Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2020

12.02.2020 | Original Scientific Report

Report of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Postoperative Complications by Using a Surgical Risk Calculator in a Cohort of General Surgery Patients

verfasst von: Elisa M. Müller, Eva Herrmann, Thomas Schmandra, Thomas F. Weigel, Ernst Hanisch, Alexander Buia

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The study investigates whether postoperative complications in elective surgery can be reduced by using a risk calculator via raising the awareness of the surgeon in a preoperative briefing. Postoperative complications like wound infections or pneumonia result in a high burden for healthcare systems. Multiple quality improvement programs address this problem like the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator® (SRC).

Methods

To determine whether the preoperative usage of the SRC could reduce inpatient postoperative complications, two groups of 832 patients each were compared using propensity score matching. The SRC was employed retrospectively in the period 2012/2013 in one group (“Retro”) and prospectively in the other group (“Prosp”) in the period 2014/2015. Actual inpatient postoperative complications were classified by SRC complication categories and compared with the Clavien–Dindo complication classification system (Dindo et al. in Ann Surg 240:205–213, 2004).

Results

Comparing SRC “serious complication” and SRC “any complication,” a nonsignificant increase in the “Prosp”-group was apparent (serious complication: 6.6% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.164; any complication: 8.5% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.444).

Conclusion

Use of the SRC neither reduces inpatient postoperative complications nor the severity of complications. The calculations of the SRC rely on a 30-day postoperative follow-up. Poor sensitivity and medium specificity of the SRC showed that the SRC could not make accurate predictions in a short follow-up time averaging 6 days. Alternatively, since the observed complication rate was low in our study, in an environment of already highly implemented risk management tools, reductions in complications are not easily achieved.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. www.thelancet.com. 372:139 Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. www.​thelancet.​com. 372:139
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G et al (2016) Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012. Bull World Health Organ 94:201–209FCrossRef Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G et al (2016) Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012. Bull World Health Organ 94:201–209FCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearse RM, Clavien PA, Demartines N et al (2016) Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth 117:601–609CrossRef Pearse RM, Clavien PA, Demartines N et al (2016) Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth 117:601–609CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Haugen AS, Søfteland E, Almeland SK et al (2015) Effect of the World Health Organization checklist on patient outcomes: a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 261:821–828CrossRef Haugen AS, Søfteland E, Almeland SK et al (2015) Effect of the World Health Organization checklist on patient outcomes: a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 261:821–828CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Treadwell JR, Lucas S, Tsou AY (2014) Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation. BMJ Qual Saf 23:299–318CrossRef Treadwell JR, Lucas S, Tsou AY (2014) Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation. BMJ Qual Saf 23:299–318CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Howell AM, Panesar SS, Burns EM et al (2014) Reducing the burden of surgical harm: a systematic review of the interventions used to reduce adverse events in surgery. Ann Surg 259:630–641CrossRef Howell AM, Panesar SS, Burns EM et al (2014) Reducing the burden of surgical harm: a systematic review of the interventions used to reduce adverse events in surgery. Ann Surg 259:630–641CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y et al (2010) Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA 304:1693CrossRef Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y et al (2010) Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA 304:1693CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nundy S, Mukherjee A, Sexton JB et al (2008) Impact of preoperative briefings on operating room delays. Arch Surg 143:1068CrossRef Nundy S, Mukherjee A, Sexton JB et al (2008) Impact of preoperative briefings on operating room delays. Arch Surg 143:1068CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Salas E, Frush K (2012) Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training. In: Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training, 1st ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 170 Salas E, Frush K (2012) Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training. In: Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training, 1st ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 170
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sacks GD, Dawes AJ, Ettner SL et al (2016) Surgeon perception of risk and benefit in the decision to operate. Ann Surg 264:896–903CrossRef Sacks GD, Dawes AJ, Ettner SL et al (2016) Surgeon perception of risk and benefit in the decision to operate. Ann Surg 264:896–903CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 217:833–842.e3CrossRef Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 217:833–842.e3CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogel P, Vogel DHV (2019) Cognition errors in the treatment course of patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal resection. BMC 6:1–10 Vogel P, Vogel DHV (2019) Cognition errors in the treatment course of patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal resection. BMC 6:1–10
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R et al (2012) The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 214:214–230CrossRef Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R et al (2012) The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 214:214–230CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D et al (2016) SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process Table 1 Revised Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0) publication guidelines. J Contin Educ Nursing, J Am Coll Surg 25:986–992 Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D et al (2016) SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process Table 1 Revised Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0) publication guidelines. J Contin Educ Nursing, J Am Coll Surg 25:986–992
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanhaecht K, Ovretveit J, Elliott MJ et al (2012) Have we drawn the wrong conclusions about the value of care pathways? Is a cochrane review appropriate? Eval. Heal. Prof. 35:28–42CrossRef Vanhaecht K, Ovretveit J, Elliott MJ et al (2012) Have we drawn the wrong conclusions about the value of care pathways? Is a cochrane review appropriate? Eval. Heal. Prof. 35:28–42CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tevis S (2014) Implications of multiple complications on post-operative recovery in general surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 219:e36CrossRef Tevis S (2014) Implications of multiple complications on post-operative recovery in general surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 219:e36CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider EC, Sarnak DO, Squires D et al (2017) Mirror, Mirror 2017: international comparison reflects flaws and opportunities for better U.S. Health Care Schneider EC, Sarnak DO, Squires D et al (2017) Mirror, Mirror 2017: international comparison reflects flaws and opportunities for better U.S. Health Care
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sacks GD, Dawes AJ, Ettner SL et al (2016) Impact of a risk calculator on risk perception and surgical decision making: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 264:889–895CrossRef Sacks GD, Dawes AJ, Ettner SL et al (2016) Impact of a risk calculator on risk perception and surgical decision making: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 264:889–895CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Glasgow RE, Hawn MT, Hosokawa PW et al (2014) Comparison of prospective risk estimates for postoperative complications: human versus computer model. J Am Coll Surg 218:237–245CrossRef Glasgow RE, Hawn MT, Hosokawa PW et al (2014) Comparison of prospective risk estimates for postoperative complications: human versus computer model. J Am Coll Surg 218:237–245CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Markus PM, Martell J, Leister I et al (2005) Predicting postoperative morbidity by clinical assessment. Br J Surg 92:101–106CrossRef Markus PM, Martell J, Leister I et al (2005) Predicting postoperative morbidity by clinical assessment. Br J Surg 92:101–106CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson JS, Baxter BT, Allison JG et al (2003) Temporal patterns of postoperative complications. Arch Surg 138:596–603CrossRef Thompson JS, Baxter BT, Allison JG et al (2003) Temporal patterns of postoperative complications. Arch Surg 138:596–603CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lonjon G, Porcher R, Ergina P et al (2017) Potential pitfalls of reporting and bias in observational studies with propensity score analysis assessing a surgical procedure. Ann Surg 265:901–909CrossRef Lonjon G, Porcher R, Ergina P et al (2017) Potential pitfalls of reporting and bias in observational studies with propensity score analysis assessing a surgical procedure. Ann Surg 265:901–909CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lonjon G, Boutron I, Trinquart L et al (2014) Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures. Ann Surg 259:18–25CrossRef Lonjon G, Boutron I, Trinquart L et al (2014) Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures. Ann Surg 259:18–25CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Weigel TF, Hanisch E, Hanisch A et al (2019) Power of judgment: the significance of Kant’s philosophy for the medical system today. J Surg Educ 76:4–8CrossRef Weigel TF, Hanisch E, Hanisch A et al (2019) Power of judgment: the significance of Kant’s philosophy for the medical system today. J Surg Educ 76:4–8CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Report of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Postoperative Complications by Using a Surgical Risk Calculator in a Cohort of General Surgery Patients
verfasst von
Elisa M. Müller
Eva Herrmann
Thomas Schmandra
Thomas F. Weigel
Ernst Hanisch
Alexander Buia
Publikationsdatum
12.02.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05393-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

World Journal of Surgery 6/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.