? J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2007;34(3):270–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Won.0000270821.91694.56.CrossRef

29.

d’Altilia N, Mancini V, Falagario UG, et al. A matched-pair analysis after robotic and retropubic radical prostatectomy: a new definition of continence and the impact of different surgical techniques. Cancers. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14184350.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Jeong SJ, Yeon JS, Lee JK, et al. Development and validation of nomograms to predict the recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: comparisons between immediate, early, and late continence. World J Urol. 2014;32(2):437–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1127-y.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Matsushita K, Kent MT, Vickers AJ, et al. Preoperative predictive model of recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2015;116(4):577–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13087.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS, et al. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. JAMA. 2000;283(3):354–60. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.3.354.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Lardas M, Grivas N, Debray TPA, et al. Patient- and tumour-related prognostic factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(3):674–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.020.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Gondoputro W, Thompson J, Evans M, et al. how does age affect urinary continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? A prospective multi-institutional study using independently collected, validated questionnaires. J Urol. 2022;207(5):1048–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000002391.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Strasser H, Tiefenthaler M, Steinlechner M, Bartsch G, Konwalinka G. Urinary incontinence in the elderly and age-dependent apoptosis of rhabdosphincter cells. Lancet. 1999;354(9182):918–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02588-x.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Skarecky D. Evaluation of long-term thermal injury using cautery during nerve sparing robotic prostatectomy. Urology. 2008;72(6):1371–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.101.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Kadono Y, Ueno S, Kadomoto S, et al. Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(8):1034–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22877.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Mandel P, Kretschmer A, Chandrasekar T, et al. The effect of BMI on clinicopathologic and functional outcomes after open radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2014;32(3):297–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.09.005.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Teber D, Gözen AS, Cresswell J, Canda AE, Yencilek F, Rassweiler J. Prevention and management of ureteral injuries occurring during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Heilbronn experience and a review of the literature. World J Urol. 2009;27(5):613–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0428-7.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Noblett KL, Jensen JK, Ostergard DR. The relationship of body mass index to intra-abdominal pressure as measured by multichannel cystometry. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1997;8(6):323–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02765589.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology. 2009;73(2):316–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.493.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Wolin KY, Luly J, Sutcliffe S, Andriole GL, Kibel AS. Risk of urinary incontinence following prostatectomy: the role of physical activity and obesity. J Urol. 2010;183(2):629–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.09.082.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Corona G, Gacci M, Baldi E, Mancina R, Forti G, Maggi M. Androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer: focusing on sexual side effects. J Sexual Med. 2012;9(3):887–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02590.x.CrossRef

44.

Gacci M, Corona G, Apolone G, et al. Influence of serum testosterone on urinary continence and sexual activity in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2010;13(2):168–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2010.4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Novara G, Ficarra V, D’Elia C, et al. Evaluating urinary continence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1028–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.04.069.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Cakmak S, Canda AE, Ener K, Atmaca AF, Altinova S, Balbay MD. Does type 2 diabetes mellitus have an impact on postoperative early, mid-term and late-term urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? J Endourol. 2019;33(3):201–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0822.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Teber D, Sofikerim M, Ates M, et al. Is type 2 diabetes mellitus a predictive factor for incontinence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? A matched pair and multivariate analysis. J Urol. 2010;183(3):1087–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.033.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Dell’Oglio P, Stabile A, Gandaglia G, et al. New surgical approaches for clinically high-risk or metastatic prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017;17(11):1013–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2017.1374858.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Gu Z, Zheng Z, Zhang W, et al. The development and assessment of a predicting nomogram for the recovery of immediate urinary continence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Front Surg. 2022;9:1071093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1071093.CrossRefPubMed

51.

von Bodman C, Matsushita K, Savage C, et al. Recovery of urinary function after radical prostatectomy: predictors of urinary function on preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol. 2012;187(3):945–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.143.CrossRef

52.

Hakimi AA, Faleck DM, Agalliu I, Rozenblit AM, Chernyak V, Ghavamian R. Preoperative and intraoperative measurements of urethral length as predictors of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25(6):1025–30. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0692.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Mizutani Y, Uehara H, Fujisue Y, et al. Urinary continence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: association with postoperative membranous urethral length measured using real-time intraoperative transrectal ultrasonography. Oncol Lett. 2012;3(1):181–4. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2011.446.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Sauer M, Tennstedt P, Berliner C, et al. Predictors of short and long term urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy in prostate MRI: significance and reliability of standardized measurements. Eur J Radiol. 2019;120:108668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108668.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Liu L, Zhou S, Song D, et al. The predictors of short and long term urinary continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center report in China. World J Surg Oncol. 2024;22(1):150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03425-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Valenzi FM, Fuschi A, Al Salhi Y, et al. Is early continence recovery related to the length of spared urethra? A prospective multicenter study comparing preoperative MRI and histologic specimen measurements after robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024;50(6):108319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108319.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Barakat B, Addali M, Hadaschik B, Rehme C, Hijazi S, Zaqout S. Predictors of early continence recovery following radical prostatectomy, including transperineal ultrasound to evaluate the membranous urethra length (CHECK-MUL study). Diagnostics. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14080853.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Song C, Doo CK, Hong JH, Choo MS, Kim CS, Ahn H. Relationship between the integrity of the pelvic floor muscles and early recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007;178(1):208–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.044.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Lee CH, Ha HK. Intravesical prostatic protrusion as a predictor of early urinary continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2014;21(7):653–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12419.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Yang B, Zhang F, Xiao C, Lu J, Ma L, Huang Y. Impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging anatomic features on urinary continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2020;104(3–4):239–46. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506021.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Tutolo M, Rosiello G, Stabile G, et al. The key role of levator ani thickness for early urinary continence recovery in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. Neurourol Urodynam. 2022;41(7):1563–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25001.CrossRef

62.

Zhang S, Liang C, Qian J, et al. The impact of three different bladder neck reconstruction techniques on urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2020;34(6):663–70. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0064.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Jacobsen NE, Moore KN, Estey E, Voaklander D. Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of postoperative urinary incontinence rates. J Urol. 2007;177(2):615–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.022.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Martínez-Holguín E, Herranz-Amo F, Lledó-García E, et al. Comparison between laparoscopic and open prostatectomy: postoperative urinary continence analysis. Actas Urol Espanolas. 2020;44(8):535–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2019.10.002.CrossRef

65.

Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1557–64. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1451.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):431–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044.CrossRefPubMed

67.

Rocco B, Coelho RF, Cozzi G, De Lorenzis E, Patel V. Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. In: SL Best, SY Nakada, editors. Minimally Invasive Urology: An Essential Clinical Guide to Endourology, Laparoscopy, LESS and Robotics. Springer: New York; 2015. p. 49–77.CrossRef

68.

Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM. A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol. 2010;58(3):457–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.008.CrossRefPubMed

69.

Liu J, Zhang J, Yang Z, et al. Comparison of Retzius-sparing and conventional robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy regarding continence and sexual function: an updated meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022;25(1):47–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00459-5.CrossRefPubMed

70.

Ku JY, Ha HK. Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for a single experienced surgeon: comparison with simultaneous laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Men’s Health. 2015;33(1):30–5. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.2015.33.1.30.CrossRef

71.

Steineck G, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, et al. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):559–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.011.CrossRefPubMed

72.

Palisaar JR, Roghmann F, Brock M, Löppenberg B, Noldus J, von Bodman C. Predictors of short-term recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2015;33(6):771–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1340-3.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Xiang P, Du Z, Guan D, et al. Is there any difference in urinary continence between bilateral and unilateral nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2024;22(1):66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03340-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

74.

Hollabaugh RS Jr, Dmochowski RR, Kneib TG, Steiner MS. Preservation of putative continence nerves during radical retropubic prostatectomy leads to more rapid return of urinary continence. Urology. 1998;51(6):960–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00128-9.CrossRefPubMed

75.

Marshall FF. Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 1996;156(5):1724. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65491-0.CrossRefPubMed

76.

Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1138–44. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa011788.CrossRefPubMed

77.

Van Kampen M, De Weerdt W, Van Poppel H, et al. Prediction of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy. Urol Int. 1998;60(2):80–4. https://doi.org/10.1159/000030216.CrossRefPubMed

78.

Creta M, Manfredi C, Arcaniolo D, et al. Functional and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients with history of surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic enlargement: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00678-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

79.

Shao IH, Chang YH, Hou CM, Lin ZF, Wu CT. Predictors of short-term and long-term incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(1):421–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060517715396.CrossRefPubMed

80.

Liu Y, Qin J, Li KP, et al. Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy previous transurethral resection of prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(4):1271–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01555-5.CrossRefPubMed

81.

Gu L, Li Y, Li X, Liu W. Does previous transurethral resection of the prostate negatively influence subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men diagnosed with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(4):1299–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01588-w.CrossRefPubMed

82.

Leyh-Bannurah SR, Liakos N, Oelke M, et al. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients with prior transurethral subvesical deobstruction: results of a high-volume center. J Urol. 2021;206(2):308–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000001776.CrossRefPubMed

83.

Loughlin KR, Prasad MM. Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a confluence of 3 factors. J Urol. 2010;183(3):871–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.011.CrossRefPubMed

84.

Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Rogers E, et al. Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 1996;156(5):1707–13.CrossRefPubMed

85.

Bianco FJ Jr, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (“trifecta”). Urology. 2005;66(5 Suppl):83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.116.CrossRefPubMed

86.

Winters JC, Appell RA, Rackley RR. Urodynamic findings in postprostatectomy incontinence. Neurourol Urodynam. 1998;17(5):493–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1998)17:5%3c493::aid-nau5%3e3.0.co;2-8.CrossRef

87.

Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC, Weiss JP, Verhaaren M. The pathophysiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: a clinical and video urodynamic study. J Urol. 2000;163(6):1767–70.CrossRefPubMed

88.

Ficazzola MA, Nitti VW. The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings. J Urol. 1998;160(4):1317–20.CrossRefPubMed

89.

Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kawaguchi S, et al. Investigating the mechanism underlying urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy: effectiveness of a longer urethral stump to prevent urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2018;122(3):456–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14181.CrossRefPubMed

90.

Leach GE, Trockman B, Wong A, Hamilton J, Haab F, Zimmern PE. Post-prostatectomy incontinence: urodynamic findings and treatment outcomes. J Urol. 1996;155(4):1256–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66235-9.CrossRefPubMed

91.

Goluboff ET, Chang DT, Olsson CA, Kaplan SA. Urodynamics and the etiology of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: the initial Columbia experience. J Urol. 1995;153(3 Pt 2):1034–7.PubMed

92.

Desautel MG, Kapoor R, Badlani GH. Sphincteric incontinence: the primary cause of post-prostatectomy incontinence in patients with prostate cancer. Neurourol Urodynam. 1997;16(3):153–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1997)16:3%3c153::aid-nau4%3e3.0.co;2-d.CrossRef

93.

Giannantoni A, Mearini E, Zucchi A, et al. Bladder and urethral sphincter function after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a prospective long-term study. Eur Urol. 2008;54(3):657–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.10.054.CrossRefPubMed

94.

Porena M, Mearini E, Mearini L, Vianello A, Giannantoni A. Voiding dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy: more than external urethral sphincter deficiency. Eur Urol. 2007;52(1):38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.051.CrossRefPubMed

95.

Trofimenko V, Myers JB, Brant WO. Post-prostatectomy incontinence: how common and bothersome is it really? Sex Med Rev. 2017;5(4):536–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.05.001.CrossRefPubMed

96.

Thüroff JW, Abrams P, Andersson KE, et al. EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2011;59(3):387–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.021.CrossRefPubMed

97.

Sandhu JS, Breyer B, Comiter C, et al. Incontinence after prostate treatment: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2019;202(2):369–78. https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000000314.CrossRefPubMed

98.

Morey AF, Singla N, Carmel M, et al. Standing cough test for evaluation of post-prostatectomy incontinence: a pilot study. Can J Urol. 2017;24(1):8664–9.PubMed

99.

O’Sullivan R, Karantanis E, Stevermuer TL, Allen W, Moore KH. Definition of mild, moderate and severe incontinence on the 24-hour pad test. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;111(8):859–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00211.x.CrossRef

100.

Soto González M, Da Cuña Carrera I, Lantarón Caeiro EM, Gutiérrez Nieto M, López García S, Ojea Calvo A. Correlation between the 1-hour and 24-hour pad test in the assessment of male patients with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence. Prog Urol. 2018;28(11):536–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2018.06.011.CrossRefPubMed

101.

Sato Y, Tanda H, Nakajima H, et al. Simple and reliable predictor of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: serial measurement of urine loss ratio after catheter removal. Int J Urol. 2014;21(7):647–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12400.CrossRefPubMed

102.

Shy M, Fletcher SG. Objective evaluation of overactive bladder: Which surveys should i use? Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2013;8(1):45–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-012-0167-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

103.

Machioka K, Kadono Y, Naito R, et al. Evaluating urinary incontinence before and after radical prostatectomy using The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form. Neurourol Urodynam. 2019;38(2):726–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23907.CrossRef

104.

Ouanes Y, Hermi A, Chaker K, Bibi M, Mrad Daly K, Nouira Y. Impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life after open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e28106. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

105.

Coyne KS, Margolis MK, Hsieh R, Vats V, Chapple CR. Validation of the urinary sensation scale (USS). Neurourol Urodynam. 2011;30(3):360–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.21005.CrossRef

106.

Miller JM, Guo Y, Rodseth SB. Cluster analysis of intake, output, and voiding habits collected from diary data. Nurs Res. 2011;60(2):115–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182097813.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

107.

van Brummen HJ, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH. The association between overactive bladder symptoms and objective parameters from bladder diary and filling cystometry. Neurourol Urodynam. 2004;23(1):38–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10162.CrossRef

108.

Homma Y, Kakizaki H, Yamaguchi O, et al. Assessment of overactive bladder symptoms: comparison of 3-day bladder diary and the overactive bladder symptoms score. Urology. 2011;77(1):60–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.06.044.CrossRefPubMed

109.

Hennessey DB, Hoag N, Gani J. Impact of bladder dysfunction in the management of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence-a review. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(Suppl 2):S103–11. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.04.14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

110.

Rehder P, Gozzi C. Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52(3):860–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.110.CrossRefPubMed

111.

Soljanik I, Gozzi C, Becker AJ, Stief CG, Bauer RM. Risk factors of treatment failure after retrourethral transobturator male sling. World J Urol. 2012;30(2):201–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0671-6.CrossRefPubMed

112.

Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Roosen A, et al. Impact of the “repositioning test” on postoperative outcome of retroluminar transobturator male sling implantation. Urol Int. 2013;90(3):334–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000347123.CrossRefPubMed

113.

Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G, et al. Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol. 2005;48(5):734–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.06.004.CrossRefPubMed

114.

Centemero A, Rigatti L, Giraudo D, et al. Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise for early continence after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled study. Eur Urol. 2010;57(6):1039–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.028.CrossRefPubMed

115.

Kannan P, Winser SJ, Fung B, Cheing G. Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training alone and in combination with biofeedback, electrical stimulation, or both compared to control for urinary incontinence in men following prostatectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2018;98(11):932–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy101.CrossRefPubMed

116.

Zhou L, Chen Y, Yuan X, Zeng L, Zhu J, Zheng J. Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise for continence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1186067. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1186067.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

117.

Goode PS, Burgio KL, Johnson TM 2nd, et al. Behavioral therapy with or without biofeedback and pelvic floor electrical stimulation for persistent postprostatectomy incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011;305(2):151–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1972.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

118.

Wille S, Sobottka A, Heidenreich A, Hofmann R. Pelvic floor exercises, electrical stimulation and biofeedback after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol. 2003;170(2 Pt 1):490–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000076141.33973.75.CrossRefPubMed

119.

Alan C, Eren AE, Ersay AR, Kocoglu H, Basturk G, Demirci E. Efficacy of duloxetine in the early management of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol. 2015;8(1):43–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365688.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

120.

De Nunzio C, Brucker B, Bschleipfer T, et al. Beyond antimuscarinics: a review of pharmacological and interventional options for overactive bladder management in men. Eur Urol. 2021;79(4):492–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.032.CrossRefPubMed

121.

Nam RK, Herschorn S, Loblaw DA, et al. Population based study of long-term rates of surgery for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012;188(2):502–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.005.CrossRefPubMed

122.

Mottet N, Boyer C, Chartier-Kastler E, Ben Naoum K, Richard F, Costa P. Artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800 for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: the French experience. Urol Int. 1998;60(Suppl 2):25–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000056548.CrossRefPubMed

123.

Sacomani CAR, Zequi SC, Costa WHD, et al. Long-term results of the implantation of the AMS 800 artificial sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a single-center experience. Int Braz J Urol. 2018;44(1):114–20. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.Ibju.2017.0165.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

124.

Walsh IK, Williams SG, Mahendra V, Nambirajan T, Stone AR. Artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient: safety, efficacy and satisfaction. BJU Int. 2002;89(4):364–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01759.x.CrossRefPubMed

125.

Van der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63(4):681–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.034.CrossRefPubMed

126.

Chow PM, Agrawal-Patel S, Wood H, Angermeier K. Prior male sling does not affect outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter. BJU Int. 2024;133(5):564–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16282.CrossRefPubMed

127.

Munier P, Nicolas M, Tricard T, Droupy S, Costa P, Saussine C. What if artificial urinary sphincter is not possible? Feasibility and effectiveness of ProACT for patients with persistent stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy treated by sling. Neurourol Urodynam. 2020;39(5):1417–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24355.CrossRef

128.

Beaugerie A, Poinard F, Denormandie A, et al. Comparative urodynamic study in cadaver of urethral pressure profilometry between the UroMems artificial urinary sphincter and the AMS800™. Eur Urolol. 2022;81:876.CrossRef

129.

Comiter C. Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient? Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12(2):91–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2014.346.CrossRefPubMed

130.

Meisterhofer K, Herzog S, Strini KA, Sebastianelli L, Bauer R, Dalpiaz O. Male slings for postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(3):575–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.01.008.CrossRefPubMed

131.

Del Giudice F, Huang J, Li S, et al. Contemporary trends in the surgical management of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy in the United States. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023;26(2):367–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00558-x.CrossRefPubMed

132.

Abrams P, Constable LD, Cooper D, et al. Outcomes of a noninferiority randomised controlled trial of surgery for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery (MASTER). Eur Urol. 2021;79(6):812–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.024.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

133.

Sacco E, Gandi C, Marino F, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: a propensity score-matched study. BJU Int. 2021;127(2):229–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15197.CrossRefPubMed

134.

Khouri RK Jr, Ortiz NM, Baumgarten AS, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter outperforms sling for moderate male stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2020;141:168–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.028.CrossRefPubMed

135.

Constable L, Abrams P, Cooper D, et al. Synthetic sling or artificial urinary sphincter for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery: the MASTER non-inferiority RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2022;26(36):1–152. https://doi.org/10.3310/tbfz0277.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

136.

Mühlstädt S, Angulo JC, Mohammed N, Schumann A, Fornara P. Complications of the urinary incontinence system ATOMS: description of risk factors and how to prevent these pitfalls. World J Urol. 2020;38(7):1795–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02962-w.CrossRefPubMed

137.

Angulo JC, Ruiz S, Lozano M, Arance I, Virseda M, Lora D. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) and male readjustment mechanical external (REMEEX) system for post-prostatectomy incontinence. World J Urol. 2021;39(4):1083–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03300-1.CrossRefPubMed

138.

Tricard T, Song QX, Munier P, et al. Adjustable continence therapy (proACT) for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence post-prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023 update). World J Urol. 2023;41(7):1793–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04452-6.CrossRefPubMed

139.

Choinière R, Violette PD, Morin M, et al. Evaluation of benefits and harms of surgical treatments for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(4):1042–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.09.007.CrossRefPubMed

140.

Larson T, Jhaveri H, Yeung LL. Adjustable continence therapy (ProACT) for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodynam. 2019;38(8):2051–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24135.CrossRef

Titel: Recent Advances in Diagnosing and Treating Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence
verfasst von: Yunlong Li, MM
YingMing Xiao, MM
Zhengang Shen, MM
ShengKe Yang, MD
Zeng Li, MM
Hong Liao, MM
Shukui Zhou, PhD, MD
Publikationsdatum: 31.08.2024
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 12/2024
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16110-1

ASO Visual Abstract: Margin Width and Local Recurrence in Patients with Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast

ASO Visual Abstract

Interdisciplinary Implementation of a Synoptic Reporting Template for Melanoma Nodal Surveillance Ultrasound

Open Access
Melanoma

Clinical Variables Influencing Outcomes in Patients with Atypical Intradermal Smooth Muscle Neoplasms (Formerly Cutaneous Leiomyosarcomas): Single-Institution Study of 95 Surgical Patients

Sarcoma

ASO Visual Abstract: Impact of Mastectomy Flap Necrosis on Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Measures After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy—A Preliminary Analysis

ASO Visual Abstract

Single Port Robotic Liver Resection: Metastasectomy for Recurrent Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatobiliary Tumors

Preoperative Staging of Colon Cancer—Picking the Lesser of Two Evils

Colorectal Cancer

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Welcher Zugangsweg ist besser für den interventionellen Mitralklappenersatz?

29.04.2025
DGK-Jahrestagung 2025
Kongressbericht

Bisher wird für den interventionellen Mitralklappenersatz standardmäßig der transapikale Zugangsweg gewählt. In einer Registeranalyse hat dieser in puncto Sicherheit allerdings den Kürzeren gezogen.

Lohnt sich die Karotis-Revaskularisation?

25.04.2025
Karotisstenose
Nachrichten

Die medikamentöse Therapie für Menschen mit Karotisstenosen hat sich in den vergangenen Dekaden verbessert. Braucht es also noch einen invasiven Eingriff zur Revaskularisation der Halsschlagader bei geringem bis moderatem Risiko für einen ipsilateralen Schlaganfall?

Höhere Dosis von Dexamethason senkt Überlebenschancen

25.04.2025
Zerebrale Metastasen
Nachrichten

Personen mit Hirnmetastasen, die perioperativ höhere kumulative Dosen von Dexamethason erhalten, haben eine schlechtere Prognose. Um die Ergebnisse zu verbessern, bedarf es strengerer Dosierungsschemata.

Appendektomie erhält Remission bei Colitis ulcerosa

24.04.2025
Colitis ulcerosa
Nachrichten

Wird der Wurmfortsatz bei Personen mit Colitis ulcerosa entfernt, ist die Rückfallrate um ein Drittel geringer als unter konservativer Behandlung. Auch die Lebensqualität verbessert sich und der Bedarf an Medikamenten nimmt ab.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Recent Advances in Diagnosing and Treating Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence

Abstract

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2024

ASO Visual Abstract: Margin Width and Local Recurrence in Patients with Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast

Interdisciplinary Implementation of a Synoptic Reporting Template for Melanoma Nodal Surveillance Ultrasound

Clinical Variables Influencing Outcomes in Patients with Atypical Intradermal Smooth Muscle Neoplasms (Formerly Cutaneous Leiomyosarcomas): Single-Institution Study of 95 Surgical Patients

ASO Visual Abstract: Impact of Mastectomy Flap Necrosis on Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Measures After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy—A Preliminary Analysis

Single Port Robotic Liver Resection: Metastasectomy for Recurrent Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Preoperative Staging of Colon Cancer—Picking the Lesser of Two Evils

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Welcher Zugangsweg ist besser für den interventionellen Mitralklappenersatz?

Lohnt sich die Karotis-Revaskularisation?

Höhere Dosis von Dexamethason senkt Überlebenschancen

Appendektomie erhält Remission bei Colitis ulcerosa

Update Chirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten