nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.06.2010 | Original Article

Reliability and clinical validity of a Polish version of the CONTILIFE: a quality of life questionnaire for urinary incontinence

verfasst von: Artur Rogowski, Przemyslaw Bienkowski, Jerzy Samochowiec, Pawel Mierzejewski, Malgorzata Jerzak, Wlodzimierz Baranowski

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 6/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The primary aim of the study was to translate and validate a Polish version of the CONTILIFE, a quality of life questionnaire. The clinical validity of the CONTILIFE was assessed against the number of urinary leaks, Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP), and maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP).

Methods

One hundred women with stress urinary incontinence completed a Polish version of the CONTILIFE twice with a 4-day interval.

Results

Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α= 0.94) and test–retest reliability of the instrument (ICC = 0.96) were very good. A significant relationship was found between all the CONTILIFE dimension scores, the CONTILIFE global score, and the number of urinary leaks per week. A less significant relationship was found between VLPP, MUCP, and CONTILIFE dimension and global scores.

Conclusions

A Polish version of the CONTILIFE can be a reliable measure of quality of life in stress urinary incontinence patients.

Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al (2002) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21(2):167–178CrossRefPubMed

Lagro-Janssen TL, Smits AJ, van Weel C (1990) Women with urinary incontinence: self-perceived worries and general practitioners’ knowledge of problem. Br J Gen Pract 40(337):331–334PubMed

Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S (2000) A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT Study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag. J Clin Epidemiol 53(11):1150–1157CrossRefPubMed

Gasquet I, Tcherny-Lessenot S, Gaudebout P, Bosio Le Goux B, Klein P, Haab F (2006) Influence of the severity of stress urinary incontinence on quality of life, health care seeking, and treatment: a national cross-sectional survey. Eur Urol 50(4):818–825CrossRefPubMed

Jarvis GJ, Hall S, Stamp S, Millar DR, Johnson A (1980) An assessment of urodynamic examination in incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 87(10):893–896PubMed

Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, Marquis P, Andrejasich CM, Buesching DP (1999) Cultural adaptation of a quality-of-life measure for urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 36(5):427–435CrossRefPubMed

Amarenco G, Arnould B, Carita P, Haab F, Labat JJ, Richard F (2003) European psychometric validation of the CONTILIFE: a quality of life questionnaire for urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 43(4):391–404CrossRefPubMed

van der Vaart CH, de Leeuw JR, Roovers JP, Heintz AP (2003) Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited. Neurourol Urodyn 22(2):97–104CrossRefPubMed

Albo M, Wruck L, Baker J et al (2007) The relationships among measures of incontinence severity in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 177(5):1810–1814CrossRefPubMed

10.

Corcos J, Beaulieu S, Donovan J, Naughton M, Gotoh M (2002) Quality of life assessment in men and women with urinary incontinence. J Urol 168(3):896–905CrossRefPubMed

11.

Ghoniem G, Stanford E, Kenton K et al (2008) Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J 19(1):5–33CrossRef

12.

Saadoun K, Ringa V, Fritel X, Varnoux N, Zins M, Bréart G (2006) Negative impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life, a cross-sectional study among women aged 49–61 years enrolled in the GAZEL cohort. Neurourol Urodyn 25(7):696–702CrossRefPubMed

13.

Summitt RL Jr, Stovall TG, Bent AE, Ostergard DR (1992) Urinary incontinence: correlation of history and brief office evaluation with multichannel urodynamic testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166(6 Pt 1):1835–1840PubMed

14.

Jensen JK, Nielsen FR Jr, Ostergard DR (1994) The role of patient history in the diagnosis of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 83(5 Pt 2):904–910PubMed

15.

Lowenstein L, Dooley Y, Kenton K et al (2007) The volume at which women leak first on urodynamic testing is not associated with quality of life, measures of urethral integrity or surgical failure. J Urol 178(1):193–196CrossRefPubMed

16.

Guerette NL, Bena JF, Davila GW (2008) Transobturator slings for stress incontinence: using urodynamic parameters to predict outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 19(1):97–102CrossRef

17.

Nager CW, Schulz JA, Stanton SL, Monga A (2001) Correlation of urethral closure pressure, leak-point pressure and incontinence severity measures. Int Urogynecol J 12(6):395–400CrossRef

18.

Stach-Lempinen B, Hakala AL, Laippala P, Lehtinen K, Metsänoja R, Kujansuu E (2004) Do objective urodynamic or clinical findings determine impact of urinary incontinence or its treatment on quality of life? Urology 63(1):67–71CrossRefPubMed

19.

Chen CC, Rooney CM, Paraiso MF et al (2008) Leak point pressure does not correlate with incontinence severity or bother in women undergoing surgery for urodynamic stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 19(9):1193–1198CrossRef

20.

Theofrastous JP, Bump RC, Elser DM, Wyman JF, McClish DK (1995) Correlation of urodynamic measures of urethral resistance with clinical measures of incontinence severity in women with pure genuine stress incontinence. The Continence Program for Women Research Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173(2):407–412CrossRefPubMed

21.

Schäfer W, Abrams P, Limin L et al (2002) Good urodynamic practices, uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21(3):261–274CrossRefPubMed

22.

Lane TM, Shah PJ (2000) Leak-point pressures. BJU Int 86(8):942–949CrossRefPubMed

23.

Roumeguère T, Quackels T, Bollens R et al (2005) Trans-obturator vaginal tape (TOT) for female stress incontinence: one year follow-up in 120 patients. Eur Urol 48(5):805–809CrossRefPubMed

24.

Amarenco G, Haab F, Labat JJ, Synthelabo (2005) CONTILIFE information booklet

25.

Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica 16:297–334CrossRef

26.

Hendriks EJ, Bernards AT, Staal JB, de Vet HC, de Bie RA (2008) Factorial validity and internal consistency of the PRAFAB questionnaire in women with stress urinary incontinence. BMC Urol 8:1CrossRefPubMed

27.

Girod I, McCarthy C, Marrel A, De La Loge C, Marquis P (1999) Development and psychometric validation of a quality of life questionnaire in urinary incontinence. Abstracts presented to the 6th Annual Conference of ISOQOL, Barcelona, Spain, 3–6 November 1999. Qual Life Res 7:658

28.

Karantanis E, Fynes M, Moore KH, Stanton SL (2004) Comparison of the ICIQ-SF and 24-hour pad test with other measures for evaluating the severity of urodynamic stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 15(2):111–116CrossRef

29.

Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA, Blaivas JG, Hadley HR, Luber KM (1997) Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. The American Urological Association. J Urol 158(3 Pt 1):875–880PubMed

Titel: Reliability and clinical validity of a Polish version of the CONTILIFE: a quality of life questionnaire for urinary incontinence
verfasst von: Artur Rogowski
Przemyslaw Bienkowski
Jerzy Samochowiec
Pawel Mierzejewski
Malgorzata Jerzak
Wlodzimierz Baranowski
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2010
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1095-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

23.04.2024 | Medikamente in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit | Nachrichten

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Reliability and clinical validity of a Polish version of the CONTILIFE: a quality of life questionnaire for urinary incontinence

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2010

Long-term efficacy of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for the treatment of urinary incontinence

Lower urinary tract symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse

Autologous transplantation of adult adipose derived stem cells into rabbit urethral wall

Factors influencing long-term pessary use

The adjustable tension-free vaginal tape—obturator

Midline fascial plication under continuous digital transrectal control: which factors determine anatomic outcome?

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie