Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 6/2014

01.12.2014 | Original Article

Retrospective observational study on the incidence of incisional hernias after colorectal carcinoma resection with follow-up CT scan

verfasst von: K. Claes, R. Beckers, E. Heindryckx, I. Kyle-Leinhase, P. Pletinckx, D. Claeys, F. Muysoms

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Incisional hernia (IH) is the most frequent complication after colorectal carcinoma (CRC) resection. The incidence depends on the method of follow-up, where ultrasound yields a significant number of additional hernias compared to clinical examination alone. Not many studies have evaluated the value of computed tomography (CT) to diagnose IH.

Methods

The CorreCT study is a retrospective cohort study of IH after CRC surgery by clinical examination and by CT, as reported in the medical files. Additional independent reviewing of all CTs by two radiologists was performed.

Results

From the oncological database (2004–2008) of the hospital, 598 patients with CRC were identified. The data of 448 consecutive patients who underwent surgery were analyzed. Tumors were resected by laparotomy in 366 patients (81.7 %), by laparoscopy in 76 patients (17.0 %) and by laparotomy after conversion in 6 patients (1.3 %). A clinical follow-up by the surgeon in 282 patients (62.9 %) with a mean duration of 33 months, yielded 49 patients with IH (17.4 %). The mean time of IH diagnosis (T1) was 19 months. Only 16 patients (33 %) underwent a hernia repair. For 363 patients (81.0 %), CT follow-up was available for a mean period of 30 months. In 84 patients (23.1 %), an IH was diagnosed with a mean T1 of 21 months. The review of all CTs by two independent radiologists yielded additional IH in 19 and 21 patients, respectively, increasing the IH rate to 29.1 and 29.7 %, respectively, and with a decrease in mean T1 to 14 months. The inter-observer agreement between the radiologists had a Kappa-statistic of 0.73 (95 % CI 0.65–0.81). For those patients with disagreement between the radiologists, a final agreement was made during an additional reviewing session of both radiologists, increasing the IH rate to 35.0 %. Comparing clinical follow-up, routine CT follow-up, and reassessed CT follow-up we found a statistically significant difference between the three methods of IH detection (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

CT follow-up can identify significantly more IH than clinical examination alone, in particular if the radiologist focuses on IH development. Furthermore, we showed that focused CT evaluation diagnosed IH 7 months earlier than routine CT and 5 months earlier than clinical follow-up alone.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Höer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2002) Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg 73:474–480PubMedCrossRef Höer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2002) Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg 73:474–480PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA (2003) Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surg J R Coll Surg Edinb Ireland 1:17–22 O’Dwyer PJ, Courtney CA (2003) Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surg J R Coll Surg Edinb Ireland 1:17–22
3.
Zurück zum Zitat van ’t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J (2002) Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg 89:1350–1356PubMedCrossRef van ’t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J (2002) Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg 89:1350–1356PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Meijer E-J, Timmermans L, Jeekel J, Lange JF, Muysoms FE (2013) The principles of abdominal wound closure. Acta Chir Belg 113(4):239–244PubMed Meijer E-J, Timmermans L, Jeekel J, Lange JF, Muysoms FE (2013) The principles of abdominal wound closure. Acta Chir Belg 113(4):239–244PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bloemen A, van Dooren P, Huizinga BF, Hoofwijk AG (2012) Comparison of ultrasonography and physical examination in the diagnosis of incisional hernia in a prospective study. Hernia 16:53–57PubMedCrossRef Bloemen A, van Dooren P, Huizinga BF, Hoofwijk AG (2012) Comparison of ultrasonography and physical examination in the diagnosis of incisional hernia in a prospective study. Hernia 16:53–57PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat den Hartog D, Dur AH, Kamphuis AG, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW (2009) Comparison of ultrasonography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernias. Hernia 13:45–48CrossRef den Hartog D, Dur AH, Kamphuis AG, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW (2009) Comparison of ultrasonography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernias. Hernia 13:45–48CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Muysoms FE, Deerenberg EB, Peeters E, Agresta F, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Ceelen W, Champault GG, Corcione F, Cuccurullo D, DeBeaux AC, Dietz UA, Fitzgibbons R, Gillion JF, Hilgers R-D, Jeekel J, Köckerling F, Kyle-Leinhase I, Mandala V, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Simmermacher RKJ, Schumpelick V, Śmietański M, Walgenbach M, Miserez M (2013) Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair. Hernia 17(4):423–433. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1108-5 PubMedCrossRef Muysoms FE, Deerenberg EB, Peeters E, Agresta F, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Ceelen W, Champault GG, Corcione F, Cuccurullo D, DeBeaux AC, Dietz UA, Fitzgibbons R, Gillion JF, Hilgers R-D, Jeekel J, Köckerling F, Kyle-Leinhase I, Mandala V, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Simmermacher RKJ, Schumpelick V, Śmietański M, Walgenbach M, Miserez M (2013) Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair. Hernia 17(4):423–433. doi:10.​1007/​s10029-013-1108-5 PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335:806–808CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335:806–808CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Debeaux AC, Dietz UA, Jeekel J, Klinge U, Köckerling F, Mandala V, Montgomery A, Morales Conde S, Puppe F, Simmermacher RK, Śmietański M, Miserez M (2012) EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 16:239–250. doi:10.1007/s10029-012-0912-7 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Debeaux AC, Dietz UA, Jeekel J, Klinge U, Köckerling F, Mandala V, Montgomery A, Morales Conde S, Puppe F, Simmermacher RK, Śmietański M, Miserez M (2012) EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 16:239–250. doi:10.​1007/​s10029-012-0912-7 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhangu A, Fitzgerald JE, Singh P, Battersby N, Mariott P, Pinkey T (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy. Hernia 17:445–455PubMedCrossRef Bhangu A, Fitzgerald JE, Singh P, Battersby N, Mariott P, Pinkey T (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy. Hernia 17:445–455PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Retrospective observational study on the incidence of incisional hernias after colorectal carcinoma resection with follow-up CT scan
verfasst von
K. Claes
R. Beckers
E. Heindryckx
I. Kyle-Leinhase
P. Pletinckx
D. Claeys
F. Muysoms
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1214-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

Hernia 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.