Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2012 | Correspondence | Ausgabe 1/2012 Open Access

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012

Researcher-decision-maker partnerships in health services research: Practical challenges, guiding principles

Zeitschrift:
BMC Health Services Research > Ausgabe 1/2012
Autoren:
Anne Hofmeyer, Catherine Scott, Laura Lagendyk
Wichtige Hinweise

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

CS conceived and designed the study and was the principal investigator for the study. She participated in the creation of the guiding principles and drafted the manuscript. AH co-created the guiding principles with CS, and helped to draft the manuscript. LL analyzed the qualitative data, reviewed and applied the guiding principles, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abstract

Background

In health services research, there is a growing view that partnerships between researchers and decision-makers (i.e., collaborative research teams) will enhance the effective translation and use of research results into policy and practice. For this reason, there is an increasing expectation by health research funding agencies that health system managers, policy-makers, practitioners and clinicians will be members of funded research teams. While this view has merit to improve the uptake of research findings, the practical challenges of building and sustaining collaborative research teams with members from both inside and outside the research setting requires consideration. A small body of literature has discussed issues that may arise when conducting research in one’s own setting; however, there is a lack of clear guidance to deal with practical challenges that may arise in research teams that include team members who have links with the organization/community being studied (i.e., are “insiders”).

Discussion

In this article, we discuss a researcher-decision-maker partnership that investigated practice in primary care networks in Alberta. Specifically, we report on processes to guide the role clarification of insider team members where research activities may pose potential risk to participants or the team members (e.g., access to raw data).

Summary

These guiding principles could provide a useful discussion point for researchers and decision-makers engaged in health services research.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe