Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology 9/2016

01.09.2016 | Neuro-oncology (GJ Lesser, Section Editor)

Relapsed Glioblastoma: Treatment Strategies for Initial and Subsequent Recurrences

verfasst von: Alicia Tosoni, MD, Enrico Franceschi, MD, Rosalba Poggi, MD, Alba A. Brandes, MD

Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology | Ausgabe 9/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Opinion Statement

At the time of glioblastoma (GBM) recurrence, a sharp analysis of prognostic factors, disease characteristics, response to adjuvant treatment, and clinical conditions should be performed. A prognostic assessment could allow a careful selection between patients that could be proposed to intensified approaches or palliative setting. Participation in clinical trials aims to improve outcome, and should be encouraged due to dismal prognosis of GBM patients after recurrence. Reoperation should be proposed if the tumor is amenable to a complete resection and if prognostic factors suggest that patient could benefit from a second surgery. Second-line chemotherapy should be chosen based on MGMT status, time to disease recurrence, and toxicity profile. If enrollment into a clinical trial is not possible, a nitrosourea-based regimen is the preferred choice, carefully evaluating any previous temozolomide (TMZ)-related toxicity. In MGMT-methylated patients relapsing after TMZ completion, a rechallenge could be proposed. After second progression, the clinical advantage of subsequent lines of chemotherapy still needs to be clarified. However, based on performance status, patients’ preference, and disease behavior, a third-line treatment could be considered. Available treatments include nitrosoureas, bevacizumab, or carboplatin plus etoposide. However, more effective therapeutic options are needed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):987–96.CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):987–96.CrossRefPubMed
2•.
Zurück zum Zitat Carson KA, Grossman SA, Fisher JD, Shaw EG. Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with recurrent glioma enrolled onto the new approaches to brain tumor therapy CNS consortium phase I and II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(18):2601–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carson KA, Grossman SA, Fisher JD, Shaw EG. Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with recurrent glioma enrolled onto the new approaches to brain tumor therapy CNS consortium phase I and II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(18):2601–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3•.
4•.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorlia T, Stupp R, Brandes AA, Rampling RR, Fumoleau P, Dittrich C, et al. New prognostic factors and calculators for outcome prediction in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a pooled analysis of EORTC Brain Tumour Group phase I and II clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(8):1176–84. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.004 .These three studies analized the role of prognostic factors in large series of GBM recurrent patientsCrossRefPubMed Gorlia T, Stupp R, Brandes AA, Rampling RR, Fumoleau P, Dittrich C, et al. New prognostic factors and calculators for outcome prediction in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a pooled analysis of EORTC Brain Tumour Group phase I and II clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(8):1176–84. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2012.​02.​004 .These three studies analized the role of prognostic factors in large series of GBM recurrent patientsCrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR, Gokaslan ZL, Shi W, DeMonte F, et al. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg. 2001;95(2):190–8.CrossRefPubMed Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR, Gokaslan ZL, Shi W, DeMonte F, et al. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg. 2001;95(2):190–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang SM, Parney IF, McDermott M, Barker 2nd FG, Schmidt MH, Huang W, et al. Perioperative complications and neurological outcomes of first and second craniotomies among patients enrolled in the Glioma Outcome Project. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(6):1175–81. doi:10.3171/jns.2003.98.6.1175. CrossRefPubMed Chang SM, Parney IF, McDermott M, Barker 2nd FG, Schmidt MH, Huang W, et al. Perioperative complications and neurological outcomes of first and second craniotomies among patients enrolled in the Glioma Outcome Project. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(6):1175–81. doi:10.​3171/​jns.​2003.​98.​6.​1175.​ CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JK, Hodges T, Arko L, Shen M, Dello Iacono D, McNabb A, et al. Scale to predict survival after surgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2010;28(24):3838–43. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.30.0582. CrossRef Park JK, Hodges T, Arko L, Shen M, Dello Iacono D, McNabb A, et al. Scale to predict survival after surgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2010;28(24):3838–43. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2010.​30.​0582.​ CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nava F, Tramacere I, Fittipaldo A, Bruzzone MG, Dimeco F, Fariselli L, et al. Survival effect of first- and second-line treatments for patients with primary glioblastoma: a cohort study from a prospective registry, 1997-2010. Neuro-Oncology. 2014;16(5):719–27. doi:10.1093/neuonc/not316. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nava F, Tramacere I, Fittipaldo A, Bruzzone MG, Dimeco F, Fariselli L, et al. Survival effect of first- and second-line treatments for patients with primary glioblastoma: a cohort study from a prospective registry, 1997-2010. Neuro-Oncology. 2014;16(5):719–27. doi:10.​1093/​neuonc/​not316.​ CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11•.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandes AA, Bartolotti M, Tosoni A, Poggi R, Bartolini S, Paccapelo A, et al. Patient outcomes following second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma. Future Oncol. 2016;12(8):1039–44. doi:10.2217/fon.16.9 .This study conducted in a large series of GBM patients reoperated at recurrence demonstrated that extent of resection and MGMT methylation status were correlated with survivalCrossRefPubMed Brandes AA, Bartolotti M, Tosoni A, Poggi R, Bartolini S, Paccapelo A, et al. Patient outcomes following second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma. Future Oncol. 2016;12(8):1039–44. doi:10.​2217/​fon.​16.​9 .This study conducted in a large series of GBM patients reoperated at recurrence demonstrated that extent of resection and MGMT methylation status were correlated with survivalCrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ringel F, Pape H, Sabel M, Krex D, Bock HC, Misch M, et al. Clinical benefit from resection of recurrent glioblastomas: results of a multicenter study including 503 patients with recurrent glioblastomas undergoing surgical resection. Neuro-Oncology. 2016;18(1):96–104. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov145. CrossRefPubMed Ringel F, Pape H, Sabel M, Krex D, Bock HC, Misch M, et al. Clinical benefit from resection of recurrent glioblastomas: results of a multicenter study including 503 patients with recurrent glioblastomas undergoing surgical resection. Neuro-Oncology. 2016;18(1):96–104. doi:10.​1093/​neuonc/​nov145.​ CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke JL, Ennis MM, Yung WK, Chang SM, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF, et al. Is surgery at progression a prognostic marker for improved 6-month progression-free survival or overall survival for patients with recurrent glioblastoma? Neuro-Oncology. 2011;13(10):1118–24. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nor110. CrossRefPubMed Clarke JL, Ennis MM, Yung WK, Chang SM, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF, et al. Is surgery at progression a prognostic marker for improved 6-month progression-free survival or overall survival for patients with recurrent glioblastoma? Neuro-Oncology. 2011;13(10):1118–24. doi:10.​1093/​neuonc/​nor110.​ CrossRefPubMed
15•.
Zurück zum Zitat Suchorska B, Weller M, Tabatabai G, Senft C, Hau P, Sabel MC, et al. Complete resection of contrast-enhancing tumor volume is associated with improved survival in recurrent glioblastoma-results from the DIRECTOR trial. Neuro-Oncology. 2016;18(4):549–56. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov326 .The study demonstrated that complete resection was associated with improved survival in GBM reoperated patientsCrossRefPubMed Suchorska B, Weller M, Tabatabai G, Senft C, Hau P, Sabel MC, et al. Complete resection of contrast-enhancing tumor volume is associated with improved survival in recurrent glioblastoma-results from the DIRECTOR trial. Neuro-Oncology. 2016;18(4):549–56. doi:10.​1093/​neuonc/​nov326 .The study demonstrated that complete resection was associated with improved survival in GBM reoperated patientsCrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandes AA, Carpentier AF, Kesari S, Sepulveda-Sanchez JM, Wheeler HR, Chinot O, et al. A phase II randomized study of galunisertib monotherapy or galunisertib plus lomustine compared with lomustine monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology. 2016. doi:10.1093/neuonc/now009. Brandes AA, Carpentier AF, Kesari S, Sepulveda-Sanchez JM, Wheeler HR, Chinot O, et al. A phase II randomized study of galunisertib monotherapy or galunisertib plus lomustine compared with lomustine monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology. 2016. doi:10.​1093/​neuonc/​now009.​
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Batchelor TT, Mulholland P, Neyns B, Nabors LB, Campone M, Wick A, et al. Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(26):3212–8. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.47.2464. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Batchelor TT, Mulholland P, Neyns B, Nabors LB, Campone M, Wick A, et al. Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(26):3212–8. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2012.​47.​2464.​ CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Taal W, Oosterkamp HM, Walenkamp AM, Dubbink HJ, Beerepoot LV, Hanse MC, et al. Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(9):943–53. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70314-6. CrossRefPubMed Taal W, Oosterkamp HM, Walenkamp AM, Dubbink HJ, Beerepoot LV, Hanse MC, et al. Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(9):943–53. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(14)70314-6.​ CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Franceschi E, Blatt V, Santoro A, Faedi M, et al. Fotemustine as second-line treatment for recurrent or progressive glioblastoma after concomitant and/or adjuvant temozolomide: a phase II trial of Gruppo Italiano Cooperativo di Neuro-Oncologia (GICNO). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;64(4):769–75. doi:10.1007/s00280-009-0926-8. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Franceschi E, Blatt V, Santoro A, Faedi M, et al. Fotemustine as second-line treatment for recurrent or progressive glioblastoma after concomitant and/or adjuvant temozolomide: a phase II trial of Gruppo Italiano Cooperativo di Neuro-Oncologia (GICNO). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;64(4):769–75. doi:10.​1007/​s00280-009-0926-8.​ CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandes AA, Finocchiaro G, Zagonel V, Reni M, Caserta C, Fabi A, et al. AVAREG: a phase 2, randomized, noncomparative study of fotemustine or bevacizumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology. 2016. doi:10.1093/neuonc/now035. Brandes AA, Finocchiaro G, Zagonel V, Reni M, Caserta C, Fabi A, et al. AVAREG: a phase 2, randomized, noncomparative study of fotemustine or bevacizumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology. 2016. doi:10.​1093/​neuonc/​now035.​
23••.
24••.
Zurück zum Zitat Weller M, Tabatabai G, Kastner B, Felsberg J, Steinbach JP, Wick A, et al. MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic biomarker for benefit from dose-intensified temozolomide rechallenge in progressive glioblastoma: the DIRECTOR trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(9):2057–64. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2737 .This study provides the evidence for temozolomide rechallange in MGMT methylated patients in recurrence after temozolomide interruptionCrossRefPubMed Weller M, Tabatabai G, Kastner B, Felsberg J, Steinbach JP, Wick A, et al. MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic biomarker for benefit from dose-intensified temozolomide rechallenge in progressive glioblastoma: the DIRECTOR trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(9):2057–64. doi:10.​1158/​1078-0432.​CCR-14-2737 .This study provides the evidence for temozolomide rechallange in MGMT methylated patients in recurrence after temozolomide interruptionCrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Vredenburgh JJ, Desjardins A, Herndon 2nd JE, Dowell JM, Reardon DA, Quinn JA, et al. Phase II trial of bevacizumab and irinotecan in recurrent malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(4):1253–9.CrossRefPubMed Vredenburgh JJ, Desjardins A, Herndon 2nd JE, Dowell JM, Reardon DA, Quinn JA, et al. Phase II trial of bevacizumab and irinotecan in recurrent malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(4):1253–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K, Duic P, Royce C, Stroud I, et al. Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(5):740–5.CrossRefPubMed Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K, Duic P, Royce C, Stroud I, et al. Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(5):740–5.CrossRefPubMed
31.
32••.
Zurück zum Zitat Wick W, Brandes A, Gorlia T, Bendszus M, Sahm F, Taal W et al. Phase III trial exploring the combination of bevacizumab and lomustine in patients with first recurrence of glioblastoma: the EORTC 26101 trial. Neuro Oncol. 2015;(17). This phase III study randomized recurrent GBM patients to bevacizumab in combination with CCNU or CCNU alone demonstrating a significant increase in PFS not translating in a survival advantage. Wick W, Brandes A, Gorlia T, Bendszus M, Sahm F, Taal W et al. Phase III trial exploring the combination of bevacizumab and lomustine in patients with first recurrence of glioblastoma: the EORTC 26101 trial. Neuro Oncol. 2015;(17). This phase III study randomized recurrent GBM patients to bevacizumab in combination with CCNU or CCNU alone demonstrating a significant increase in PFS not translating in a survival advantage.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Levin VA, Mendelssohn ND, Chan J, Stovall MC, Peak SJ, Yee JL, et al. Impact of bevacizumab administered dose on overall survival of patients with progressive glioblastoma. J Neuro-Oncol. 2015;122(1):145–50. doi:10.1007/s11060-014-1693-x. CrossRef Levin VA, Mendelssohn ND, Chan J, Stovall MC, Peak SJ, Yee JL, et al. Impact of bevacizumab administered dose on overall survival of patients with progressive glioblastoma. J Neuro-Oncol. 2015;122(1):145–50. doi:10.​1007/​s11060-014-1693-x.​ CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong ET, Gautam S, Malchow C, Lun M, Pan E, Brem S. Bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a meta-analysis. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2011;9(4):403–7. Wong ET, Gautam S, Malchow C, Lun M, Pan E, Brem S. Bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a meta-analysis. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2011;9(4):403–7.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Franceschi E, Bartolotti M, Brandes AA. Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: open issues. Future Oncol. 2015;11. Franceschi E, Bartolotti M, Brandes AA. Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: open issues. Future Oncol. 2015;11.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandmann T, Bourgon R, Garcia J, Li C, Cloughesy T, Chinot OL, et al. Patients with proneural glioblastoma may derive overall survival benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to first-line radiotherapy and temozolomide: retrospective analysis of the AVAglio trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(25):2735–44. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5005. CrossRefPubMed Sandmann T, Bourgon R, Garcia J, Li C, Cloughesy T, Chinot OL, et al. Patients with proneural glioblastoma may derive overall survival benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to first-line radiotherapy and temozolomide: retrospective analysis of the AVAglio trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(25):2735–44. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2015.​61.​5005.​ CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Sulman EP, Won M, Blumenthal A, Vogelbaum M, Colman H, Jenkins RB et al. Molecular predictors of outcome and response to bevacizumab (BEV) based on analysis of RTOG 0825, a phase III randomized trial comparing chemoradiation with or without BEV in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:suppl;abstr. Sulman EP, Won M, Blumenthal A, Vogelbaum M, Colman H, Jenkins RB et al. Molecular predictors of outcome and response to bevacizumab (BEV) based on analysis of RTOG 0825, a phase III randomized trial comparing chemoradiation with or without BEV in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:suppl;abstr.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Erdem-Eraslan L, van den Bent MJ, Hoogstrate Y, Naz-Khan H, Stubbs A, van der Spek P, et al. Identification of patients with recurrent glioblastoma who may benefit from combined bevacizumab and CCNU therapy: a report from the BELOB trial. Cancer Res. 2016;76(3):525–34. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0776. CrossRefPubMed Erdem-Eraslan L, van den Bent MJ, Hoogstrate Y, Naz-Khan H, Stubbs A, van der Spek P, et al. Identification of patients with recurrent glioblastoma who may benefit from combined bevacizumab and CCNU therapy: a report from the BELOB trial. Cancer Res. 2016;76(3):525–34. doi:10.​1158/​0008-5472.​CAN-15-0776.​ CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Sampson J, Vlahovic G, Sahebjam S, Omuro A, Baehring J, Hafler D, et al. Preliminary safety and activity of nivolumab and its combination with ipilimumab in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM): CHECKMATE-143. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(No 15_suppl (May 20 Supplement)):3010. Sampson J, Vlahovic G, Sahebjam S, Omuro A, Baehring J, Hafler D, et al. Preliminary safety and activity of nivolumab and its combination with ipilimumab in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM): CHECKMATE-143. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(No 15_suppl (May 20 Supplement)):3010.
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Reardon D, Desjardins A, Schuster J, Tran D, Fink KL, Nabors BL, et al. ReACT: long-term survival from a randomized phase ii study of rindopepimut (CDX-110) plus bevacizumab in relapsed glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology. 2015;17:v107–12.CrossRef Reardon D, Desjardins A, Schuster J, Tran D, Fink KL, Nabors BL, et al. ReACT: long-term survival from a randomized phase ii study of rindopepimut (CDX-110) plus bevacizumab in relapsed glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology. 2015;17:v107–12.CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Crane CA, Han SJ, Ahn B, Oehlke J, Kivett V, Fedoroff A, et al. Individual patient-specific immunity against high-grade glioma after vaccination with autologous tumor derived peptides bound to the 96 KD chaperone protein. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(1):205–14. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3358. CrossRefPubMed Crane CA, Han SJ, Ahn B, Oehlke J, Kivett V, Fedoroff A, et al. Individual patient-specific immunity against high-grade glioma after vaccination with autologous tumor derived peptides bound to the 96 KD chaperone protein. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(1):205–14. doi:10.​1158/​1078-0432.​CCR-11-3358.​ CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonder M, Weller M, Eisele G, Roth P. Carboplatin and etoposide in heavily pretreated patients with progressive high-grade glioma. Chemotherapy. 2014;60(5–6):375–8. doi:10.1159/000440678. PubMed Tonder M, Weller M, Eisele G, Roth P. Carboplatin and etoposide in heavily pretreated patients with progressive high-grade glioma. Chemotherapy. 2014;60(5–6):375–8. doi:10.​1159/​000440678.​ PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Relapsed Glioblastoma: Treatment Strategies for Initial and Subsequent Recurrences
verfasst von
Alicia Tosoni, MD
Enrico Franceschi, MD
Rosalba Poggi, MD
Alba A. Brandes, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Treatment Options in Oncology / Ausgabe 9/2016
Print ISSN: 1527-2729
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6277
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-016-0422-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2016

Current Treatment Options in Oncology 9/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.