Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2012 | Research article | Ausgabe 1/2012 Open Access

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012

Reduction in inappropriate hospital use based on analysis of the causes

Zeitschrift:
BMC Health Services Research > Ausgabe 1/2012
Autoren:
Víctor Soria-Aledo, Andrés Carrillo-Alcaraz, Benito Flores-Pastor, Alfredo Moreno-Egea, Milagros Carrasco-Prats, José Luis Aguayo-Albasini
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1472-6963-12-361) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Authors' contribution

VS conceived the study and participated in the design to draft the manuscript AC participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis, giving final approval of the version to be published BF made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the manuscript. AM revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. MC participated in the sequence alignment and drafted the manuscript and gave final approval of the version to be published. JA participated in the sequence alignment and drafted the manuscript and gave final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abstract

Background

To reduce inappropriate admissions and stays with the application of an improvement cycle in patients admitted to a University Hospital. The secondary objective is to analyze the hospital cost saved by reducing inadequacy after the implementation of measures proposed by the group for improvement.

Methods

Pre- and post-analysis of a sample of clinical histories studied retrospectively, in which the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) was applied to a representative hospital sample of 1350 clinical histories in two phases. In the first phase the AEP was applied retrospectively to 725 admissions and 1350 stays. The factors associated with inappropriateness were analysed together with the causes, and specific measures were implemented in a bid to reduce inappropriateness. In the second phase the AEP was reapplied to a similar group of clinical histories and the results of the two groups were compared. The cost of inappropriate stays was calculated by cost accounting. Setting: General University Hospital with 426 beds serving a population of 320,000 inhabitants in the centre of Murcia, a city in south-eastern Spain.

Results

Inappropriate admissions were reduced significantly: 7.4% in the control group and 3.2% in the intervention group. Likewise, inappropriate stays decreased significantly from 24.6% to 10.4%. The cost of inappropriateness in the study sample fell from 147,044 euros to 66,642 euros. The causes of inappropriateness for which corrective measures were adopted were those that showed the most significant decrease.

Conclusions

It is possible to reduce inadequacy by applying measures based on prior analysis of the situation in each hospital.
Zusatzmaterial
Authors’ original file for figure 1
12913_2010_2266_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 2
12913_2010_2266_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe