Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2018

05.10.2018 | Correspondence

Reply to letter to the editor

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The study we published [1] was the research article based on the complete final cohort. The previous paper, published in AJOG [2] was only an abstract, based on partial preliminary data, for the SMFM conference, and for that reason its results differ from those of the complete study. Also, this study was not powered for its outcome due to its limited sample size, and was not argued to be. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Shinar S, Blecher Y, Alpern S et al (2017) Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:1185–1189CrossRef Shinar S, Blecher Y, Alpern S et al (2017) Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:1185–1189CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shinar S, Ashwal E, Blecher Y et al (2016) Bilateral salpingectomy vs tubal ligation for permanent sterilization during a cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216:S415–S416CrossRef Shinar S, Ashwal E, Blecher Y et al (2016) Bilateral salpingectomy vs tubal ligation for permanent sterilization during a cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216:S415–S416CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Reply to letter to the editor
Publikationsdatum
05.10.2018
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4904-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.