Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health 3/2016

29.06.2015 | Original Paper

Religious Involvement and Perceptions of Control: Evidence from the Miami-Dade Health Survey

verfasst von: Anita E. Pascoe, Terrence D. Hill, Krysia N. Mossakowski, Robert J. Johnson

Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study uses data collected through the 2011 Miami-Dade Health Survey (n = 444) to test whether religious involvement is associated with three distinct control beliefs. Regression results suggest that people who exhibit high levels of religious involvement tend to report higher levels of the sense of control, self-control, and the health locus of control than respondents who exhibit low levels of religious involvement. Although this study suggests that religious involvement can promote perceptions of control over one’s own life, this pattern is apparently concentrated at the high end of the distribution for religious involvement, indicating a threshold effect.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ellison, C. G., & Burdette, A. M. (2012). Religion and the sense of control among US adults. Sociology of Religion, 73, 1–22.CrossRef Ellison, C. G., & Burdette, A. M. (2012). Religion and the sense of control among US adults. Sociology of Religion, 73, 1–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ellison, C. G., & Levin, J. S. (1998). The religion-health connection: Evidence, theory, and future directions. Health Education & Behavior, 25, 700–720.CrossRef Ellison, C. G., & Levin, J. S. (1998). The religion-health connection: Evidence, theory, and future directions. Health Education & Behavior, 25, 700–720.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Exline, J. J. (2002). Stumbling blocks on the religious road: Fractured relationships, nagging vices, and the inner struggle to believe. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 182–189.CrossRef Exline, J. J. (2002). Stumbling blocks on the religious road: Fractured relationships, nagging vices, and the inner struggle to believe. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 182–189.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fiori, K. L., Brown, E. E., Cortina, K. S., & Antonucci, T. C. (2006). Locus of control as a mediator of the relationship between religiosity and life satisfaction: Age, race, and gender differences. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 9, 239–263.CrossRef Fiori, K. L., Brown, E. E., Cortina, K. S., & Antonucci, T. C. (2006). Locus of control as a mediator of the relationship between religiosity and life satisfaction: Age, race, and gender differences. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 9, 239–263.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Geyer, A., & Baumeister, R. (2005). Religion, morality, and self-control. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 412–432). New York: Guilford Press. Geyer, A., & Baumeister, R. (2005). Religion, morality, and self-control. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 412–432). New York: Guilford Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–29.CrossRef Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hayward, R. D., & Krause, N. (2013). Trajectories of late-life change in God-mediated control. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 49–58.CrossRefPubMedCentral Hayward, R. D., & Krause, N. (2013). Trajectories of late-life change in God-mediated control. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 49–58.CrossRefPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Hill, T., Burdette, A., & Idler, E. (2011). Religious involvement, health status, and mortality risk. In R. Settersten & J. Angel (Eds.), Handbook of sociology of aging (pp. 533–546). New York: Springer.CrossRef Hill, T., Burdette, A., & Idler, E. (2011). Religious involvement, health status, and mortality risk. In R. Settersten & J. Angel (Eds.), Handbook of sociology of aging (pp. 533–546). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hill, T. D., Cook, H. H., & Whitfield, K. E. (2014). Race and ethnic variations in the education-control-distress model. Social Science Quarterly, 95, 269–285.CrossRef Hill, T. D., Cook, H. H., & Whitfield, K. E. (2014). Race and ethnic variations in the education-control-distress model. Social Science Quarterly, 95, 269–285.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koenig, H. G. (2009). Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: a review. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54, 283–291.PubMed Koenig, H. G. (2009). Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: a review. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54, 283–291.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Krause, N., & Van Tran, T. (1989). Stress and religious involvement among older blacks. Journal of Gerontology, 44, S4–S13.CrossRefPubMed Krause, N., & Van Tran, T. (1989). Stress and religious involvement among older blacks. Journal of Gerontology, 44, S4–S13.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Levin, J. S., & Schiller, P. L. (1986). Religion and the multidimensional health locus of control scales. Psychological Reports, 59, 26.CrossRefPubMed Levin, J. S., & Schiller, P. L. (1986). Religion and the multidimensional health locus of control scales. Psychological Reports, 59, 26.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat McCullough, M. E., & Willoughby, B. L. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 69.CrossRefPubMed McCullough, M. E., & Willoughby, B. L. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 69.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1991). Eliminating defense and agreement bias from measures of the sense of control: A 2 × 2 index. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 127–145.CrossRef Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1991). Eliminating defense and agreement bias from measures of the sense of control: A 2 × 2 index. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 127–145.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (2003). Social causes of psychological distress. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (2003). Social causes of psychological distress. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Pargament, K. I. (2002). The bitter and the sweet: An evaluation of the costs and benefits of religiousness. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 168–181.CrossRef Pargament, K. I. (2002). The bitter and the sweet: An evaluation of the costs and benefits of religiousness. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 168–181.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schieman, S. (2008). The religious role and the sense of personal control. Sociology of Religion, 69, 273–296.CrossRef Schieman, S. (2008). The religious role and the sense of personal control. Sociology of Religion, 69, 273–296.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seeman, M. (1983). Alienation motifs in contemporary theorizing: The hidden continuity of the classic themes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 171–184.CrossRef Seeman, M. (1983). Alienation motifs in contemporary theorizing: The hidden continuity of the classic themes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 171–184.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw, B. A., & Krause, N. (2001). Exploring race variations in aging and personal control. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56, S119–S124.CrossRef Shaw, B. A., & Krause, N. (2001). Exploring race variations in aging and personal control. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56, S119–S124.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shrauger, J. S., & Silverman, R. E. (1971). The relationship of religious background and participation to locus of control. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 10, 11–16.CrossRef Shrauger, J. S., & Silverman, R. E. (1971). The relationship of religious background and participation to locus of control. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 10, 11–16.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wallston, K. A., Wallston, B. S., & DeVellis, R. (1978). Development of the multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scales. Health Education & Behavior, 6, 160–170.CrossRef Wallston, K. A., Wallston, B. S., & DeVellis, R. (1978). Development of the multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scales. Health Education & Behavior, 6, 160–170.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Welch, M. R., Tittle, C. R., & Grasmick, H. G. (2006). Christian religiosity, self-control and social conformity. Social Forces, 84, 1605–1623.CrossRef Welch, M. R., Tittle, C. R., & Grasmick, H. G. (2006). Christian religiosity, self-control and social conformity. Social Forces, 84, 1605–1623.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30, 377–399.CrossRefPubMed White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30, 377–399.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Wink, P., Dillon, M., & Prettyman, A. (2007). Religion as moderator of the sense of control–health connection: Gender differences. Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging, 19, 21–41.CrossRef Wink, P., Dillon, M., & Prettyman, A. (2007). Religion as moderator of the sense of control–health connection: Gender differences. Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging, 19, 21–41.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Religious Involvement and Perceptions of Control: Evidence from the Miami-Dade Health Survey
verfasst von
Anita E. Pascoe
Terrence D. Hill
Krysia N. Mossakowski
Robert J. Johnson
Publikationsdatum
29.06.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Religion and Health / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0081-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Journal of Religion and Health 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe