Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2017

23.08.2016 | Dynamic Manuscript

Relationship between stoma creation route for end colostomy and parastomal hernia development after laparoscopic surgery

verfasst von: Hitoshi Hino, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Yusuke Kinugasa, Akio Shiomi, Hiroyasu Kagawa, Yushi Yamakawa, Masakatsu Numata, Akinobu Furutani, Takuya Suzuki, Kakeru Torii

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The therapeutic benefits of extraperitoneal colostomy with laparoscopic surgery remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the route for stoma creation with laparoscopic surgery and stoma-related complications, especially parastomal hernia (PSH).

Methods

From January 2007 to March 2015, a total of 59 patients who underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection or Hartmann procedure were investigated. Patient demographic and treatment characteristics, including stoma-related complications, were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Transperitoneal and extraperitoneal colostomy were performed in 29 and 30 patients, respectively. Median follow-up duration was 21 months (range: 2–95). Patient demographic and treatment characteristics were comparable between the transperitoneal group (TPG) and the extraperitoneal group (EPG). PSH developed in 12 (41 %) patients in TPG, and 4 (13 %) patients in EPG (p = 0.020). The incidence of other stoma-related complications and non-stoma-related complications did not differ significantly between TPG and EPG. No patient characteristics except for transperitoneal route for stoma creation were associated with PSH development.

Conclusions

The extraperitoneal route for stoma creation is associated with a significantly lower incidence of PSH development after laparoscopic surgery. Whenever possible, extraperitoneal colostomy should be recommended, even with laparoscopic surgery.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Marwan K, Staples MP, Thursfield V, Bell SW (2010) The rate of abdominoperineal resections for rectal cancer in the state of Victoria, Australia: a population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1645–1651CrossRefPubMed Marwan K, Staples MP, Thursfield V, Bell SW (2010) The rate of abdominoperineal resections for rectal cancer in the state of Victoria, Australia: a population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1645–1651CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Purkayastha S, Antoniou A, Aylin P, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2008) A national perspective on the decline of abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 247:77–84CrossRefPubMed Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Purkayastha S, Antoniou A, Aylin P, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2008) A national perspective on the decline of abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 247:77–84CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Soreide O, Norwegian Rectal Cancer G (2004) Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47:48–58CrossRefPubMed Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Soreide O, Norwegian Rectal Cancer G (2004) Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47:48–58CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujita S, Akasu T, Mizusawa J, Saito N, Kinugasa Y, Kanemitsu Y, Ohue M, Fujii S, Shiozawa M, Yamaguchi T, Moriya Y, Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology G (2012) Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 13:616–621CrossRefPubMed Fujita S, Akasu T, Mizusawa J, Saito N, Kinugasa Y, Kanemitsu Y, Ohue M, Fujii S, Shiozawa M, Yamaguchi T, Moriya Y, Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology G (2012) Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 13:616–621CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ Jr, Matthews JB (1994) Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg 129:413–418 discussion 418-419 CrossRefPubMed Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ Jr, Matthews JB (1994) Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg 129:413–418 discussion 418-419 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung MT, Chia NH, Chiu WY (2001) Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum 44:266–270CrossRefPubMed Cheung MT, Chia NH, Chiu WY (2001) Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum 44:266–270CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Botet X, Boldo E, Llaurado JM (1996) Colonic parastomal hernia repair by translocation without formal laparotomy. Br J Surg 83:981CrossRefPubMed Botet X, Boldo E, Llaurado JM (1996) Colonic parastomal hernia repair by translocation without formal laparotomy. Br J Surg 83:981CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger D, Bientzle M (2007) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon’s experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1668–1673CrossRefPubMed Berger D, Bientzle M (2007) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon’s experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1668–1673CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat LeBlanc KA, Bellanger DE (2002) Laparoscopic repair of paraostomy hernias: early results. J Am Coll Surg 194:232–239CrossRefPubMed LeBlanc KA, Bellanger DE (2002) Laparoscopic repair of paraostomy hernias: early results. J Am Coll Surg 194:232–239CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Ludwig K (2004) Repair of paracolostomy hernias with a prosthetic mesh in the intraperitoneal onlay position: modified Sugarbaker technique. Dis Colon Rectum 47:185–191CrossRefPubMed Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Ludwig K (2004) Repair of paracolostomy hernias with a prosthetic mesh in the intraperitoneal onlay position: modified Sugarbaker technique. Dis Colon Rectum 47:185–191CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lian L, Wu XR, He XS, Zou YF, Wu XJ, Lan P, Wang JP (2012) Extraperitoneal vs. intraperitoneal route for permanent colostomy: a meta-analysis of 1,071 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:59–64CrossRefPubMed Lian L, Wu XR, He XS, Zou YF, Wu XJ, Lan P, Wang JP (2012) Extraperitoneal vs. intraperitoneal route for permanent colostomy: a meta-analysis of 1,071 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:59–64CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920CrossRefPubMed Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamada M, Ozaki K, Muraoka G, Kawakita N, Nishioka Y (2012) Permanent end-sigmoid colostomy through the extraperitoneal route prevents parastomal hernia after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 55:963–969CrossRefPubMed Hamada M, Ozaki K, Muraoka G, Kawakita N, Nishioka Y (2012) Permanent end-sigmoid colostomy through the extraperitoneal route prevents parastomal hernia after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 55:963–969CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Leroy J, Diana M, Callari C, Barry B, D’Agostino J, Wu HS, Marescaux J (2012) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal colostomy in elective abdominoperineal resection for cancer: a single surgeon experience. Colorectal Dis 14:e618–e622CrossRefPubMed Leroy J, Diana M, Callari C, Barry B, D’Agostino J, Wu HS, Marescaux J (2012) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal colostomy in elective abdominoperineal resection for cancer: a single surgeon experience. Colorectal Dis 14:e618–e622CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Heiying J, Yonghong D, Xiaofeng W, Hang Y, Kunlan W, Bei Z, Jinhao Z, Qiang L (2014) A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2:58–62CrossRef Heiying J, Yonghong D, Xiaofeng W, Hang Y, Kunlan W, Bei Z, Jinhao Z, Qiang L (2014) A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2:58–62CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang FB, Pu YW, Zhong FY, Lv XD, Yang ZX, Xing CG (2015) Laparoscopic permanent sigmoid stoma creation through the extraperitoneal route versus transperitoneal route. A meta-analysis of stoma-related complications. Saudi Med J 36:159–163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang FB, Pu YW, Zhong FY, Lv XD, Yang ZX, Xing CG (2015) Laparoscopic permanent sigmoid stoma creation through the extraperitoneal route versus transperitoneal route. A meta-analysis of stoma-related complications. Saudi Med J 36:159–163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat American Society of Colon, Rectal Surgeons Committee Members, Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses Society Committee M (2007) ASCRS and WOCN joint position statement on the value of preoperative stoma marking for patients undergoing fecal ostomy surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 34:627–628CrossRef American Society of Colon, Rectal Surgeons Committee Members, Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses Society Committee M (2007) ASCRS and WOCN joint position statement on the value of preoperative stoma marking for patients undergoing fecal ostomy surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 34:627–628CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nastro P, Knowles CH, McGrath A, Heyman B, Porrett TR, Lunniss PJ (2010) Complications of intestinal stomas. Br J Surg 97:1885–1889CrossRefPubMed Nastro P, Knowles CH, McGrath A, Heyman B, Porrett TR, Lunniss PJ (2010) Complications of intestinal stomas. Br J Surg 97:1885–1889CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Sato S, Yamakawa Y, Kagawa H, Tomioka H, Mori K (2015) Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 29:1679–1685CrossRefPubMed Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Sato S, Yamakawa Y, Kagawa H, Tomioka H, Mori K (2015) Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 29:1679–1685CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Tomioka H, Kagawa H, Yamakawa Y (2015) Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center. Surg Today. doi:10.1007/s00595-015-1266-4 Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Tomioka H, Kagawa H, Yamakawa Y (2015) Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center. Surg Today. doi:10.​1007/​s00595-015-1266-4
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Tomioka H, Kagawa H (2016) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30:721–728CrossRefPubMed Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Tomioka H, Kagawa H (2016) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30:721–728CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2009) Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg 33:118–121 (discussion 122-113) CrossRefPubMed Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2009) Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg 33:118–121 (discussion 122-113) CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Pilgrim CH, McIntyre R, Bailey M (2010) Prospective audit of parastomal hernia: prevalence and associated comorbidities. Dis Colon Rectum 53:71–76CrossRefPubMed Pilgrim CH, McIntyre R, Bailey M (2010) Prospective audit of parastomal hernia: prevalence and associated comorbidities. Dis Colon Rectum 53:71–76CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mylonakis E, Scarpa M, Barollo M, Yarnoz C, Keighley MR (2001) Life table analysis of hernia following end colostomy construction. Colorectal Dis 3:334–337CrossRefPubMed Mylonakis E, Scarpa M, Barollo M, Yarnoz C, Keighley MR (2001) Life table analysis of hernia following end colostomy construction. Colorectal Dis 3:334–337CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Funahashi K, Suzuki T, Nagashima Y, Matsuda S, Koike J, Shiokawa H, Ushigome M, Arai K, Kaneko T, Kurihara A, Kaneko H (2014) Risk factors for parastomal hernia in Japanese patients with permanent colostomy. Surg Today 44:1465–1469CrossRefPubMed Funahashi K, Suzuki T, Nagashima Y, Matsuda S, Koike J, Shiokawa H, Ushigome M, Arai K, Kaneko T, Kurihara A, Kaneko H (2014) Risk factors for parastomal hernia in Japanese patients with permanent colostomy. Surg Today 44:1465–1469CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Relationship between stoma creation route for end colostomy and parastomal hernia development after laparoscopic surgery
verfasst von
Hitoshi Hino
Tomohiro Yamaguchi
Yusuke Kinugasa
Akio Shiomi
Hiroyasu Kagawa
Yushi Yamakawa
Masakatsu Numata
Akinobu Furutani
Takuya Suzuki
Kakeru Torii
Publikationsdatum
23.08.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5198-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.