Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2018

12.05.2018 | Original Article

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer judged by PERCIST – multicenter study in Japan

verfasst von: Kazuhiro Kitajima, Koya Nakatani, Kazushige Yamaguchi, Masatoyo Nakajo, Atsushi Tani, Mana Ishibashi, Keiko Hosoya, Takahiro Morita, Takayuki Kinoshita, Hayato Kaida, Yasuo Miyoshi

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and predict breast cancer recurrence using Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST).

Materials and methods

Fifty-nine breast cancer patients underwent fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) before and after NAC prior to planned surgical resection. Pathological complete response (pCR) of the primary tumor was evaluated using PERCIST, while effects of clinicopathological factors on progression-free survival (PFS) were examined using log-rank and Cox methods.

Results

Fifty-six patients and 54 primary tumors were evaluated. Complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response, stable metabolic disease, and progressive metabolic disease were seen in 45, 7, 3, and 1 patients, respectively, and 43, 7, 3, and 1 primary tumors, respectively. Eighteen (33.3%) of the 54 primary tumors showed pCR. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of PERCIST to predict pCR were 100% (18/18), 30.6% (11/36), 41.9% (18/43), 100% (11/11), and 53.7% (29/54), respectively. An optimal percent decrease in peak standardized uptake value for a primary tumor corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak) of 84.3% was found to have a sensitivity of 77.8% (14/18), specificity of 77.8% (28/36), PPV of 63.6% (14/22), NPV of 87.5% (28/32), and accuracy of 77.8% (42/54). Seven (12.5%) of the 56 patients developed recurrent disease (median follow-up 28.1 months, range 11.4–96.4 months). CMR (p = 0.031), pCR (p = 0.024), and early TNM stage (p = 0.033) were significantly associated with longer PFS.

Conclusion

PERCIST is useful for predicting pathological response and prognosis following NAC in breast cancer patients. However, FDG-PET/CT showed a tendency toward underestimation of the residual tumor, and relatively low specificity and PPV of PERCIST showed that a combination of other imaging modalities would still be needed to predict pCR.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Brown A, Fisher ER, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2672–85.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Brown A, Fisher ER, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2672–85.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher ER, Wang J, Bryant J, Fisher B, Mamounas E, Wolmark N. Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) Protocol B-18. Cancer. 2002;95:681–95.CrossRefPubMed Fisher ER, Wang J, Bryant J, Fisher B, Mamounas E, Wolmark N. Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) Protocol B-18. Cancer. 2002;95:681–95.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chia S, Swain SM, Byrd DR, Mankoff DA. Locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:786–90.CrossRefPubMed Chia S, Swain SM, Byrd DR, Mankoff DA. Locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:786–90.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, Geyer CE, Kahlenberg MS, Robidoux A, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:78–85.CrossRef Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, Geyer CE, Kahlenberg MS, Robidoux A, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:78–85.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Angulo AM, McGuire SE, Buchholz TA, Tucker SL, Kuerer HM, Rouzier R, et al. Factors predictive of distant metastases in patients with breast cancer who have a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7098–104.CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez-Angulo AM, McGuire SE, Buchholz TA, Tucker SL, Kuerer HM, Rouzier R, et al. Factors predictive of distant metastases in patients with breast cancer who have a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7098–104.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):122S–50S.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):122S–50S.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tateishi U, Miyake M, Nagaoka T, Terauchi T, Kubota K, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: prediction of pathologic response with PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--prospective assessment. Radiology. 2012;263:53–63.CrossRefPubMed Tateishi U, Miyake M, Nagaoka T, Terauchi T, Kubota K, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: prediction of pathologic response with PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--prospective assessment. Radiology. 2012;263:53–63.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Koolen BB, Pengel KE, Wesseling J, Vogel WV, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Vincent AD, et al. Sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of complete pathological response in breast and axilla during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:32–40.CrossRefPubMed Koolen BB, Pengel KE, Wesseling J, Vogel WV, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Vincent AD, et al. Sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of complete pathological response in breast and axilla during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:32–40.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mghanga FP, Lan X, Bakari KH, Li C, Zhang Y. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in monitoring the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2013;13:271–9.CrossRefPubMed Mghanga FP, Lan X, Bakari KH, Li C, Zhang Y. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in monitoring the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2013;13:271–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi EK, Yoo IR, Kim SH, Park SY, O JH, Kang BJ. The value of pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy F-18 FDG PET/CT scans in breast cancer: comparison with MRI. Acta Radiol. 2018;59:41–9.CrossRefPubMed Choi EK, Yoo IR, Kim SH, Park SY, O JH, Kang BJ. The value of pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy F-18 FDG PET/CT scans in breast cancer: comparison with MRI. Acta Radiol. 2018;59:41–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tőkés T, Kajáry K, Szentmártoni G, Lengyel Z, Györke T, Torgyík L, et al. Predictive and prognostic value of FDG-PET/CT imaging and different response evaluation criteria after primary systemic therapy of breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2017;24:137–46.CrossRefPubMed Tőkés T, Kajáry K, Szentmártoni G, Lengyel Z, Györke T, Torgyík L, et al. Predictive and prognostic value of FDG-PET/CT imaging and different response evaluation criteria after primary systemic therapy of breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2017;24:137–46.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Odawara S, Kitajima K, Katsuura T, Kurahashi Y, Shinohara H, Yamakado K. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT - RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0. Eur J Radiol. 2018;101:65–71.CrossRefPubMed Odawara S, Kitajima K, Katsuura T, Kurahashi Y, Shinohara H, Yamakado K. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT - RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0. Eur J Radiol. 2018;101:65–71.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurosumi M, Akashi-Tanaka S, Akiyama F, Komoike Y, Mukai H, Nakamura S, et al. Histopathological criteria for assessment of therapeutic response in breast cancer (2007 version). Breast Cancer. 2008;15:5–7.CrossRefPubMed Kurosumi M, Akashi-Tanaka S, Akiyama F, Komoike Y, Mukai H, Nakamura S, et al. Histopathological criteria for assessment of therapeutic response in breast cancer (2007 version). Breast Cancer. 2008;15:5–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheikhbahaei S, Trahan TJ, Xiao J, Taghipour M, Mena E, Connolly RM, et al. FDG-PET/CT and MRI for evaluation of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Oncologist. 2016;21:931–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sheikhbahaei S, Trahan TJ, Xiao J, Taghipour M, Mena E, Connolly RM, et al. FDG-PET/CT and MRI for evaluation of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Oncologist. 2016;21:931–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Huppe AI, Mehta AK, Brem RF. Molecular breast imaging: a comprehensive review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018;39:60–9.CrossRefPubMed Huppe AI, Mehta AK, Brem RF. Molecular breast imaging: a comprehensive review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018;39:60–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Collarino A, de Koster EJ, Valdés Olmos RA, de Geus-Oei LF, Pereira Arias-Bouda LM. Is technetium-99m sestamibi imaging able to predict pathologic nonresponse to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer? A meta-analysis evaluating current use and shortcomings. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18:9–18.CrossRefPubMed Collarino A, de Koster EJ, Valdés Olmos RA, de Geus-Oei LF, Pereira Arias-Bouda LM. Is technetium-99m sestamibi imaging able to predict pathologic nonresponse to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer? A meta-analysis evaluating current use and shortcomings. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18:9–18.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Collarino A, Valdés Olmos RA, van der Hoeven AF, Pereira Arias-Bouda LM. Methodological aspects of 99mTc-sestamibi guided biopsy in breast cancer. Clin Transl Imaging. 2016;4:367–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Collarino A, Valdés Olmos RA, van der Hoeven AF, Pereira Arias-Bouda LM. Methodological aspects of 99mTc-sestamibi guided biopsy in breast cancer. Clin Transl Imaging. 2016;4:367–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalinyak JE, Berg WA, Schilling K, Madsen KS, Narayanan D, Tartar M. Breast cancer detection using high-resolution breast PET compared to whole-body PET or PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:260–75.CrossRefPubMed Kalinyak JE, Berg WA, Schilling K, Madsen KS, Narayanan D, Tartar M. Breast cancer detection using high-resolution breast PET compared to whole-body PET or PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:260–75.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Noritake M, Narui K, Kaneta T, Sugae S, Sakamaki K, Inoue T, et al. Evaluation of the response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using 18F-FDG positron emission mammography compared with whole-body 18F-FDG PET: a prospective observational study. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:169–75.CrossRefPubMed Noritake M, Narui K, Kaneta T, Sugae S, Sakamaki K, Inoue T, et al. Evaluation of the response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using 18F-FDG positron emission mammography compared with whole-body 18F-FDG PET: a prospective observational study. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:169–75.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer judged by PERCIST – multicenter study in Japan
verfasst von
Kazuhiro Kitajima
Koya Nakatani
Kazushige Yamaguchi
Masatoyo Nakajo
Atsushi Tani
Mana Ishibashi
Keiko Hosoya
Takahiro Morita
Takayuki Kinoshita
Hayato Kaida
Yasuo Miyoshi
Publikationsdatum
12.05.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4008-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2018 Zur Ausgabe