Skip to main content

01.12.2018 | Letter | Ausgabe 1/2018 Open Access

Systematic Reviews 1/2018

Response to ‘Increasing value and reducing waste in data extraction for systematic reviews: tracking data in data extraction forms’

Systematic Reviews > Ausgabe 1/2018
Jens Jap, Ian J. Saldanha, Bryant T. Smith, Joseph Lau, Tianjing Li
Wichtige Hinweise
This comment refers to the article available at: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13643-017-0546-z.


This is a response to a Letter. Data abstraction is a time-consuming and error-prone systematic review task. Shokraneh and Adams categorize available techniques for tracking data during data abstraction into three methods: simple annotation, descriptive addressing, and Cartesian coordinate system. While we agree with the categorization of the techniques, we disagree with the authors’ statement that descriptive addressing is a PDF-independent method, i.e., any sort of descriptive addressing must reference a specific version of PDF file and not just any PDF of said report. Different versions of PDFs of the same report might place text and tables on different locations of the same page and/or on different pages. Consequently, it is our opinion that any kind of source location information should be accompanied by the source or linked by an intermediary service such as the Data Abstraction Assistant (DAA).
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Systematic Reviews 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe