The Ki67 Index has been extensively studied as a prognostic biomarker in breast cancer. However, its clinical adoption is largely hampered by the lack of a standardized method to assess Ki67 that limits inter-laboratory reproducibility. It is important to standardize the computation of the Ki67 Index before it can be effectively used in clincial practice.
In this study, we develop a systematic approach towards standardization of the Ki67 Index. We first create the ground truth consisting of tumor positive and tumor negative nuclei by registering adjacent breast tissue sections stained with Ki67 and H&E. The registration is followed by segmentation of positive and negative nuclei within tumor regions from Ki67 images. The true Ki67 Index is then approximated with a linear model of the area of positive to the total area of tumor nuclei.
When tested on 75 images of Ki67 stained breast cancer biopsies, the proposed method resulted in an average root mean square error of 3.34. In comparison, an expert pathologist resulted in an average root mean square error of 9.98 and an existing automated approach produced an average root mean square error of 5.64.
We show that it is possible to approximate the true Ki67 Index accurately without detecting individual nuclei and also statically demonstrate the weaknesses of commonly adopted approaches that use both tumor and non-tumor regions together while compensating for the latter with higher order approximations.
Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, Wacker H-H, Schwab U, Stein H. Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol. 1984;133(4):1710–5. PubMed
Niazi MKK, Pennell M, Elkins C, Hemminger J, Jin M, Kirby S, Kurt H, Miller B, Plocharczyk E, Roth R. Entropy based quantification of Ki-67 positive cell images and its evaluation by a reader study. In: SPIE Medical Imaging: 2013. Bellingham: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2013. p. 86760I.
Arihiro K, Oda M, Ohara M, Kadoya T, Osaki A, Nishisaka T, Shiroma N, Kobayashi Y. Comparison of visual assessment and image analysis in the evaluation of Ki-67 expression and their prognostic significance in immunohistochemically defined luminal breast carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46(12):1081–7. PubMed
Berlin A, Castro-Mesta JF, Rodriguez-Romo L, Hernandez-Barajas D, González-Guerrero JF, Rodríguez-Fernández IA, González-Conchas G, Verdines-Perez A, Vera-Badillo FE. Prognostic role of Ki-67 score in localized prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017.
Niazi MKK, Downs-Kelly E, Gurcan MN. Hot spot detection for breast cancer in Ki-67 stained slides: image dependent filtering approach. In: SPIE Medical Imaging: 2014. Bellingham: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2014. 904106-904108.
Dowsett M, Nielsen T, A’Hern R, Bartlett J, Coombes R, Cuzick J, Ellis M, Henry N, Hugh J, Lively T. International Ki-67 in breast Cancer working group. Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the international Ki67 in breast Cancer working group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(22):1656–64. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Ferguson P. Fast, free and reproducible: how to count KI-67 on your computer. Pathology. 2013;45:S61. CrossRef
Laurinavicius A, Plancoulaine B, Laurinaviciene A, Herlin P, Meskauskas R, Baltrusaityte I, Besusparis J, Dasevicius D, Elie N, Iqbal Y. A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(2):R35. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Maeda I, Abe K, Koizumi H, Nakajima C, Tajima S, Aoki H, Tsuchiya J, Tsuchiya S, Tsuchiya K, Shimo A. Comparison between Ki67 labeling index determined using image analysis software with virtual slide system and that determined visually in breast cancer. Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan). 2016;23(5):745–51. CrossRef
Carbognin L, Sperduti I, Fabi A, Dieci MV, Kadrija D, Griguolo G, Pilotto S, Guarneri V, Zampiva I, Brunelli M. Prognostic impact of proliferation for resected early stage ‘pure’invasive lobular breast cancer: cut-off analysis of Ki67 according to histology and clinical validation. Breast. 2017;35:21–6. CrossRefPubMed
Lawrence I, Lin K. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45(1):255–68. CrossRef
Bland JM, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307–10. CrossRef
Luporsi E, André F, Spyratos F, Martin P-M, Jacquemier J, Penault-Llorca F, Tubiana-Mathieu N, Sigal-Zafrani B, Arnould L, Gompel A. Ki-67: level of evidence and methodological considerations for its role in the clinical management of breast cancer: analytical and critical review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132(3):895–915. CrossRefPubMed
Xu H, Lu C, Berendt R, Jha N, Mandal M. Automatic nuclei detection based on generalized laplacian of gaussian filters. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016;21(3):826–37. CrossRef
Kuok C-P, Wu P-T, Jou IM, Su F-C, Sun Y-N. Automatic segmentation and classification of tendon nuclei from IHC stained images. In: International Conference on Graphic and Image Processing (ICGIP 2015). Bellingham: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2015. p. 98170J.
Akakin HC, Gokozan H, Otero J, Gurcan MN. An adaptive algorithm for detection of multiple-type, positively stained nuclei in IHC images with minimal prior information: application to OLIG2 staining gliomas. In: SPIE Medical Imaging: 2015. Bellingham: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2015. p. 942007–8.
Niazi MKK, Satoskar AA, Gurcan MN. An automated method for counting cytotoxic T-cells from CD8 stained images of renal biopsies. In: SPIE Medical Imaging: 2013. Bellingham: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2013. p. 867606.
Kong H, Gurcan M, Belkacem-Boussaid K. Splitting touching-cell clusters on histopathological images. In: Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on. Piscataway: IEEE; 2011. p. 208–11.
Gurcan MN, Pan T, Shimada H, Saltz J. Image analysis for neuroblastoma classification: segmentation of cell nuclei. In: 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2006 2006. Piscataway: IEEE; 2006. p. 4844–7.
Sertel O, Catalyurek UV, Shimada H, Gurcan MN. Computer-aided prognosis of neuroblastoma: Detection of mitosis and karyorrhexis cells in digitized histological images. Piscataway: IEEE; 2009. p. 1433–6.
Kong J, Sertel O, Shimada H, Boyer KL, Saltz JH, Gurcan MN. A multi-resolution image analysis system for computer-assisted grading of neuroblastoma differentiation. Bellingham: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2008. p. 69151T.
Yang L, Chen W, Meer P, Salaru G, Feldman M, Foran D. High throughput analysis of breast cancer specimens on the grid. Med Image Comput Comput-Assist Interv–MICCAI. 2007;10:617–25.
Bueno G, García-Rojo M, Déniz O, Fernández-Carrobles MM, Vállez N, Salido J, García-González J. Emerging trends: grid technology in pathology. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;179:218–29. PubMed
Zhang X, Yang L, Liu W, Su H, Zhang S. Mining histopathological images via composite hashing and online learning. Cham: MICCAI (2); 2014. p. 479–86.
- Relationship between the Ki67 index and its area based approximation in breast cancer
Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi
Metin N. Gurcan
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie
Mail Icon II