Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
AIDS and Behavior
Erschienen in: AIDS and Behavior 7/2016

05.05.2016 | Original Paper

Relationship Dynamics and Partner Beliefs About Viral Suppression: A Longitudinal Study of Male Couples Living with HIV/AIDS (The Duo Project)

verfasst von: Amy A. Conroy, Kristi E. Gamarel, Torsten B. Neilands, Samantha E. Dilworth, Lynae A. Darbes, Mallory O. Johnson

Erschienen in: AIDS and Behavior | Ausgabe 7/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Accurate beliefs about partners’ viral suppression are important for HIV prevention and care. We fit multilevel mixed effects logistic regression models to examine associations between partners’ viral suppression beliefs and objective HIV RNA viral load tests, and whether relationship dynamics were associated with accurate viral suppression beliefs over time. Male couples (N = 266 couples) with at least one HIV-positive partner on antiretroviral therapy completed five assessments over 2 years. Half of the 407 HIV-positive partners were virally suppressed. Of the 40 % who had inaccurate viral load beliefs, 80 % assumed their partner was suppressed. The odds of having accurate viral load beliefs decreased over time (OR = 0.83; p = 0.042). Within-couple differences in dyadic adjustment (OR = 0.66; p < 0.01) and commitment (OR = 0.82; p = 0.022) were negatively associated with accurate viral load beliefs. Beliefs about a partner’s viral load may factor into sexual decision-making and social support. Couple-based approaches are warranted to improve knowledge of partners’ viral load.
Literatur
1.
Siedner MJ, Musinguzi N, Tsai AC, et al. Treatment as long-term prevention: sustained reduction in HIV sexual transmission risk with use of antiretroviral therapy in rural Uganda. AIDS. 2014;28:267–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
3.
Rodger A, Bruun T, Cambiano V, et al. HIV transmission risk through condomless sex If HIV+ partner on suppressive ART: PARTNER Study. Conference on retroviruses and opportunistic infections (CROI) on March 3–6, 2014.
4.
van den Boom W, Davidovich U, Witlox R, Stolte I. Frequent use of viral sorting by HIV-positive MSM: The consideration of viral load when deciding to engage in unprotected anal intercourse with HIV-positive and HIV-negative partners. Presented at 10th Annual Aids Impact conference, Santa Fe, New Mexico. 2011.
5.
Mitchell JW. HIV-negative and HIV-discordant gay male couples’ use of HIV Risk-reduction strategies: differences by partner type and couples’ HIV-status. AIDS Behav. 2013;17:1557–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Horvath KJ, Smolenski D, Iantaffi A, Grey JA, Rosser BRS. Discussions of viral load in negotiating sexual episodes with primary and casual partners among men who have sex with men. AIDS Care. 2012;24(8):1052–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Prestage G, Mao L, Kippax S, et al. Use of viral load to negotiate condom use among gay men in Sydney, Australia. AIDS Behav. 2009;13:645–51.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Van de Ven P, Mao L, Fogarty A, et al. Undetectable viral load is associated with sexual risk taking in HIV serodiscordant gay couples in Sydney. AIDS. 2005;19:179–84.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Crepaz N, Hart TA, Marks G. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and sexual risk behavior: a meta-analytic review. JAMA. 2004;292:224–36.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zablotska IB, Imrie J, Prestage G, et al. Gay men’s current practice of HIV seroconcordant unprotected anal intercourse: serosorting or seroguessing? AIDS Care. 2009;21:501–10.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Montgomery BM. The form and function of quality communication in marriage. Fam Relat. 1981;30:21–30.CrossRef
12.
Anglewicz PA, Bignami-Van Assche S, Clark S, Mkandawire J. HIV risk among currently married couples in rural Malawi: what do spouses know about each other? AIDS Behav. 2008;14(1):103–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
14.
Katz DA, Kiarie JN, John-Stewart GC, et al. HIV testing men in the antenatal setting: understanding male non-disclosure. Int J STD AIDS. 2009;20(11):765–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Conroy AA, Wong LH. How reliable are self-reports of HIV status disclosure? Evidence from couples in Malawi. Soc Sci Med. 2015;144:28–37.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Meichenbaum D, Turk DC. Facilitating treatment adherence: a practitioner’s guidebook. New York: Plenum Press; 1987.CrossRef
17.
Bekele T, Rourke SB, Tucker R, et al. Direct and indirect effects of perceived social support on health-related quality of life in persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Care. 2013;25(3):337–46.PubMed
18.
Huynh AK, Kinsler JJ, Cunningham WE, Sayles JN. The role of mental health in mediating the relationship between social support and optimal ART adherence. AIDS Care. 2013;25(9):1179–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Yeji F, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Newell ML, et al. Are social support and HIV coping strategies associated with lower depression in adults on antiretroviral treatment? Evidence from rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. AIDS Care. 2014;26(12):1482–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Ammassari A, Trotta MP, Murri R, Castelli F, Narciso P, Noto P, et al. Correlates and predictors of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy: overview of published literature. JAIDS. 2002;31:S123–7.PubMed
21.
Gonzalez JS, Penedo FJ, Antoni MH, et al. Social support, positive states of mind, and HIV treatment adherence in men and women living with HIV/AIDS. Health Psychol. 2004;23(4):413.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Catz SL, Kelly JA, Bogart LM, Benotsch EG, McAuliffe TL. Patterns, correlates, and barriers to medication adherence among persons prescribed new treatments for HIV disease. Health Psychol. 2000;19(2):124.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Leserman J, Perkins DO, Evans DL. Coping with the threat of AIDS: the role of social support. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149:1514.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Wrubel J, Stumbo S, Johnson MO. Antiretroviral medication support practices among partners of men who have sex with men: a qualitative study. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2008;22(11):851–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Wrubel J, Stumbo S, Johnson MO. Male same-sex couple dynamics and received social support for HIV medication adherence. J Soc Pers Relatsh. 2010;27(4):553–72.CrossRef
26.
Hamilton MM, Razzano LA, Martin NB. The relationship between type and quality of social support and HIV medication adherence. J HIV/AIDS Soc Serv. 2007;6(1–2):39–63.CrossRef
27.
Davies G, Koenig LJ, Stratford D, Palmore M, Bush T, Golde M, et al. Overview and implementation of an intervention to prevent adherence failure among HIV-infected adults initiating antiretroviral therapy: lessons learned from Project HEART. AIDS Care. 2006;18:895–903.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Remien RH, Stirratt MJ, Dolezal C, et al. Couple-focused support to improve HIV medication adherence: a randomized controlled trial. AIDS. 2005;19:807–14.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Lewis MA, McBride CM, Pollak KI, et al. Understanding health behavior change among couples: an interdependence and communal coping approach. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:1369–80.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Rusbult C, Lange PMAV. Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54(54):351–75.CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
Darbes LA, Chakravarty D, Neilands TB, Beougher SC, Hoff CC. Sexual risk for HIV among gay male couples: a longitudinal study of the impact of relationship dynamics. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(1):47–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Mitchell JW, Champeau D, Harvey SM. Actor-partner effects of demographic and relationship factors associated with HIV risk within gay male couples. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(7):1337–45.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Mitchell JW, Harvey SM, Champeau D, Seal DW. Relationship factors associated with HIV risk among a sample of gay male couples. AIDS Behav. 2012;16:404–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Hoff CC, Chakravarty D, Beougher SC, Neilands TB, Darbes L. Relationship characteristics associated with sexual risk behavior among MSM in committed relationships. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2012;26(12):738–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Gomez AM, Beougher SC, Chakravarty D, Neilands TB, Mandic CG, Darbes LA, Hoff CC. Relationship dynamics as predictors of broken agreements about outside sexual partners: implications for HIV prevention among gay couples. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(6):1584–8.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Mitchell JW, Harvey SM, Champeau D, Moskowitz DA, Seal DW. Relationship factors associated with gay male couples’ concordance on aspects of their sexual agreements: establishment, type, and adherence. AIDS Behav. 2012;16:1560–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Johnson MO, Dilworth SE, Taylor JM, et al. Primary relationships, HIV treatment adherence, and virologic control. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(6):1511–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Turner C, Ku L, Rogers S, et al. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science. 1998;280(5365):867–73.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Funk JL, Rogge RD. Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the couples satisfaction index. J Fam Psychol. 2007;21(4):572–83.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Sabourin S, Valois P, Lussier Y. Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psycholol Assess. 2005;17(1):15–27.CrossRef
42.
Spanier G. Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam. 1976;38:15–28.CrossRef
43.
Kurdek L. Assessing multiple determinants of relationship commitment in cohabitating gay, cohabitating lesbian, dating heterosexual, and married heterosexual couples. Fam Relat. 1995;44:261–6.CrossRef
44.
Christensen A, Shenk JL. Communication, conflict, and psychological distance in nondistressed, clinic, and divorcing couples. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59(3):458–63.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Allison P. Fixed effects regression methods for longitudinal data using SAS. Cary: SAS Institute; 2005.
46.
Neuhaus JM, Kalbfleisch JD. Between- and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data.”. Biometrics. 1998;54(2):638–45.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York: The Guilford Press; 2006.
48.
Petersen T. Analyzing panel data: fixed- and random-effects models. In: Hardy M, Bryman A, editors. Handbook of data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2004. p. 331–45.
49.
Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach (second edition). New York: Springer; 2003.
50.
Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer; 2001.CrossRef
51.
Agresti A, Finlay B. Statistical methods for the social sciences. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2009.
52.
Hox JJ. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2010.
53.
Carrico A, Woolf-King S, Neilands T, Dilworth S, Johnson M. Stimulant use and HIV disease management among men in same-sex relationships. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;139:174–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Kalichman SC, Eaton L, Cain D, et al. Changes in HIV treatment beliefs and sexual risk behaviors among gay and bisexual men. Health Psychol. 2007;26(5):650–6.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Kalichman SC, Cherry C, Kalichman MO, et al. Sexual behaviors and transmission risks among people living with HIV: beliefs, perceptions, and challenges to using treatments as prevention. Arch Sex Behav. 2015. doi:10.​1007/​s10508-015-0559-4.
56.
57.
Gamarel K, Comfort M, Wood T, Neilands T, Johnson M. A qualitative analysis of male couples coping with HIV: disentangling the “we.” J Health Psychol. 2015. doi:10.​1177/​1359105315571975​.
58.
Gamarel K, Revenson T. Dyadic adaptation to chronic illness: The importance of considering context in understanding couples’ resilience. In: Skerrett K, Fergus K, editors. Couples resilience: emerging perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer; 2015. p. 83–105.CrossRef
59.
van den Boom W, Stolte I, Sandfort T, Davidovich U. Serosorting and sexual risk behaviour according to different casual partnership types among MSM: the study of one-night stands and sex buddies. AIDS Care. 2011;24(2):167–73.PubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Mitchell JW, Garcia L, Champeau D, Harvey SM, Petroll AE. HIV-negative seroconcordant gay male couples’ attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control for planned condom use within and outside of their relationships. Int J Sex Health. 2012;24(4):239–53.CrossRef
61.
Dodge B, Herbenick D, Tsung-Chieh F, et al. Sexual behaviors of U.S. men by self-identified sexual orientation: results From the 2012 national survey of sexual health and behavior. J Sex Med. 2016;13(4):637–49.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Sullivan PS, Salazar L, Buchbinder S, Sanchez TH. Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities. AIDS. 2009;23:1153–62.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Conroy AA, McGrath N, Van Rooyen H, et al. Power and the association with relationship quality in south african couples: implications for HIV/AIDS interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2016;153:1–11.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Ribaudo H, Lennox J, Currier J, et al.Virologic failure endpoint definition in clinical trials: Is using HIV-1 RNA threshold <200 copies/mL better than <50 copies/mL? An analysis of ACTG studies Paper presented at the 16th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infection; 2009 Montreal, Canada.
65.
66.
67.
SFDPH. HIV epidemiology annual report. San Francisco: San Francisco Department of Public Health; 2014.
68.
Schwarcz S, Hsu LC, Scheer S. Disparities and trends in viral suppression during a transition to a “test and treat” approach to the HIV epidemic, San Francisco, 2008–2012. JAIDS. 2015;70:529–37.PubMed
69.
UNAIDS. 90-90-90: an ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2014.
70.
Burton J, Darbes LA, Operario D. Couples-focused behavioral interventions for prevention of HIV: systematic review of the state of evidence. AIDS Behav. 2010;14:1–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Relationship Dynamics and Partner Beliefs About Viral Suppression: A Longitudinal Study of Male Couples Living with HIV/AIDS (The Duo Project)
verfasst von
Amy A. Conroy
Kristi E. Gamarel
Torsten B. Neilands
Samantha E. Dilworth
Lynae A. Darbes
Mallory O. Johnson
Publikationsdatum
05.05.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
AIDS and Behavior / Ausgabe 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1090-7165
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3254
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1423-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

AIDS and Behavior 7/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Repeat Use of Post-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Among Nairobi-Based Female Sex Workers Following Sexual Exposure

Original Paper

Sexual Behavior, Risk Compensation, and HIV Prevention Strategies Among Participants in the San Francisco PrEP Demonstration Project: A Qualitative Analysis of Counseling Notes

Original Paper

Early Adopters: Correlates of HIV Chemoprophylaxis Use in Recent Online Samples of US Men Who Have Sex with Men

Original Paper

Depression and Oral FTC/TDF Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Men and Transgender Women Who Have Sex With Men (MSM/TGW)

Original Paper

Framing HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for the General Public: How Inclusive Messaging May Prevent Prejudice from Diminishing Public Support

Original Paper

Seasons of Risk: Anticipated Behavior on Vacation and Interest in Episodic Antiretroviral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among a Large National Sample of U.S. Men Who have Sex with Men (MSM)

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

25.04.2024 | Hypotonie | Nachrichten

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 | Nierenkarzinom | Nachrichten

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 | NSCLC | Nachrichten

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC
weitere anzeigen

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise