Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2016

26.07.2006 | Editorial

Reoperative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Adding Nuance to the Management of Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer

verfasst von: Hiram S. Cody III, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Sonderheft 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Since the pioneering reports of Krag et al.1 and Giuliano et al.2 >10 years ago, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has emerged as a new method for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer and has become standard care at many institutions in the United States and worldwide. A current meta-analysis3 of 69 published studies of SLN biopsy validated by a backup axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) confirms an overall success rate of 96%, with the SLN falsely negative in 7.3% of node-positive cases. Observational studies have asked and answered many questions regarding definition, case selection, technique (nuclear medical, surgical, and pathologic), learning curve, and, most importantly, safety. The morbidity of SLN biopsy, although not zero, is less than that of ALND,4,5 and axillary local recurrence (LR) after a negative SLN biopsy is both comparable to that of ALND and vanishingly rare, occurring in 0.12% of our own patients at 30 months’ follow-up.6 It appears that few false-negative SLN procedures, if any, ever result in axillary LR. Three randomized trials5,7,8 of identical design address the survival equivalence of SLN biopsy and ALND and are almost certain to demonstrate no difference. Finally, two trials,7,9 through a physician- and patient-blinded design, promise an answer to the still-controversial subject of prognostic significance in immunohistochemically detected SLN micrometastases. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, et al. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 1993;2:335–40CrossRefPubMed Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, et al. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 1993;2:335–40CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 2006;106:4–16CrossRefPubMed Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 2006;106:4–16CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Temple LK, Baron R, Cody HS III, et al. Sensory morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection: a prospective study of 233 women. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:654–62CrossRefPubMed Temple LK, Baron R, Cody HS III, et al. Sensory morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection: a prospective study of 233 women. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:654–62CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:546–53CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:546–53CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Naik AM, Fey J, Gemignani M, et al. The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures. Ann Surg 2004;240:462–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Naik AM, Fey J, Gemignani M, et al. The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures. Ann Surg 2004;240:462–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Krag DN. Protocol B-32: a randomized phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection to conventional axillary dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. Available at: http://www.nsabp.pitt.edu/B-32.ASP (7/18/06) Krag DN. Protocol B-32: a randomized phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection to conventional axillary dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. Available at: http://​www.​nsabp.​pitt.​edu/​B-32.​ASP (7/18/06)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke D, Newcombe RG, Mansel RE. The learning curve in sentinel node biopsy: the ALMANAC experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:211S–215SCrossRefPubMed Clarke D, Newcombe RG, Mansel RE. The learning curve in sentinel node biopsy: the ALMANAC experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:211S–215SCrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Taback B, Nguyen P, Hansen N, Edwards GK, Conway K, Giuliano A. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for local recurrence of breast cancer after breast conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol (in press) Taback B, Nguyen P, Hansen N, Edwards GK, Conway K, Giuliano A. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for local recurrence of breast cancer after breast conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol (in press)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Port ER, Fey J, Gemignani ML, et al. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy: a new option for patients with primary or locally recurrent breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:167–72CrossRefPubMed Port ER, Fey J, Gemignani ML, et al. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy: a new option for patients with primary or locally recurrent breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:167–72CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1227–32CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1227–32CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233–41CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233–41CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat van Tienhoven G, Voogd AC, Peterse JL, et al. Prognosis after treatment for loco-regional recurrence after mastectomy or breast conserving therapy in two randomised trials (EORTC 10801 and DBCG-82TM). EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:32–8CrossRefPubMed van Tienhoven G, Voogd AC, Peterse JL, et al. Prognosis after treatment for loco-regional recurrence after mastectomy or breast conserving therapy in two randomised trials (EORTC 10801 and DBCG-82TM). EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:32–8CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmoor C, Sauerbrei W, Bastert G, et al. Role of isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer: results of four prospective studies. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:1696–708PubMed Schmoor C, Sauerbrei W, Bastert G, et al. Role of isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer: results of four prospective studies. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:1696–708PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Martino S, et al. Outcome after invasive local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:1367–73PubMed Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Martino S, et al. Outcome after invasive local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:1367–73PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fortin A, Larochelle M, Laverdiere J, et al. Local failure is responsible for the decrease in survival for patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:101–9PubMed Fortin A, Larochelle M, Laverdiere J, et al. Local failure is responsible for the decrease in survival for patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:101–9PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Reoperative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Adding Nuance to the Management of Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer
verfasst von
Hiram S. Cody III, MD
Publikationsdatum
26.07.2006
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe Sonderheft 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.01.905

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 5/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.