nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.03.2018 | Retina (J Fortun, Section Editor)

Retinal Telemedicine

verfasst von: Ru-ik Chee, Dana Darwish, Álvaro Fernández-Vega, Samir N. Patel, Karyn Jonas, Susan Ostmo, J. Peter Campbell, Michael F. Chiang, R.V. Paul Chan

Erschienen in: Current Ophthalmology Reports | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This study aims for an update and overview of the literature on current telemedicine applications in retina.

Recent Findings

The application of telemedicine to the field of Ophthalmology and Retina has been growing with advancing technologies in ophthalmic imaging. Retinal telemedicine has been most commonly applied to diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy of prematurity in adult and pediatric patients, respectively. Telemedicine has the potential to alleviate the growing demand for clinical evaluation of retinal diseases. Subsequently, automated image analysis and deep learning systems may facilitate efficient processing of large, increasing numbers of images generated in telemedicine systems. Telemedicine may additionally improve access to education and standardized training through tele-education systems.

Summary

Telemedicine has the potential to be utilized as a useful adjunct but not a complete replacement for physical clinical examinations. Retinal telemedicine programs should be carefully and appropriately integrated into current clinical systems.

Rathi S, Tsui E, Mehta N, Zahid S, Schuman JS. The current state of teleophthalmology in the United States. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(12):1729–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.026.CrossRefPubMed

Lamirel C, Bruce BB, Wright DW, Delaney KP, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Quality of nonmydriatic digital fundus photography obtained by nurse practitioners in the emergency department: the FOTO-ED study. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(3):617–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rothschild MI, Russ R, Brennan KA, Williams CJ, Berrones D, Patel B, et al. The economic model of retinopathy of prematurity (EcROP) screening and treatment: Mexico and the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;168:110–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.04.014.CrossRefPubMed

Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87(1):4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007.CrossRefPubMed

Bresnick GH, Mukamel DB, Dickinson JC, Cole DR. A screening approach to the surveillance of patients with diabetes for the presence of vision-threatening retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(1):19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00010-X.CrossRefPubMed

Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 9. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98:766–785.

Zoega GM, Gunnarsdóttir T, Björnsdóttir S, et al. Screening compliance and visual outcome in diabetes. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83(6):687–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00541.x.CrossRefPubMed

Lee PP, Feldman ZW, Ostermann J, Brown DS, Sloan FA. Longitudinal rates of annual eye examinations of persons with diabetes and chronic eye diseases. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(10):1952–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00817-0.CrossRefPubMed

Zimmer-Galler IE, Kimura AE, Gupta S. Diabetic retinopathy screening and the use of telemedicine. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26(3):167–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000142.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Chasan JE, Delaune B, Maa AY, Lynch MG. Effect of a teleretinal screening program on eye care use and resources. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(9):1045–51. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1051.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Scanlon PH. The English National Screening Programme for diabetic retinopathy 2003–2016. Acta Diabetol. 2017;54(6):515–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-017-0974-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Prescott G, Sharp P, Goatman K, Scotland G, Fleming A, Philip S, et al. Improving the cost-effectiveness of photographic screening for diabetic macular oedema: a prospective, multi-centre, UK study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(8):1042–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304338.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Li HK, Horton M, Bursell S-E, Cavallerano J, Zimmer-Galler I, Tennant M, et al. Telehealth practice recommendations for diabetic retinopathy, second edition. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(10):814–37. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0075.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Schulze-Döbold C, Erginay A, Robert N, Chabouis A, Massin P. Ophdiat(®): five-year experience of a telemedical screening programme for diabetic retinopathy in Paris and the surrounding area. Diabetes Metab. 2012;38(5):450–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2012.05.003.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Cuadros J, Bresnick G. EyePACS: an adaptable telemedicine system for diabetic retinopathy screening. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(3):509–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229680900300315.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Zimmer-Galler I, Zeimer R. Results of implementation of the DigiScope for diabetic retinopathy assessment in the primary care environment. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12(2):89–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2006.12.89.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Abramoff MD, Suttorp-Schulten MSA. Web-based screening for diabetic retinopathy in a primary care population: the EyeCheck project. Telemed J E Health. 2005;11(6):668–74. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2005.11.668.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Sanchez CR, Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Aiello LP, Aiello LM. Ocular telemedicine for diabetic retinopathy and the Joslin Vision Network. Semin Ophthalmol. 2010;25(5-6):218–24. https://doi.org/10.3109/08820538.2010.518893.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Ng M, Nathoo N, Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MTS. Improving access to eye care: teleophthalmology in Alberta, Canada. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(2):289–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229680900300209.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Looker HC, Nyangoma SO, Cromie DT, Olson JA, Leese GP, Black MW, et al. Rates of referable eye disease in the Scottish National Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(6):790–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303948.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Lagan MA, O’Gallagher MK, Johnston SE, Hart PM. Angle closure glaucoma in the Northern Ireland Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme. Eye. 2016;30(8):1091–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, Clermont AC, Birkmire-Peters D, Aiello LP, et al. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(3):572–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00604-7.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Cavallerano AA, Cavallerano JD, Katalinic P, Tolson AM, Aiello LP, Aiello LM, et al. Use of Joslin Vision Network digital-video nonmydriatic retinal imaging to assess diabetic retinopathy in a clinical program. Retina. 2003;23(2):215–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006982-200304000-00013.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Cavallerano JD, Aiello LP, Cavallerano AA, Katalinic P, Hock K, Kirby R, et al. Nonmydriatic digital imaging alternative for annual retinal examination in persons with previously documented no or mild diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(4):667–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.075.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Kirkizlar E, Serban N, Sisson JA, Swann JL, Barnes CS, Williams MD. Evaluation of telemedicine for screening of diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2604–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.029.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Kernt M, Hadi I, Pinter F, Seidensticker F, Hirneiss C, Haritoglou C, et al. Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using nonmydriatic ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Optomap) compared with ETDRS 7-field stereo photography. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(12):2459–63. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

• Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Noble J, Aiello LM, Aiello LP. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(3):549–559.e2. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field images are acquired more rapidly and compare favorably with gold standard dilated ETDRS photography and dilated fundus examination in determining diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema severity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.03.019.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Kirkpatrick JN, Manivannan A, Gupta AK, Hipwell J, Forrester JV, Sharp PF. Fundus imaging in patients with cataract: role for a variable wavelength scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79(10):892–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.79.10.892.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Silva PS, Horton MB, Clary D, Lewis DG, Sun JK, Cavallerano JD, et al. Identification of diabetic retinopathy and ungradable image rate with ultrawide field imaging in a National Teleophthalmology Program. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(6):1360–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.043.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Wong RL, Tsang CW, Wong DS, McGhee S, Lam CH, Lian J, et al. Are we making good use of our public resources? The false-positive rate of screening by fundus photography for diabetic macular oedema. Hong Kong Med J. 2017;23(4):356–64. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj166078.PubMed

31.

Bruce BB, Lamirel C, Biousse V, Ward A, Heilpern KL, Newman NJ, et al. Feasibility of nonmydriatic ocular fundus photography in the emergency department: phase I of the FOTO-ED study. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(9):928–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01147.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Ouyang Y, Heussen FM, Keane PA, Sadda SR, Walsh AC. The retinal disease screening study: retrospective comparison of nonmydriatic fundus photography and three-dimensional optical coherence tomography for detection of retinal irregularities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(8):5694–700. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12043.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Li B, Powell A-M, Hooper PL, Sheidow TG. Prospective evaluation of teleophthalmology in screening and recurrence monitoring of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(3):276–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.5014.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Ausayakhun S, Skalet AH, Jirawison C, Ausayakhun S, Keenan JD, Khouri C, et al. Accuracy and reliability of telemedicine for diagnosis of cytomegalovirus retinitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(6):1053–1058.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.030.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Jirawison C, Yen M, Leenasirimakul P, Chen J, Guadanant S, Kunavisarut P, et al. Telemedicine screening for cytomegalovirus retinitis at the point of care for human immunodeficiency virus infection. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(2):198–205. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.4766.CrossRefPubMed

36.

International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:991–9.

37.

Home Page - FocusROP. https://www.focusrop.com. Accessed 22 Oct 2017.

38.

Fijalkowski N, Zheng LL, Henderson MT, Wallenstein MB, Leng T, Moshfeghi DM. Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP): four-years of screening with telemedicine. Curr Eye Res. 2013;38(2):283–91. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2012.754902.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Ells AL, Holmes JM, Astle WF, Williams G, Leske DA, Fielden M, et al. Telemedicine approach to screening for severe retinopathy of prematurity: a pilot study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(11):2113–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00831-5.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Lorenz B, Spasovska K, Elflein H, Schneider N. Wide-field digital imaging based telemedicine for screening for acute retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Six-year results of a multicentre field study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247(9):1251–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1077-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Dai S, Chow K, Vincent A. Efficacy of wide-field digital retinal imaging for retinopathy of prematurity screening. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;39(1):23–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02399.x.PubMed

42.

Vinekar A, Gilbert C, Dogra M, Kurian M, Shainesh G, Shetty B, et al. The KIDROP model of combining strategies for providing retinopathy of prematurity screening in underserved areas in India using wide-field imaging, tele-medicine, non-physician graders and smart phone reporting. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(1):41–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.126178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Castillo-Riquelme MC, Lord J, Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, Haines L. Cost-effectiveness of digital photographic screening for retinopathy of prematurity in the United Kingdom. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(02):201–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462304000984.CrossRefPubMed

44.

• Chiang MF, Melia M, Buffenn AN, Lambert SR, Recchia FM, Simpson JL, et al. Detection of clinically significant retinopathy of prematurity using wide-angle digital retinal photography: a report by the American Academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(6):1272–80. This report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology provides a detailed analysis and evaluation of the quality of evidence of studies related to the detection of clinically significant retinopathy of prematurity with wide-angle digital retinal photography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Fierson WM, Capone A Jr, American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Ophthalmology, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Association of Certified Orthoptists. Telemedicine for evaluation of retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1):e238–54. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0978.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Callaway NF, Ludwig CA, Blumenkranz MS, Jones JM, Fredrick DR, Moshfeghi DM. Retinal and optic nerve hemorrhages in the newborn infant: one-year results of the newborn eye screen test study. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1043–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Li L-H, Li N, Zhao J-Y, Fei P, Zhang G, Mao J, et al. Findings of perinatal ocular examination performed on 3573, healthy full-term newborns. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(5):588–91. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302539.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Vinekar A, Govindaraj I, Jayadev C, Kumar AK, Sharma P, Mangalesh S, et al. Universal ocular screening of 1021 term infants using wide-field digital imaging in a single public hospital in India—a pilot study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(5):e372–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12685.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Goyal P, Padhi TR, Das T, Pradhan L, Sutar S, Butola S, et al. Outcome of universal newborn eye screening with wide-field digital retinal image acquisition system: a pilot study. Eye. 2017;32(1):67–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2017.129.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Chee RI, Chan RVP. Universal newborn eye screening: an effective strategy to improve ocular health? Eye. 2017;32(1):50–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2017.133.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Kalpathy-Cramer J, Campbell JP, Erdogmus D, Tian P, Kedarisetti D, Moleta C, et al. Plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity: improving diagnosis by ranking disease severity and using quantitative image analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(11):2345–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Wittenberg LA, Jonsson NJ, RVP C, Chiang MF. Computer-based image analysis for plus disease diagnosis in retinopathy of prematurity. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2012;49(1):11–9; quiz 10, 20. https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20110222-01.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Campbell JP, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Erdogmus D, Tian P, Kedarisetti D, Moleta C, et al. Plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity: a continuous spectrum of vascular abnormality as a basis of diagnostic variability. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(11):2338–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.026.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Campbell JP, Ataer-Cansizoglu E, Bolon-Canedo V, Bozkurt A, Erdogmus D, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. Expert diagnosis of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity from computer-based image analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(6):651–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0611.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Ataer-Cansizoglu E, Bolon-Canedo V, Peter Campbell J, et al. Computer-based image analysis for plus disease diagnosis in retinopathy of prematurity: performance of the “i-ROP” system and image features associated with expert diagnosis. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2015;4(6):5. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.4.6.5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Abbey AM, Besirli CG, Musch DC, Andrews CA, Capone A Jr, Drenser KA, et al. Evaluation of screening for retinopathy of prematurity by ROPtool or a lay reader. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(2):385–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.048.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Sim DA, Keane PA, Tufail A, Egan CA, Aiello LP, Silva PS. Automated retinal image analysis for diabetic retinopathy in telemedicine. Curr Diab Rep. 2015;15(3):14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-015-0577-6.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Philip S, Fleming AD, Goatman KA, Fonseca S, Mcnamee P, Scotland GS, et al. The efficacy of automated “disease/no disease” grading for diabetic retinopathy in a systematic screening programme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(11):1512–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.119453.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Abràmoff MD, Folk JC, Han DP, Walker JD, Williams DF, Russell SR, et al. Automated analysis of retinal images for detection of referable diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(3):351–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1743.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Tufail A, Rudisill C, Egan C, Kapetanakis VV, Salas-Vega S, Owen CG, et al. Automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment software: diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness compared with human graders. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(3):343–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.11.014.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Tufail A, Kapetanakis VV, Salas-Vega S, Egan C, Rudisill C, Owen CG, et al. An observational study to assess if automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment software can replace one or more steps of manual imaging grading and to determine their cost-effectiveness. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(92):1–72. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20920.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521(7553):436–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Abràmoff MD, Lou Y, Erginay A, Clarida W, Amelon R, Folk JC, et al. Improved automated detection of diabetic retinopathy on a publicly available dataset through integration of deep learning. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(13):5200–6. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-19964.CrossRefPubMed

64.

• Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, Stumpe MC, Wu D, Narayanaswamy A, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA. 2016;316(22):2402–10. “In this evaluation of retinal fundus photographs from adults with diabetes, an algorithm based on deep machine learning had high sensitivity and specificity for detecting referable diabetic retinopathy”. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.17216.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Gargeya R, Leng T. Automated identification of diabetic retinopathy using deep learning. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(7):962–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.02.008.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Lee CS, Baughman DM, Lee AY. Deep learning is effective for classifying normal versus age-related macular degeneration OCT images. Ophthalmology Retina. 2017;1(4):322–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2016.12.009.CrossRef

67.

Kalpathy-Cramer J, Peter Campbell J, Kim S, et al. Deep learning for the identification of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:5554.

68.

Peter Campbell J, Kim S, Swan R, et al. Is there clinical utility for a continuous severity score for plus disease in ROP? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:4737.CrossRef

69.

Tibrewal S, Tian P, Kedarisetti D, et al. Evaluation of computer-based image analysis for retinopathy of prematurity screening. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:5539.

70.

Wong TY, Bressler NM. Artificial intelligence with deep learning technology looks into diabetic retinopathy screening. JAMA. 2016;316(22):2366–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.17563.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Campbell JP, Swan R, Jonas K, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a tele-education system for the diagnosis of ophthalmic disease by international trainees. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015;2015:366–75.PubMedPubMedCentral

72.

Chan RVP, Patel SN, Ryan MC, et al. The Global Education Network for Retinopathy of Prematurity (Gen-Rop): development, implementation, and evaluation of a novel tele-education system (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2015;113:T2.PubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Retinal Telemedicine
verfasst von: Ru-ik Chee
Dana Darwish
Álvaro Fernández-Vega
Samir N. Patel
Karyn Jonas
Susan Ostmo
J. Peter Campbell
Michael F. Chiang
R.V. Paul Chan
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Ophthalmology Reports / Ausgabe 1/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 2167-4868
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-018-0161-8

Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography: a Review

Retina (J Fortun, Section Editor)

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Retinal Vein Occlusion: Quantifying Macular Ischemia

Retina (J Fortun, Section Editor)

Correction to: Extracellular Vesicles: Biomarkers, Therapeutics, and Vehicles in the Visual System

Open Access
Correction

Update on the Intraoperative OCT: Where Do We Stand?

Retina (J Fortun, Section Editor)

Home Monitoring for Age-related Macular Degeneration

Retina (J Fortun, Section Editor)

Smartphone Assisted Fundus Fundoscopy/Photography

Retina (J Fortun, Section Editor)

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Künstliche Intelligenz in der Medizin – Chancen und Risiken aus ethischer Sicht

Künstliche Intelligenz
Leitthema

Bildgebende Fächer wie die Augenheilkunde bieten vielfältige Möglichkeiten für den nutzbringenden Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz (KI). Die Auswertung von Bildern und Daten mittels trainierter Algorithmen besitzt das Potenzial, die …

Okuläre Graft-versus-Host-Disease

Graft-versus-Host-Krankheit
CME-Artikel

Die okuläre Graft-versus-Host-Erkrankung („graft-versus-host disease“ [GVHD]) nach allogener hämatopoetischer Stammzelltransplantation (HSCT) stellt überwiegend eine entzündliche und destruierende Augenoberflächenerkrankung mit zunehmender …

Kataraktchirurgie in Subsahara-Afrika – Möglichkeiten und Grenzen

Open Access
Katarakt
Originalie

Die Bedeutung von Sehbeeinträchtigung und Blindheit für Individuen und Gesellschaften hat in den letzten Jahren ein hohes Maß an Aufmerksamkeit erfahren. Wesentliche Aspekte dieser Thematik sind im World report on vision der …

Ätiologie kindlicher Augenverletzungen in einem Krankenhaus der Tertiärversorgung in Tansania

Verletzungen des Auges
Originalie

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Retinal Telemedicine

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography: a Review

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Retinal Vein Occlusion: Quantifying Macular Ischemia

Correction to: Extracellular Vesicles: Biomarkers, Therapeutics, and Vehicles in the Visual System

Update on the Intraoperative OCT: Where Do We Stand?

Home Monitoring for Age-related Macular Degeneration

Smartphone Assisted Fundus Fundoscopy/Photography

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Künstliche Intelligenz in der Medizin – Chancen und Risiken aus ethischer Sicht

Okuläre Graft-versus-Host-Disease

Kataraktchirurgie in Subsahara-Afrika – Möglichkeiten und Grenzen

Ätiologie kindlicher Augenverletzungen in einem Krankenhaus der Tertiärversorgung in Tansania

Update Augenheilkunde

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten