nach oben

11.01.2025 | Research

Reduced-dose CT scan of colorectal cancer

verfasst von: Shenglin Li, Xinmei Yang, Yuntai Cao, Long Yuan, Ting Lu, Yuxuan Wang, Jun Zhao, Wenjuan Zhang, Junlin Zhou, Guojin Zhang

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy and second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. With the clinical application of neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, the long-term survival outcome of CRC patients has greatly improved [2, 3]. However, the five-year overall survival rate of patients with advanced colorectal cancer remains less than 61% [4]. Therefore, the American Cancer Society recommends starting screening at 45 years of age to help reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC [5]. These screening protocols mainly consist of stool and blood-based laboratory tests paired with visual examinations and imaging. Computed tomography (CT) has been shown to be the more tolerable imaging technique, with fewer complications and greater scope of application, and can assess obstructed or challenging anatomy compared to optical colonoscopy [6‐8]. …

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209 – 49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660, PMID 33538338.

Morton D, Seymour M, Magill L, Handley K, Glasbey J, Glimelius B et al. Preoperative chemotherapy for operable colon cancer: mature results of an international randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(8):1541-52. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00046, PMID 36657089.

Foxtrot Collaborative. Feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced, operable colon cancer: the pilot phase of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(11):1152–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70348-0.CrossRef

Liu ZH, Wang N, Wang FQ, Dong Q, Ding J. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in pT4 colon cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;56:221 – 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.032, PMID 29940259.

Wolf AMD, Fontham ETH, Church TR, Flowers CR, Guerra CE, LaMonte SJ et al. Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(4):250 – 81. doi: 10.3322/caac.21457, PMID 29846947.

Nagata K, Takabayashi K, Yasuda T, Hirayama M, Endo S, Nozaki R et al. Adverse events during CT colonography for screening, diagnosis and preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: a Japanese national survey. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(12):4970–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4920-y, PMID 28674967.CrossRefPubMed

Spada C, Hassan C, Bellini D, Burling D, Cappello G, Carretero C et al. Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) guideline - update 2020. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(5):2967-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07413-4, PMID 33104846.

Spada C, Hassan C, Bellini D, Burling D, Cappello G, Carretero C et al. Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) guideline - update 2020. Endoscopy. 2020;52(12):1127-41. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1258-4819, PMID 33105507.

Horton KM, Abrams RA, Fishman EK. Spiral CT of colon cancer: imaging features and role in management. RadioGraphics. 2000;20(2):419–30. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.2.g00mc14419, PMID 10715340.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Arico’ FM, Trimarchi R, Portaluri A, Barilla’ C, Migliaccio N, Bucolo GM et al. Virtual monoenergetic dual-layer dual-energy CT images in colorectal cancer: CT diagnosis could be improved? Radiol Med. 2023;128(8):891-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01663-0, PMID 37310558.

11.

Beer L, Toepker M, Ba-Ssalamah A, Schestak C, Dutschke A, Schindl M et al. Objective and subjective comparison of virtual monoenergetic vs. polychromatic images in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(7):3617–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06116-9, PMID 30888484.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Hickethier T, Kroeger JR, Lennartz S, Doerner J, Maintz D, Chang DH. Venous-phase chest CT with reduced contrast medium dose: utilization of spectral low keV monoenergetic images improves image quality. Eur J Radiol. 2020;122:108756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108756, PMID 31786505.

13.

Cheng F, Liu Y, Du L, Wang L, Li L, Shi J et al. Evaluation of optimal monoenergetic images acquired by dual-energy CT in the diagnosis of T staging of thoracic esophageal cancer. Insights Imaging. 2023;14(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01381-1, PMID 36763193.

14.

Agostini A, Borgheresi A, Mari A, Floridi C, Bruno F, Carotti M et al. Dual-energy CT: theoretical principles and clinical applications. Radiol Med. 2019;124(12):1281-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01107-8, PMID 31792703.

15.

Mileto A, Barina A, Marin D, Stinnett SS, Roy Choudhury K, Wilson JM et al. Virtual monochromatic images from dual-energy multidetector CT: variance in CT numbers from the same lesion between single-source projection-based and dual-source image-based implementations. Radiology. 2016;279(1):269 – 77. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015150919, PMID 26536403.

16.

Lee T, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Joo I, Bae JS, Yoo J et al. Deep learning-based image reconstruction of 40-keV virtual monoenergetic images of dual-energy CT for the assessment of hypoenhancing hepatic metastasis. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(9):6407-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08728-0, PMID 35380228.

17.

Hanson GJ, Michalak GJ, Childs R, McCollough B, Kurup AN, Hough DM et al. Low kV versus dual-energy virtual monoenergetic CT imaging for proven liver lesions: what are the advantages and trade-offs in conspicuity and image quality? A pilot study. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018;43(6):1404–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1327-9, PMID 28983661.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Grant KL, Flohr TG, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, Thomas C, Schmidt B. Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media. Invest Radiol. 2014;49(9):586–92. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000060, PMID 24710203.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Jensen CT, Gupta S, Saleh MM, Liu X, Wong VK, Salem U et al. Reduced-dose deep learning reconstruction for abdominal CT of liver metastases. Radiology. 2022;303(1):90 – 8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.211838, PMID 35014900.

20.

Jiang B, Li N, Shi X, Zhang S, Li J, de Bock GH et al. Deep learning reconstruction shows better lung nodule detection for ultra-low-dose chest CT. Radiology. 2022;303(1):202 – 12. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.210551, PMID 35040674.

21.

Li S, Yuan L, Lu T, et al. Deep learning imaging reconstruction of reduced-dose 40 keV virtual monoenergetic imaging for early detection ofcolorectal cancer liver metastases. Eur J Radiol. 2023;168:111128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111128, PMID 3781630.

22.

Jensen CT, Wagner-Bartak NA, Vu LN, Liu X, Raval B, Martinez D et al. Detection of Colorectal Hepatic metastases Is Superior at Standard Radiation Dose CT versus Reduced Dose CT. Radiology. 2019;290(2):400-9. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018181657, PMID 30480489.

23.

Lyu P, Neely B, Solomon J, Rigiroli F, Ding Y, Schwartz FR et al. Effect of deep learning image reconstruction in the prediction of resectability of pancreatic cancer: diagnostic performance and reader confidence. Eur J Radiol. 2021;141:109825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109825, PMID 34144309.

24.

Racine D, Brat HG, Dufour B, Steity JM, Hussenot M, Rizk B et al. Image texture, low contrast liver lesion detectability and impact on dose: deep learning algorithm compared to partial model-based iterative reconstruction. Eur J Radiol. 2021;141:109808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109808, PMID 34120010.

25.

Park J, Shin J, Min IK, Bae H, Kim YE, Chung YE. Image quality and lesion detectability of lower-dose abdominopelvic CT obtained using deep learning image reconstruction. Korean J Radiol. 2022;23(4):402 – 12. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0683, PMID 35289146.

26.

Lenga L, Czwikla R, Wichmann JL, Leithner D, Albrecht MH, Booz C et al. Dual-energy CT in patients with colorectal cancer: improved assessment of hypoattenuating liver metastases using noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2018;106:184 – 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.07.027, PMID 30150043.

27.

Martin SS, Wichmann JL, Pfeifer S, Leithner D, Lenga L, Reynolds MA et al. Impact of noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic dual-energy computed tomography on image quality in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2017;97:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.10.008, PMID 29153358.

28.

Lee SM, Kim SH, Ahn SJ, Kang HJ, Kang JH, Han JK. Virtual monoenergetic dual-layer, dual-energy CT enterography: optimization of keV settings and its added value for Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(6):2525–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5215-z, PMID 29294151.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Nerad E, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Nelemans P, Bakers FC, Beets GL et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CT for local staging of colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207(5):984 – 95. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.15785, PMID 27490941.

30.

Granata V, Faggioni L, Grassi R, Fusco R, Reginelli A, Rega D et al. Structured reporting of computed tomography in the staging of colon cancer: a Delphi consensus proposal. Radiol Med. 2022;127(1):21–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01418-9, PMID 34741722.CrossRefPubMed

31.

O’Dowd EL, Lee RW, Akram AR, Bartlett EC, Bradley SH, Brain K et al. Defining the road map to a UK national lung cancer screening programme. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(5):e207-18. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00104-3, PMID 37142382.

32.

Lam S, Bai C, Baldwin DR, Chen Y, Connolly C, de Koning H et al. Current and future perspectives on CT screening for lung cancer: A road map for 2023–2027 from the IASLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2023.07.019, PMID 37487906.

33.

Silvestri GA, Goldman L, Tanner NT, Burleson J, Gould M, Kazerooni EA et al. Outcomes from more than 1 million people screened for lung cancer with low-dose CT imaging. Chest. 2023;164(1):241 – 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2023.02.003, PMID 36773935.

34.

Ippolito D, Drago SG, Talei Franzesi CR, Casiraghi A, Sironi S. Diagnostic value of fourth-generation iterative reconstruction algorithm with low-dose CT protocol in assessment of mesorectal fascia invasion in rectal cancer: comparison with magnetic resonance. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42(9):2251–2260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1138-z, PMID: 28429055.

35.

Zhang J, Hu M, Cheng Q, Wang S, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Li J, Wei W. Achieving sub-millisievert CT colonography for accurate colorectal tumor detection using smart examination protocols: a prospective self-controlled study. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Sep 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04557-5, PMID: 39276190.

36.

Chen Y, Huang Z, Feng L, Zou W, Kong D, Zhu D, Dai G, Zhao W, Zhang Y, Luo M. Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Improves the Image Quality of Low-Dose CT Colonography. Acad Radiol. 2024;31(8):3191–3199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.01.021, PMID: 38290889.

37.

Rajiah PS, Dunning CAS, Rajendran K, Tandon YK, Ahmed Z, Larson NB et al. High-pitch multienergy coronary CT angiography in dual-source photon-counting detector CT scanner at low iodinated contrast dose. Invest Radiol. 2023;58(9):681–90. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000961, PMID 36822655.PubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Wessling J, Fischbach R, Borchert A, Kugel H, Allkemper T, Osada N et al. Detection of colorectal polyps: comparison of multi-detector row CT and MR colonography in a colon phantom. Radiology. 2006;241(1):125 – 31. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2411050292, PMID 16908674.

39.

Nagayama Y, Iyama A, Oda S, Taguchi N, Nakaura T, Utsunomiya D et al. Dual-layer dual-energy computed tomography for the assessment of hypovascular hepatic metastases: impact of closing k-edge on image quality and lesion detectability. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(6):2837-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5789-0, PMID 30377793.

40.

Lyu P, Li Z, Chen Y, Wang H, Liu N, Liu J et al. Deep learning reconstruction CT for liver metastases: low-dose dual-energy vs standard-dose single-energy. Eur Radiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10033-3, PMID 37532899.

41.

Park HJ, Choi SY, Lee JE, Lim S, Lee MH, Yi BH et al. Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(6):3974-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08459-8, PMID 35064803.

Titel: Reduced-dose CT scan of colorectal cancer
verfasst von: Shenglin Li
Xinmei Yang
Yuntai Cao
Long Yuan
Ting Lu
Yuxuan Wang
Jun Zhao
Wenjuan Zhang
Junlin Zhou
Guojin Zhang
Publikationsdatum: 11.01.2025
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04660-7

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

KI-gestütztes Mammografiescreening überzeugt im Praxistest

16.01.2025
Künstliche Intelligenz im Gesundheitswesen
Nachrichten

Mit dem Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz lässt sich die Detektionsrate im Mammografiescreening offenbar deutlich steigern. Mehr unnötige Zusatzuntersuchungen sind laut der Studie aus Deutschland nicht zu befürchten.

Stumme Schlaganfälle − ein häufiger Nebenbefund im Kopf-CT?

12.01.2025
Computertomografie
Nachrichten

In 4% der in der Notfallambulanz initiierten zerebralen Bildgebung sind „alte“ Schlaganfälle zu erkennen. Gar nicht so selten handelt es sich laut einer aktuellen Studie dabei um unbemerkte Insulte. Bietet sich hier womöglich die Chance auf ein effektives opportunistisches Screening?

Die elektronische Patientenakte kommt: Das sollten Sie jetzt wissen

12.01.2025
Elektronische Patientenakte
Nachrichten

Am 15. Januar geht die „ePA für alle“ zunächst in den Modellregionen an den Start. Doch schon bald soll sie in allen Praxen zum Einsatz kommen. Was ist jetzt zu tun? Was müssen Sie wissen? Wir geben in einem FAQ Antworten auf 21 Fragen.

Stören weiße Wände und viel Licht die Bildqualitätskontrolle?

09.01.2025
Mammografie
Nachrichten

Wenn es darum geht, die technische Qualität eines Mammogramms zu beurteilen, könnten graue Wandfarbe und reduzierte Beleuchtung im Bildgebungsraum von Vorteil sein. Darauf deuten zumindest Ergebnisse einer kleinen Studie hin.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen