Skip to main content

Open Access 27.02.2025 | ORIGINAL PAPER

Religion and Mental Health: Is the Relationship Causal?

verfasst von: Tyler J. VanderWeele, Suzanne T. Ouyang

Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health

Abstract

Evidence is presented that the protective relationships between religious participation and depression, suicide, and substance use are in fact causal. Such evidence comes from rigorous longitudinal studies with large sample size and control for confounding and baseline outcomes; from meta-analyses and systematic reviews of such studies; from robustness of associations to potential unmeasured confounding; and from quasi-experimental designs in the economics literature. The evidence for the associations with anxiety is less clear. The results have societal and public health implications with regard to the proportion of the rise in mental illness that might be attributable to declining religious participation. The results have individual and clinical implications with regard to ethically sensitive evidence-based approaches that might encourage service attendance for those who already positively identify with a religious tradition and encourage other forms of community participation for those who do not.
Hinweise
This paper was adapted from the keynote address, Religion and Mental Health: Is the Relationship Causal? given by Dr. Tyler J. VanderWeele at the International Association for the Psychology of Religion Annual Conference on August 24, 2023.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

In this brief commentary, we will consider the evidence for causality concerning associations between religion and mental health and will offer some remarks on the implications of this body of evidence both for society and also for public health and clinical practice. While there are a number of narrative summaries of the evidence relating religious and spiritual participation to mental health (e.g., Hayward & Krause, 2013; Levin, 2010; Rosmarin et al., 2020), our particular focus here will be on evidence from large longitudinal studies controlling for baseline outcomes, or from quasi-experimental and instrumental variable designs, that can more adequately provide evidence for causation (VanderWeele, 2021b).

Evidence

Depression

Perhaps the best studied outcome concerning the relationship between religious participation and mental health concerns depression. In a comprehensive review of the literature, Koenig et al. (2023) discuss more than 20 rigorous longitudinal studies, with control for baseline depression, with the vast majority indicating a protective association between religious participation and subsequent depression, mostly with data from the USA, but also from the Netherlands, Australia, Canada, the UK, and Chile, along with one large study with participants from 10 European countries (Croezen et al., 2015). A recent systematic review (Balboni et al., 2022) of the religion and health literature between 2000 and 2022 likewise indicated that of 32 longitudinal studies of the relationships between religion/spirituality and depression, with control for baseline outcomes and with a sample size of at least 1000, 77% of the studies evaluating religious service attendance found notable evidence for a protective association with depression. A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies with control for baseline confounding and baseline depression (Garssen et al., 2021; VanderWeele, 2021a) indicated that service attendance was associated with 33% reduction in the odds of depression incidence (OR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58–0.81).

Suicide

There is also considerable evidence relating religious participation and suicide. Koenig et al. (2023) report a number of rigorous longitudinal studies indicating a protective association between religious participation and suicide or suicide behavior and ideation. In the aforementioned systematic review of the literature (Balboni et al., 2022) of longitudinal studies with control for baseline outcome measures and sample sizes of at least 1000, three out of four studies indicated that religious service attendance was associated with lower suicide. While there are a limited number of large rigorous studies, the studies that have been carried out provide strong evidence and indicate large effects. For example, VanderWeele et al. (2016) report weekly religious service attendance associated with an 84% reduction in the risk of completed suicide (HR = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06–0.46) over 16 years.

Anxiety

In contrast with the associations relating religious participation to depression and to suicide, the evidence concerning anxiety is more mixed. In the systematic review of Balboni et al. (2022), anxiety is not among the outcomes for which the evidence was rated as strong, with only half of the studies suggesting evidence for a protective association. In addition, some of the largest longitudinal studies of religious participation and anxiety indicate either little evidence (Li et al., 2016) or fairly small effect sizes (Chen et al., 2020). It may be the case that religious participation decreases anxiety and provides peace for some individuals or in some contexts but increases anxiety for or in others.

Substance Use

The evidence is relatively stronger once again for the relationship between religious participation and substance use. Koenig et al. report (2023) report numerous rigorous longitudinal studies indicating a protective association between religious participation and lower smoking, alcohol consumption, and drug use. In their systematic review of studies on religion/spirituality and health, Balboni et al. (2022) report that of 38 longitudinal studies with control for baseline outcomes and sample sizes of at least 1000, the vast majority of these indicate protective associations with smoking, alcohol abuse, and drug use.

Well-Being

There is likewise considerable evidence for moderately strong longitudinal associations between religious participation and various aspects of mental well-being including happiness, life satisfaction, meaning, purpose, and numerous other health and well-being outcomes also (Balboni et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2020; Koenig et al., 2023). Much of the longitudinal research on religion and well-being concerns life satisfaction, and Balboni et al. (2022) report that of 10 longitudinal studies with control for baseline outcomes and sample sizes of at least 1000 focused on life satisfaction, 7 of these (70%) indicate a beneficial association. Less longitudinal research has been carried out with regard to meaning and purpose, but the existing longitudinal research does also suggest a beneficial association (Chen et al., 2019, 2020; Krause & Hayward, 2012).

Further Synthesis of Evidence

The evidence for associations between religious participation and suicide, depression, and substance use is especially strong. A summary of key studies is found in Table 1. Further evidence synthesis through quantitative meta-analysis restricted to more rigorous longitudinal studies with control for baseline outcome is still needed as this has thus far effectively only been carried out for depression (and for mortality for physical health) (Chida et al., 2009; Garssen et al., 2021; VanderWeele, 2021a). However, even at present, the various studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses employing longitudinal designs, with large sample sizes, extensive confounding control, and control also for baseline outcomes (VanderWeele, 2021b) provides some, albeit not definitive, evidence that the relationship between religious participation and these mental health outcomes is causal.
Table 1
Key longitudinal evidence on religion and mental health
Reference
Outcome
Population
Type of study
Garssen et al., (2021)
Mental health/depression
Children, adolescents, and adults
Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
VanderWeele et al., (2016)
Suicide
Adults
Longitudinal study
Chen et al., (2020)
Substance use
Adults
Multi-outcome longitudinal study
Chen and VanderWeele, (2018)
Substance use
Adolescents
Multi-outcome longitudinal study
Note the evidence for relationships between religion and anxiety is more mixed (see text)
Further evidence comes from sensitivity analysis concerning the robustness of these associations to potential unmeasured confounding. Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding (VanderWeele & Ding, 2017; VanderWeele, 2021a) of the meta-analysis concerning religious service attendance and depression (Garssen et al., 2021) was carried out. This work indicates that to explain away the longitudinal association between religious service attendance and depression, an unmeasured confounder that was associated with greater service attendance and with lower depression across studies by risk ratios of 1.74 each, above and beyond the measured covariates, could suffice, but weaker joint confounder associations could not. To shift the lower confidence interval of the estimate to the null, an unmeasured confounder that was associated with greater service attendance and with lower depression across studies by risk ratios of 1.46 each could suffice, but weaker joint confounder associations could not. Similar but yet stronger robustness to potential unmeasured confounding also pertains to the associations between religious service attendance and suicide. VanderWeele et al. (2016) report that for an unmeasured confounder to explain away the HR estimate of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.06–0.46), an unmeasured confounder associated with both increased service attendance and decreased suicide incidence by risk ratios of 12-fold each, above and beyond the measured confounders, could suffice, but weaker joint confounder associations could not. To bring the estimate’s upper confidence limit to the null, an unmeasured confounder associated with both increased service attendance and decreased suicide incidence by risk ratios of 3.7-fold each, above and beyond the measured confounders, could suffice, but weaker joint confounder associations could not.
Yet further evidence for causality for these relationships comes from quasi-experimental study designs within the economics literature. With regard to depression, quasi-experimental designs, using within-school variation in adolescents’ peers’ religiosity as an instrumental variable, support a causal relationship between religious participation and lower rates of depression (Fruehwirth et al., 2019). Likewise with regard to death by suicide, poisoning, and alcoholic liver disease (sometimes called “deaths of despair”), quasi-experimental designs, using the repeal of “blue laws” that restrict business activity on Sundays as an instrumental variable, support evidence for a protective causal effect of service attendance on the incidence of these “deaths of despair” (Giles et al., 2023). Such quasi-experimental and instrumental variable designs are themselves subject to assumptions to establish causation, but a different set of assumptions than the observational longitudinal research. That the results seem to be relatively consistent across these different designs and assumptions strengthens evidence yet further (VanderWeele, 2021b).

Societal Implications

The relatively strong evidence for causal effects of religious participation is relevant at the individual level. However, it is relevant also at the societal level. Concerning suicide, VanderWeele et al. (2017) report that if the effect estimate from the large longitudinal study of religious service attendance and completed suicide (VanderWeele et al., 2016) were extrapolated to the US population, it would indicate that roughly 40% of the rise in suicide from 1999 to 2014 could be attributed to declining religious service attendance.
Likewise, concerning depression, Kreski et al. (2022) report that of the increasing US adolescent depression rates from 1991 to 2019, approximately 28% of the increase can be attributed to declining religious service attendance. Had service attendance rates in 2019 remained at the levels they were at in 1991, depression rates, they project, would be 28% lower.
That the role of religion in these various trends is still neglected in major public health discussions and reviews of temporal trends concerning mental health (e.g., Martínez-Alés, 2022) is a failure of the public health community to take seriously a major social determinant of health. It constitutes a possibly intentional blindness on the part of the public health community, and one that should be corrected in research, in teaching, in public health discussions, and in intervention efforts.

Clinical and Public Health Efforts

The clinical and public health implications of the evidence concerning the causal role of religious participation are more subtle. Religious commitments are typically shaped by values, systems of meaning, experiences, upbringing, relationships, evidence, truth claims, and so forth. The various ways that religious identity, belief, and commitments are formed should be respected. Any sort of universal “prescription” from the clinical or public health community is arguably thus inappropriate (Sloan et al., 2000; VanderWeele et al., 2022).
Nevertheless, attentiveness to these matters of religious and spiritual commitment arguably does have at least some relevance within clinical and public health practice. For persons who already positively self-identify with a religious tradition, encouraging communal participation is arguably not inappropriate and could be carried out in various ethical and culturally sensitive ways both within medicine and public health (VanderWeele et al., 2022). In an evidence synthesis and recommendation process using an expert Delphi panel, Balboni et al. (2022) recommend that health systems, “Incorporate patient-centered and evidence-based approaches regarding the beneficial associations of religious/spiritual community participation to improve medical care and population health.”
VanderWeele et al. (2022) further discuss the implications of the evidence base concerning religious participation and both mental and physical health. They recommend that in clinical practice, a brief 2-question spiritual history be taken consisting of the questions “Are religion or spirituality important to you in thinking about health and illness or at other times?” and “Do you have, or would you like to have, someone to talk to about religious or spiritual matters?” They then suggest that for those who positively self-identify with a religious tradition, participation in religious community could be encouraged, and for those who do not thus positively self-identify other forms of community participation could be encouraged. For those who have had negative experiences or even abuse in religious settings, such spiritual histories might help uncover these, and referrals to counselors, chaplains, or mental health professionals could be made to provide further support. Given the evidence base that now exists, neglect of these issues may in fact be viewed as doing harm.
VanderWeele et al. (2022) further discuss potential public health and social prescribing campaigns that could encourage religious participation for those positively identifying with a religious tradition and other forms of community participation for those who do not. Such social prescribing practices have already gained some traction in the UK (NHS England, 2020); the US Surgeon General recently released a report encouraging the adoption of such practices in the USA as well (Murthy, 2023). Given the strong evidence for causal effects of religious participation on mental health, and on other aspects of health and well-being, the implementation of these approaches could be especially valuable.

Limitations

The present evidence does have certain limitations. First, most of the evidence presented in the literature on this topic is observational and therefore cannot definitively establish causation. While randomized trials can provide stronger evidence, in most settings this would be unethical or infeasible. Nevertheless, some of the existing evidence is quite compelling and the sensitivity analysis suggesting robustness to unmeasured confounding adds further evidence, as do the quasi-experimental designs. Second, for some outcomes (e.g., suicide) the total number of large rigorous longitudinal studies is still somewhat limited, and only in the case of depression (Garssen et al., 2021; VanderWeele, 2021a) have all of the relevant longitudinal studies been synthesized in meta-analysis. Finally, most of the literature examines these topics within Western contexts, and so its generalizability may be limited. Further study in other cultures and contexts, and for a wider range of religious traditions, could enhance our understanding of the relationship of religion and mental health globally.

Conclusions

This commentary has summarized evidence from the literature that indicates a protective effect of religious participation against depression, suicide, and substance use. This effect is not seen as clearly for anxiety, and further study is needed to determine the extent to which religious participation affects anxiety, or in what contexts. Understanding the relationships between mental health outcomes and religious participation has important implications on how we promote mental health both in clinical and population-wide contexts, especially for those individuals and communities who positively identify with a religious tradition.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

Tyler J. VanderWeele reports owning shares of CoreSensum.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, Y., Kim, E. S., Koh, H. K., Frazier, A. L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2019). Sense of mission and subsequent health and well-being among young adults: An outcome-wide analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 188(4), 664–673.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen, Y., Kim, E. S., Koh, H. K., Frazier, A. L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2019). Sense of mission and subsequent health and well-being among young adults: An outcome-wide analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 188(4), 664–673.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Croezen, S., Avendano, M., Burdorf, A., & Van Lenthe, F. J. (2015). Social participation and depression in old age: A fixed-effects analysis in 10 European countries. American Journal of Epidemiology, 182(2), 168–176.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Croezen, S., Avendano, M., Burdorf, A., & Van Lenthe, F. J. (2015). Social participation and depression in old age: A fixed-effects analysis in 10 European countries. American Journal of Epidemiology, 182(2), 168–176.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Hayward, R. D., & Krause, N. (2013). Religion, mental health, and well-being: Social aspects. In V. Saroglou (Ed.), Religion, personality, and social behavior (pp. 265–290). Psychology Press. Hayward, R. D., & Krause, N. (2013). Religion, mental health, and well-being: Social aspects. In V. Saroglou (Ed.), Religion, personality, and social behavior (pp. 265–290). Psychology Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Koenig, H. K., VanderWeele, T. J., & Peteet, J. R. (2023). Handbook of religion and health (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. Koenig, H. K., VanderWeele, T. J., & Peteet, J. R. (2023). Handbook of religion and health (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Krause, N., & Hayward, R. (2012). Religion, meaning in life, and change in physical functioning during late adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 19, 158–169.CrossRef Krause, N., & Hayward, R. (2012). Religion, meaning in life, and change in physical functioning during late adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 19, 158–169.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Levin, J. (2010). Religion and mental health: Theory and research. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 7(2), 102–115.CrossRef Levin, J. (2010). Religion and mental health: Theory and research. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 7(2), 102–115.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosmarin, D. H., & Koenig, H. G. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of spirituality, religion, and mental health. Academic Press. Rosmarin, D. H., & Koenig, H. G. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of spirituality, religion, and mental health. Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sloan RP, Bagiella E, VandeCreek L, Hover M, Casalone C, Hirsch TJ, Hasan Y, Kreger R, Poulos P. (2000). Should physicians prescribe religious activities?. New England Journal of Medicine, 342(25), 1913–1916.CrossRefPubMed Sloan RP, Bagiella E, VandeCreek L, Hover M, Casalone C, Hirsch TJ, Hasan Y, Kreger R, Poulos P. (2000). Should physicians prescribe religious activities?. New England Journal of Medicine, 342(25), 1913–1916.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Religion and Mental Health: Is the Relationship Causal?
verfasst von
Tyler J. VanderWeele
Suzanne T. Ouyang
Publikationsdatum
27.02.2025
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Religion and Health
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-025-02266-x