Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders 1/2021

Open Access 10.06.2021 | Review article

Reducing unscheduled hospital care for adults with diabetes following a hypoglycaemic event: which community-based interventions are most effective? A systematic review

verfasst von: Aoife Watson, Donna McConnell, Vivien Coates

Erschienen in: Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders | Ausgabe 1/2021

Abstract

Aim

To determine which community-based interventions are most effective at reducing unscheduled hospital care for hypoglycaemic events in adults with diabetes.

Methods

Medline Ovid, CINAHL Plus and ProQuest Health and Medical Collection were searched using both key search terms and medical subject heading terms (MeSH) to identify potentially relevant studies. Eligible studies were those that involved a community-based intervention to reduce unscheduled admissions in adults with diabetes. Papers were initially screened by the primary researcher and then a secondary reviewer. Relevant data were then extracted from papers that met the inclusion criteria.

Results

The search produced 2226 results, with 1360 duplicates. Of the remaining 866 papers, 198 were deemed appropriate based on titles, 90 were excluded following abstract review. A total of 108 full papers were screened with 19 full papers included in the review. The sample size of the 19 papers ranged from n = 25 to n = 104,000. The average ages within the studies ranged from 41 to 74 years with females comprising 57% of the participants. The following community-based interventions were identified that explored reducing unscheduled hospital care in people with diabetes; telemedicine, education, integrated care pathways, enhanced primary care and care management teams.

Conclusions

This systematic review shows that a range of community-based interventions, requiring different levels of infrastructure, are effective in reducing unscheduled hospital care for hypoglycaemia in people with diabetes. Investment in effective community-based interventions such as integrated care and patient education must be a priority to shift the balance of care from secondary to primary care, thereby reducing hospital admissions.
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s40200-021-00817-z.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Diabetes is a complex, chronic condition that requires a high level of self-management in order to maintain normal blood glucose levels as well as continual monitoring from healthcare professionals [1]. Globally, it is estimated over 463 million people live with diabetes [2]. Achieving normal blood glucose levels is hard for many people due to lack of support, increasing age, poor education and poor medication concordance and unexpected activities/events which can lead to numerous consequences, both short term and long term, particularly in urgent situations [3]. In the short term, irregular blood glucose levels can lead to an increase in the severity of high and low glucose levels, potentially resulting in unscheduled care. Whilst in the long term they can result in macrovascular complications such as heart disease, stroke and limb amputations, as well as microvascular complications such as retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy [46]. These complications can be exacerbated by a lack of knowledge of what are satisfactory blood glucose levels, inadequate management of the treatment regimes, lifestyle challenges and psychosocial and/ or emotional problems [7].
People with diabetes may require unscheduled hospital care for a variety of unavoidable medical emergencies including stroke, myocardial infarction, trauma and loss of consciousness whereby hospital care is vital [8]. However, unscheduled hospital care be avoided for acute complications such as hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia if adequate community care is received [9]. Unscheduled hospital care refers to any healthcare that is unplanned, including prehospital care, emergency department (ED) care, specialist hospital support or admissions and hospitalisations [10]. A prehospital setting refers to any care that is received by a patient in the community prior to their arrival in hospital. In 2016 in the USA, there were 16 million visits to hospital by adults whereby a diagnosis for diabetes was listed. Of these visits, 224,000 were for hyperglycaemia, 203,000 were for diabetic ketoacidosis and 235,000 were for hypoglycaemia [11]. Severe hypoglycaemia has been associated with greater blood glucose variability and higher haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, making it harder to manage and thus requiring more ambulance call outs [12]. Severe hypoglycaemic events (SHE) account for 48,000–98,400 emergency ambulance calls within Scotland and England annually [13].
Diabetes costs the NHS over £3bn per year, accounting for approximately 10% of the budget [14]. Some of these costs arise from ambulance calls that result in conveying a person to hospital which costs approximately £359.51 per patient, with non- elective admissions in England for people with diabetes costing over £1.6bn annually, albeit not all for diabetic specific causes [12, 15]. In addition to the direct costs relating to diabetes, there are also indirect costs and care burdens that arise including loss of earnings from time off work and the need for informal care [16].
Reducing unscheduled admissions for diabetes has the potential to reduce costs on the health services by providing the right care, in the right place, at the right time, by placing the patient at the centre of the model which aligns with the Transforming Your Care (TYC) strategy in the UK [45]. Fewer unscheduled admissions could also reduce overcrowding and clinical pressures in the emergency department, leading to reduced waiting times.
A range of interventions have been trialled to reduce unscheduled admissions in people with diabetes; from treat and leave protocols, to telemedicine, to integration of care between primary care providers and specialists. The objective of this systematic review is to determine which community-based interventions are most effective at reducing unscheduled hospital care for hypoglycaemic events in adults with diabetes. To date, there have been no other published systematic reviews conducted investigating this topic, despite the importance and implications for clinical practice and research.

Methods

Protocol and registration

The protocol for this review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) [CRD42019132649]. The review was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. See supplementary file (PRISMA 2020 checklist).

Search strategy

The search strategy was developed alongside the subject librarian and confirmed with the project team, with the final search taking place on 8th April 2020. Three databases; Medline Ovid, CINAHL Plus and ProQuest Health and Medical Collection were systematically searched, with EMBASE and AMED included in the Medline Ovid database. The search was developed for Medline Ovid and adapted for the other databases as seen in Fig. 1. Both key search terms and medical subject heading terms (MeSH)/ Thesaurus terms were used to identify relevant publications from January 2014 to April 2020. The lower year limit of 2014 was selected to focus on recent publications due to the rapid progression of healthcare and technology. A search of the reference lists in relevant papers was also carried out to identify all relevant papers to determine which interventions were effective at reducing unscheduled hospital care in people with diabetes. The key search strategy and key words were: (diabet* or hypoglyc$emi* or TIDM or T2DM or type 1 or type 2 or blood-sugar or Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/ or Diabetes Mellitus/ or Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/) AND (ambulance or paramedic* or EMS or ambulatory or Ambulances/ or Allied Health Personnel/ or Emergency Medical Services/ or emergency or emergency-care) AND ('treat adj2 leave') or 'see) adj2 leave') or 'treat) adj2 refer') or 'refuse) adj2 transport' or admission* or readmission* or prevent admission or prevent readmission). A hand search of the grey literature and the reference lists in relevant papers was also carried out to identify all relevant papers to determine which interventions were effective at reducing unscheduled care in people with diabetes.

Selection criteria

The inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed alongside the review question using the PICOS (participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes and study design) strategy.
Papers were initially screened based upon their titles and abstract. The inclusion criteria were that the paper related to people with (1) diabetes, (2) participants were over 18 years old, (3) included an intervention and (4) was undertaken in a prehospital community setting. Eligible papers were then screened in full to determine whether they (5) addressed reducing unscheduled hospital care. Papers were excluded from the search if they were not written in English, did not involve human subjects and/or were not published since 2014. A sample of papers were then reviewed by a second reviewer (VC) who was blinded from the prior decision and any disagreements discussed until resolved. A third reviewer (DMcC) was consulted on any papers where an agreement was not reached.

Data extraction

For papers that met the inclusion criteria, data were extracted by one reviewer (AW) and inputted into a form in Microsoft Excel. Data extraction was guided by the PICOS strategy and involved; study identification (title, first author, year), location of study, description of intervention, category of intervention, length of time of intervention, study design, SURE guideline used and score, sample size, percentage of participants that were female, average age, study outcomes, limitations and any notes on the study. Authors were contacted if further information or clarification was needed. If this information remained unavailable, the data cell was left blank. Any papers that were missing data on the type of intervention or study outcome were excluded if the author could not be contacted for clarification.

Quality assurance

The quality of the studies was assessed using the Specialist Unit for Review Evidence (SURE) critical appraisal guidelines to critique health related research and identify the ways errors and bias can distort research results, tailored to the relevant study design [17, 18]. When completing the checklist, 1 point was assigned for ‘Yes’ answers, with 0 points assigned for ‘No’ or ‘Can’t tell’ answers. The total points were added up and then converted to percentages to class the studies as high, moderate or poor quality. Studies were described as ‘high’ quality if they scored > 80%, ‘moderate’ quality if they scored > 60 < 80% and ‘poor’ quality if they scored < 60%. Papers were reviewed for quality by a second reviewer (VC) for rigour and any disagreements discussed. A third reviewer (DMcC) was consulted on any papers where an agreement was not reached.

Results

Summary

The study selection process is outlined in Fig. 2. The search produced 866 unique citations that were screened based on their title and abstract with 108 full texts requested. There were 19 papers that met the full inclusion criteria and had sufficient data to be included in the analysis. These papers are summarised in Table 1.
Table 1
Summary of paper characteristics used in review
Author
Year of Publication
Location
Intervention
Length of Time
Category of Intervention
Study Design
SURE
Quality
Sample
Males
Females
Mean Age
Finding
Guideline Used
Rating
Size
Kaufman et al.
2014
USA
High risk patients reached out to by care management teams composed of registered nurse, licensed practice nurse, community health worker, health coaches, social work staff
90 day intervention with 6 month follow up
Care
Unclear
Study design
NA
25
36%
64%
63
Reduction in hospital admissions.
management
unclear- not completed
intervention
 
Kearns et al.
2017
USA
Care management teams were assigned to intervention practices composed of a physician, care manager, medical assistant
3 years
Care management team
Randomised prospective cohort study
RCT
Moderate
19,696
48%
52%
55
ER visits and readmissions increased while hospital admissions and urgent care visits decreased across both groups.
Ginzburg et al.
2017
Israel
Nurse managed care
management team composed
of physician, nurse, social worker, pharmacist, physical exercise consultant, other medical specialists
6 months
Care management team
Retrospective cross sectional study
Cross sectional
Low
100
52%
48%
63
Decrease in hospitalisations. Increase in dietician,
ophthalmologist, family physician visits
Brophy et al.
2014
USA
Collaborative drug therapy management providing health
coaching, education, transportation assistance, prescription refills
1 year
Drug therapy
Retrospective quasi experiment with comparison group
RCT
Moderate
1764
45%
55%
58
Reduction in hospital admissions (significant KF group, non significant ACP group), reduction in ED visits.
Yeung et al.
2014
USA
6 month low intensity, 24
month high intensity self management and support groups by certified diabetes educator and clinical psychologist
2.5 years
Education
Single cohort, time series prospective study
Cohort
Moderate
60
30%
70%
62
No significant difference in acute care use, non acute care use, days
lost to disability found. Increase in non acute care use approached significance. Decrease in urgent care and ED visits. Improvement in clinical markers and self care.
Elliott et al.
2014
UK
DAFNE
5 day course
Education
Retrospective observational study
Study design
NA
939
53%
47%
41
Significant reduction in ketoacidosis episodes, hypoglycaemia episodes, hospital admissions, ED visits, paramedic call outs. Improvements in glycaemic control and quality of life.
doesn't fit- not completed
Wong et al.
2014
Hong Kong
Patient empowerment programme giving patients greater control over their health through collaboration with the healthcare provdider
12 month follow up
Enhanced
Observational, matched, cohort study
Cohort
High
2282
50%
50%
64
Significantly improved clinical outcomes in HvA1c, LDL-C, improved clinical outcomes in BP. Significant reductions in GOPC vivits, reduction in SOPC visits, ED visits, inpatient admissions
primary care program
MacKay et al.
2014
Canada
Modified role of medical office assistant to do key tasks for
people with diabetes
12 months
Enhanced
Unclear
Study design
NA
96
47%
53%
66
Similar number of patients with ED visits and hospital admissions
primary care program
unclear- not completed
Seidu et al.
2016
UK
Enhanced practices used primary care physicians (PCPs) with an interest in diabetes, supported by multidisciplinary primary care teams to provide care to patients dischardged from secondary care in primary care
12 month follow up
Enhanced
Before and after
Case Control
High
8366
50%
50%
Unknown
Decrease in admissions and outpatient attendances.
primary care program
Peterson et al.
2017
USA
Extension of CareFirst's program to Medicare. Nurses worked with patients’ usual primary care
practitioners to coordinate care for high-risk Medicare patients.
2.5 years
Enhanced
Unclear
Study design
NA
104,000
41%
59%
74
Decline in hospitalisation rates by 10% in intervention group, similar to control group.
primary care program
unclear- not completed
Goff et al.
2018
USA
Team based care model using 2 registered nurses, 2 medical assistance trained as outreach workers, case manager
12 month follow up
Enhanced
Controlled before and after observational study
Case Control
High
319
36%
64%
53
Reduction in unplanned
primary care program
hospitalisation rates, no change in annual rate of ED visits.
Zurovac et al.
2019
USA
Behavioural health integrated into primary care with physicians, nurses, medical assistants, practice manager, behavioural health therapists, registered nurse health coaches, panel manager
24 months
Enhanced
Observational study
Study design
NA
2001
41%
59%
72
No significant reduction in hospitalisations. Reduced ED visits. Improvement in diabetes care
primary care program
doesn't fit- not completed
McLendon et al.
2019
USA
Care coordination, telemedicine, education
12 months
Enhanced
Retrospective study
Study design
NA
59
20%
80%
Unknown
Statistically significant reduction in ED visits, hospital admissions,
statistically significant increase in
A1c, increased DSME score
primary care program
doesn't fit- not completed
Chung et al.
2014
USA
Clinical pharmacy program following collaborative drug therapy management protocol
providing 30 minute visits with pharmacist whenever needed
30 minute
Integrated care pathway
Retrospective cohort study
Cohort
High
782
45%
55%
51
Statistically significant reduction in hospitalisations, non significant increase in ED visits, significant reduction in HbA1c levels.
visit with
pharmacist whenever needed with 1 year follow up
Sampson et al.
2017
UK
Severe hypogylcaemic
ambulance management team who referred callers to an education teamthey where then had direct face to face or
telephone contact
education on SH management and avoidance
17 months
Integrated care pathway
Retrospective study
Study design
doesn't fit- not completed
NA
2000
56%
44%
67
Reduction in ambulance transport
to hospital and hospital
 
admissions
Bennett et al.
2018
USA
Community paramedicine- implementing a care plan devised by liason nurse over a number of visits
Unknown
Integrated care pathway
Pre and post test evaluation with comparison group
Case Control
High
68
40%
60%
58
Significant decrease in ED visits, ambulance calls, inpatient length of stay, hospitalisations, readmisstion rate and increase in transports compared to comparison group.
Increase in comparison group.
Quan et al.
2015
USA
Automated telephone calls with follow up from health staff/ lay person for behavioural action plan
6 month intervention
Telemedicine
Controlled quasi experimental evaluation trial
RCT
High
362
29%
71%
55
Reduction in ED visits and hospitalizations.
Due-
2015
Denmark
Diabetic specialist nurse answers calls out of hours
6 months
Telemedicine
Sequential exploratory mixed methods study. Observational study
Study design
NA
592
44%
56%
62
ATC prevented the escalation of severe diabetes related conditions and likely prevented admissions in 15/17 cases.
Christensen et al.
doesn't fit- not completed
Warren et al.
2017
Australia
Care coordinator provided additional assistance with
6 months
Telemedicine
Randomised
RCT
High
126
54%
46%
61
Decrease in GP visits, specialist referrals, hospital admissions.
control trial

Study characteristics and participants

Studies that were included were those published since 2014, with data collected from USA (n = 11) [1929], UK (n = 3) [3032], Hong Kong (n = 1) [33], Denmark (n = 1) [34], Canada (n = 1) [35], Israel (n = 1) [36] and Australia (n = 1) [37]. There were a range of interventions identified that explored reducing unscheduled hospital care in people with diabetes; telemedicine (n = 3) [20, 34, 37], education (n = 2) [19, 30], integrated care pathways (n = 4) [2325, 31], enhanced primary care (n = 7) [2629, 32, 33, 35] and care management teams (n = 3) [21, 22, 36]. The study design of the papers were heterogenous; 3 before- after studies [25, 26, 32], 1 randomised controlled trial (RCT) [37], 4 cohort studies [19, 22, 23, 33], 2 quasi experiments [20, 24], 1 cross sectional study [36], 1 mixed method study [34], 4 observational or retrospective studies [2831] and 3 designs were unspecified/unknown [21, 27, 35]. The sample size of the 19 papers ranged from n = 25 to n = 104,000. The average ages within the studies ranged from 41 to 74 years with females comprising 57% of the participants.

Study quality

Based on the SURE guidelines, there were 7 high quality papers [20, 23, 25, 26, 32, 33, 37], 3 moderate quality papers [19, 22, 24] and 1 low quality paper [36]. It was not possible to complete a critical appraisal for 8 papers; 3 papers where the study design was not clear [21, 27, 35] and 5 papers where the study design did not fit the SURE guidelines (18, 26–28, 31).

Study outcomes

The papers produced results about hospitalisation rates, with varying degrees of significance. Three papers reported a significant decrease in hospitalisations [23, 24, 30], 12 papers reported a decrease in hospitalisations, although not significant [20, 21, 2527, 3137] and 3 reported no change in hospitalisations [19, 22, 28]. No papers reported an increase in hospitalisations due to the intervention.

Discussion

Main findings

This systematic review has shown that there are a number of studies relating to interventions that reduce unscheduled hospital care for hypoglycaemic events for adults with diabetes. This is currently particularly important as adults with diabetes have been reluctant to go to hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic, fearful of contracting the virus and consequently missing treatment [38]. The interventions were categorised as telemedicine, education, integrated care pathways, enhanced primary care and care management teams and had varying levels of effectiveness as outlined below.

Telemedicine

Telemedicine is the delivery of health care at a distance to optimize and improve health outcomes [39]. There were 3 studies that utilised telemedicine, albeit in different ways. Quan et al. used automated telephone calls with behavioural follow ups from health care staff or a trained lay person for 6 months [20]. Due-Christensen et al. utilised acute telephone counselling from a diabetic specialist nurse (DSN) out of hours over 6 months [34]. Warren et al. used a home monitor that captured clinical measurements and provided additional care from a diabetes care coordinator [37].
The use of telemedicine showed a decrease in unscheduled admissions and ED visits across all 3 studies although the results were not significant [20, 34, 37]. These studies were based in Australia [37], USA [20] and Denmark [34], showing success in different countries. Both Warren et al. and Quan et al. used a RCT design to compare efficacy [20, 37] whilst Due- Christensen et al. used an observational design thus not allowing for the control of variables [34]. Whilst there were no significant differences in the findings, a larger sample size might have shown significance as there were only 126 participants in [37], 362 in [20] and 592 in [34].

Patient education

Patient education is offered to people with long term conditions to aid and enhance their self-management of their health and wellbeing [40]. Elliott et al. evaluated the DAFNE (Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating) education course that is used in the UK and Ireland whilst Yeung et al. developed a 2.5 year long-term education program that provided low intensity self- management education for 6 months before a 24 month high intensity self-management support component with a certified diabetes educator and clinical psychologist [19, 30].
Patient education also showed a decrease in the number of unscheduled admissions and ED visits. Elliott et al. found that this decrease in ED visits and unscheduled admissions was significant [30], however Yeung et al. did not find the decrease in admissions to be significant, nor the reduction in ED visits [19]. This could be due to the small sample size in the study by Yeung et al. [19] (n = 60) and the older age of the participants in the study by Yeung et al. [19] (mean age 62 years old) compared with the study by Elliott et al. [30] (mean age 41 years old). The trials took place in the USA [19] and UK [30]. These results show that a 2.5 year, long- term educational program does not necessarily provide increased benefits over shorter structured education programs.

Care management teams

Care management teams are a team based approach to helping patients and their support system manage chronic illnesses more effectively [41]. Kaufman et al. used coordinated care management teams composed of a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, community health worker, health coaches, social work staff, program manager, nurse care manager, program director and associate clinical director to improve care [21]. Ginzburg et al. used a nurse managed care team comprising a physician, nurse, social worker, pharmacist, physical exercise consultant and other medical specialists to achieve optimal diabetes control and management, with telephone reminders included [36]. Kearns et al. compared resource utilization in traditional care with resource utilization in care management teams comprising a physician, medical assistant and care manager, who was a certified diabetes educator [22].
The use of care management teams had mixed results on their efficacy in reducing unscheduled admissions. Kaufman et al. found a decrease in healthcare utilization in both ED visits and admissions however they had a small sample size (n = 25) [21]. Ginzburg et al. also had a relatively small sample size (n = 100). Their study showed a significant increase in non- acute care visits to physicians and ophthalmologists along with a non- significant increase in dietitian visits. These increases, could explain the decrease in hospitalisations observed [36]. Kearns et al. had the largest sample size (n = 19,696), however found no change in healthcare utilization and admissions relevant to the intervention. There was a decrease in urgent care visits and hospital admissions and an increase in ED visits and readmissions, however these changes were seen in both the intervention and control groups, suggesting influence from outside factors not related to the intervention [22].

Integrated care

Integrated care is the coordination and integration of health services, to ensure the best patient care [42]. The integrated care studies were broken down into those that involved pharmacists and those that utilised the ambulance service. Brophy et al. used collaborative drug management therapy involving both a pharmacist and care manager for high risk patients treated with polypharmacy, providing health coaching, education, transportation assistance and prescription refill assistance [24]. The study by Chung et al. used a clinical pharmacy program under a collaborative drug therapy management program enabling patients to receive a 30 min visit with the pharmacist, when needed, to maintain patient safety and achieve the patients’ goals [23]. Sampson et al. implemented a new integrated care pathway for managing severe hypoglycaemia that involved providing patients with written information on avoiding severe hypoglycaemia and a diabetes education follow up session with an educator within 3 days of their call, unless the patient actively opted out [31]. Bennett et al. used community paramedicine to shift care from ED and inpatients to outpatient and medical home based care by community paramedics implementing a care plan devised by a liaison nurse over a number of visits [25]. Whilst ambulance care is considered unscheduled care, these studies were relevant as they were aimed to prevent hospital admissions and ED attendances.
The pharmacy interventions by both Brophy et al. and Chung et al. showed a statistically significant decrease in hospitalisations upon their implementation. Brophy et al. found that there was a decrease in ED visits although it was not significant [24]. This was contradicted by Chung et al. who found that there was an increase in ED visits, however this increase was less in the intervention group than the comparison group [23]. Whilst both Chung et al. and Brophy et al. had large sample size [23, 24], the sample size in the control and intervention groups in [23] were unevenly matched (557:225) [13]. These studies both used retrospective data analysis and so confounding variables would not have been controlled.
Studies by both Sampson et al. and Bennett et al. involving ambulance services showed a decrease in unscheduled admissions [25, 31]. Bennett et al. showed a decrease in ED visits and ambulance calls, however an increase in those requiring hospital transport for higher levels of care. The control group also reflected these outcomes, however at a lower rate than the intervention group, indicating that the intervention group utilised care more appropriately than the control group [25]. This contradicts the study by Sampson et al. who showed a decrease in hospital transports upon implementation of the new clinical pathway [31].
These studies suggest that better co-ordination across health care sectors and professional groups has the potential to, and has been shown to, improve outcomes in adults with diabetes.

Enhanced primary care

Enhanced primary care is increased clinical and social support in the community provided by nurses, care coordinators, support workers and others who work alongside GP’s to help patients learn more about and improve their condition management [43]. Zurovak et al. used integrated teams of physicians, nurses, medical assistants, practice managers, behavioural health therapists, registered nurse health coaches and panel managers to provide patient-centred care to improve behavioural health, care management of chronic illnesses and improved technology [28]. MacKay et al. enhanced the role of the medical office assistant to carry out key tasks in diabetes care to find out if it improved the effectiveness of care [35]. The study by Seidu et al. compared practices providing enhanced primary care with practices providing core care. Enhanced practices had a primary care physician and practice nurse with an interest in diabetes who identified patients who could be discharged from secondary care and managed in primary care with monthly meetings discussing care for the complex cases [32]. Wong et al. implemented a patient empowerment program to give patients greater control over their health care decisions utilizing a collaborative approach between the patient and healthcare provider [33]. In Goff et al. ’s study they implemented a team care model, consisting of 2 registered nurses, 2 medical assistants trained as outreach workers and a case manager and compared the outcome and resource utilization with matched controls who did not receive the enhanced care [26]. The study by Peterson et al. utilised nurses to work with the patient and their primary care physician to develop and implement care plans, contacting patients approximately once a week, to measure association with extending CareFirst’s BlueCross BlueShield commercial health insurance program to Medicare Fee-for-service patients on outcome and resource use [27]. Multiple interventions were used by McLendon et al. to enhance diabetes care including nurse care management involving doctors, physician assistants and nurses, telemedicine and education [29].
Enhanced primary care was the most common intervention identified in this review with six studies focused on it. Three studies were based in the USA [2628], one in the UK [32], one in Hong Kong [33] and one in Canada [35]. Zurovac et al. found a slight, non- significant increase in the number of admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions but no overall change in hospitalisations [28]. This contradicted the other five papers that showed a decrease in the number of unscheduled admissions, albeit all non- significantly. MacKay et al. found that whilst there was a decrease in admissions, the control group also had a decrease suggesting external factors not related to the intervention were at play [35]. ED visits were found to be decreased or remained similar in four of the six studies. Seidu et al. did not measure ED visits but commented that they would be unlikely to increase [32] and Zurovac et al. showed an increase in ED visits although at a lower rate than the control, despite the program not employing specific strategies to reduce ED visits [28]. Wong et al. showed an increase in specialist outpatient clinic visits but a significant decrease in general outpatient clinic visits [33] with Seidu et al. showing a decrease in the number of non- elective bed days [32].
Reducing unscheduled admissions for diabetes will help reduce overcrowding and clinical pressures in the emergency department, leading to reduced waiting times. This will also reduce costs on the health services by providing the right care, in the right place, at the right time, by placing the patient at the centre of the model which aligns with the Transforming Your Care (TYC) strategy in the UK [45]. In addition, better co-ordination across health care sectors and professional groups has the potential to, and has been shown to, improve outcomes in adults with diabetes.

Limitations

There were a number of limitations in relation to this review; the search only included papers written in English and published since 2014 so there could be interventions that pre- dated this or interventions published in other languages not identified in the search. However, as health care and technology progresses so rapidly it was felt important to focus on recent practice as far as possible. The most common limitation that appeared in the studies was an underpowered or small sample size, potentially leading to Type II errors or bias [19, 20, 25, 29, 3537, 44]. In one study financial incentives were also used to encourage participation which could have produced results that would have not been seen otherwise [27]. Three studies lacked a control group [19, 30, 34] and a number of studies did not blind either participants, healthcare professionals or researchers in the allocation of the intervention arm, potentially leading to bias [20, 2426, 2832, 37]. Three studies also had unclear study designs [21, 27, 35]. There were only 7 high quality papers and 3 moderate quality papers, with 1 low quality paper and 8 papers of unknown quality, therefore the strength of the evidence should be considered with caution.
Data extraction was undertaken by one reviewer only (AW) due to the lack of ambiguity in the data to be extracted, having a second reviewer may have added to the rigour of the study.

Conclusion

The findings in this paper show that globally, there is a scarcity of high-quality research into interventions that reduce unscheduled hospital care in adults with diabetes, despite this being such an important aspect of health care provision. Statistically significant decreases were reported from one study using patient education and two studies promoting integrated care suggesting these are the most effective interventions at reducing unscheduled hospital care for hypoglycaemic events in adults with diabetes. It is evident that there are opportunities to improve integrated care for people with diabetes however, as the quality of the existing evidence base is variable, further high-quality research with larger samples should be carried out to enhance the evidence base around these interventions. Investment in effective community-based interventions must be a priority to shift the balance of care from secondary to primary care to facilitate reduction in unscheduled hospital admissions.

Declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no competing interests, either financial or personal.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

© Springer Medizin

Bis 11. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr 50 % sparen!

e.Med Innere Medizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

© Springer Medizin

Bis 11. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr 50 % sparen!

Anhänge

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Literatur
11.
Zurück zum Zitat CDC. National Diabetes Statistics Report 2020. Estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. 2020. CDC. National Diabetes Statistics Report 2020. Estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. 2020.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Field BCT, Nayar R, Kilvert A, Baxter M, Hickey J, Cummings M, Bain SC. A retrospective observational study of people with Type 1 diabetes with self-reported severe hypoglycaemia reveals high level of ambulance attendance but low levels of therapy change and specialist intervention. Diabet Med. 2018;35(9):1223–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13670.CrossRef Field BCT, Nayar R, Kilvert A, Baxter M, Hickey J, Cummings M, Bain SC. A retrospective observational study of people with Type 1 diabetes with self-reported severe hypoglycaemia reveals high level of ambulance attendance but low levels of therapy change and specialist intervention. Diabet Med. 2018;35(9):1223–31. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​dme.​13670.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeung RO, Oh M, Tang TS. (2014). Does a 2.5-year self-management education and support intervention change patterns of healthcare use in African-American adults with type 2 diabetes?. Diabet Med :A J British Diabet Assoc, 31(4), 472–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12374 Yeung RO, Oh M, Tang TS. (2014). Does a 2.5-year self-management education and support intervention change patterns of healthcare use in African-American adults with type 2 diabetes?. Diabet Med :A J British Diabet Assoc, 31(4), 472–476. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​dme.​12374
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kearns P. Diabetes Care Management Teams Did Not Reduce Utilization When Compared With Traditional Care: A Randomized Cluster Trial. Managed care (Langhorne, Pa.). 2017;26(10):33–40. Kearns P. Diabetes Care Management Teams Did Not Reduce Utilization When Compared With Traditional Care: A Randomized Cluster Trial. Managed care (Langhorne, Pa.). 2017;26(10):33–40.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung N, Rascati K, Lopez D, Jokerst J, Garza A. Impact of a Clinical Pharmacy Program on Changes in Hemoglobin A1c, Diabetes-Related Hospitalizations, and Diabetes-Related Emergency Department Visits for Patients with Diabetes in an Underserved Population. J Manag Care Pharmacy. 2014;20(9):914–919. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.9.914 Chung N, Rascati K, Lopez D, Jokerst J, Garza A. Impact of a Clinical Pharmacy Program on Changes in Hemoglobin A1c, Diabetes-Related Hospitalizations, and Diabetes-Related Emergency Department Visits for Patients with Diabetes in an Underserved Population. J Manag Care Pharmacy. 2014;20(9):914–919. https://​doi.​org/​10.​18553/​jmcp.​2014.​20.​9.​914
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Brophy L, Williams A, Berman EJ, Keleti D, Michael KE, Shepherd M, Tegenu M. Collaborative DTM reduces hospitalization and healthcare costs in patients with diabetes treated with polypharmacy. Am J Manag Care. 2014. Brophy L, Williams A, Berman EJ, Keleti D, Michael KE, Shepherd M, Tegenu M. Collaborative DTM reduces hospitalization and healthcare costs in patients with diabetes treated with polypharmacy. Am J Manag Care. 2014.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Elliott J, Jacques RM, Kruger J, Campbell MJ, Amiel SA, Mansell P, Heller SR. Substantial reductions in the number of diabetic ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycaemia episodes requiring emergency treatment lead to reduced costs after structured education in adults with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med :A J British Diabet Assoc 2014;31(7):847–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12441 Elliott J, Jacques RM, Kruger J, Campbell MJ, Amiel SA, Mansell P, Heller SR. Substantial reductions in the number of diabetic ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycaemia episodes requiring emergency treatment lead to reduced costs after structured education in adults with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med :A J British Diabet Assoc 2014;31(7):847–853. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​dme.​12441
31.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong CKH, Wong WCW, Lam CLK, Wan YF, Wong WHT, Chung KL, Fong DYT. Effects of Patient Empowerment Programme (PEP) on clinical outcomes and health service utilization in type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: an observational matched cohort study. PloS One. 2014;9(5):e95328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095328 Wong CKH, Wong WCW, Lam CLK, Wan YF, Wong WHT, Chung KL, Fong DYT. Effects of Patient Empowerment Programme (PEP) on clinical outcomes and health service utilization in type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: an observational matched cohort study. PloS One. 2014;9(5):e95328. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0095328
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Due-Christensen M, Kaldan G, Almdal TP, Glindorf M, Nielsen KE, Zoffmann V. Out-of-office hours nurse-driven acute telephone counselling service in a large diabetes outpatient clinic: A mixed methods evaluation. Patient Education and Counseling. 2015;98(7):890–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.014 Due-Christensen M, Kaldan G, Almdal TP, Glindorf M, Nielsen KE, Zoffmann V. Out-of-office hours nurse-driven acute telephone counselling service in a large diabetes outpatient clinic: A mixed methods evaluation. Patient Education and Counseling. 2015;98(7):890–894. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​pec.​2015.​03.​014
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Ginzburg T, Hoffman R, Azuri J. Improving diabetes control in the community: A nurse managed intervention model in a multidisciplinary clinic. Australian J Advanced Nursing. 2017. Ginzburg T, Hoffman R, Azuri J. Improving diabetes control in the community: A nurse managed intervention model in a multidisciplinary clinic. Australian J Advanced Nursing. 2017.
Metadaten
Titel
Reducing unscheduled hospital care for adults with diabetes following a hypoglycaemic event: which community-based interventions are most effective? A systematic review
verfasst von
Aoife Watson
Donna McConnell
Vivien Coates
Publikationsdatum
10.06.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders / Ausgabe 1/2021
Elektronische ISSN: 2251-6581
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-021-00817-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.