Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

28.07.2017 | Scientific Contribution

Relational autonomy in informed consent (RAIC) as an ethics of care approach to the concept of informed consent

verfasst von: Peter I. Osuji

Erschienen in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The perspectives of the dominant Western ethical theories, have dominated the concepts of autonomy and informed consent for many years. Recently this dominant understanding has been challenged by ethics of care which, although, also emanates from the West presents a more nuanced concept: relational autonomy, which is more faithful to our human experience. By paying particular attention to relational autonomy, particularity and Process approach to ethical deliberations in ethics of care, this paper seeks to construct a concept of informed consent from the perspective of ethics of care which is here called relational autonomy-in-informed consent (RAIC). Thus, providing a broader theoretical basis for informed consent beyond the usual theoretical perspectives that are particularly Western. Care ethics provides such a broader basis because it appeals to a global perspective that encompasses lessons from other cultures, and this will help to enrich the current ideas of bioethics principles of autonomy and informed consent. This objective will be achieved by exploring the ethics of care emphasis on relationships based on a universal experience of caring; and by contrasting its concept of autonomy as relational with the understanding of autonomy in the approaches of the dominant moral theories that reflect rational, individualistic, and rights-oriented autonomy of the American liberalism.
Fußnoten
1
Being an emerging moral theory, ethics of care is not yet considered as one of the dominant moral theories. That is why some authors such as Marian Verkerk prefer to call it “a moral perspective or orientation”.
 
2
There is constant need to cultivate the virtues appropriate to the practices of care and of moral evaluation of how the practices are being carried out. (Held 2006, 37).
 
3
For a comprehensive summary of the critique of the contractists, see Peter I. Osuji, (2014, 73) ff, Annette Baier (1997), and Held (1993).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Baier, Annette. 1997. The need for more than justice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13: 41–56. Baier, Annette. 1997. The need for more than justice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13: 41–56.
Zurück zum Zitat Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press. Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bentham, Jeremy. 1970. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. J.H. Burns and H.L.A. Hart. Oxford: Clarendon. Bentham, Jeremy. 1970. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. J.H. Burns and H.L.A. Hart. Oxford: Clarendon.
Zurück zum Zitat Bubeck, Diemut E. 1995. Care, Gender, and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Bubeck, Diemut E. 1995. Care, Gender, and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chan, Sin Yee. 1993. An ethic of loving: ethical particularism and the engaged perspective in confucian role-ethics. PhD. diss., University of Michigan. Chan, Sin Yee. 1993. An ethic of loving: ethical particularism and the engaged perspective in confucian role-ethics. PhD. diss., University of Michigan.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooney, William. 1998. Rights Theory. In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, ed. Ruth F Chadwick. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Cooney, William. 1998. Rights Theory. In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, ed. Ruth F Chadwick. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Dworkin, Ronald M. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Dworkin, Ronald M. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Feinberg, Joe. 1973. Social Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Feinberg, Joe. 1973. Social Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedmans, Marilyn. 2000. Autonomy, Social Disruption, and Women. In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, ed. Catriona Mackenzie, and Natalie Stoljar, 35–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Friedmans, Marilyn. 2000. Autonomy, Social Disruption, and Women. In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, ed. Catriona Mackenzie, and Natalie Stoljar, 35–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gelfand, Scott D. 2004. The ethics of care and (capital?) punishment. Law and Philosophy 23 (6): 593–614. Gelfand, Scott D. 2004. The ethics of care and (capital?) punishment. Law and Philosophy 23 (6): 593–614.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin, James. 1986. Well-Being: Its Meaning. Measurement and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon. Griffin, James. 1986. Well-Being: Its Meaning. Measurement and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon.
Zurück zum Zitat Hegel, Georg Wilhelm F. 1942. Philosophy of Right (trans: Knox, T.M.). Oxford: Clarendon. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm F. 1942. Philosophy of Right (trans: Knox, T.M.). Oxford: Clarendon.
Zurück zum Zitat Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Held, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. New York: Oxford University Press. Held, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kant, Immanuel. 2005. Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals. (trans: Abbott, Thomas Kingsmill and Stilwell, K.S.). Boston: Digireads. Kant, Immanuel. 2005. Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals. (trans: Abbott, Thomas Kingsmill and Stilwell, K.S.). Boston: Digireads.
Zurück zum Zitat Koehn, Daryl. 1998. Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care Trust and Empathy. London: Routledge. Koehn, Daryl. 1998. Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care Trust and Empathy. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Leithart, Peter J. 1988. Review: Alasdair Maclntyre: Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1988. Westminster Theological Journal 50: 416–419. Leithart, Peter J. 1988. Review: Alasdair Maclntyre: Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1988. Westminster Theological Journal 50: 416–419.
Zurück zum Zitat Little, Margaret Olivia. 1998. Care, from theory to orientation and back. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (2): 190–209.CrossRef Little, Margaret Olivia. 1998. Care, from theory to orientation and back. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (2): 190–209.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1988. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1988. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.
Zurück zum Zitat Maier, Barbara, Warren A. Shibles. 2011. The Philosophy and Practice of Medicine and Bioethics: A Naturalistic-Humanistic Approach. (International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine 47). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.CrossRef Maier, Barbara, Warren A. Shibles. 2011. The Philosophy and Practice of Medicine and Bioethics: A Naturalistic-Humanistic Approach. (International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine 47). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meyers, Diana T., ed. 1997. Feminists Rethink the Self, [Feminist Theory and Politics Series]. Boulder, CO: Westview. Meyers, Diana T., ed. 1997. Feminists Rethink the Self, [Feminist Theory and Politics Series]. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyers, Diana Tietjens. 2000. Intersectional Identity and the Authentic Self: Opposites Attract! In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, ed. Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie, 175–180. New York: Oxford University. Meyers, Diana Tietjens. 2000. Intersectional Identity and the Authentic Self: Opposites Attract! In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, ed. Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie, 175–180. New York: Oxford University.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore, George Edward. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Moore, George Edward. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Zurück zum Zitat Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1989. Reconceiving autonomy: sources, thoughts, and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1: 7–36. Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1989. Reconceiving autonomy: sources, thoughts, and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1: 7–36.
Zurück zum Zitat Osuji, Peter I. 2014. African Traditional Medicine: Autonomy and Informed Consent. New York: Springer. Osuji, Peter I. 2014. African Traditional Medicine: Autonomy and Informed Consent. New York: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Paley, John. 2002. Virtue of autonomy: the Kantian ethic of care. Nursing Philosophy 3: 133–143.CrossRef Paley, John. 2002. Virtue of autonomy: the Kantian ethic of care. Nursing Philosophy 3: 133–143.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paulsen, Jens Erik. 2011. Ethics of caring and professional roles. Nursing Ethics 18 (2): 201–208.CrossRef Paulsen, Jens Erik. 2011. Ethics of caring and professional roles. Nursing Ethics 18 (2): 201–208.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Po-wah, Julia Tao Lai. 2002. Is just caring possible? challenge to bioethics in the new century. In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im)Possibility of Global Bioethics, ed. Julia, Tao Lai Po-wah, 41–58. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publication.CrossRef Po-wah, Julia Tao Lai. 2002. Is just caring possible? challenge to bioethics in the new century. In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im)Possibility of Global Bioethics, ed. Julia, Tao Lai Po-wah, 41–58. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publication.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pullman, Daryl. 1999. The ethics of autonomy and dignity in long-term care. Canadian Journal of Aging 18 (1): 26–46.CrossRef Pullman, Daryl. 1999. The ethics of autonomy and dignity in long-term care. Canadian Journal of Aging 18 (1): 26–46.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ruddick, Sara. 1980. Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies 6: 342–367.CrossRef Ruddick, Sara. 1980. Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies 6: 342–367.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Slote, Michael. 2003. Morals from Motives. Oxford: Oxford University. Slote, Michael. 2003. Morals from Motives. Oxford: Oxford University.
Zurück zum Zitat Tadd, W. 1998. Nurses’ ethics. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, vol. 3. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Tadd, W. 1998. Nurses’ ethics. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, vol. 3. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Tronto, Joan C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. New York: Routledge. Tronto, Joan C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanlaere, Linus, and Chris Gastmans. 2011. A personalist approach to care ethics. Nursing Ethics 18 (2): 161–173.CrossRef Vanlaere, Linus, and Chris Gastmans. 2011. A personalist approach to care ethics. Nursing Ethics 18 (2): 161–173.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Verkerk, Marian A. 2001. The care perspective and autonomy. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 4 (3): 289–294.CrossRef Verkerk, Marian A. 2001. The care perspective and autonomy. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 4 (3): 289–294.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Relational autonomy in informed consent (RAIC) as an ethics of care approach to the concept of informed consent
verfasst von
Peter I. Osuji
Publikationsdatum
28.07.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1386-7423
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8633
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9789-7