Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 5/2019

25.02.2019 | Reports of Original Investigations

Representation of female authors in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of articles between 1954 and 2017

verfasst von: Alana M. Flexman, MD, FRCPC, Arun Parmar, BHSc(c), Gianni R. Lorello, BSc, MD, MSc (Med Ed), CIP, FRCPC

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Females remain under-represented in academic anesthesiology. Our objectives were to investigate gender differences over time in the first and last authors of published articles as well as corresponding citation rates in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (CJA).

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of first and last authors’ gender from editorials and original articles published in the CJA in a sample of one calendar year of each decade between 1954 to 2017. We analyzed the relationships between author gender, year of publication, article type, and number of citations.

Results

Out of 639 articles identified, 542 (85%) were original investigations and 97 (15%) were editorials. Where gender could be confidently identified, the majority (461/571, 81%) of first authors were male. Although there was an increase in the proportion of female first authors over time, this increase was outpaced by the overall increase in female anesthesiologists in Canada. Original articles received more citations and were more likely to have a female first author than editorial articles were. An original article with a female first author resulted in 0.34 (95% confidence interval, 0.28 to 0.39; P < 0.001) more citations per article than a male first author when adjusting for year of publication.

Conclusions

Our study shows that, despite a slow increase over time, female authors are under-represented relative to male authors in the CJA and relative to the changing demographics of anesthesiologists in Canada. The reasons for this disparity are multifactorial and further research is needed to identify effective solutions.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mottiar M. Because it’s 2018: women in Canadian anesthesiology. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 953-4.CrossRefPubMed Mottiar M. Because it’s 2018: women in Canadian anesthesiology. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 953-4.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Leslie K, Hopf HW, Houston P, O’Sullivan E. Women, minorities, and leadership in anesthesiology: take the pledge. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1394-6.CrossRefPubMed Leslie K, Hopf HW, Houston P, O’Sullivan E. Women, minorities, and leadership in anesthesiology: take the pledge. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1394-6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Toledo P, Duce L, Adams J, Ross VH, Thompson KM, Wong CA. Diversity in the American Society of Anesthesiologists leadership. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1611-6.CrossRefPubMed Toledo P, Duce L, Adams J, Ross VH, Thompson KM, Wong CA. Diversity in the American Society of Anesthesiologists leadership. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1611-6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Straehley CJ, Longo P. Family issues affecting women in medicine, particularly women surgeons. Am J Surg 2006; 192: 695-8.CrossRefPubMed Straehley CJ, Longo P. Family issues affecting women in medicine, particularly women surgeons. Am J Surg 2006; 192: 695-8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Colletti LM, Mulholland MW, Sonnad SS. Perceived obstacles to career success for women in academic surgery. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 972-7.CrossRefPubMed Colletti LM, Mulholland MW, Sonnad SS. Perceived obstacles to career success for women in academic surgery. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 972-7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright AL, Schwindt LA, Bassford TL, et al. Gender differences in academic advancement: patterns, causes, and potential solutions in one US College of Medicine. Acad Med 2003; 78: 500-8.CrossRefPubMed Wright AL, Schwindt LA, Bassford TL, et al. Gender differences in academic advancement: patterns, causes, and potential solutions in one US College of Medicine. Acad Med 2003; 78: 500-8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sexton KW, Hocking KM, Wise E, et al. Women in academic surgery: the pipeline is busted. J Surg Educ 2012; 69: 84-90.CrossRefPubMed Sexton KW, Hocking KM, Wise E, et al. Women in academic surgery: the pipeline is busted. J Surg Educ 2012; 69: 84-90.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Silver JK, Slocum CS, Bank AM, et al. Where are the women? The underrepresentation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from medical specialty societies. PM&R 2017; 9: 804-15.CrossRef Silver JK, Slocum CS, Bank AM, et al. Where are the women? The underrepresentation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from medical specialty societies. PM&R 2017; 9: 804-15.CrossRef
10.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Silver JK, Poorman JA, Reilly JM, Spector ND, Goldstein R, Zafonte RD. Assessment of women physicians among authors of perspective-type articles published in high-impact pediatric journals. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1: e180802.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Silver JK, Poorman JA, Reilly JM, Spector ND, Goldstein R, Zafonte RD. Assessment of women physicians among authors of perspective-type articles published in high-impact pediatric journals. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1: e180802.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Long MT, Leszczynski A, Thompson KD, Wasan SK, Calderwood AH. Female authorship in major academic gastroenterology journals: a look over 20 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81(1440-7): e3. Long MT, Leszczynski A, Thompson KD, Wasan SK, Calderwood AH. Female authorship in major academic gastroenterology journals: a look over 20 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81(1440-7): e3.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Butler J. Gender Trouble. Routledge; 2011. Butler J. Gender Trouble. Routledge; 2011.
15.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilbert JR, Williams ES, Lundberg GD. Is there gender bias in JAMA’s peer review process? JAMA 1994; 272: 139-42.CrossRefPubMed Gilbert JR, Williams ES, Lundberg GD. Is there gender bias in JAMA’s peer review process? JAMA 1994; 272: 139-42.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Carnes M, Morrissey C, Geller SE. Women“s health and women”s leadership in academic medicine: hitting the same glass ceiling? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008; 17: 1453-62.CrossRefPubMed Carnes M, Morrissey C, Geller SE. Women“s health and women”s leadership in academic medicine: hitting the same glass ceiling? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008; 17: 1453-62.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Reed V, Buddeberg-Fischer B. Career obstacles for women in medicine: an overview. Med Educ 2001; 35: 139-47.CrossRefPubMed Reed V, Buddeberg-Fischer B. Career obstacles for women in medicine: an overview. Med Educ 2001; 35: 139-47.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Files JA, Mayer AP, Ko MG, et al. Speaker introductions at internal medicine grand rounds: forms of address reveal gender bias. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2017; 26: 413-9.CrossRefPubMed Files JA, Mayer AP, Ko MG, et al. Speaker introductions at internal medicine grand rounds: forms of address reveal gender bias. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2017; 26: 413-9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat DuVal D, McKnight D. In reply to “Because it’s 2018: women in Canadian anesthesiology”. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 955.CrossRefPubMed DuVal D, McKnight D. In reply to “Because it’s 2018: women in Canadian anesthesiology”. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 955.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Seemann NM, Webster F, Holden HA, et al. Women in academic surgery: why is the playing field still not level? Am J Surg 2016; 211: 343-9.CrossRefPubMed Seemann NM, Webster F, Holden HA, et al. Women in academic surgery: why is the playing field still not level? Am J Surg 2016; 211: 343-9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Dezsö CL, Gaddis Ross D. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strateg Manag J 2012; 33: 1072-89.CrossRef Dezsö CL, Gaddis Ross D. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strateg Manag J 2012; 33: 1072-89.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Marsch J. Women in science-what’s the world missing. Eur Sci Edit 2012; 38: 2. Marsch J. Women in science-what’s the world missing. Eur Sci Edit 2012; 38: 2.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoover EL. Mentoring women in academic surgery: overcoming institutional barriers to success. J Natl Med Assoc 2006; 98: 1542-5.PubMedPubMedCentral Hoover EL. Mentoring women in academic surgery: overcoming institutional barriers to success. J Natl Med Assoc 2006; 98: 1542-5.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Jagsi R, Griffith KA, DeCastro RA, Ubel P. Sex, role models, and specialty choices among graduates of US medical schools in 2006-2008. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 218: 345-52.CrossRefPubMed Jagsi R, Griffith KA, DeCastro RA, Ubel P. Sex, role models, and specialty choices among graduates of US medical schools in 2006-2008. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 218: 345-52.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Flexman AM, Gelb AW. Mentorship in anesthesia: how little we know. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 241-5.CrossRefPubMed Flexman AM, Gelb AW. Mentorship in anesthesia: how little we know. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 241-5.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Zakus P, Gelb AW, Flexman AM. A survey of mentorship among Canadian anesthesiology residents. Can J Anesth 2015; 62: 972-8.CrossRefPubMed Zakus P, Gelb AW, Flexman AM. A survey of mentorship among Canadian anesthesiology residents. Can J Anesth 2015; 62: 972-8.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine RB, Mechaber HF, Reddy ST, Cayea D, Harrison RA. “A good career choice for women”: female medical students’ mentoring experiences a multi-institutional qualitative study. Acad Med 2013; 88: 527-34.CrossRefPubMed Levine RB, Mechaber HF, Reddy ST, Cayea D, Harrison RA. “A good career choice for women”: female medical students’ mentoring experiences a multi-institutional qualitative study. Acad Med 2013; 88: 527-34.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer KL, Perez RV, Ho HS. Factors affecting choice of surgical residency training program. J Surg Res 2001; 98: 71-5.CrossRefPubMed Mayer KL, Perez RV, Ho HS. Factors affecting choice of surgical residency training program. J Surg Res 2001; 98: 71-5.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Sukhera J, Milne A, Teunissen PW, Lingard L, Watling C. Adaptive reinventing: implicit bias and the co-construction of social change. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2018; 23: 587-99.CrossRefPubMed Sukhera J, Milne A, Teunissen PW, Lingard L, Watling C. Adaptive reinventing: implicit bias and the co-construction of social change. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2018; 23: 587-99.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Budden AE, Tregenza T, Aarssen LW, Koricheva J, Leimu R, Lortie CJ. Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends Ecol Evol 2008; 23: 4-6.CrossRefPubMed Budden AE, Tregenza T, Aarssen LW, Koricheva J, Leimu R, Lortie CJ. Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends Ecol Evol 2008; 23: 4-6.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Webb TJ, O’Hara B, Freckleton RP. Does double-blind review benefit female authors? Trends Ecol Evol 2008; 23: 351-3.CrossRefPubMed Webb TJ, O’Hara B, Freckleton RP. Does double-blind review benefit female authors? Trends Ecol Evol 2008; 23: 351-3.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Tscharntke T, Hochberg ME, Rand TA, Resh VH, Krauss J. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biol 2007; 5: e18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tscharntke T, Hochberg ME, Rand TA, Resh VH, Krauss J. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biol 2007; 5: e18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Representation of female authors in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of articles between 1954 and 2017
verfasst von
Alana M. Flexman, MD, FRCPC
Arun Parmar, BHSc(c)
Gianni R. Lorello, BSc, MD, MSc (Med Ed), CIP, FRCPC
Publikationsdatum
25.02.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01328-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.