Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Cardiology 3/2020

20.03.2020 | Review Article

Registries, Risk Calculators, and Risk-Adjusted Outcomes: Current Usage, Limitations, and Future Prospects

verfasst von: Ralf J. Holzer, Jeffrey D. Dayton

Erschienen in: Pediatric Cardiology | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Small study sizes are a limiting factor in assessing outcome measures in pediatric cardiology. It is even more difficult to assess the outcomes of congenital catheterizations where the sample sizes are even smaller, particularly on a individual institutional level. The creation of multicenter registries is a method by which investigators can pool data to better assess quality and outcome measures of these procedures. No registry is perfect with several being available today, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. In addition, there are a multitude of methods currently used to assess quality and outcomes from the data contained in these registries, each having its own limitations as well. Nonetheless, multicenter registrities remain one of the best available options to improve the quality of care for pediatric interventional cardiac catheterization. Below, we provide an overview of the current state of quality assessment/improvement in pediatric interventional cardiology including a review of the available registrities and the metrics used to measure quality of care and outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee RI, Jones LW (1933) The fundamentals of good medical care. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Lee RI, Jones LW (1933) The fundamentals of good medical care. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Io M (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC Io M (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tynan M, Finley JP, Fontes V, Hess J, Kan J (1990) Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of native coarctation: results of valvuloplasty and angioplasty of congenital anomalies registry. Am J Cardiol 65(11):790–792PubMedCrossRef Tynan M, Finley JP, Fontes V, Hess J, Kan J (1990) Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of native coarctation: results of valvuloplasty and angioplasty of congenital anomalies registry. Am J Cardiol 65(11):790–792PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergersen L, Marshall A, Gauvreau K et al (2010) Adverse event rates in congenital cardiac catheterization—a multi-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75(3):389–400PubMed Bergersen L, Marshall A, Gauvreau K et al (2010) Adverse event rates in congenital cardiac catheterization—a multi-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75(3):389–400PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Everett AD, Ringel R, Rhodes JF et al (2006) Development of the MAGIC congenital heart disease catheterization database for interventional outcome studies. J Interv Cardiol 19(2):173–177PubMedCrossRef Everett AD, Ringel R, Rhodes JF et al (2006) Development of the MAGIC congenital heart disease catheterization database for interventional outcome studies. J Interv Cardiol 19(2):173–177PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jenkins KJ, Beekman Iii RH, Bergersen LJ et al (2008) Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease—the perspective of cardiology. Cardiol Young 18(Suppl 2):116–123PubMedCrossRef Jenkins KJ, Beekman Iii RH, Bergersen LJ et al (2008) Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease—the perspective of cardiology. Cardiol Young 18(Suppl 2):116–123PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Holzer R, Qureshi S, Ghasemi A et al (2010) Stenting of aortic coarctation: acute, intermediate, and long-term results of a prospective multi-institutional registry—congenital cardiovascular interventional study consortium (CCISC). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76(4):553–563PubMedCrossRef Holzer R, Qureshi S, Ghasemi A et al (2010) Stenting of aortic coarctation: acute, intermediate, and long-term results of a prospective multi-institutional registry—congenital cardiovascular interventional study consortium (CCISC). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76(4):553–563PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Everett AD, Jennings J, Sibinga E et al (2009) Community use of the amplatzer atrial septal defect occluder: results of the multicenter MAGIC atrial septal defect study. Pediatr Cardiol 30(3):240–247PubMedCrossRef Everett AD, Jennings J, Sibinga E et al (2009) Community use of the amplatzer atrial septal defect occluder: results of the multicenter MAGIC atrial septal defect study. Pediatr Cardiol 30(3):240–247PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Holzer RJ, Gauvreau K, Kreutzer J et al (2011) Balloon angioplasty and stenting of branch pulmonary arterues: adverse events and procedural characteristics—results of a multi-institutional registry. Circ Interv 4:287–296CrossRef Holzer RJ, Gauvreau K, Kreutzer J et al (2011) Balloon angioplasty and stenting of branch pulmonary arterues: adverse events and procedural characteristics—results of a multi-institutional registry. Circ Interv 4:287–296CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Holzer RJ, Gauvreau K, Kreutzer J, Hirsch R, Torres A, Bergersen L (2011) Safety and efficacy of balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty: a multicenter experience. JACC 80:663–672 Holzer RJ, Gauvreau K, Kreutzer J, Hirsch R, Torres A, Bergersen L (2011) Safety and efficacy of balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty: a multicenter experience. JACC 80:663–672
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergersen L, Gauvreau K, Foerster SR et al (2011) Catheterization for congenital heart disease adjustment for risk method (CHARM). JACC Interv 4:1037–1046CrossRef Bergersen L, Gauvreau K, Foerster SR et al (2011) Catheterization for congenital heart disease adjustment for risk method (CHARM). JACC Interv 4:1037–1046CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergersen L, Gauvreau K, Marshall A et al (2011) Procedure-type risk categories for pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4:188–194PubMedCrossRef Bergersen L, Gauvreau K, Marshall A et al (2011) Procedure-type risk categories for pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4:188–194PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin GR, Beekman RH, Ing FF et al (2010) The IMPACT registry: improving pediatric and adult congenital treatments. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 13(1):20–25PubMedCrossRef Martin GR, Beekman RH, Ing FF et al (2010) The IMPACT registry: improving pediatric and adult congenital treatments. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 13(1):20–25PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayaram N, Beekman RH 3rd, Benson L et al (2015) Adjusting for risk associated with pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization: a report from the NCDR IMPACT registry. Circulation 132(20):1863–1870PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jayaram N, Beekman RH 3rd, Benson L et al (2015) Adjusting for risk associated with pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization: a report from the NCDR IMPACT registry. Circulation 132(20):1863–1870PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nykanen DG, Forbes TJ, Du W et al (2016) CRISP: catheterization RISk score for pediatrics: a report from the congenital cardiac interventional study consortium (CCISC). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 87(2):302–309PubMedCrossRef Nykanen DG, Forbes TJ, Du W et al (2016) CRISP: catheterization RISk score for pediatrics: a report from the congenital cardiac interventional study consortium (CCISC). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 87(2):302–309PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill KD, Du W, Fleming GA et al (2019) Validation and refinement of the catheterization RISk score for pediatrics (CRISP score): an analysis from the congenital cardiac interventional study consortium. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 93(1):97–104PubMedCrossRef Hill KD, Du W, Fleming GA et al (2019) Validation and refinement of the catheterization RISk score for pediatrics (CRISP score): an analysis from the congenital cardiac interventional study consortium. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 93(1):97–104PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown DW, Dipilato AE, Chong EC, Lock JE, McElhinney DB (2010) Aortic valve reinterventions after balloon aortic valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis intermediate and late follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(21):1740–1749PubMedCrossRef Brown DW, Dipilato AE, Chong EC, Lock JE, McElhinney DB (2010) Aortic valve reinterventions after balloon aortic valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis intermediate and late follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(21):1740–1749PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Holzer RJ, Cheatham JP (2010) Shifting the balance between aortic insufficiency and residual gradients after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(21):1750–1751PubMedCrossRef Holzer RJ, Cheatham JP (2010) Shifting the balance between aortic insufficiency and residual gradients after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(21):1750–1751PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin CH, Hegde S, Marshall AC et al (2014) Incidence and management of life-threatening adverse events during cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 35(1):140–148PubMedCrossRef Lin CH, Hegde S, Marshall AC et al (2014) Incidence and management of life-threatening adverse events during cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 35(1):140–148PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat OByrne ML, Silber JH, Kennedy KF, et al. (2018) Failure to rescue as an outcome metric in the pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization laboratory: an analysis of data the improving adult and congenital treatment (IMPACT) registry. Circulation 138:A11788. OByrne ML, Silber JH, Kennedy KF, et al. (2018) Failure to rescue as an outcome metric in the pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization laboratory: an analysis of data the improving adult and congenital treatment (IMPACT) registry. Circulation 138:A11788.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibbs JL, Monro JL, Cunningham D, Rickards A (2004) Survival after surgery or therapeutic catheterisation for congenital heart disease in children in the United Kingdom: analysis of the central cardiac audit database for 2000–1. BMJ 328(7440):611PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gibbs JL, Monro JL, Cunningham D, Rickards A (2004) Survival after surgery or therapeutic catheterisation for congenital heart disease in children in the United Kingdom: analysis of the central cardiac audit database for 2000–1. BMJ 328(7440):611PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat McElhinney DB, Quartermain MD, Kenny D, Alboliras E, Amin Z (2016) Relative risk factors for cardiac erosion following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects: a case-control study. Circulation 133(18):1738–1746PubMedCrossRef McElhinney DB, Quartermain MD, Kenny D, Alboliras E, Amin Z (2016) Relative risk factors for cardiac erosion following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects: a case-control study. Circulation 133(18):1738–1746PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Backes CH, Bergersen L, Rome JJ et al (2015) Quality metrics in cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease: utility of 30-day mortality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 85(1):104–110PubMedCrossRef Backes CH, Bergersen L, Rome JJ et al (2015) Quality metrics in cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease: utility of 30-day mortality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 85(1):104–110PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Forbes TJ, Kim DW, Du W et al (2011) Comparison of surgical, stent, and balloon angioplasty treatment of native coarctation of the aorta: an observational study by the CCISC (congenital cardiovascular interventional study consortium). J Am Coll Cardiol 58(25):2664–2674PubMedCrossRef Forbes TJ, Kim DW, Du W et al (2011) Comparison of surgical, stent, and balloon angioplasty treatment of native coarctation of the aorta: an observational study by the CCISC (congenital cardiovascular interventional study consortium). J Am Coll Cardiol 58(25):2664–2674PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Forbes TJ, Garekar S, Amin Z et al (2007) Procedural results and acute complications in stenting native and recurrent coarctation of the aorta in patients over 4 years of age: a multi-institutional study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70(2):276–285PubMedCrossRef Forbes TJ, Garekar S, Amin Z et al (2007) Procedural results and acute complications in stenting native and recurrent coarctation of the aorta in patients over 4 years of age: a multi-institutional study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70(2):276–285PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Holzer R, Beekman R, Benson L et al (2016) Characteristics and safety of interventions and procedures performed during catheterisation of patients with congenital heart disease: early report from the national cardiovascular data registry. Cardiol Young 26(6):1202–1212PubMedCrossRef Holzer R, Beekman R, Benson L et al (2016) Characteristics and safety of interventions and procedures performed during catheterisation of patients with congenital heart disease: early report from the national cardiovascular data registry. Cardiol Young 26(6):1202–1212PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Byrne ML, Kennedy KF, Jayaram N et al (2019) Failure to rescue as an outcome metric for pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization laboratory programs: analysis of data from the IMPACT registry. J Am Heart Assoc 8(21):e013151PubMedPubMedCentral O’Byrne ML, Kennedy KF, Jayaram N et al (2019) Failure to rescue as an outcome metric for pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization laboratory programs: analysis of data from the IMPACT registry. J Am Heart Assoc 8(21):e013151PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Asoh K, Hickey E, Dorostkar PC et al (2009) Outcomes of emergent cardiac catheterization following pediatric cardiac surgery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73(7):933–940PubMedCrossRef Asoh K, Hickey E, Dorostkar PC et al (2009) Outcomes of emergent cardiac catheterization following pediatric cardiac surgery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73(7):933–940PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore JW, Vincent RN, Beekman RH 3rd et al (2014) Procedural results and safety of common interventional procedures in congenital heart disease: initial report from the national cardiovascular data registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(23):2439–2451PubMedCrossRef Moore JW, Vincent RN, Beekman RH 3rd et al (2014) Procedural results and safety of common interventional procedures in congenital heart disease: initial report from the national cardiovascular data registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(23):2439–2451PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Vincent RN, Moore J, Beekman RH et al (2015) Procedural characteristics and adverse events in diagnostic and interventional catheterizations in pediatric and congenital heart disease: initial report from the IMPACT registry. Cardiol Yong 26:70–78CrossRef Vincent RN, Moore J, Beekman RH et al (2015) Procedural characteristics and adverse events in diagnostic and interventional catheterizations in pediatric and congenital heart disease: initial report from the IMPACT registry. Cardiol Yong 26:70–78CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Dehmer GJ, Jennings J, Madden RA et al (2016) The national cardiovascular data registry voluntary public reporting program: an interim report from the NCDR public reporting advisory group. J Am Coll Cardiol 67(2):205–215PubMedCrossRef Dehmer GJ, Jennings J, Madden RA et al (2016) The national cardiovascular data registry voluntary public reporting program: an interim report from the NCDR public reporting advisory group. J Am Coll Cardiol 67(2):205–215PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Registries, Risk Calculators, and Risk-Adjusted Outcomes: Current Usage, Limitations, and Future Prospects
verfasst von
Ralf J. Holzer
Jeffrey D. Dayton
Publikationsdatum
20.03.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Pediatric Cardiology / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02300-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Pediatric Cardiology 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.