Relationship between knee osteoarthritis and meniscal shape in observation of Japanese patients by using magnetic resonance imaging

The meniscal measurement results are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 4. The deformations with significant difference are also summarized in Fig. 5. The medial LD, medial posterior wedge width, medial posterior wedge angle, and lateral LD were significantly different between the normal and severe groups. The medial LD and posterior wedge angle in the severe group were 19.3% and 52.7% greater than the respective values in the normal group. The medial posterior wedge width in the severe group was 15.5% smaller than that in the normal group. The lateral LD in the severe group was 9.9% greater than that in the normal group. The standard deviation of each measured quantity in the severe group was markedly high.

Table 3 shows the WORMS scores of the medial region and the significant differences in each group and region. The WORMS score for the cartilage and osteophytes in the medial meniscus was significantly different between the groups. In the normal group, the cartilage score of the medial femoral central (MFC) was larger than that of the medial femoral posterior (MFP) and medial tibial posterior (MTP). In the severe group, the cartilage score of the MTP was smaller than that of the MFC and medial femoral central (MTC). In all groups, bone attrition score was largest for the MTC. In the normal group, the osteophytes score of the MTP was smaller than that of the MFC and MFP. In the severe group, the osteophytes score of the MFP was larger than that of the medial tibial anterior (MTA), MTC, and MFP.

Table 4 shows the same components in the lateral region. The WORMS scores in the lateral region were lower than those in the medial region. The marrow abnormality and bone cyst scores showed no significant differences in each group. In the mild group, the bone attrition score of the lateral femoral central (LFC) was larger than that of the lateral femoral posterior (LFP), lateral tibial anterior (LTA), and lateral femoral central (LTC). In normal and mild groups, the femoral osteophytes score (LFC and LFP) was larger than the tibial osteophytes score (LTA, LTC, and LTP).

Table 5 shows the amount of medial meniscal extrusion. There was a significant difference between the normal and severe groups (p = 0.0136).

This paper adopted the WORMS score of cartilage and osteophytes, which exhibited a significant difference among the groups. Tables 6 and 7 show the correlation coefficients between the WORMS scores of cartilage and osteophytes and the medial meniscal size. The WORMS scores of each region indicated a strong correlation, and the LD showed a strong correlation as well (r = 0.59–0.68).

Many authors have reported the presence of degeneration in the posterior region of the medial meniscus in patients with knee OA [11‐13]. We considered that Japanese patients with knee OA are likely to have different characteristics than Westerners because of the differences in lifestyles and body types between these two populations. Therefore, this paper has herein included a discussion of previously published Japanese reports. Fukuda et al. [14] and Nagata et al. [15] stated that degeneration occurred in the posterior region of the medial meniscus with a high probability and expanded from posterior to anterior. In the present study, we found that the LD and posterior region of the medial meniscus of the severe group changed in size compared with those in the normal group. These results support the findings of previous reports. The location of meniscal degeneration more or less corresponded to the position at which the meniscal size changed. Lee et al. [16] stated that the posterior region of the medial meniscus had a characteristic fiber array, and Kwak et al. [17] reported that the same region had high strength. Markris et al. [18] stated that meniscal cells with degeneration were larger in diameter than normal meniscal cells. Based on these previous reports and our results, we conclude that thickening due to degeneration occurs in the medial posterior region.

A few studies on the lateral meniscus have been reported. In Japan, Kitamura et al. [19] reported that lateral meniscal degeneration occurred in the middle and posterior regions. Hirotsu et al. [20] reported that such degeneration occurred in the anterior region. Thus, no consensus has been reached. In the present study, the LD of the lateral meniscus in the severe group was larger than that in the normal group. However, this paper obtained no information that supported the findings of previous studies. The lateral meniscus has a wider range of movements than does the medial meniscus because it has no adhesion to the surrounding tissue; therefore, we considered that the lateral meniscus is able to deflect mechanical stress and that this deflection leads to less degeneration.

In this study, we used the KL method to group the patients. The validity of this grouping method is supported by the fact that the WORMS scores were significantly different among the groups. In the medial region, the cartilage and osteophytes scores were markedly correlated with the characteristics of knee OA progression. The cartilage score reflected the characteristics of this region. The central region tended to be more severe than the posterior region; for example, the MTC was significantly greater than the MTP in the severe group. In the lateral region, the scores of all categories were lower than those in the medial region.

The WORMS score, which represents OA progression, showed a stronger correlation with LD (r = 0.59–0.68) than with the other geometric parameters of the meniscus. This suggests that meniscal changes associated with OA progression were greater in the longitudinal direction than in the inner and outer directions. It is well known that OA progression involves varus deformation and a smaller range of motion. However, patients with OA often have flexion contracture that leads to a limited range of motion. Therefore, we considered that OA progression may be strongly associated with a meniscal longitudinal element. Although some studies have shown a relationship between posterior horn tears and medial meniscal extrusion [16, 21], the present study revealed a low correlation coefficient between the WORMS scores and meniscal extrusion (WORMS score of cartilage and extrusion, r = 0.36–0.45; WORMS score of osteophytes and extrusion, r = 0.22–0.26). Although it is well known that the medial meniscal extrusion caused by degeneration occurs medially, this study showed that the posterior extrusion was more remarkable. Considering that no patients had posterior root tears in this study, the medial meniscus appeared to expand in all directions in a posterior-dominant fashion. Consequently, this result did not support those of previous studies.

A limitation of the present study is that we did not compare the measured meniscal size with the presence of meniscal tears. It is well known that the meniscal size depends on the type of meniscal injury. The second limitation is that the MR images used in this study were taken in a non-weight-bearing position. There is a possibility that weight bearing would change the results. The third limitation is that although observation of MR images using WORMS scores is very useful to understand the progression of knee OA, it shows only one aspect of the pathology. In clinical practice, it is necessary to compare other parameters such as pain and joint range of motion. These points will be studied in future work.

This is the first report on the relationship between the progression of knee OA and the meniscal size in Japanese patients with OA. The finding that the change in the posterior region of the medial meniscus was roughly consistent with the meniscal degeneration is in agreement with many previous studies. On the other hand, it is a new finding that the most relevant relation between the progression of the knee OA and the deformation of the meniscus was in the longitudinal direction. In addition, although meniscal deformation and meniscal extrusion can be found in many patients, the severities of these changes differ among individual patients. We need more detailed analyses of the individual biomechanical impact of the progression of knee OA on the meniscus.