Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 1/2016

01.01.2016 | Letter to the Editor

Response to the letter to the editor: the correct episiotomy—does it exist?

verfasst von: Lena Sagi-Dain, Shlomi Sagi

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The concept of episiotomy was introduced in 1741. This procedure is still sparingly used in many countries, despite the surprising lack of evidence to support its benefits. According to several recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses, no solid evidence has been demonstrated in the professional literature to recommend episiotomy performance even in the most “classic” scenarios, such as prevention and management of shoulder dystocia, vacuum delivery, and prevention of impending tear [13]. Furthermore, this procedure may be related to an increased risk of various obstetric complications, such as postpartum bleeding, pain, and a higher rate of advanced perineal lacerations [3]. Thus, in our opinion, episiotomy should be maximally restricted unless large randomized controlled trials are published supporting its use. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S (2015) The role of episiotomy in prevention and management of shoulder dystocia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 70(5):354–362PubMedCrossRef Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S (2015) The role of episiotomy in prevention and management of shoulder dystocia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 70(5):354–362PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S (2015) Morbidity associated with episiotomy in vacuum delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 122(8):1073–1081PubMedCrossRef Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S (2015) Morbidity associated with episiotomy in vacuum delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 122(8):1073–1081PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Carroli G, Mignini L (2009) Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000081PubMed Carroli G, Mignini L (2009) Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000081PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cescon C, Riva D, Začesta V et al (2014) Effect of vaginal delivery on the external anal sphincter muscle innervation pattern evaluated by multichannel surface EMG: results of the multicentre study TASI-2. Int Urogynecol J 25(11):1491–1499PubMedCrossRef Cescon C, Riva D, Začesta V et al (2014) Effect of vaginal delivery on the external anal sphincter muscle innervation pattern evaluated by multichannel surface EMG: results of the multicentre study TASI-2. Int Urogynecol J 25(11):1491–1499PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cescon C, Raimondi EE, Začesta V, Drusany-Starič K, Martsidis K, Merletti R (2014) Characterization of the motor units of the external anal sphincter in pregnant women with multichannel surface EMG. Int Urogynecol J 25(8):1097–1103PubMedCrossRef Cescon C, Raimondi EE, Začesta V, Drusany-Starič K, Martsidis K, Merletti R (2014) Characterization of the motor units of the external anal sphincter in pregnant women with multichannel surface EMG. Int Urogynecol J 25(8):1097–1103PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Response to the letter to the editor: the correct episiotomy—does it exist?
verfasst von
Lena Sagi-Dain
Shlomi Sagi
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2882-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Urogynecology Digest

Urogynecology digest

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.