None of the authors have any competing interests to declare.
JM, VA, and JV were responsible for manuscript thought, writing and editing. KP and AK helped in the data collection. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
To examine the intra and inter-rater reliability of lumbar flexion and extension measurements attained using three landmarking methods for dual inclinometry.
This was a repeated measures reliability study. Convenience sampling was used to obtain forty volunteer subjects. Two assessors measured a series of lumbar flexion and extension movements using the J-Tech™ dual inclinometer. Three different landmarking methods were used: 1) straight palpation of PSIS and L1, 2) palpation of PSIS and the site of the nearest 5 cm interval point closest to L1 and 3) location of PSIS and 15 cm cephalad. Upon landmarking, adhesive tape was used to mark landmarks and the inclinometer was placed on sites for three trials of flexion and extension. Tape was removed and landmarks were relocated by the same assessor (intra-rater) for an additional three trials; and this process was repeated by a second assessor (inter-rater). Reliability was determined using intra-class correlation coefficients.
Reliability within a set of three repetitions was very high (ICCs > 0.90); intra-rater reliability after relocating landmarks was high (ICCs > 0.80); reliability between therapists was moderate to high (0.60 > ICCs < 0.76). Assessment of flexion and extension movements by straight palpation of bony landmarks as in the Straight palpation of PSIS and L1 method (ICC: Flexion 0.60; Extension 0.74) was found to be marginally less reliable than the other two landmarking measurement strategies (ICC: Flexion 0.66; Extension 0.76).
All three methods of land marking are reliable. We recommend the use of the PSIS to 15 cm cephalad method as used in the modified-modified Schobers test as it is the simplest to perform and aligns with current clinical practice.
MacDermid JCCK, Gandhi R. The reliability and validity of double inclinometer in measuring lumbar mobility. Physiother Can. 2000;53(1):1–s29.
Williams R, Binkley J, Bloch R, Goldsmith CH, Minuk T. Reliability of the modified-modified Schober and double inclinometer methods for measuring lumbar flexion and extension. Phys Ther. 1993;73(1):33–44. PubMed
Fitzgerald GK, Wynveen KJ, Rheault W, Rothschild B. Objective assessment with establishment of normal values for lumbar spinal range of motion. Phys Ther. 1983;63(11):1776–81. PubMed
Kippers V, Parker AW. Toe-touch test. A measure of its validity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(11):1680–4. PubMed
Beattie P, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL. Reliability of the attraction method for measuring lumbar spine backward bending. Phys Ther. 1987;67(3):364–9. PubMed
Mayer TG, Tencer AF, Kristoferson S, Mooney V. Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984;9(6):588–95. CrossRef
Littlewood C, May S. Measurement of range of movement in the lumbar spine—what methods are valid? A systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2007;93(3):201–11. CrossRef
Cupon LN, Jahn WT. Current standards for measuring spinal range of motion for impairment. J Chiropractic Med. 2003;2(1):8–12. CrossRef
Van A, J.A.M, der Korst V. Assessment of the flexibility of the LumbarÂ. Scand J Rheumatol. 1973;2(2):87–91. CrossRef
Association AM. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment 4 th edition. 4th ed. 1993. 1(2):112–130.
Cocchiarela L. American Medical Association, Anderson GBJ: Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 5th edition: Amer Medical Assn. 5th ed. 2001.
Rondinelli RD, Genovese E, Brigham CR. American Medical Association: Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 6th edition: 6th ed. Chicago, Ill.: American Medical Association. 6th ed. 2008.
Binkley J, Stratford PW, Gill C. Interrater reliability of lumbar accessory motion mobility testing. Phys Ther. 1995;75(9):786–92. discussion 793–5. PubMed
Downey B, Taylor N, Niere K. Can manipulative physiotherapists agree on which lumbar level to treat based on palpation? Physiotherapy. 2003;89(2):74–81. CrossRef
McKenzie AM, Taylor NF. Can Physiotherapists locate Lumbar spinal levels by palpation? Physiotherapy. 1997;83(5):235–9. CrossRef
Fleiss JL. Design and analysis of clinical experiments: Wiley. 2011.
Portney L, Watkins M. Foundation of Clinical Research: Applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2000.
Stokes IA, Abery JM. Influence of the hamstring muscles on lumbar spine curvature in sitting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1980;5(6):525–8. CrossRef
Sarah T. A systematic review of methods to measure posture. Physical Ther Rev. 2003;8(1):45–50. CrossRef
- Reliability of three landmarking methods for dual inclinometry measurements of lumbar flexion and extension
Joy C MacDermid
Joshua I Vincent
Kimberly L Payne
Aubrey K So
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Mail Icon II