Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2017

29.12.2016 | Original Research

Research Participants’ Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic Research

verfasst von: Julia Wynn, Josue Martinez, Jimmy Duong, Codruta Chiuzan, Jo C. Phelan, Abby Fyer, Robert L. Klitzman, Paul S. Appelbaum, Wendy K. Chung

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Secondary or incidental results can be identified in genomic research that increasingly uses whole exome/genome sequencing. Understanding research participants’ preferences for secondary results and what influences these decisions is important for patient education, counseling, and consent, and for the development of policies regarding return of secondary results. Two hundred nineteen research participants enrolled in genomic studies were surveyed regarding hypothetical preferences for specific types of secondary results, and these preferences were correlated with demographic information and psychosocial data. The majority of research participants (73%) indicated a preference to learn about all results offered, with no clear pattern regarding which results were not desired by the remaining participants. Participants who reported greater interest in genetic privacy were less likely to indicate a preference to learn all results, as were individuals who self-identified as Jewish. Although most research participants preferred to receive all secondary results offered, a significant subset preferred to exclude some results, suggesting that an all-or-none policy would not be ideal for all participants. The correlations between preferences to receive secondary results, religious identification, and privacy concerns demonstrate the need for culturally sensitive counseling and educational materials accessible to all education levels to allow participants to make the best choices for themselves.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Allain, D. C., Friedman, S., & Senter, L. (2012). Consumer awareness and attitudes about insurance discrimination post enactment of the genetic information nondiscrimination act. Familial Cancer, 11(4), 637–644.CrossRefPubMed Allain, D. C., Friedman, S., & Senter, L. (2012). Consumer awareness and attitudes about insurance discrimination post enactment of the genetic information nondiscrimination act. Familial Cancer, 11(4), 637–644.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Appelbaum, P. S., Waldman, C. R., Fyer, A., Klitzman, R., Parens, E., Martinez, J., et al. (2014). Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic research. Genetics in Medicine, 16(5), 367–373.CrossRefPubMed Appelbaum, P. S., Waldman, C. R., Fyer, A., Klitzman, R., Parens, E., Martinez, J., et al. (2014). Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic research. Genetics in Medicine, 16(5), 367–373.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong, K., Calzone, K., Stopfer, J., Fitzgerald, G., Coyne, J., & Weber, B. (2000). Factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 9(11), 1251–1254. Armstrong, K., Calzone, K., Stopfer, J., Fitzgerald, G., Coyne, J., & Weber, B. (2000). Factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 9(11), 1251–1254.
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong, K., Putt, M., Halbert, C. H., Grande, D., Schwartz, J. S., Liao, K., et al. (2012). The influence of health care policies and health care system distrust on willingness to undergo genetic testing. Medical Care, 50(5), 381–387.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Armstrong, K., Putt, M., Halbert, C. H., Grande, D., Schwartz, J. S., Liao, K., et al. (2012). The influence of health care policies and health care system distrust on willingness to undergo genetic testing. Medical Care, 50(5), 381–387.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Bennette, C. S., Trinidad, S. B., Fullerton, S. M., Patrick, D., Amendola, L., Burke, W., et al. (2013). Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT). Genetics in Medicine, 15(11), 873–881.CrossRefPubMed Bennette, C. S., Trinidad, S. B., Fullerton, S. M., Patrick, D., Amendola, L., Burke, W., et al. (2013). Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT). Genetics in Medicine, 15(11), 873–881.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Black, L., Avard, D., Zawati, M. H., Knoppers, B. M., Hebert, J., Sauvageau, G., et al. (2013). Funding considerations for the disclosure of genetic incidental findings in biobank research. Clinical Genetics, 84(5), 397–406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Black, L., Avard, D., Zawati, M. H., Knoppers, B. M., Hebert, J., Sauvageau, G., et al. (2013). Funding considerations for the disclosure of genetic incidental findings in biobank research. Clinical Genetics, 84(5), 397–406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Daack-Hirsch, S., Driessnack, M., Hanish, A., Johnson, V. A., Shah, L. L., Simon, C. M., et al. (2013). Information is information’: a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing. Clinical Genetics, 84(1), 11–18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Daack-Hirsch, S., Driessnack, M., Hanish, A., Johnson, V. A., Shah, L. L., Simon, C. M., et al. (2013). Information is information’: a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing. Clinical Genetics, 84(1), 11–18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Directors, A. B. O. (2015). ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 17(1), 68–69.CrossRef Directors, A. B. O. (2015). ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 17(1), 68–69.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Erblich, J., Brown, K., Kim, Y., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Livingston, B. E., & Bovbjerg, D. H. (2005). Development and validation of a breast cancer genetic counseling knowledge questionnaire. Patient Education and Counseling, 56(2), 182–191.CrossRefPubMed Erblich, J., Brown, K., Kim, Y., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Livingston, B. E., & Bovbjerg, D. H. (2005). Development and validation of a breast cancer genetic counseling knowledge questionnaire. Patient Education and Counseling, 56(2), 182–191.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Facio, F. M., Eidem, H., Fisher, T., Brooks, S., Linn, A., Kaphingst, K. A., et al. (2013). Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the Clin Seq study. European Journal of Human Genetics, 21(3), 261–265.CrossRefPubMed Facio, F. M., Eidem, H., Fisher, T., Brooks, S., Linn, A., Kaphingst, K. A., et al. (2013). Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the Clin Seq study. European Journal of Human Genetics, 21(3), 261–265.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Gech, A., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(5), 893–897. Gech, A., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(5), 893–897.
Zurück zum Zitat Gollust, S. E., Gordon, E. S., Zayac, C., Griffin, G., Christman, M. F., Pyeritz, R. E., et al. (2012). Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants. Public Health Genomics, 15(1), 22–30.CrossRefPubMed Gollust, S. E., Gordon, E. S., Zayac, C., Griffin, G., Christman, M. F., Pyeritz, R. E., et al. (2012). Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants. Public Health Genomics, 15(1), 22–30.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hegwer, G., Fairley, C., Charrow, J., & Ormond, K. E. (2006). Knowledge and attitudes toward a free education and Ashkenazi Jewish carrier testing program. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(1), 61–70.CrossRefPubMed Hegwer, G., Fairley, C., Charrow, J., & Ormond, K. E. (2006). Knowledge and attitudes toward a free education and Ashkenazi Jewish carrier testing program. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(1), 61–70.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kaphingst, K. A., Facio, F. M., Cheng, M. R., Brooks, S., Eidem, H., Linn, A., et al. (2012). Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge. Clinical Genetics, 82(5), 408–415.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kaphingst, K. A., Facio, F. M., Cheng, M. R., Brooks, S., Eidem, H., Linn, A., et al. (2012). Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge. Clinical Genetics, 82(5), 408–415.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 617–627.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 617–627.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Klitzman, R., Appelbaum, P. S., Fyer, A., Martinez, J., Buquez, B., Wynn, J., et al. (2013). Researchers’ views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings. Genetics in Medicine, 15(11), 888–895.CrossRefPubMed Klitzman, R., Appelbaum, P. S., Fyer, A., Martinez, J., Buquez, B., Wynn, J., et al. (2013). Researchers’ views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings. Genetics in Medicine, 15(11), 888–895.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Klitzman, R., Buquez, B., Appelbaum, P. S., Fyer, A., & Chung, W. K. (2014). Processes and factors involved in decisions regarding return of incidental genomic findings in research. Genetics in Medicine, 16(4), 311–317.CrossRefPubMed Klitzman, R., Buquez, B., Appelbaum, P. S., Fyer, A., & Chung, W. K. (2014). Processes and factors involved in decisions regarding return of incidental genomic findings in research. Genetics in Medicine, 16(4), 311–317.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lee, K. A., Hicks, G., & Nino-Murcia, G. (1991). Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue. Psychiatry Research, 36(3), 291–298.CrossRefPubMed Lee, K. A., Hicks, G., & Nino-Murcia, G. (1991). Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue. Psychiatry Research, 36(3), 291–298.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lemke, A. A., Bick, D., Dimmock, D., Simpson, P., & Veith, R. (2013). Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey study. Clinical Genetics, 84(3), 230–236.CrossRefPubMed Lemke, A. A., Bick, D., Dimmock, D., Simpson, P., & Veith, R. (2013). Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey study. Clinical Genetics, 84(3), 230–236.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Regier, D. A., Peacock, S. J., Pataky, R., van der Hoek, K., Jarvik, G. P., Hoch, J., et al. (2015). Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment. CMAJ, 187(6), E190–E197.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Regier, D. A., Peacock, S. J., Pataky, R., van der Hoek, K., Jarvik, G. P., Hoch, J., et al. (2015). Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment. CMAJ, 187(6), E190–E197.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Rose, A., Peters, N., Shea, J. A., & Armstrong, K. (2005). The association between knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing for cancer risk in the United States. Journal of Health Communication, 10(4), 309–321.CrossRefPubMed Rose, A., Peters, N., Shea, J. A., & Armstrong, K. (2005). The association between knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing for cancer risk in the United States. Journal of Health Communication, 10(4), 309–321.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Sanderson, S. C., Linderman, M. D., Suckiel, S. A., Diaz, G. A., Zinberg, R. E., Ferryman, K., et al. (2015a). Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the Health Seq project. European Journal of Human Genetics, 24(1), 14–20. Sanderson, S. C., Linderman, M. D., Suckiel, S. A., Diaz, G. A., Zinberg, R. E., Ferryman, K., et al. (2015a). Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the Health Seq project. European Journal of Human Genetics, 24(1), 14–20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanderson, S. C., Suckiel, S. A., Zweig, M., Bottinger, E. P., Jabs, E. W., & Richardson, L. D. (2015b). Development and preliminary evaluation of an online educational video about whole-genome sequencing for research participants, patients, and the general public. Genetics in Medicine, 18(5), 501–512. Sanderson, S. C., Suckiel, S. A., Zweig, M., Bottinger, E. P., Jabs, E. W., & Richardson, L. D. (2015b). Development and preliminary evaluation of an online educational video about whole-genome sequencing for research participants, patients, and the general public. Genetics in Medicine, 18(5), 501–512.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz, M. D., Hughes, C., Roth, J., Main, D., Peshkin, B. N., Isaacs, C., et al. (2000). Spiritual faith and genetic testing decisions among high-risk breast cancer probands. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 9(4), 381–385. Schwartz, M. D., Hughes, C., Roth, J., Main, D., Peshkin, B. N., Isaacs, C., et al. (2000). Spiritual faith and genetic testing decisions among high-risk breast cancer probands. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 9(4), 381–385.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Winman, S. Wright, & M. Johnson (Eds.), Measures in health psychology; a user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NEFER-NELSON. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Winman, S. Wright, & M. Johnson (Eds.), Measures in health psychology; a user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NEFER-NELSON.
Zurück zum Zitat Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J. B. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary care evaluation of mental disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA, 282(18), 1737–1744.CrossRefPubMed Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J. B. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary care evaluation of mental disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA, 282(18), 1737–1744.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Townsend, A., Adam, S., Birch, P. H., Lohn, Z., Rousseau, F., & Friedman, J. M. (2012). “I want to know what’s in Pandora’s box”: comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 158A(10), 2519–2525.CrossRefPubMed Townsend, A., Adam, S., Birch, P. H., Lohn, Z., Rousseau, F., & Friedman, J. M. (2012). “I want to know what’s in Pandora’s box”: comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 158A(10), 2519–2525.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Wallston, B. S., Wallston, K. A., Kaplan, G. D., & Maides, S. A. (1976). Development and validation of the health locus of control (HLC) scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44(4), 5.CrossRef Wallston, B. S., Wallston, K. A., Kaplan, G. D., & Maides, S. A. (1976). Development and validation of the health locus of control (HLC) scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44(4), 5.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Warsch, J. R., Warsch, S., Herman, E., Zakarin, L., Schneider, A., Hoffman, J., et al. (2014). Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to carrier screening for the Ashkenazi Jewish panel: a Florida experience: education and barriers assessment for Jewish genetic diseases. Journal of Community Genetics, 5(3), 223–231.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Warsch, J. R., Warsch, S., Herman, E., Zakarin, L., Schneider, A., Hoffman, J., et al. (2014). Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to carrier screening for the Ashkenazi Jewish panel: a Florida experience: education and barriers assessment for Jewish genetic diseases. Journal of Community Genetics, 5(3), 223–231.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Wynn, J., Martinez, J., Duong, J., Zhang, Y., Phelan, J., Fyer, A., et al. (2015). Association of Researcher Characteristics with Views on Return of Incidental Findings from Genomic Research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24(5), 833–841. Wynn, J., Martinez, J., Duong, J., Zhang, Y., Phelan, J., Fyer, A., et al. (2015). Association of Researcher Characteristics with Views on Return of Incidental Findings from Genomic Research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24(5), 833–841.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu, J. H., Harrell, T. M., Jamal, S. M., Tabor, H. K., & Bamshad, M. J. (2014). Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing. American Journal of Human Genetics, 95(1), 77–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yu, J. H., Harrell, T. M., Jamal, S. M., Tabor, H. K., & Bamshad, M. J. (2014). Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing. American Journal of Human Genetics, 95(1), 77–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Research Participants’ Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic Research
verfasst von
Julia Wynn
Josue Martinez
Jimmy Duong
Codruta Chiuzan
Jo C. Phelan
Abby Fyer
Robert L. Klitzman
Paul S. Appelbaum
Wendy K. Chung
Publikationsdatum
29.12.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-0059-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.