nach oben

Clinical Oral Investigations

Erschienen in:

03.11.2017 | Original Article

Retention force of removable partial dentures with different double crowns

verfasst von: Christin Arnold, Jeremias Hey, Jürgen M. Setz, Arne F. Boeckler, Ramona Schweyen

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the study was to compare the retentive behaviors of double crowns with different designs and material compositions before and after artificial aging.

Materials and methods

Six pairs of double crowns were fabricated: telescopic crowns 0° made of high-noble metal (group A) or non-precious metal (group B), telescopic zirconia copings with secondary crowns made of electroplated gold 2° (group C), crowns with friction pins 2° made of non-precious metal (group D) or zirconia (group E), and conical crowns 6° made of high-noble metal (group F). Retention forces were assessed before and after artificial aging, and after axial and non-axial loading.

Results

Initially, specimens in group D (13.9 N), B (12.5 N), and E (12.2 N) exhibited the highest retention forces. Retention forces in groups A (9.6 N), C (7.4 N), and F (6.0 N) were statistically significantly lower than those of the other groups (p < 0.05). After artificial aging, double crowns with additional retention elements exhibited the highest retention forces. The largest retention force losses were evident in groups A (70%), B (64%), C (39%), and F (47%).

Conclusions

Double crowns with different designs and made of different materials exhibited different retention forces and different long-term retentive behavior. The highest retention force losses were evident in double crowns with more extended surface contact, such as telescopic crowns.

Clinical significance

Telescopic crowns with additional retention elements were more resistant to wearing than double crowns without additional retention elements. An additional clinical benefit might be the quick and easy possibility of enhancing retention.

Dexter JE (1883) The cap plate: a new appliance in mechanical dentistry. Dent Cosmos 25(7):344–350

Wenz H-J, Kern M (2007) Long-term behavior of double crowns. Quintessenz Zahntech 33(12):1482–1494

Verma R, Joda T, Brägger U, Wittneben J-G (2013) A systematic review of the clinical performance of tooth-retained and implant-retained double crown prostheses with a follow-up of ≥ 3 years. J Prosthodont 22:2–12CrossRefPubMed

ELsyad MA, Elsaadawy MG, Abdoou AM, Habib AA (2013) Effect of different implant positions on strain developed around four implants supporting a mandibular overdenture with rigid telescopic copings. Quintessence Int 44(9):679–686PubMed

Rammelsberg P, Bernhart G, Bermejo JL, Schmitter M, Schwarz S (2014) Prognosis of implants and abutment teeth under combined tooth-implant-supported and solely implant-supported double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 25:813–818CrossRefPubMed

Rinke S, Ziebolz D, Ratka-Krüger P, Frisch E (2014) Clinical outcome of double crown-retained mandibular removable dentures supported by a combination of residual teeth and strategic implants. J Prosthodont. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12214

Schwindling FS, Dittmann B, Rammelsberg P (2014) Double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses: a retrospective study of survival and complications. J Prosthet Dent 112(3):488–493CrossRefPubMed

Szentpetery V, Lautenschläger C, Setz JM (2012) Frictional telescopic crowns in severely reduced dentitions: a 5-year clinical outcome study. Int J Prosthodont 25:217–220PubMed

Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K, Lehmann KM (2001) Clinical longevity of removable partial dentures retained by telescopic crowns: outcome of the double crown with clearance fit. Int J Prosthodont 14(3):207–213PubMed

10.

Wagner B, Kern M (2000) Clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures 10 years after insertion: success rates, hygienic problems and technical failures. Clin Oral Investig 4:74–80CrossRefPubMed

11.

Behr M, Hofmann E, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G (2000) Technical failure rates of double crown-retained removable partial dentures. Clin Oral Investig 4:87–90CrossRefPubMed

12.

Igarashi Y, Goto T (1997) Ten-year follow-up study for conical crown retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 10:149–155PubMed

13.

Bergman B, Ericson A, Molin M (1996) Long-term clinical results after treatment with conical crown-retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 9:533–538PubMed

14.

Stober T, Danner D, Bömicke W, Hassel AJ (2015) Improvement of oral health-related quality-of-life by use of different kinds of double-crown-retained removable partial dentures. Acta Odontol Scand 20:1–6

15.

Eisenmann E, Mokabberi A, Walter MH, Freesmeyer WB (2004) Improving the fit of implant-supported superstructures using the spark erosion technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19(6):810–818PubMed

16.

Rübeling G (1999) New techniques in spark erosion: the solution to an accurately fitting screw-retained implant restoration. Quintessence Int 30(1):37–48

17.

Weber H, Frank G (1993) Spark erosion procedure: a method for extensive combined fixed and removable prosthodontic care. J Prosthet Dent 69(2):222–227CrossRefPubMed

18.

Bayer S, Zuziak W, Kraus D, Keilig L, Stark H, Enkling N (2011) Conical crowns with electroplated gold copings: retention force changes caused by wear and combined off-axial load. Clin Oral Implants Res 22:323–329CrossRefPubMed

19.

Ohkawa S, Okane H, Nagasawa T, Tsuru H (1990) Changes in retention of various telescope crown assemblies over long term use. J Prosthet Dent 64:153–158CrossRefPubMed

20.

Alsabeeha NHM, Payne AGT, Swain MV (2009) Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features. Int J Prosthodont 22(5):429–440PubMed

21.

Chung KH, Chung CY, Cagna DR, Cronin RJ (2004) Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures. J Prosthodont 13(4):221–226CrossRefPubMed

22.

Sarnat AE (1983) The efficiency of cobalt samarium (Co₅Sm) magnets as retention units for overdentures. J Dent 11(4):324–333CrossRefPubMed

23.

Besimo CH, Graber G, Flühler M (1996) Retention force changes in implant-supported titanium telescope crowns over long-term use in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 23:372–378CrossRefPubMed

24.

Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Naumann M (2010) Parameters affecting retentive force of electroformed double-crown systems. Clin Oral Investig 14:129–135CrossRefPubMed

25.

Gurbulak AG, Kilic K, Eroglu Z, Gercekcioglu E, Kesim B (2013) Evaluation of the retention force of double crowns used in combination with a galvanoforming and casting fabrication technique. J Prosthodont 22:63–68CrossRefPubMed

26.

Engels J, Schubert O, Güth JF, Hoffmann M, Jauernig CH, Erdelt K, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F (2013) Wear behavior of different double-crown system. Clin Oral Investig 17:503–510CrossRefPubMed

27.

Sakai Y, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, Igarashi Y (2011) Effects of surface roughness and tapered angle of cone crown telescopic system on retentive force. Dent Mater J 30(5):635–641CrossRefPubMed

28.

Güngör MA, Artunc C, Sonugelen M (2004) Parameters affecting retentive force of conus crowns. J Oral Rehabil 31:271–277CrossRefPubMed

29.

Minagi S, Natsuaki N, Nishigawa G, Sato T (1999) New telescopic crown design for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 8:684–688CrossRef

30.

Weigl P, Hahn L, Lauer HC (2000) Advanced biomaterials used for a new telescopic retainer for removable dentures: Ceramics vs. electroplated gold copings: Part I. In vitro tribology effects. J Biomed Mater Res 53:320–336CrossRefPubMed

31.

Dillschneider T, Nothdurft FP, Abed-Rabbo M, Mitov G, Pospiech PR (2009) In vitro-investigations on the wear behavior of different double crown systems. Dent Mater 25:e20CrossRef

32.

Turp I, Bozdağ E, Sünbüloğlu E, Kahruman C, Yusufoğlu I, Bayraktar G (2014) Retention and surface changes of zirconia primary crowns with secondary crowns different materials. Clin Oral Investig 18:2023–2035CrossRefPubMed

33.

Dabrowa T, Dobrowolska A, Wieleba W (2013) The role of friction in the mechanism of retaining the partial removable dentures with double crown systems. Acta of Bioeng Biomech 15(4):43–48

34.

Picton DCA (1990) Tooth mobility – an update. Eur J Orthod 12:109–115CrossRefPubMed

35.

Körber KH (1983) Dynamischer Mechanismus von Parodontium und Gewebestrukturen unter herausnehmbarem Zahnersatz. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 38:975–985PubMed

36.

Behr M, Rosentritt M, Taubenhansl P, Kolbeck C, Handel G (2005) Fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced composite restorations with different framework design. Acta Odontol Scand 63:153–157CrossRefPubMed

37.

Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Zellweger G, Büchler A, Zappini G (2008) Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols. Dent Mater 24:1352–1361CrossRefPubMed

38.

Nejatidanesh F, Momeni G, Savabi O (2009) Flexural strength of interim resin materials for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthodont 18:507–511CrossRefPubMed

39.

Stappert CF, Chitmongkolsuk S, Silva NR, Att W, Strub JR (2008) Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials. Dent Mater 24:1248–1257CrossRefPubMed

40.

Bayer S, Stark H, Gölz L, Keilig L, Kraus D, Hansen A, Enkling N (2012) Telescopic crowns: extra-oral and intra-oral retention force measurement—in vitro/in vivo correlation. Gerodontology 29:e340–e347CrossRefPubMed

41.

Schalk S (2011) Eine objektive und subjektive Beurteilung der Retentionskräfte verschiedener Verbindungselemente an herausnehmbaren Teilprothesen. Dissertation, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg. http://digital.bibliothek.uni-halle.de/hs/urn/urn:nbn:de:gbv:3:4-6216. Accessed 02 June 2016

42.

Bayer S, Stark H, Gölz L, Keilig L, Kraus D, Hansen A, Enkling N (2012) Clinical retention force development of double crowns. Clin Oral Investig 16:407–411CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Retention force of removable partial dentures with different double crowns
verfasst von: Christin Arnold
Jeremias Hey
Jürgen M. Setz
Arne F. Boeckler
Ramona Schweyen
Publikationsdatum: 03.11.2017
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2224-x

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Retention force of removable partial dentures with different double crowns

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical significance

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical significance

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Global oral health status of athletes with intellectual disabilities

Change in reimbursement and costs in German oncological head and neck surgery over the last decade: ablative tongue cancer surgery and reconstruction with split-thickness skin graft vs. microvascular radial forearm flap

Influence of different types of light on the response of the pulp tissue in dental bleaching: a systematic review

Oral cancer radiotherapy affects enamel microhardness and associated indentation pattern morphology

How frequent does peri-implantitis occur? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Correction to: Cyclic fatigue and torsional strength of three different thermally treated reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter