nach oben

Journal of Family Violence

Erschienen in:

13.03.2020 | Original Article

Responding to Stalking Victims: Perceptions, Barriers, and Directions for Future Research

verfasst von: Tim Boehnlein, Jeff Kretschmar, Wendy Regoeczi, Jill Smialek

Erschienen in: Journal of Family Violence | Ausgabe 7/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Stalking cases have long presented challenges for the criminal justice system. The end result has been low conviction rates for stalking offenses and frustration for stalking victims. To date, little is known regarding the perspectives of criminal justice and community advocacy agencies in working with stalking perpetrators and victims and how these could inform practice and future research. We conducted interviews with individuals in the different agencies involved in the Cuyahoga County, Ohio criminal justice system and well as the victim service organizations that work with stalking victims in the county. We collected information about their perceptions of stalking victims, what obstacles exist to addressing their needs, what changes are needed to increase the charging and prosecution rates for stalking cases, and how different system players draw distinctions between stalking and domestic violence offenders. Key findings include the significant discrepancy perceived between the public’s view of stalking and actual stalking behavior, the varied views of what constitutes a typical stalking victim, the wide range of needs of stalking victims, the challenges to charging and prosecuting stalking cases, and the burden placed on victims in these cases. We conclude by discussing obstacles that exist for victims seeking help from the criminal justice system for stalking behavior and provide suggestions for education and training that could lead to more effective stalking policy and practice. The study concludes with recommendations for future research on stalking.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

This situation only very recently changed with the opening of the Cuyahoga County Family Justice Center in 2015.

Backes, B., Fedina, L., & Holmes, J. L. (2020). The criminal justice system response to intimate partner stalking: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Family Violence, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00139-3.

Basile, K. C., Swahn, M. H., Chen, J., & Saltzman, L. E. (2006). Stalking in the United States: recent national prevalence estimates. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 31, 172–175.

Baum, K., Catalano, S., Rand, M., & Rose, C. (2009). Stalking victimization in the United States (NCJ 224527). Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Bjerregaard, B. (2000). An empirical study of stalking victimization. Violence and Victims, 15, 389–406.PubMed

Blaauw, E., Winkel, F. W., Arensman, E., Sheridan, L., & Freeve, A. (2002). The toll of stalking: the relationship between features of stalking and psychopathology of victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 50–63.

Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., et al. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Botuck, S., Berretty, P., Cho, S., Tax, C. A., Archer, M., & Cattaneo, L. (2009). Understanding intimate partner stalking: Implications for offering victim services (Grant 2005-WG-BX-0007). Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.

Brady, P. Q., & Nobles, M. R. (2017). The dark figure of stalking: examining law enforcement response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 3149–3173.PubMed

Brady, P. Q., Nobles, M. R., & Bouffard, L. A. (2017). Are college students really at a higher risk for stalking?: exploring the generalizability of student samples in victimization research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 52, 12–21.

Brewster, M. P. (1999). Exploration of the experiences and needs of former intimate stalking victims. West Chester: National Institute of Justice.

Brewster, M. (2001). Legal help-seeking experiences of former intimate stalking victims. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12, 91–112.

Budd, T., Mattinson, J., & Myhill, A. (2000). The extent and nature of stalking: Findings from the 1998 British crime survey. London: Home Office.

Campbell, J., & Moore, R. (2011). Self-perceptions of stalking victimization and impacts on victim reporting. Police Practice and Research, 12, 506–517.

Campbell, J., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., Curry, M., et al. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089–1097.PubMedPubMedCentral

Catalano, S. (2012). Stalking victimization in the United States - Revisited (NCJ 224527). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Programs, U.S., Department of Justice.

Davis, K. E., Coker, A. L., & Sanderson, M. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of being stalked for men and women. Violence and Victims, 17, 429–443.PubMed

DuMonthier, A., Dusenbery, M, & Gonzalez, S. (2017). Intersections of stalking and economic security. Report # B365, Institute for Women’s Policy Research.

Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2002). Being pursued: stalking victimization in a national study of college women. Criminology and Public Policy, 1, 257–308.

Fox, K. A., Nobles, M. R., & Fisher, B. S. (2011). Method behind the madness: An examination of stalking measurements. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 74–84.

Geistman, J., Smith, B., Lambert, E., & Cluse-Tolar, T. (2013). What to do about stalking: a preliminary study of how stalking victims responded to stalking and their perceptions of the effectiveness of these actions. Criminal Justice Studies, 26, 43–66.

Gottfredson, M. R., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1987). Decision making in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.

Johnson, H., & Hotton, T. (2003). Losing control: homicide risk in estranged and intact intimate relationships. Homicide Studies, 7, 58–84.

Jordan, C., Logan, T., Walker, R., & Nigoff, A. (2003). Stalking victimization: the efficacy of criminal justice response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 148–165.

Jordan, C. E., Wilcox, P., & Pritchard, A. J. (2007). Stalking acknowledgement and reporting among college women experiencing intrusive behaviors: Implications for the emergence of a “class stalking case.”. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 556–569.

Kamphuis, J. H., Emmelkamp, P. M., & Bartak, A. (2003). Individual differences in post-traumatic stress following post-intimate stalking: stalking severity and psychosocial variables. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 145–156.PubMed

Klein, A., Salomon, A., Huntington, N., Dubois, J., & Lang, D. (2009). A statewide study of stalking and its criminal justice response (Grant No. 2007-WG-BX-003). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

Logan, T., & Cole, J. (2007). The impact of partner stalking on mental health and protective order outcomes over time. Violence and Victims, 22, 546–562.PubMed

Logan, T., & Walker, R. (2010). Toward a deeper understanding of the harms caused by partner stalking. Violence and Victims, 25, 440–455.PubMed

Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2017). Stalking: a multidimensional framework for assessment and safety planning. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18, 200–222.

Logan, T., Cole, J., Shannon, L., & Walker, R. (2006a). Partner stalking: How women respond, cope, and survive. New York: Springer.

Logan, T., Walker, R., Stewart, C., & Allen, J. (2006b). Victim service and justice system representative responses about partner stalking: what do professionals recommend. Violence and Victims, 21, 49–66.PubMed

Logan, T., Shannon, L., Cole, J., & Swanberg, J. (2007). Partner stalking and implications for women’s employment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 268–291.PubMed

Logan, T., Walker, R., & Hoyt, W. (2012). The economic costs of partner violence and the cost-benefit of civil protective orders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1137–1154.PubMed

Max, W., Rice, D. P., Finkelstein, E., Bardwell, R. A., & Leadbetter, S. (2004). The economic toll of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Violence and Victims, 19, 259–272.PubMed

McFarlane, J., Campbell, J., & Watson, K. (2002). Intimate partner stalking and femicide: urgent implications for women’s safety. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20, 51–68.

Melton, H. C. (2005). Stalking in the context of domestic violence. Women & Criminal Justice, 15, 33–58.

Miller, L. (2012). Stalking: patterns, motives, and intervention strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 495–506.

Mohandie, K., Meloy, J. R., McGowan, M. G., & Williams, J. (2006). The RECON typology of stalking: reliability and validity based upon a large sample of north American stalkers. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51, 147–155.PubMed

Mullen, P. E., Pathé, M., & Purcell, R. (2009). Stalkers and their victims (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. E. (1997). The impact of stalkers on their victims. British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 12–17.PubMed

Patton, C., Nobles, M. R., & Fox, K. A. (2010). Look who’s stalking: stalking perpetration and attachment theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 282–290.

Payne, B. K., & Chappell, A. (2008). Using student samples in criminological research. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19, 175–192.

Peterson, R. A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450–461.

Purcell, R., Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. E. (2002). The prevalence and nature of stalking in the Australian community. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 114–120.

Purcell, R., Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. E. (2004). Editorial: when do repeated intrusions become stalking? Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 15, 571–583.

Reyns, B. W., & Englebrecht, C. M. (2010). The stalking victim’s decision to contact the police: a test of Gottfredson and Gottfredson’s theory of criminal justice decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 998–1005.

Rosenfeld, B. (2004). Violence risk factors in stalking and obsessional harassment: a review and preliminary meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 9–36.

Sabina, C., Cuevas, C. A., & Schally, J. L. (2012). Help-seeking in a national sample of victimized Latino women: the influence of victimization types. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 40–61.PubMed

Saldaña, J. (2008). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Scott, A. J., & Sheridan, L. (2011). Reasonable perceptions of stalking: the influence of conduct severity and the perpetrator-target relationship. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 331–343.

Scott, A. J., Lloyd, R., & Gavin, J. (2010). The influence of prior relationship on perceptions of stalking in the United Kingdom and Australia. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1185–1194.

Sheridan, L., & Davies, G. M. (2001). Violence and the prior victim–stalker relationship. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 11, 102–116.PubMed

Sheridan, L., & Lyndon, A. E. (2012). The influence of prior relationship, gender, and fear on the consequences of stalking victimization. Sex Roles, 66, 340–350.

Sheridan, L., Gillett, R., Davies, G., Blaauw, E., & Patel, D. (2003). There’s no smoke without fire: are male ex-partners perceived as more ‘entitled’ to stalk than acquaintance or stranger stalkers? British Journal of Psychology, 94, 87–98.PubMed

Sinclair, H. C., & Frieze, I. H. (2002). Initial courtship behavior and stalking: How should we draw the line. Stalking: Perspectives on victims and perpetrators, 186–211.

Sinwelski, S., & Vinton, L. (2001). Stalking: the constant threat of violence. Journal of Women and Social Work, 16, 46–65.

Smith, S. G., Chen, J., Basile, K. C., Gilbert, L. K., Merrick, M. T., Patel, N., Walling, M., & Jain, A. (2017). The National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010–2012 state report. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Spence-Diehl, E., & Potocky-Tripodi, M. (2001). Victims of stalking: a study of service needs as perceived by victim service practitioners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 86–94.

Spitzberg, B. H. (2002). The tactical topography of stalking victimization and management. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3, 261–288.

Spitzberg, B., & Cupach, W. (2014). The dark side of relationship pursuit: From attraction to obsession and stalking. New York: Routledge.

Thomas, S. D., Purcell, R., Pathe, M., & Mullen, P. E. (2008). Harm associated with stalking victimization. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42, 800–806.

Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the national violence against women survey (NCJ# 169592). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). The role of stalking in domestic violence crime reports generated by the Colorado Springs Police Department. Violence and Victims, 15, 427–441.PubMed

Weller, M., Hope, L., & Sheridan, L. (2013). Police and public perceptions of stalking: the role of prior victim-offemder relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 320–339.PubMed

Zweig, J. M., Schlichter, K. A., & Burt, M. R. (2002). Assisting women victims of violence who experience multiple barriers to services. Violence Against Women, 8, 162–180.

Titel: Responding to Stalking Victims: Perceptions, Barriers, and Directions for Future Research
verfasst von: Tim Boehnlein
Jeff Kretschmar
Wendy Regoeczi
Jill Smialek
Publikationsdatum: 13.03.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Family Violence / Ausgabe 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0885-7482
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2851
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00147-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

23.04.2024 | Demenz | Nachrichten

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Responding to Stalking Victims: Perceptions, Barriers, and Directions for Future Research

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

Update Psychiatrie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2020

Examining Stalking Experiences and Outcomes for Men and Women Stalked by (Ex)partners and Non-partners

The Criminal Justice System Response to Intimate Partner Stalking: a Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Research

Psychometric Analyses of Stalking Measures from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey

Intersections of Stalking and Technology-Based Abuse: Emerging Definitions, Conceptualization, and Measurement

Correlates of Intimate Partner Stalking Precipitated Homicides in the United States

Advocacy Responses to Intimate Partner Stalking: Micro, Mezzo, and Macro Level Practices

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

Update Psychiatrie