Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 12/2017

04.09.2017 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Retrospective analysis of treatments with recombinant FSH and recombinant LH versus human menopausal gonadotropin in women with reduced ovarian reserve

verfasst von: Mario Mignini Renzini, Claudio Brigante, Giovanni Coticchio, Mariabeatrice Dal Canto, Ilaria Caliari, Ruggero Comi, Elena De Ponti, Rubens Fadini

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 12/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purposes

The aim of this study is to determine whether a clinical advantage is gained with use of LH in combination with FSH or as a component of human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) to achieve optimal ovarian stimulation.

Methods

In this study, we compared retrospectively two regimens, r-FSH/r-LH and hMG, for the treatment of women with reduced ovarian reserve, identified as subjects with antral follicle count (AFC) < 11 and AMH ≤ 1.1 ng/ml.

Results

Overall, the clinical pregnancy per started cycle was higher in the r-FSH/r-LH group (12.5 vs. 8.1%, P < 0.02), while implantation (11.1 vs. 9.5%) and miscarriage rates (29.9 vs. 35.9%) were comparable. Data were further analysed performing separate comparisons in subpopulations with different ranges of AFC, i.e. < 4, 4–6 and 7–10. Major differences between the two regimens were observed in women with AFC < 4. In this subpopulation, not only was the clinical pregnancies per started cycle higher in the r-FSH/r-LH group (10.2 vs. 1.5%, P < 0.01), but also implantation was significantly higher (13.0 vs. 2.8%, P < 0.02).

Conclusions

A r-FSH/r-LH regimen appears to be beneficial for the treatment of women with extremely poor ovarian reserve. It should be considered however that, being retrospective, this study is affected by obvious limitations, such as post-treatment patient selection criteria and absence of randomisation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Orvieto R, Patrizio P. GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: an ongoing debate. Reprod BioMed Online. Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. 2013;26:4–8.CrossRefPubMed Orvieto R, Patrizio P. GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: an ongoing debate. Reprod BioMed Online. Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. 2013;26:4–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiao J-S, Su C-M, Zeng X-T. Comparisons of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in supposed normal ovarian responders undergoing IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tian X, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2014; 9:e106854. Xiao J-S, Su C-M, Zeng X-T. Comparisons of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in supposed normal ovarian responders undergoing IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tian X, editor. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2014; 9:e106854.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fatemi HM, Popovic-Todorovic B, Humaidan P, Kol S, Banker M, Devroey P, et al. Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger and “freeze-all” approach in GnRH antagonist protocol. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1008–11.CrossRefPubMed Fatemi HM, Popovic-Todorovic B, Humaidan P, Kol S, Banker M, Devroey P, et al. Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger and “freeze-all” approach in GnRH antagonist protocol. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1008–11.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. Ovarian antral folliculogenesis during the human menstrual cycle: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:73–91.CrossRefPubMed Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. Ovarian antral folliculogenesis during the human menstrual cycle: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:73–91.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillier SG, Smyth CD, Whitelaw PF, Miró F, Howles CM. Gonadotrophin control of follicular function. Horm Res. 1995;43:216–23.CrossRefPubMed Hillier SG, Smyth CD, Whitelaw PF, Miró F, Howles CM. Gonadotrophin control of follicular function. Horm Res. 1995;43:216–23.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillier SG. Gonadotropic control of ovarian follicular growth and development. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001;179:39–46.CrossRefPubMed Hillier SG. Gonadotropic control of ovarian follicular growth and development. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001;179:39–46.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ezcurra D, Humaidan P. A review of luteinising hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin when used in assisted reproductive technology. Reprod Biol Endocrinol BioMed Central. 2014;12:95.CrossRef Ezcurra D, Humaidan P. A review of luteinising hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin when used in assisted reproductive technology. Reprod Biol Endocrinol BioMed Central. 2014;12:95.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Durnerin CI, Erb K, Fleming R, Hillier H, Hillier SG, Howles CM, et al. Effects of recombinant LH treatment on folliculogenesis and responsiveness to FSH stimulation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:421–6.CrossRefPubMed Durnerin CI, Erb K, Fleming R, Hillier H, Hillier SG, Howles CM, et al. Effects of recombinant LH treatment on folliculogenesis and responsiveness to FSH stimulation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:421–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Revelli A, Pettinau G, Basso G, Carosso A, Ferrero A, Dallan C, et al. Controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant-FSH plus recombinant-LH vs. human menopausal gonadotropin based on the number of retrieved oocytes: results from a routine clinical practice in a real-life population. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:1–8.CrossRef Revelli A, Pettinau G, Basso G, Carosso A, Ferrero A, Dallan C, et al. Controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant-FSH plus recombinant-LH vs. human menopausal gonadotropin based on the number of retrieved oocytes: results from a routine clinical practice in a real-life population. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:1–8.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vuong TNL, Phung HT, Ho MT. Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged ≥35 years: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1188–95.CrossRefPubMed Vuong TNL, Phung HT, Ho MT. Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged ≥35 years: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1188–95.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fábregues F, Creus M, Casals G, Carmona F, Balasch J. Outcome from consecutive ICSI cycles in patients treated with recombinant human LH and those supplemented with urinary hCG-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation in the long GnRH-agonist protocol. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:430–5.CrossRefPubMed Fábregues F, Creus M, Casals G, Carmona F, Balasch J. Outcome from consecutive ICSI cycles in patients treated with recombinant human LH and those supplemented with urinary hCG-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation in the long GnRH-agonist protocol. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:430–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pacchiarotti A, Sbracia M, Frega A, Selman H, Rinaldi L, Pacchiarotti A. Urinary hMG (Meropur) versus recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH (Pergoveris) in IVF: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:2467–9.CrossRefPubMed Pacchiarotti A, Sbracia M, Frega A, Selman H, Rinaldi L, Pacchiarotti A. Urinary hMG (Meropur) versus recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH (Pergoveris) in IVF: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:2467–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong Y, Bu Z, Dai W, Zhang M, Bao X, Sun Y. Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:109–17. Xiong Y, Bu Z, Dai W, Zhang M, Bao X, Sun Y. Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:109–17.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Howles C. Luteinizing hormone supplementation in ART. In: Kovacs G, editor. How to improve your ART success rates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 99–104.CrossRef Howles C. Luteinizing hormone supplementation in ART. In: Kovacs G, editor. How to improve your ART success rates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 99–104.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Ferrero S, Baroni E, Sapienza F, Cobellis L, et al. Management of poor responders in IVF. Reprod BioMed Online. 2005;10:235–46.CrossRefPubMed Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Ferrero S, Baroni E, Sapienza F, Cobellis L, et al. Management of poor responders in IVF. Reprod BioMed Online. 2005;10:235–46.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson SM. Biomarkers of ovarian response: current and future applications. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:963–9.CrossRefPubMed Nelson SM. Biomarkers of ovarian response: current and future applications. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:963–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ubaldi F, Vaiarelli A, D’Anna R, Rienzi L. Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new? Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–10.CrossRef Ubaldi F, Vaiarelli A, D’Anna R, Rienzi L. Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new? Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–10.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Casarini L, Lispi M, Longobardi S, Milosa F, La Marca A, Tagliasacchi D, et al. LH and hCG action on the same receptor results in quantitatively and qualitatively different intracellular signalling. Gromoll J, editor. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46682.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Casarini L, Lispi M, Longobardi S, Milosa F, La Marca A, Tagliasacchi D, et al. LH and hCG action on the same receptor results in quantitatively and qualitatively different intracellular signalling. Gromoll J, editor. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46682.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahan MH, Agdi M, Shehata F, Son W, Tan SL. A comparison of outcomes from in vitro fertilization cycles stimulated with either recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) or human chorionic gonadotropin acting as an LH analogue delivered as human menopausal gonadotropins, in subjects with good or poor ovarian reserve: a retrospective analysis. Europ J Obstetr Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;172:70–3.CrossRef Dahan MH, Agdi M, Shehata F, Son W, Tan SL. A comparison of outcomes from in vitro fertilization cycles stimulated with either recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) or human chorionic gonadotropin acting as an LH analogue delivered as human menopausal gonadotropins, in subjects with good or poor ovarian reserve: a retrospective analysis. Europ J Obstetr Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;172:70–3.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Humaidan P, Chin W, Rogoff D, D'Hooghe T, Longobardi S, Hubbard J, et al. Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders. Hum Reprod. Oxford University Press; 2017; 32:1–12. Humaidan P, Chin W, Rogoff D, D'Hooghe T, Longobardi S, Hubbard J, et al. Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders. Hum Reprod. Oxford University Press; 2017; 32:1–12.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehert P, Schertz JC, Ezcurra D. Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone produces more oocytes with a lower total dose per cycle in assisted reproductive technologies compared with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lehert P, Schertz JC, Ezcurra D. Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone produces more oocytes with a lower total dose per cycle in assisted reproductive technologies compared with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1768–74.CrossRefPubMed Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1768–74.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Retrospective analysis of treatments with recombinant FSH and recombinant LH versus human menopausal gonadotropin in women with reduced ovarian reserve
verfasst von
Mario Mignini Renzini
Claudio Brigante
Giovanni Coticchio
Mariabeatrice Dal Canto
Ilaria Caliari
Ruggero Comi
Elena De Ponti
Rubens Fadini
Publikationsdatum
04.09.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 12/2017
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1034-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2017

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 12/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.