Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 9/2020

04.05.2020 | Original Contributions

Reoperation Incidence and Severity Within 6 Months After Bariatric Surgery: a Propensity-Matched Study from Nationwide Data

verfasst von: Laurent Brunaud, Cecile Payet, Stephanie Polazzi, Florence Bihain, Didier Quilliot, Jean-Christophe Lifante, Antoine Duclos

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Data about incidence and severity of reoperations up to 6 months after bariatric surgery are currently limited. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the incidence and severity of reoperations after initial bariatric surgical procedures and to compare this between the 3 most frequent current surgical procedures (sleeve, gastric bypass, gastric banding).

Study Design

Nationwide observational cohort study using data from French Hospital Information System (2013–2015) to evaluate incidence and severity of reoperations within 6 months after bariatric surgery. Hazard ratios (HR) of longitudinal comparison between historical propensity-matched cohorts were estimated from a Fine and Gray’s model using competing risk of death.

Results

Cumulative reoperation rates increased from postoperative day-30 to day-180. Consequently, 31.1 to 90.0% of procedures would have been missed if the reoperation rate was based solely on a 30-day follow-up. Reoperation rate at 6 months was significantly higher after gastric bypass than after sleeve (HR 0.64; IC 95% [0.53–0.77]) and corresponded to moderate-risk reoperations (HR 0.65; IC 95% [0.53–0.78]). Reoperation rate at 6 months was significantly higher after gastric banding than after sleeve (HR 0.08; IC 95% [0.07–0.09]) and corresponded to moderate-risk reoperations (HR 0.08; IC 95% [0.07–0.10]).

Conclusion

Cumulative incidence of reoperations increased from 30 days to 6 months after sleeve, gastric bypass, or gastric banding and corresponded to moderate-risk surgical procedures. Consequently, 30-day reoperation rate should no longer be considered when evaluating complications and surgical performance after bariatric surgery.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240:416–23.CrossRef Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240:416–23.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Reges O, Greenland P, Dicker D, et al. Association of bariatric surgery using laparoscopic banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs usual care obesity management with all-cause mortality. JAMA. 2018;319:279–90.CrossRef Reges O, Greenland P, Dicker D, et al. Association of bariatric surgery using laparoscopic banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs usual care obesity management with all-cause mortality. JAMA. 2018;319:279–90.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stenberg E, Szabo E, Agren G, et al. Early complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Ann Surg. 2014;260:1040–7.CrossRef Stenberg E, Szabo E, Agren G, et al. Early complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Ann Surg. 2014;260:1040–7.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunaud L, Polazzi S, Lifante JC, et al. Health care institutions volume is significantly associated with postoperative outcomes in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28:923–31.CrossRef Brunaud L, Polazzi S, Lifante JC, et al. Health care institutions volume is significantly associated with postoperative outcomes in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28:923–31.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Caiazzo R, Baud G, Clement G, et al. Impact of centralized management of bariatric surgery complications on 90-day mortality. Ann Surg. 2018;268:831–7.CrossRef Caiazzo R, Baud G, Clement G, et al. Impact of centralized management of bariatric surgery complications on 90-day mortality. Ann Surg. 2018;268:831–7.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Nguyen B, Nguyen VQ, et al. Outcomes of bariatric surgery performed at accredited vs nonaccredited centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:467–74.CrossRef Nguyen NT, Nguyen B, Nguyen VQ, et al. Outcomes of bariatric surgery performed at accredited vs nonaccredited centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:467–74.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimick JB, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, et al. Bariatric surgery complications before vs after implementation of a national policy restricting coverage to centers of excellence. JAMA. 2013;309:792–9.CrossRef Dimick JB, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, et al. Bariatric surgery complications before vs after implementation of a national policy restricting coverage to centers of excellence. JAMA. 2013;309:792–9.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Nicholas L, et al. Identifying high-quality bariatric surgery centers: hospital volume or risk-adjusted outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:702–6.CrossRef Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Nicholas L, et al. Identifying high-quality bariatric surgery centers: hospital volume or risk-adjusted outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:702–6.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2128–37.CrossRef Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2128–37.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fry BT, Scally CP, Thumma JR, et al. Quality improvement in bariatric surgery: the impact of reducing postoperative complications on Medicare payments. Ann Surg. 2018;268:22–7.CrossRef Fry BT, Scally CP, Thumma JR, et al. Quality improvement in bariatric surgery: the impact of reducing postoperative complications on Medicare payments. Ann Surg. 2018;268:22–7.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Markar SR, Penna M, Karthikesalingam A, et al. The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on clinical outcome following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1126–34.CrossRef Markar SR, Penna M, Karthikesalingam A, et al. The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on clinical outcome following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1126–34.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Krell RW, Finks JF, English WJ, et al. Profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery quality: which outcomes are most reliable? J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:725–34.CrossRef Krell RW, Finks JF, English WJ, et al. Profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery quality: which outcomes are most reliable? J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:725–34.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunaud L, Payet C, Lifante JC, et al. Regarding manuscript “impact of centralized management of bariatric surgery complications on 90-day mortality”. Ann Surg. 2019;270:e47–8.CrossRef Brunaud L, Payet C, Lifante JC, et al. Regarding manuscript “impact of centralized management of bariatric surgery complications on 90-day mortality”. Ann Surg. 2019;270:e47–8.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Armoiry X, Obadia JF, Pascal L, et al. Comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients: a nationwide study in France. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156:1017–25.CrossRef Armoiry X, Obadia JF, Pascal L, et al. Comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients: a nationwide study in France. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156:1017–25.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.CrossRef Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Janik MR, Rogula TG, Mustafa RR, et al. Safety of revision sleeve gastrectomy compared to Roux-Y gastric bypass after failed gastric banding: analysis of the MBSAQIP. Ann Surg. 2018;14:1276–82. Janik MR, Rogula TG, Mustafa RR, et al. Safety of revision sleeve gastrectomy compared to Roux-Y gastric bypass after failed gastric banding: analysis of the MBSAQIP. Ann Surg. 2018;14:1276–82.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bohnen JD, Mavros MN, Ramly EP, et al. Intraoperative adverse events in abdominal surgery: what happens in the operating room does not stay in the operating room. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1119–25.CrossRef Bohnen JD, Mavros MN, Ramly EP, et al. Intraoperative adverse events in abdominal surgery: what happens in the operating room does not stay in the operating room. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1119–25.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Iglehart JK. Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness research--IOM recommendations. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:325–8.CrossRef Iglehart JK. Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness research--IOM recommendations. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:325–8.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.CrossRef Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46:399–424.CrossRef Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46:399–424.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Marrie RA, Dawson NV, Garland A. Quantile regression and restricted cubic splines are useful for exploring relationships between continuous variables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:511–7.CrossRef Marrie RA, Dawson NV, Garland A. Quantile regression and restricted cubic splines are useful for exploring relationships between continuous variables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:511–7.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10:150–61.CrossRef Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10:150–61.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lazzati A, De Antonio M, Paolino L, et al. Natural history of adjustable gastric banding: lifespan and revisional rate: a nationwide study on administrative data on 53,000 patients. Ann Surg. 2017;265:439–45.CrossRef Lazzati A, De Antonio M, Paolino L, et al. Natural history of adjustable gastric banding: lifespan and revisional rate: a nationwide study on administrative data on 53,000 patients. Ann Surg. 2017;265:439–45.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Debs T, Petrucciani N, Kassir R, et al. Trends of bariatric surgery in France during the last 10 years: analysis of 267,466 procedures from 2005-2014. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1602–9.CrossRef Debs T, Petrucciani N, Kassir R, et al. Trends of bariatric surgery in France during the last 10 years: analysis of 267,466 procedures from 2005-2014. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1602–9.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibrahim AM, Dimick JB. What metrics accurately reflect surgical quality? Annu Rev Med. 2018;69:481–91.CrossRef Ibrahim AM, Dimick JB. What metrics accurately reflect surgical quality? Annu Rev Med. 2018;69:481–91.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:255–355.CrossRef Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:255–355.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:241–54.CrossRef Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:241–54.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ladak F, Dang JT, Switzer NJ, et al. Rates of reoperation and nonoperative intervention within 30 days of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:431–40.CrossRef Ladak F, Dang JT, Switzer NJ, et al. Rates of reoperation and nonoperative intervention within 30 days of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:431–40.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Musella M, Vitiello A. Comment on: rates of reoperation and intervention within 30 days of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:e9–10.CrossRef Musella M, Vitiello A. Comment on: rates of reoperation and intervention within 30 days of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:e9–10.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaar ME, Lundberg P, Stoltzfus J. Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:545–51.CrossRef Chaar ME, Lundberg P, Stoltzfus J. Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:545–51.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, et al. Postoperative early major and minor complications in laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2273–84.CrossRef Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, et al. Postoperative early major and minor complications in laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2273–84.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Talsma AK, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW, et al. The 30-day versus in-hospital and 90-day mortality after esophagectomy as indicators for quality of care. Ann Surg. 2014;260:267–73.CrossRef Talsma AK, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW, et al. The 30-day versus in-hospital and 90-day mortality after esophagectomy as indicators for quality of care. Ann Surg. 2014;260:267–73.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Young MT, Gebhart A, Phelan MJ, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:880–5.CrossRef Young MT, Gebhart A, Phelan MJ, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:880–5.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Fysekidis M, Catheline JM. Are guidelines for standardized outcome reporting in bariatric surgery responsible for missing the big picture in bariatric surgery related major complications? Ann Surg. 2018;268:e12–e3.CrossRef Fysekidis M, Catheline JM. Are guidelines for standardized outcome reporting in bariatric surgery responsible for missing the big picture in bariatric surgery related major complications? Ann Surg. 2018;268:e12–e3.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibrahim AM, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Reoperation and Medicare expenditures after laparoscopic gastric band surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:835–42.CrossRef Ibrahim AM, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Reoperation and Medicare expenditures after laparoscopic gastric band surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:835–42.CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Payet C, Lifante JC, Carty MJ, et al. Methodological quality of surgical mortality studies using large hospital databases: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1113–8.CrossRef Payet C, Lifante JC, Carty MJ, et al. Methodological quality of surgical mortality studies using large hospital databases: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1113–8.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Reoperation Incidence and Severity Within 6 Months After Bariatric Surgery: a Propensity-Matched Study from Nationwide Data
verfasst von
Laurent Brunaud
Cecile Payet
Stephanie Polazzi
Florence Bihain
Didier Quilliot
Jean-Christophe Lifante
Antoine Duclos
Publikationsdatum
04.05.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04570-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

Obesity Surgery 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.