Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2017

08.10.2016 | EDITOR’S FORUM

Remote magnetic navigation for ventricular ablation: did the machine win this round?

verfasst von: J. David Burkhardt

Erschienen in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Remote magnetic navigation has been available as a tool for mapping and ablation for well over a decade. In that period of time, it has shown to be useful in nearly every type of ablation procedure from the most simple to the most complex [13]. Some operators prefer the system for atrial fibrillation ablation, others for ventricular tachycardia ablation, and some use it for any ablation. Despite numerous publications showing reductions in fluoroscopic exposure and the obvious benefits of not wearing lead and standing tableside for hours, remote magnetic navigation has not become the standard of care in the world [4]. Most publications appear to show similar success rates, and many show favorable complication rates [57]. So what is the limitation to universal acceptance? In addition, many centers have purchased the system, yet it sits unused. Why would a physician give up a more comfortable procedure to perform an ablation wearing lead and being exposed to more radiation? …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Akca F, Schwagten B, Theuns DAJ, Takens M, Musters P, Szili-Torok T. Safety and feasibility of single-catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation for treatment of slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia compared to conventional ablation strategies. Acta Cardiol. 2013;68(6):559–67.PubMed Akca F, Schwagten B, Theuns DAJ, Takens M, Musters P, Szili-Torok T. Safety and feasibility of single-catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation for treatment of slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia compared to conventional ablation strategies. Acta Cardiol. 2013;68(6):559–67.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim S-H, Oh Y-S, Kim D-H, Choi IJ, Kim T-S, Shin W-S, et al. Long-term outcomes of remote magnetic navigation for ablation of supraventricular tachycardias. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;43(2):187–92.CrossRefPubMed Kim S-H, Oh Y-S, Kim D-H, Choi IJ, Kim T-S, Shin W-S, et al. Long-term outcomes of remote magnetic navigation for ablation of supraventricular tachycardias. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;43(2):187–92.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu J, Deisenhofer I, Ammar S, Fichtner S, Reents T, Zhu P, et al. Acute and long-term outcome after catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in patients after the Mustard or Senning operation for D-transposition of the great arteries. Europace. 2013;15(6):886–91.CrossRefPubMed Wu J, Deisenhofer I, Ammar S, Fichtner S, Reents T, Zhu P, et al. Acute and long-term outcome after catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in patients after the Mustard or Senning operation for D-transposition of the great arteries. Europace. 2013;15(6):886–91.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin QI, Pehrson S, Jacobsen PK, Chen XU. Efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation using remote magnetic navigation: experience from 1,006 procedures. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27 Suppl 1:S23–28.CrossRefPubMed Jin QI, Pehrson S, Jacobsen PK, Chen XU. Efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation using remote magnetic navigation: experience from 1,006 procedures. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27 Suppl 1:S23–28.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss JP, May HT, Bair TL, Crandall BG, Cutler MJ, Day JD, et al. A comparison of remote magnetic irrigated tip ablation versus manual catheter irrigated tip catheter ablation with and without force sensing feedback. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27 Suppl 1:S5–S10.CrossRefPubMed Weiss JP, May HT, Bair TL, Crandall BG, Cutler MJ, Day JD, et al. A comparison of remote magnetic irrigated tip ablation versus manual catheter irrigated tip catheter ablation with and without force sensing feedback. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27 Suppl 1:S5–S10.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin Q, Pehrson S, Jacobsen PK, Chen X. Impact of catheter ablation with remote magnetic navigation on procedural outcomes in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;44(2):197–204.CrossRefPubMed Jin Q, Pehrson S, Jacobsen PK, Chen X. Impact of catheter ablation with remote magnetic navigation on procedural outcomes in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;44(2):197–204.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang F, Yang B, Chen H, Ju W, Kojodjojo P, Cao K, et al. Magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for mapping and ablation of right ventricular outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias: a randomized controlled study. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(8):1178–83.CrossRefPubMed Zhang F, Yang B, Chen H, Ju W, Kojodjojo P, Cao K, et al. Magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for mapping and ablation of right ventricular outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias: a randomized controlled study. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(8):1178–83.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tahir SMA, Chaudhry GM, Syed MA, Marchese T, Kotler G, Haffajee CI, et al. Remote magnetic navigation system provides a superior catheter stability in acquisition of His bundle electrogram. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008;21(3):209–13.CrossRefPubMed Tahir SMA, Chaudhry GM, Syed MA, Marchese T, Kotler G, Haffajee CI, et al. Remote magnetic navigation system provides a superior catheter stability in acquisition of His bundle electrogram. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008;21(3):209–13.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Aagaard P, Natale A, Briceno D, Nakagawa H, Mohanty S, Gianni C, et al. Remote magnetic navigation: a focus on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27 Suppl 1:S38–44.CrossRefPubMed Aagaard P, Natale A, Briceno D, Nakagawa H, Mohanty S, Gianni C, et al. Remote magnetic navigation: a focus on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27 Suppl 1:S38–44.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Santangeli P, Dello Russo A, Pieroni M, Casella M, Di Biase L, Burkhardt JD, et al. Fragmented and delayed electrograms within fibrofatty scar predict arrhythmic events in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: results from a prospective risk stratification study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(8):1200–6.CrossRefPubMed Santangeli P, Dello Russo A, Pieroni M, Casella M, Di Biase L, Burkhardt JD, et al. Fragmented and delayed electrograms within fibrofatty scar predict arrhythmic events in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: results from a prospective risk stratification study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(8):1200–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Astudillo V, Conti S, Mohanty P, Mohanty S, et al. Endo-epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in the left ventricle with the remote magnetic navigation system and the 3.5-mm open irrigated magnetic catheter: results from a large single-center case-control series. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(8):1029–35.CrossRefPubMed Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Astudillo V, Conti S, Mohanty P, Mohanty S, et al. Endo-epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in the left ventricle with the remote magnetic navigation system and the 3.5-mm open irrigated magnetic catheter: results from a large single-center case-control series. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(8):1029–35.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Burkhardt DJ, Bai R, Mohanty P, Carbucicchio C, et al. Endo-epicardial homogenization of the scar versus limited substrate ablation for the treatment of electrical storms in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(2):132–41.CrossRefPubMed Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Burkhardt DJ, Bai R, Mohanty P, Carbucicchio C, et al. Endo-epicardial homogenization of the scar versus limited substrate ablation for the treatment of electrical storms in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(2):132–41.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Roy K, Gomez-Pulido F, Ernst S. Remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation in patients with congenital heart disease: a review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27 Suppl 1:S45–56.CrossRefPubMed Roy K, Gomez-Pulido F, Ernst S. Remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation in patients with congenital heart disease: a review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27 Suppl 1:S45–56.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham P, Abkenari LD, Peters ECH, Szili-Torok T. Feasibility of remote magnetic navigation for epicardial ablation. Neth Heart J. 2013;21(9):391–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abraham P, Abkenari LD, Peters ECH, Szili-Torok T. Feasibility of remote magnetic navigation for epicardial ablation. Neth Heart J. 2013;21(9):391–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawamura M, Scheinman MM, Tseng ZH, Lee BK, Marcus GM, Badhwar N. Comparison of remote magnetic navigation ablation and manual ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia after failed manual ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016. doi:10.1007/s10840-016-0158-x. Kawamura M, Scheinman MM, Tseng ZH, Lee BK, Marcus GM, Badhwar N. Comparison of remote magnetic navigation ablation and manual ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia after failed manual ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016. doi:10.​1007/​s10840-016-0158-x.
Metadaten
Titel
Remote magnetic navigation for ventricular ablation: did the machine win this round?
verfasst von
J. David Burkhardt
Publikationsdatum
08.10.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0197-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.